Effect of Active Oxygen Fluid (Blue®m) as a Root Canal Irrigant Against Enterococcus Faecalis.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Oral health & preventive dentistry Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.3290/j.ohpd.b5740308
Reem Barakat, Rahaf Almohareb, Arwa Alshahri, Nardeen Khawaji, Sarah Almufrij, Dhuha Alsuwaid, Fatma Alshehri
{"title":"Effect of Active Oxygen Fluid (Blue®m) as a Root Canal Irrigant Against Enterococcus Faecalis.","authors":"Reem Barakat, Rahaf Almohareb, Arwa Alshahri, Nardeen Khawaji, Sarah Almufrij, Dhuha Alsuwaid, Fatma Alshehri","doi":"10.3290/j.ohpd.b5740308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the antimicrobial effect of a new active oxygen fluid (Blue®m) as a root canal irrigant against Enterococcus faecalis compared to sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Forty-five extracted single-canaled human teeth were selected, received root canal preparation, autoclaved, and contaminated with Enterococcus faecalis. The specimens were randomly allocated into three groups: Group (A) served as the negative control, receiving irrigation with saline (n &#61; 15); Group (B) was irrigated with 5.25% NaOCl (n &#61; 15); and Group (C) was irrigated with 10 mL of Blue®m (n &#61; 15). Microbial sampling from the root canals was performed before and after irrigation. The difference between the pre-irrigation and post-irrigation colony-forming units (CFU/mL) was calculated. The data was analysed using a one-way ANOVA followed by post-hoc Tukey tests. The significance level was set at 5%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Blue®m statistically significantly reduced the bacterial load compared to saline (p &#61; 0.009), but NaOCl was most effective, outperforming both (p 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Irrigation with Blue®m demonstrated antibacterial efficacy against Enterococcus faecalis, but it was not as effective as NaOCl.</p>","PeriodicalId":19696,"journal":{"name":"Oral health & preventive dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral health & preventive dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.ohpd.b5740308","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the antimicrobial effect of a new active oxygen fluid (Blue®m) as a root canal irrigant against Enterococcus faecalis compared to sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl).

Material and methods: Forty-five extracted single-canaled human teeth were selected, received root canal preparation, autoclaved, and contaminated with Enterococcus faecalis. The specimens were randomly allocated into three groups: Group (A) served as the negative control, receiving irrigation with saline (n = 15); Group (B) was irrigated with 5.25% NaOCl (n = 15); and Group (C) was irrigated with 10 mL of Blue®m (n = 15). Microbial sampling from the root canals was performed before and after irrigation. The difference between the pre-irrigation and post-irrigation colony-forming units (CFU/mL) was calculated. The data was analysed using a one-way ANOVA followed by post-hoc Tukey tests. The significance level was set at 5%.

Results: Blue®m statistically significantly reduced the bacterial load compared to saline (p = 0.009), but NaOCl was most effective, outperforming both (p 0.0001).

Conclusion: Irrigation with Blue®m demonstrated antibacterial efficacy against Enterococcus faecalis, but it was not as effective as NaOCl.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
活性氧液(Blue®m)作为根管冲洗剂对粪肠球菌的影响
目的:与次氯酸钠(NaOCl)相比,评估新型活性氧液(Blue®m)作为根管冲洗剂对粪肠球菌的抗菌效果:选取 45 颗拔出的单瓣人类牙齿,对其进行根管预备、高压灭菌和粪肠球菌污染。标本被随机分为三组:A 组作为阴性对照,接受生理盐水灌洗(n =;15);B 组接受 5.25% NaOCl 灌洗(n =;15);C 组接受 10 mL Blue®m 灌洗(n =;15)。在灌洗前后对根管进行微生物取样。计算灌洗前和灌洗后菌落形成单位(CFU/mL)的差异。数据分析采用单因素方差分析,然后进行事后 Tukey 检验。显著性水平设定为 5%:结果:与生理盐水相比,Blue®m 在统计学上明显减少了细菌量(p =;0.009),但 NaOCl 的效果最好,优于两者(p 0.0001):结论:用蓝®m 冲洗对粪肠球菌有抗菌效果,但不如 NaOCl 有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Oral health & preventive dentistry
Oral health & preventive dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinicians, general practitioners, teachers, researchers, and public health administrators will find this journal an indispensable source of essential, timely information about scientific progress in the fields of oral health and the prevention of caries, periodontal diseases, oral mucosal diseases, and dental trauma. Central topics, including oral hygiene, oral epidemiology, oral health promotion, and public health issues, are covered in peer-reviewed articles such as clinical and basic science research reports; reviews; invited focus articles, commentaries, and guest editorials; and symposium, workshop, and conference proceedings.
期刊最新文献
Self-monitoring of Oral Health Using Smartphone Selfie Powered by Artificial Intelligence: Implications for Preventive Dentistry. Does Non-surgical Periodontal Therapy With Adjunct Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy Help Reduce Periodontal Inflammation and Haemoglobin A1c Levels in Patients With Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Effect of Active Oxygen Fluid (Blue®m) as a Root Canal Irrigant Against Enterococcus Faecalis. Evaluation of Colour Changes in Nanocomposite-Based Bulk-Fill and Universal Composite Using Different Polishing Systems. The Mechanisms and Application Value of Postbiotics in Caries Prevention and Management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1