Evaluation of a modified quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay for genus Schistosoma detection using stool and urine samples from schistosomiasis endemic areas in Kenya.

IF 2.9 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2024-09-20 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0310118
Henry Kanyi, Richelle W Kihoro, Benard Chieng, Sylvie Araka, Henry Emisiko, Thierry Ramos, Sarah Nogaro, Sammy M Njenga
{"title":"Evaluation of a modified quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay for genus Schistosoma detection using stool and urine samples from schistosomiasis endemic areas in Kenya.","authors":"Henry Kanyi, Richelle W Kihoro, Benard Chieng, Sylvie Araka, Henry Emisiko, Thierry Ramos, Sarah Nogaro, Sammy M Njenga","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0310118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The microscopy-based Kato-Katz and urine filtration techniques have traditionally faced challenges in the detection of schistosomiasis in areas with low infection levels. A modified singleplex Schistosoma genus-specific quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assay was therefore evaluated as a sensitive and confirmatory schistosomiasis diagnostic test.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>The qPCR assay utilized primers and probe targeting internal transcribed spacer- 2 (ITS2) sequence of S. mansoni, S. haematobium and S. intercalatum. A plasmid (pDMD801, 100pg/ul) was used as an internal amplification control and its qPCR assays were run in parallel to the Schistosoma assays. This assay utilized samples collected from 774 participants and microscopically examined for three consecutive days. A total of 699 day-one samples (urine and stools) from two schistosomiasis endemic sites were analyzed. Similarly, 75 persons from a non-endemic control site provided both urine and stool samples that were also analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using microscopy, the proportion of positives in the two endemic regions altogether was 289/699 (41.3%). Using qPCR, 50.4% of the samples (352/699) were found to be positive for schistosome infection. The percentage of positive samples was slightly higher at 57.8% (203/351) in the S. mansoni endemic site compared with the S. haematobium site at 42.8% (149/348). Majority of the microscopy results were light infections at 26.8% (n = 94) and 26.1% (n = 91) while qPCR majority of the infections were high at 41.6% (n = 146) and 31.3% (n = 109) for the S. mansoni and S. haematobium sites, respectively. There were no positives detected by either microscopy or qPCR in the non-endemic site. Using Bayesian Latent Class Model, which does not use any technique as a gold standard, qPCR showed higher sensitivity (86.4% (PCI: 82.1-90.3)) compared to microscopy (75.6% (PCI: 71.1-80.0)).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study documents a single day-one sample modified Schistosoma qPCR assay as a powerful improved molecular assay for the detection of schistosomiasis infection that utilize either stool or urine samples. The assay is therefore recommended for monitoring in areas with low infection levels to enable accurate determination of the disease's control endpoint.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11414982/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310118","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The microscopy-based Kato-Katz and urine filtration techniques have traditionally faced challenges in the detection of schistosomiasis in areas with low infection levels. A modified singleplex Schistosoma genus-specific quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assay was therefore evaluated as a sensitive and confirmatory schistosomiasis diagnostic test.

Methodology: The qPCR assay utilized primers and probe targeting internal transcribed spacer- 2 (ITS2) sequence of S. mansoni, S. haematobium and S. intercalatum. A plasmid (pDMD801, 100pg/ul) was used as an internal amplification control and its qPCR assays were run in parallel to the Schistosoma assays. This assay utilized samples collected from 774 participants and microscopically examined for three consecutive days. A total of 699 day-one samples (urine and stools) from two schistosomiasis endemic sites were analyzed. Similarly, 75 persons from a non-endemic control site provided both urine and stool samples that were also analyzed.

Results: Using microscopy, the proportion of positives in the two endemic regions altogether was 289/699 (41.3%). Using qPCR, 50.4% of the samples (352/699) were found to be positive for schistosome infection. The percentage of positive samples was slightly higher at 57.8% (203/351) in the S. mansoni endemic site compared with the S. haematobium site at 42.8% (149/348). Majority of the microscopy results were light infections at 26.8% (n = 94) and 26.1% (n = 91) while qPCR majority of the infections were high at 41.6% (n = 146) and 31.3% (n = 109) for the S. mansoni and S. haematobium sites, respectively. There were no positives detected by either microscopy or qPCR in the non-endemic site. Using Bayesian Latent Class Model, which does not use any technique as a gold standard, qPCR showed higher sensitivity (86.4% (PCI: 82.1-90.3)) compared to microscopy (75.6% (PCI: 71.1-80.0)).

Conclusions: This study documents a single day-one sample modified Schistosoma qPCR assay as a powerful improved molecular assay for the detection of schistosomiasis infection that utilize either stool or urine samples. The assay is therefore recommended for monitoring in areas with low infection levels to enable accurate determination of the disease's control endpoint.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用肯尼亚血吸虫病流行地区的粪便和尿液样本检测血吸虫属的改良定量聚合酶链反应测定法的评估。
导言:基于显微镜的卡托-卡茨(Kato-Katz)和尿液过滤技术在低感染水平地区检测血吸虫病时一直面临挑战。因此,我们评估了一种改良的单倍血吸虫属特异性定量实时聚合酶链反应(qPCR)检测方法,将其作为一种灵敏的血吸虫病确诊检测方法:方法:qPCR 试验使用了针对曼氏血吸虫、血吸虫和间变种血吸虫的内部转录间隔序列 2(ITS2)的引物和探针。质粒(pDMD801,100pg/ul)用作内部扩增对照,其 qPCR 检测与血吸虫检测同时进行。这项检测利用了从 774 名参与者处采集的样本,并连续三天进行显微镜检查。共分析了来自两个血吸虫病流行地区的 699 份第一天样本(尿液和粪便)。同样,对来自一个非血吸虫病流行控制点的 75 人提供的尿液和粪便样本也进行了分析:通过显微镜检查,两个血吸虫病流行地区的阳性比例为 289/699 (41.3%)。通过 qPCR,发现 50.4% 的样本(352/699)血吸虫感染呈阳性。曼氏血吸虫流行区的阳性样本比例为 57.8%(203/351),略高于血吸虫流行区的 42.8%(149/348)。显微镜检查结果大多为轻度感染,分别为 26.8%(94 人)和 26.1%(91 人),而 qPCR 检查结果大多为高度感染,在曼氏沙门氏菌流行区和血吸虫流行区分别为 41.6%(146 人)和 31.3%(109 人)。在非流行区,显微镜或 qPCR 均未检测到阳性结果。贝叶斯潜类模型不将任何技术作为金标准,与显微镜检查(75.6%(PCI:71.1-80.0))相比,qPCR 显示出更高的灵敏度(86.4%(PCI:82.1-90.3)):这项研究证明,单日样本血吸虫 qPCR 检测法是一种功能强大的改良分子检测法,可用于利用粪便或尿液样本检测血吸虫感染。因此,建议在感染水平较低的地区使用该检测方法进行监测,以准确确定该疾病的控制终点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
期刊最新文献
"What does this mean for our future?" uncertainty management in mothers' narratives about the diagnosis and birth of their child with Down syndrome. A multimodal understanding of the role of sound and music in gendered toy marketing. Evaluation of the Vaginal Panel Realtime PCR kit (Vircell, SL) for diagnosing vaginitis: A comparative study with routinely used diagnostics. Fault-tolerant partition resolvability of cycle with chord. Few-shot learning for inference in medical imaging with subspace feature representations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1