Outcomes of a Depression Screening and Postscreen Intervention Pilot Program in Specialty Clinics.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Psychiatric services Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-23 DOI:10.1176/appi.ps.20240049
Sarah E Asuquo, Patricia Girardi, Danica Dummer, Amanda V Bakian, Rachel A Weir
{"title":"Outcomes of a Depression Screening and Postscreen Intervention Pilot Program in Specialty Clinics.","authors":"Sarah E Asuquo, Patricia Girardi, Danica Dummer, Amanda V Bakian, Rachel A Weir","doi":"10.1176/appi.ps.20240049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The authors evaluated the feasibility of automated depression screening and a follow-up postscreening protocol.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2) and PHQ-9 screeners were sent to 20 specialty clinics and administered to patients who were ages ≥18 years, had not completed a PHQ-2 or PHQ-9 within the past 9 months, had no psychiatric diagnosis within the past 2 years, and had no behavioral health appointment within the previous year or an upcoming behavioral health appointment. In a two-pronged approach, patients with scores indicating moderate or moderately severe depression but with no indication of possible suicidal ideation were offered behavioral health resources (first prong), or patients with scores indicating severe depression or with possible suicidal ideation were contacted via telephone and requested to schedule a behavioral health appointment (second prong).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PHQ-2 was offered to 21,674 patients, with 38.1% (N=8,247) completing the screening; 13.1% (N=1,084) of those with completed screens had a positive depression score. Of patients who completed the PHQ-9, 44.5% (N=650) were eligible for the first prong of the intervention and 31.1% (N=455) for the second prong. Depression screening completion rates differed significantly by multiple sociodemographic factors. Mean±SD lag times from screening completion to successful contact and from contact to appointment completion were 7±6 and 5±4 days, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Automated depression screening with outreach based on depression severity is feasible and provides potentially efficient use of scarce resources. More research is needed on the mechanisms for automated screening and follow-up to examine factors such as patient engagement after a positive screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":20878,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric services","volume":" ","pages":"163-168"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric services","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.20240049","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The authors evaluated the feasibility of automated depression screening and a follow-up postscreening protocol.

Methods: Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2) and PHQ-9 screeners were sent to 20 specialty clinics and administered to patients who were ages ≥18 years, had not completed a PHQ-2 or PHQ-9 within the past 9 months, had no psychiatric diagnosis within the past 2 years, and had no behavioral health appointment within the previous year or an upcoming behavioral health appointment. In a two-pronged approach, patients with scores indicating moderate or moderately severe depression but with no indication of possible suicidal ideation were offered behavioral health resources (first prong), or patients with scores indicating severe depression or with possible suicidal ideation were contacted via telephone and requested to schedule a behavioral health appointment (second prong).

Results: The PHQ-2 was offered to 21,674 patients, with 38.1% (N=8,247) completing the screening; 13.1% (N=1,084) of those with completed screens had a positive depression score. Of patients who completed the PHQ-9, 44.5% (N=650) were eligible for the first prong of the intervention and 31.1% (N=455) for the second prong. Depression screening completion rates differed significantly by multiple sociodemographic factors. Mean±SD lag times from screening completion to successful contact and from contact to appointment completion were 7±6 and 5±4 days, respectively.

Conclusions: Automated depression screening with outreach based on depression severity is feasible and provides potentially efficient use of scarce resources. More research is needed on the mechanisms for automated screening and follow-up to examine factors such as patient engagement after a positive screening.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
专科诊所抑郁筛查和筛查后干预试点项目的成果。
目的: 作者评估了自动抑郁症筛查和筛查后随访方案的可行性:作者评估了自动抑郁症筛查和筛查后随访方案的可行性:向 20 家专科诊所发送了患者健康问卷-2 (PHQ-2) 和 PHQ-9 筛查表,并对年龄≥18 岁、在过去 9 个月内未完成 PHQ-2 或 PHQ-9 测试、在过去 2 年内未被诊断出患有精神病、在过去一年内未接受过行为健康预约或即将接受行为健康预约的患者进行了筛查。通过双管齐下的方法,为得分显示为中度或中度重度抑郁但无自杀倾向的患者提供行为健康资源(第一种方法),或通过电话联系得分显示为重度抑郁或有自杀倾向的患者并要求其安排行为健康预约(第二种方法):向 21,674 名患者提供了 PHQ-2,其中 38.1%(N=8,247)的患者完成了筛查;在完成筛查的患者中,13.1%(N=1,084)的患者抑郁评分呈阳性。在完成 PHQ-9 测评的患者中,44.5%(样本数=650)符合干预措施第一部分的条件,31.1%(样本数=455)符合干预措施第二部分的条件。抑郁症筛查完成率因多种社会人口因素而有显著差异。从完成筛查到成功联系以及从联系到完成预约的平均±SD滞后时间分别为7±6天和5±4天:结论:根据抑郁症严重程度进行自动抑郁症筛查和外展服务是可行的,可有效利用稀缺资源。还需要对自动筛查和随访机制进行更多研究,以考察筛查结果呈阳性后患者参与度等因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychiatric services
Psychiatric services 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
7.90%
发文量
295
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychiatric Services, established in 1950, is published monthly by the American Psychiatric Association. The peer-reviewed journal features research reports on issues related to the delivery of mental health services, especially for people with serious mental illness in community-based treatment programs. Long known as an interdisciplinary journal, Psychiatric Services recognizes that provision of high-quality care involves collaboration among a variety of professionals, frequently working as a team. Authors of research reports published in the journal include psychiatrists, psychologists, pharmacists, nurses, social workers, drug and alcohol treatment counselors, economists, policy analysts, and professionals in related systems such as criminal justice and welfare systems. In the mental health field, the current focus on patient-centered, recovery-oriented care and on dissemination of evidence-based practices is transforming service delivery systems at all levels. Research published in Psychiatric Services contributes to this transformation.
期刊最新文献
Psychotropic Polypharmacy Combinations and Duration of Polypharmacy Among Medicaid-Enrolled Youths. Advancing Measurement-Informed Care in Outpatient Community Behavioral Health. National Trends and Disparities in Suicidal Ideation, Attempts, and Health Care Utilization Among U.S. Adults. Outcomes of a Depression Screening and Postscreen Intervention Pilot Program in Specialty Clinics. National Trends in and Concentration of Industry Payments to U.S. Psychiatrists, 2015-2021.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1