Population analysis of susceptibility to ciprofloxacin and nalidixic acid in Staphylococcus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacteriaceae.

P Søgaard, B Gahrn-Hansen
{"title":"Population analysis of susceptibility to ciprofloxacin and nalidixic acid in Staphylococcus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacteriaceae.","authors":"P Søgaard,&nbsp;B Gahrn-Hansen","doi":"10.1111/j.1699-0463.1986.tb03066.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Susceptibility to ciprofloxacin (Cfl) and nalidixic acid (Nal) was tested in vitro by means of the population analysis technique against six strains of Staphylococcus, one strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and seven strains from five genera of Enterobacteriaceae. All strains of Staphylococcus were uniformly resistant to Nal as was the Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain, all bacteria being resistant to 250- less than 500 micrograms/ml. The Enterobacteriaceae were heterogeneous as regards susceptibility to Nal. With some strains minority populations of highly-resistant bacteria could be detected with frequencies of about 10(-6.3). The MIC for Cfl for the staphylococci varied between 0.25 and 0.50 microgram/ml. There were no differences in MIC of penicillinase-producing and penicillin-susceptible strains, either in Staphylococcus aureus or in Staphylococcus epidermidis. The MIC for Cfl in the enterobacteria varied between 0.004 and 0.03 microgram/ml. The MIC for Cfl in the Pseudomonas aeruginosa was 0.25 microgram/ml. MIC for Cfl increased in all strains when the parental strains were compared to bacteria selected from the plates with the highest concentration permitting growth, indicating heterogeneity against Cfl. But while the MIC of the selected enterobacteria were lower than one fourth of the level obtainable in serum, the MIC of the selected staphylococci and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were either exceeding the level obtainable in serum or were only a little lower than this level. While Cfl thus seems to be a promising antimicrobial agent in the treatment of infections caused by enterobacteria, the suitability for infections caused by staphylococci and Pseudomonas aeruginosa should be further explored.</p>","PeriodicalId":7045,"journal":{"name":"Acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica. Section B, Microbiology","volume":"94 5","pages":"351-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1699-0463.1986.tb03066.x","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica. Section B, Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1699-0463.1986.tb03066.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Susceptibility to ciprofloxacin (Cfl) and nalidixic acid (Nal) was tested in vitro by means of the population analysis technique against six strains of Staphylococcus, one strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and seven strains from five genera of Enterobacteriaceae. All strains of Staphylococcus were uniformly resistant to Nal as was the Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain, all bacteria being resistant to 250- less than 500 micrograms/ml. The Enterobacteriaceae were heterogeneous as regards susceptibility to Nal. With some strains minority populations of highly-resistant bacteria could be detected with frequencies of about 10(-6.3). The MIC for Cfl for the staphylococci varied between 0.25 and 0.50 microgram/ml. There were no differences in MIC of penicillinase-producing and penicillin-susceptible strains, either in Staphylococcus aureus or in Staphylococcus epidermidis. The MIC for Cfl in the enterobacteria varied between 0.004 and 0.03 microgram/ml. The MIC for Cfl in the Pseudomonas aeruginosa was 0.25 microgram/ml. MIC for Cfl increased in all strains when the parental strains were compared to bacteria selected from the plates with the highest concentration permitting growth, indicating heterogeneity against Cfl. But while the MIC of the selected enterobacteria were lower than one fourth of the level obtainable in serum, the MIC of the selected staphylococci and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were either exceeding the level obtainable in serum or were only a little lower than this level. While Cfl thus seems to be a promising antimicrobial agent in the treatment of infections caused by enterobacteria, the suitability for infections caused by staphylococci and Pseudomonas aeruginosa should be further explored.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
葡萄球菌、铜绿假单胞菌和肠杆菌科细菌对环丙沙星和萘啶酸的敏感性群体分析。
采用群体分析技术对6株葡萄球菌、1株铜绿假单胞菌和5属肠杆菌科7株细菌进行环丙沙星(Cfl)和萘啶酸(Nal)的体外药敏试验。所有葡萄球菌和铜绿假单胞菌对Nal均有耐药性,所有细菌对250-小于500微克/ml均有耐药性。肠杆菌科对Nal的易感性存在异质性。在一些菌株中可以检测到少数高耐药菌群,频率约为10(-6.3)。葡萄球菌Cfl的MIC值在0.25 ~ 0.50微克/毫升之间。产青霉酶菌株和青霉素敏感菌株的MIC在金黄色葡萄球菌和表皮葡萄球菌中均无差异。肠道菌群中Cfl的MIC在0.004 ~ 0.03微克/毫升之间。铜绿假单胞菌中Cfl的MIC为0.25微克/毫升。当将亲本菌株与从培养皿中选择的最高浓度允许生长的细菌进行比较时,所有菌株的Cfl MIC均升高,表明对Cfl的异质性。但所选肠杆菌的MIC均低于血清可得水平的四分之一,而所选葡萄球菌和铜绿假单胞菌的MIC或超过血清可得水平,或略低于血清可得水平。虽然Cfl似乎是治疗肠杆菌感染的一种很有前途的抗菌剂,但它对葡萄球菌和铜绿假单胞菌感染的适用性还有待进一步探讨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The genetic control of virulence in group A streptococci. III. Plasmid-induced "switch-off"--effect on some pathogenic properties. The microscopic diagnosis of Pneumocystis carinii. An evaluation of the gram, the methylene blue, and the Ziehl-Neelsen procedures. The genetic control of virulence in group A streptococci. II. Trigger effect by plasmids on anti-phagocytic activity, opacity factor and IgG and IgA Fc-receptors. Investigation of Micrococcaceae in a department of cardiac surgery. Biochemical characterization and sensitivity patterns of strains isolated from patients, staff, and air. Evaluation of Minibact, a new system for rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Comparison of Minibact, Micro-ID and API 20E with a conventional method as reference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1