Risk-Based Qualification of Cellular Starting Material Collection Sites: Tools to Determine Scope of Manufacturer Audits and Reduce Duplicative Efforts.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI:10.1016/j.jtct.2024.09.006
Peter Holman, Kara Wacker, Linda Barnes, Joan Myers, Tracey Hlucky, Victoria Walters, Christina Anderson, William Shingler, Karishma Contractor
{"title":"Risk-Based Qualification of Cellular Starting Material Collection Sites: Tools to Determine Scope of Manufacturer Audits and Reduce Duplicative Efforts.","authors":"Peter Holman, Kara Wacker, Linda Barnes, Joan Myers, Tracey Hlucky, Victoria Walters, Christina Anderson, William Shingler, Karishma Contractor","doi":"10.1016/j.jtct.2024.09.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cellular and Gene Therapy product (CGT product) manufacturers are required by regulations to qualify sites performing cell collection and processing as part of their manufacturing processes. The use of audits to qualify a site is part of the traditional supplier quality models for drug products. Due to the rapid growth of the CGT industry in recent years, healthcare institutions and manufacturers are finding it difficult to manage the increasing workload and resources needed to support audits when they are applied to the provision of Cellular Starting Material (CSM) collection from patients/subjects for the purpose of manufacturing. To alleviate this audit burden, several manufacturers have applied risk-based approaches to determine the needs and scope of audits. The authors of this commentary recommend that all manufacturers utilize a risk-based assessment program when appropriate and explain the use of tools created to facilitate a risk-based approach to streamline and reduce duplicative audits. This approach and tools, created by The NextGen Industry Working Group (IWG) site certification workstream with representation from pharmaceutical and biotech companies, health care institutions, accrediting organizations, and other stakeholders, is aligned with proposals from other multistakeholder groups, including the ASTCT 80/20 Task Force. The tools aim to streamline the site qualification processes performed by each manufacturer, offering a standardized approach to audits or gap analysis assessments. Offering an abbreviated audit model for sites that have already attained accreditation through agencies such as the AABB (Association for the Advancement of Blood & Biotherapies) and FACT (Foundation for the Accreditation of Cellular Therapy), helping the manufacturer to focus on product-specific requirements rather than re-evaluating systems that have already been audited in great detail by other parties.</p>","PeriodicalId":23283,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation and Cellular Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation and Cellular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtct.2024.09.006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cellular and Gene Therapy product (CGT product) manufacturers are required by regulations to qualify sites performing cell collection and processing as part of their manufacturing processes. The use of audits to qualify a site is part of the traditional supplier quality models for drug products. Due to the rapid growth of the CGT industry in recent years, healthcare institutions and manufacturers are finding it difficult to manage the increasing workload and resources needed to support audits when they are applied to the provision of Cellular Starting Material (CSM) collection from patients/subjects for the purpose of manufacturing. To alleviate this audit burden, several manufacturers have applied risk-based approaches to determine the needs and scope of audits. The authors of this commentary recommend that all manufacturers utilize a risk-based assessment program when appropriate and explain the use of tools created to facilitate a risk-based approach to streamline and reduce duplicative audits. This approach and tools, created by The NextGen Industry Working Group (IWG) site certification workstream with representation from pharmaceutical and biotech companies, health care institutions, accrediting organizations, and other stakeholders, is aligned with proposals from other multistakeholder groups, including the ASTCT 80/20 Task Force. The tools aim to streamline the site qualification processes performed by each manufacturer, offering a standardized approach to audits or gap analysis assessments. Offering an abbreviated audit model for sites that have already attained accreditation through agencies such as the AABB (Association for the Advancement of Blood & Biotherapies) and FACT (Foundation for the Accreditation of Cellular Therapy), helping the manufacturer to focus on product-specific requirements rather than re-evaluating systems that have already been audited in great detail by other parties.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于风险的细胞起始材料收集点资格认证:确定制造商审核范围和减少重复工作的工具。
根据法规要求,细胞和基因治疗产品(CGT 产品)生产商必须对进行细胞采集和处理的场所进行资格审查,这是生产过程的一部分。使用审核对生产基地进行资格认证是药品传统供应商质量模式的一部分。由于近年来 CGT 行业的快速发展,医疗机构和制造商发现,当审核适用于从患者/受试者处采集细胞起始材料 (CSM) 用于生产时,很难管理日益增加的工作量和所需资源。为了减轻审核负担,一些生产商采用了基于风险的方法来确定审核的需求和范围。本评论的作者建议所有生产商在适当的时候采用基于风险的评估计划,并解释了如何使用为促进基于风险的方法而创建的工具来简化和减少重复审核。这种方法和工具由 NextGen 行业工作组 (IWG) 现场认证工作流创建,其代表来自制药和生物技术公司、医疗机构、认证组织和其他利益相关者,与其他多利益相关者团体(包括 ASTCT 80/20 工作组)的建议相一致。这些工具旨在简化各生产商执行的生产基地资格认证流程,提供标准化的审核或差距分析评估方法。为已通过 AABB(血液与生物治疗促进协会)和 FACT(细胞治疗认证基金会)等机构认证的研究机构提供简短的审核模式,帮助制造商专注于特定产品的要求,而不是重新评估已通过其他机构详细审核的系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
15.60%
发文量
1061
审稿时长
51 days
期刊最新文献
Advanced Practice Providers in Cellular Therapy: survey results from the ASTCT APP Special Interest Group exploring clinical roles, compensation and job satisfaction. Healthcare resource utilization and associated costs in patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease post allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in England: HCRU and associated costs in patients with cGvHD in England. Superior survival after unrelated allogeneic stem cell transplantation with low-dose ATG compared to low-dose TBI in myeloablative fludarabine/busulfan-based regimen for MDS on behalf of the adult MDS Working Group of the JSTCT. N-803, an IL-15 superagonist complex as maintenance therapy after allogeneic donor stem cell transplant for acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome; a Phase 2 trial. Biologically Randomized Comparison of Haploidentical Versus Human Leukocyte Antigen-Matched Related Donor Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1