The effectiveness of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG in the treatment of infantile colic: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS Translational pediatrics Pub Date : 2024-08-31 Epub Date: 2024-08-28 DOI:10.21037/tp-24-112
Huazi Liu, Qiang Fei, Tianming Yuan
{"title":"The effectiveness of <i>Lactobacillus rhamnosus</i> GG in the treatment of infantile colic: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Huazi Liu, Qiang Fei, Tianming Yuan","doi":"10.21037/tp-24-112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infantile colic is common in pediatric patients, yet few probiotics effectively treat this condition. The efficacy of <i>Lactobacillus rhamnosus</i> GG (LGG) in managing colic remains unclear. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of LGG in treating infantile colic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science databases from their inception until January 2024. We used Version 2 of the Cochrane tool (ROB 2) to assess the risk of bias in randomized trials. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 software. The inclusion criteria followed the PICOS framework: (I) participants: infants with colic; (II) intervention: LGG administration at any dose; (III) control: placebo or no treatment; (IV) outcomes: primary outcome was crying or fussing time (minutes/day) at the end of the intervention, secondary outcomes included fecal calprotectin content (µg/g) and adverse events; (V) Study type: randomized controlled trials.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four studies involving 168 infants with colic were included. The meta-analysis indicated that LGG significantly reduced daily crying time [mean difference (MD) =-32.59 minutes; 95% confidence interval (CI): -43.23 to -21.96; P<0.001] and fecal calprotectin content (MD =-103.28 µg/g; 95% CI: -149.30 to -7.26; P<0.001). Only one study reported adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LGG is effective in treating infantile colic. Further studies are needed to examine the effects of different doses, administration schedules, and durations of LGG treatment in infants with varying feeding methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":23294,"journal":{"name":"Translational pediatrics","volume":"13 8","pages":"1415-1424"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11384430/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tp-24-112","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Infantile colic is common in pediatric patients, yet few probiotics effectively treat this condition. The efficacy of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) in managing colic remains unclear. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of LGG in treating infantile colic.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science databases from their inception until January 2024. We used Version 2 of the Cochrane tool (ROB 2) to assess the risk of bias in randomized trials. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 software. The inclusion criteria followed the PICOS framework: (I) participants: infants with colic; (II) intervention: LGG administration at any dose; (III) control: placebo or no treatment; (IV) outcomes: primary outcome was crying or fussing time (minutes/day) at the end of the intervention, secondary outcomes included fecal calprotectin content (µg/g) and adverse events; (V) Study type: randomized controlled trials.

Results: Four studies involving 168 infants with colic were included. The meta-analysis indicated that LGG significantly reduced daily crying time [mean difference (MD) =-32.59 minutes; 95% confidence interval (CI): -43.23 to -21.96; P<0.001] and fecal calprotectin content (MD =-103.28 µg/g; 95% CI: -149.30 to -7.26; P<0.001). Only one study reported adverse events.

Conclusions: LGG is effective in treating infantile colic. Further studies are needed to examine the effects of different doses, administration schedules, and durations of LGG treatment in infants with varying feeding methods.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鼠李糖乳杆菌 GG 治疗婴儿肠绞痛的有效性:系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景:婴儿肠绞痛是儿科常见病,但很少有益生菌能有效治疗这种疾病。鼠李糖乳杆菌 GG(Lactobacillus rhamnosus GGG)治疗绞痛的疗效仍不明确。在这项荟萃分析中,我们旨在评估 LGG 治疗婴儿肠绞痛的效果:我们检索了 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials 和 Web of Science 数据库中从开始到 2024 年 1 月的内容。我们使用了第二版 Cochrane 工具(ROB 2)来评估随机试验的偏倚风险。元分析使用 RevMan 5.3 软件进行。纳入标准遵循 PICOS 框架:(I) 参与者:患有肠绞痛的婴儿;(II) 干预:(IV)结果:主要结果是干预结束时的哭闹时间(分钟/天),次要结果包括粪便钙蛋白含量(微克/克)和不良事件;(V)研究类型:随机对照试验:结果:共纳入四项研究,涉及 168 名肠绞痛婴儿。荟萃分析表明,LGG 能显著减少每天的哭闹时间[平均差(MD)=-32.59 分钟;95% 置信区间(CI):-43.23 到 -21.96;PC 结论:LGG 对治疗婴儿肠绞痛有效:LGG可有效治疗婴儿肠绞痛。需要进一步研究不同剂量、给药时间和LGG治疗持续时间对不同喂养方式婴儿的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Translational pediatrics
Translational pediatrics Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
108
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
A brief clinical genetics review: stepwise diagnostic processes of a monogenic disorder-hypertriglyceridemia. An exceptionally large wave of M. pneumoniae infections among children in Tianjin post COVID-19 pandemic. Circulating chemerin and interleukin-6 in children with obesity: possible metabolic risk predictors. Clipping of a ruptured cerebral aneurysm in a toddler: a case report and review of aneurysmal treatment in children. Efficacy of core biopsies for diagnosing inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors in pediatric patients: case series from a single tertiary referral center.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1