Cesarean Sections Under Spinal Anaesthesia: Comparison of Varying Doses of Dexmedetomidine Combined with 0.75% Hyperbaric Ropivacaine: A Double-Blind Randomized Trial.

Srinivasa Rao Nallam, Srikavya Kandala, Sreelekha Kanipakam, Vinay Bathini, Sunil Chiruvella, Sonu Sesham
{"title":"Cesarean Sections Under Spinal Anaesthesia: Comparison of Varying Doses of Dexmedetomidine Combined with 0.75% Hyperbaric Ropivacaine: A Double-Blind Randomized Trial.","authors":"Srinivasa Rao Nallam, Srikavya Kandala, Sreelekha Kanipakam, Vinay Bathini, Sunil Chiruvella, Sonu Sesham","doi":"10.4274/TJAR.2024.241619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of 5 μg, 7.5 μg, and 10 μg doses of dexmedetomidine added to hyperbaric 0.75% ropivacaine on the duration of analgesia during cesarean section. Furthermore, the onset of sensory and motor block, hemodynamics, sedation, and adverse effects were investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 120 full-term parturients scheduled for cesarean section under spinal anaesthesia were randomized into three groups. Group RD5 received intrathecal hyperbaric 0.75% ropivacaine 15 mg (2 mL) plus dexmedetomidine 5 μg (0.5 mL), group RD7.5 received intrathecal hyperbaric 0.75% ropivacaine 15 mg (2 mL) plus dexmedetomidine 7.5 μg (0.5 mL), and group RD10 received intrathecal hyperbaric 0.75% ropivacaine 15 mg (2 mL) plus dexmedetomidine 10 μg (0.5 mL). Sensorimotor blockade characteristics, analgesia duration, hemodynamic variables, and adverse events were documented. Student's t-test and the chi-square test were used for data analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In groups RD5, RD7.5, and RD10, the onset of sensory block was 2.96±1.32 min, 2.26±1.50 min, and 1.96±0.93 min, respectively, while the onset of motor block was 9.63±0.11 min, 8.63±0.58 min, and 6.40±0.14 min, respectively. The duration of analgesia was significantly prolonged in group RD10 compared with groups RD7.5 and RD5 (483.43±76.21 vs. 398.74±73.59 vs. 362.58±79.87 min, respectively, <i>P</i>=0.001). Group RD10 also exhibited significantly higher incidences of sedation, bradycardia, and vomiting.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We conclude that increasing dexmedetomidine doses decreases the onset of sensory and motor blockade while prolonging analgesia duration in a dose-dependent manner.</p>","PeriodicalId":23353,"journal":{"name":"Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/TJAR.2024.241619","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of 5 μg, 7.5 μg, and 10 μg doses of dexmedetomidine added to hyperbaric 0.75% ropivacaine on the duration of analgesia during cesarean section. Furthermore, the onset of sensory and motor block, hemodynamics, sedation, and adverse effects were investigated.

Methods: A total of 120 full-term parturients scheduled for cesarean section under spinal anaesthesia were randomized into three groups. Group RD5 received intrathecal hyperbaric 0.75% ropivacaine 15 mg (2 mL) plus dexmedetomidine 5 μg (0.5 mL), group RD7.5 received intrathecal hyperbaric 0.75% ropivacaine 15 mg (2 mL) plus dexmedetomidine 7.5 μg (0.5 mL), and group RD10 received intrathecal hyperbaric 0.75% ropivacaine 15 mg (2 mL) plus dexmedetomidine 10 μg (0.5 mL). Sensorimotor blockade characteristics, analgesia duration, hemodynamic variables, and adverse events were documented. Student's t-test and the chi-square test were used for data analysis.

Results: In groups RD5, RD7.5, and RD10, the onset of sensory block was 2.96±1.32 min, 2.26±1.50 min, and 1.96±0.93 min, respectively, while the onset of motor block was 9.63±0.11 min, 8.63±0.58 min, and 6.40±0.14 min, respectively. The duration of analgesia was significantly prolonged in group RD10 compared with groups RD7.5 and RD5 (483.43±76.21 vs. 398.74±73.59 vs. 362.58±79.87 min, respectively, P=0.001). Group RD10 also exhibited significantly higher incidences of sedation, bradycardia, and vomiting.

Conclusion: We conclude that increasing dexmedetomidine doses decreases the onset of sensory and motor blockade while prolonging analgesia duration in a dose-dependent manner.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脊髓麻醉下的剖宫产手术:不同剂量右美托咪定与 0.75% 高压氧仓罗哌卡因的比较:双盲随机试验。
研究目的本研究的主要目的是评估在高压0.75%罗哌卡因中加入5微克、7.5微克和10微克剂量的右美托咪定对剖宫产术中镇痛持续时间的影响。此外,还对感觉和运动阻滞的发生、血流动力学、镇静和不良反应进行了调查:方法:将 120 名计划在脊髓麻醉下进行剖腹产手术的足月产妇随机分为三组。RD5 组接受高压鞘内注射 0.75% 罗哌卡因 15 毫克(2 毫升)加右美托咪定 5 微克(0.5 毫升),RD7.5 组接受高压鞘内注射 0.75% 罗哌卡因 15 毫克(2 毫升)加右美托咪定 7.5 微克(0.5 毫升),RD10 组接受高压鞘内注射 0.75% 罗哌卡因 15 毫克(2 毫升)加右美托咪定 10 微克(0.5 毫升)。记录了感觉运动阻滞特征、镇痛持续时间、血液动力学变量和不良事件。数据分析采用学生 t 检验和卡方检验:RD5组、RD7.5组和RD10组的感觉阻滞起始时间分别为(2.96±1.32)分钟、(2.26±1.50)分钟和(1.96±0.93)分钟,而运动阻滞起始时间分别为(9.63±0.11)分钟、(8.63±0.58)分钟和(6.40±0.14)分钟。与 RD7.5 组和 RD5 组相比,RD10 组的镇痛持续时间明显延长(分别为 483.43±76.21 分钟 vs. 398.74±73.59 分钟 vs. 362.58±79.87 分钟,P=0.001)。RD10组的镇静、心动过缓和呕吐发生率也明显较高:我们得出结论:增加右美托咪定的剂量可降低感觉和运动阻滞的发生率,同时延长镇痛持续时间,且镇痛持续时间与剂量相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cesarean Sections Under Spinal Anaesthesia: Comparison of Varying Doses of Dexmedetomidine Combined with 0.75% Hyperbaric Ropivacaine: A Double-Blind Randomized Trial. Comparative Efficacy of Intraoperative Patient State Index vs. Bi-Spectral Index in Patients Undergoing Elective Spine Surgery with Neuromonitoring Under General Anaesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Comparison of Tracheal Intubation Using the Air-Q ILA and LMA Blockbuster Among Adults Undergoing Elective Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Evaluation of Operating Room Staff Awareness of Environmental Sustainability and Medical Waste Management. Exploring Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback as a Nonpharmacological Intervention for Enhancing Perioperative Care: A Narrative Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1