A new approach to mesh fixation in laparoscopic transabdominal technique, "suture passer", superior or not?

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Updates in Surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-21 DOI:10.1007/s13304-024-01998-x
Yunushan Furkan Aydoğdu, Ömer Kubat, Çağrı Büyükkasap, Hüseyin Göbüt, Kürşat Dikmen
{"title":"A new approach to mesh fixation in laparoscopic transabdominal technique, \"suture passer\", superior or not?","authors":"Yunushan Furkan Aydoğdu, Ömer Kubat, Çağrı Büyükkasap, Hüseyin Göbüt, Kürşat Dikmen","doi":"10.1007/s13304-024-01998-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery is a common procedure and pain is a common postoperative complication. Guidelines for mesh fixation vary, with no clear rule. Mesh fixation may not be necessary in total extraperitoneal approach (TEP), but more research is needed for transabdominal preperitoneal approach (TAPP). This study was conducted comparing mesh fixation methods using a suture passer and tacker, aiming to reduce pain and operation time. We used the FUÇA method for mesh fixation in TAPP. The patients were divided into two groups: Group I underwent classical tacker method while Group II used the FUÇA method. There were 52 patients in Group I and 51 patients in Group II. Polypropylene mesh was used in both groups. The surgeries were performed by four experienced surgeons. We analyzed retrospective data including age, gender, BMI, surgical approach, procedure duration, defect size, recurrence status, postoperative pain, hernia type, and complications. Pain was assessed using VAS score and McGill pain index. Recurrence was evaluated by a different surgeon. A total of 103 patients were included: 52 in Group I and 51 in Group II. Both groups had a similar median age (47 years in Group I, 45 years in Group II) and predominantly male participants (92.3% in Group I, 92.2% in Group II). Most patients had indirect inguinal hernia (77.7%) while the rest had direct inguinal hernia (22.3%). There were no significant differences in BMI or hernia type between the groups. The defect size measured by ultrasound was similar in both groups. Group I had higher VAS pain scores on postoperative day 1, at month 1, and at month 3 compared to Group II, but the difference vanished at the 12-month mark. The McGill Pain Index showed similar results. Recurrence was observed in one patient in each group. Complications occurred in 11 patients during the follow-up period, with similar rates between the groups. The mean surgical procedure time of Group 2 was significantly shorter than that of Group 1 (49.36 m vs 43.43 m, p = 0.009). FUÇA method is a technique that can be used safely in the TAPP procedure as it reduces postoperative pain and shortens the operation time.</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"2617-2625"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Updates in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-024-01998-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery is a common procedure and pain is a common postoperative complication. Guidelines for mesh fixation vary, with no clear rule. Mesh fixation may not be necessary in total extraperitoneal approach (TEP), but more research is needed for transabdominal preperitoneal approach (TAPP). This study was conducted comparing mesh fixation methods using a suture passer and tacker, aiming to reduce pain and operation time. We used the FUÇA method for mesh fixation in TAPP. The patients were divided into two groups: Group I underwent classical tacker method while Group II used the FUÇA method. There were 52 patients in Group I and 51 patients in Group II. Polypropylene mesh was used in both groups. The surgeries were performed by four experienced surgeons. We analyzed retrospective data including age, gender, BMI, surgical approach, procedure duration, defect size, recurrence status, postoperative pain, hernia type, and complications. Pain was assessed using VAS score and McGill pain index. Recurrence was evaluated by a different surgeon. A total of 103 patients were included: 52 in Group I and 51 in Group II. Both groups had a similar median age (47 years in Group I, 45 years in Group II) and predominantly male participants (92.3% in Group I, 92.2% in Group II). Most patients had indirect inguinal hernia (77.7%) while the rest had direct inguinal hernia (22.3%). There were no significant differences in BMI or hernia type between the groups. The defect size measured by ultrasound was similar in both groups. Group I had higher VAS pain scores on postoperative day 1, at month 1, and at month 3 compared to Group II, but the difference vanished at the 12-month mark. The McGill Pain Index showed similar results. Recurrence was observed in one patient in each group. Complications occurred in 11 patients during the follow-up period, with similar rates between the groups. The mean surgical procedure time of Group 2 was significantly shorter than that of Group 1 (49.36 m vs 43.43 m, p = 0.009). FUÇA method is a technique that can be used safely in the TAPP procedure as it reduces postoperative pain and shortens the operation time.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹腔镜经腹技术中的网片固定新方法--"缝合器",到底优不优?
腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术是一种常见手术,疼痛是常见的术后并发症。网片固定的指导原则各不相同,没有明确的规定。全腹膜外入路(TEP)可能不需要网片固定,但经腹膜前入路(TAPP)则需要更多的研究。本研究比较了使用缝合器和止血钳的网片固定方法,旨在减少疼痛和手术时间。我们在 TAPP 中使用了 FUÇA 网片固定法。患者被分为两组:第一组采用传统的粘合器法,第二组采用 FUÇA 法。I 组有 52 名患者,II 组有 51 名患者。两组均使用聚丙烯网片。手术由四名经验丰富的外科医生进行。我们分析了回顾性数据,包括年龄、性别、体重指数、手术方式、手术时间、缺损大小、复发情况、术后疼痛、疝气类型和并发症。疼痛采用 VAS 评分和麦吉尔疼痛指数进行评估。复发情况由不同的外科医生进行评估。共纳入 103 名患者:第一组 52 人,第二组 51 人。两组患者的中位年龄相似(第一组 47 岁,第二组 45 岁),男性患者占多数(第一组 92.3%,第二组 92.2%)。大多数患者患有间接腹股沟疝(77.7%),其余患者患有直接腹股沟疝(22.3%)。两组患者的体重指数和疝气类型无明显差异。两组通过超声波测量的疝气缺损大小相似。与第二组相比,第一组在术后第1天、第1个月和第3个月的VAS疼痛评分较高,但在12个月时差异消失。麦吉尔疼痛指数显示出相似的结果。每组均有一名患者复发。在随访期间,有11名患者出现并发症,两组的并发症发生率相似。第二组的平均手术时间明显短于第一组(49.36 米 vs 43.43 米,P = 0.009)。FUÇA方法可减少术后疼痛,缩短手术时间,是一种可安全用于TAPP手术的技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Updates in Surgery
Updates in Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
208
期刊介绍: Updates in Surgery (UPIS) has been founded in 2010 as the official journal of the Italian Society of Surgery. It’s an international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the surgical sciences. Its main goal is to offer a valuable update on the most recent developments of those surgical techniques that are rapidly evolving, forcing the community of surgeons to a rigorous debate and a continuous refinement of standards of care. In this respect position papers on the mostly debated surgical approaches and accreditation criteria have been published and are welcome for the future. Beside its focus on general surgery, the journal draws particular attention to cutting edge topics and emerging surgical fields that are publishing in monothematic issues guest edited by well-known experts. Updates in Surgery has been considering various types of papers: editorials, comprehensive reviews, original studies and technical notes related to specific surgical procedures and techniques on liver, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, robotic and bariatric surgery.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and safety of S-1 plus oxaliplatin combined with apatinib and camrelizumab as neoadjuvant therapy for patients with locally advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a protocol for a single-arm phase II trial. Reducing the positive margins rate for anal melanoma in the modern era: a national propensity score matched study. Esophagectomy in patients with liver cirrhosis: systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcomes. Full-robotic liver resection of segment V-Vi using the harmonic ace curved shears and the hanging technique: an easy way to do it. Comparative analysis of laparoscopic, retro-muscular, and open mesh repair techniques for ventral and incisional hernias: a comprehensive review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1