What Do Younger and Well-Educated Adults Think about Self-Medication? Results of a Survey during a Public Science Event at Leipzig University.

IF 2 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pharmacy Pub Date : 2024-08-23 DOI:10.3390/pharmacy12050131
Ines Gebert, Sabine Hundertmark, Thilo Bertsche
{"title":"What Do Younger and Well-Educated Adults Think about Self-Medication? Results of a Survey during a Public Science Event at Leipzig University.","authors":"Ines Gebert, Sabine Hundertmark, Thilo Bertsche","doi":"10.3390/pharmacy12050131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Consecutive visitors to a public science event at Leipzig University were asked about their opinions/attitudes regarding their personal use of self-medication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A written questionnaire survey addressed (i) participants' characteristics, (ii) frequency of self-medication use in the last 12 months, (iii) symptoms/complaints most frequently considered applicable, (iv) preconditions, (v) limitations, (vi) risks, (vii) fears, (viii) medication information sources, (ix) influencing factors, and (x) reasons for decision making.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>(i) A total of 189 visitors (median age: 29.0 years; Q25/Q75: 22.0/44.0) participated, of whom 64.0% were female, 38.6% had a university degree, 20.1% were in training, and 14.8% were licensed in a healthcare profession. (ii) A total of 59.3% of participants stated that they had used self-medication regularly in the last 12 months. The most common answers in the respective questions were (iii) headache, 86.2%; (iv) mild complaints/symptoms, 94.7%; (v) duration, 91.6%; (vi) \"self-medication may cause adverse drug reactions\", 94.2%; (vii) \"developing a habituation effect\", 58.7%; (viii) pharmacists, 93.7%; (ix) \"physician's recommendation\", 89.3%; (x) \"intensity of complaints\", 92.6%; and (vi) 61.3% believed that they could choose an appropriate self-medication.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Younger and well-educated adults report using self-medication frequently and rate their expertise as high. Healthcare professionals are the preferred source of information.</p>","PeriodicalId":30544,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11417743/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy12050131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Consecutive visitors to a public science event at Leipzig University were asked about their opinions/attitudes regarding their personal use of self-medication.

Methods: A written questionnaire survey addressed (i) participants' characteristics, (ii) frequency of self-medication use in the last 12 months, (iii) symptoms/complaints most frequently considered applicable, (iv) preconditions, (v) limitations, (vi) risks, (vii) fears, (viii) medication information sources, (ix) influencing factors, and (x) reasons for decision making.

Results: (i) A total of 189 visitors (median age: 29.0 years; Q25/Q75: 22.0/44.0) participated, of whom 64.0% were female, 38.6% had a university degree, 20.1% were in training, and 14.8% were licensed in a healthcare profession. (ii) A total of 59.3% of participants stated that they had used self-medication regularly in the last 12 months. The most common answers in the respective questions were (iii) headache, 86.2%; (iv) mild complaints/symptoms, 94.7%; (v) duration, 91.6%; (vi) "self-medication may cause adverse drug reactions", 94.2%; (vii) "developing a habituation effect", 58.7%; (viii) pharmacists, 93.7%; (ix) "physician's recommendation", 89.3%; (x) "intensity of complaints", 92.6%; and (vi) 61.3% believed that they could choose an appropriate self-medication.

Conclusion: Younger and well-educated adults report using self-medication frequently and rate their expertise as high. Healthcare professionals are the preferred source of information.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
年轻人和受过良好教育的成年人如何看待自我药疗?莱比锡大学公共科学活动期间的调查结果。
研究背景在莱比锡大学举办的一次公众科学活动中,我们连续询问了来访者对个人使用自我药疗的看法/态度:书面问卷调查的内容包括:(i) 参与者的特征;(ii) 过去 12 个月中使用自我药疗的频率;(iii) 最常出现的症状/不适;(iv) 前提条件;(v) 局限性;(vi) 风险;(vii) 恐惧;(viii) 药物信息来源;(ix) 影响因素;(x) 作出决定的原因。结果:(i) 共有 189 名来访者(年龄中位数:29.0 岁;Q25/Q75:22.0/44.0)参加了调查,其中 64.0% 为女性,38.6% 拥有大学学位,20.1% 正在接受培训,14.8% 拥有医疗保健专业执照。(ii) 共有 59.3%的参与者表示在过去 12 个月中经常使用自我药疗。在相应的问题中,最常见的答案是:(iii) 头痛,86.2%;(iv) 轻度不适/症状,94.7%;(v) 持续时间,91.6%;(vi) "自我药疗可能会引起药物不良反应",94.2%;(vii) "形成习惯效应",58.7%;(viii)药剂师,93.7%;(ix) "医生建议",89.3%;(x) "主诉强度",92.6%;以及(vi)61.3%的人认为他们可以选择适当的自我药疗:结论:较年轻和受过良好教育的成年人表示经常使用自我药疗,并对其专业知识评价较高。医疗保健专业人员是首选的信息来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmacy
Pharmacy PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
9.10%
发文量
141
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Pharmaceutical Advertising and Public Perceptions in Saudi Arabia. Evaluating the Efficiency and Staff Satisfaction of the Point-of-Care IV Activated System Versus Traditional Piggyback in Administering IV Antibiotics at a Saudi Tertiary Hospital. A Review of Survey Instruments and Pharmacy Student Outcomes for Stress, Burnout, Depression and Anxiety. Pharmacist-Prescribed Hormonal Contraception: A Survey of Perceptions of Georgia Community Pharmacists and Non-Community Pharmacists. Pharmacists' Professional Satisfaction and Challenges: A Netnographic Analysis of Reddit and Facebook Discussions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1