What Do Younger and Well-Educated Adults Think about Self-Medication? Results of a Survey during a Public Science Event at Leipzig University.

IF 2 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pharmacy Pub Date : 2024-08-23 DOI:10.3390/pharmacy12050131
Ines Gebert, Sabine Hundertmark, Thilo Bertsche
{"title":"What Do Younger and Well-Educated Adults Think about Self-Medication? Results of a Survey during a Public Science Event at Leipzig University.","authors":"Ines Gebert, Sabine Hundertmark, Thilo Bertsche","doi":"10.3390/pharmacy12050131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Consecutive visitors to a public science event at Leipzig University were asked about their opinions/attitudes regarding their personal use of self-medication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A written questionnaire survey addressed (i) participants' characteristics, (ii) frequency of self-medication use in the last 12 months, (iii) symptoms/complaints most frequently considered applicable, (iv) preconditions, (v) limitations, (vi) risks, (vii) fears, (viii) medication information sources, (ix) influencing factors, and (x) reasons for decision making.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>(i) A total of 189 visitors (median age: 29.0 years; Q25/Q75: 22.0/44.0) participated, of whom 64.0% were female, 38.6% had a university degree, 20.1% were in training, and 14.8% were licensed in a healthcare profession. (ii) A total of 59.3% of participants stated that they had used self-medication regularly in the last 12 months. The most common answers in the respective questions were (iii) headache, 86.2%; (iv) mild complaints/symptoms, 94.7%; (v) duration, 91.6%; (vi) \"self-medication may cause adverse drug reactions\", 94.2%; (vii) \"developing a habituation effect\", 58.7%; (viii) pharmacists, 93.7%; (ix) \"physician's recommendation\", 89.3%; (x) \"intensity of complaints\", 92.6%; and (vi) 61.3% believed that they could choose an appropriate self-medication.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Younger and well-educated adults report using self-medication frequently and rate their expertise as high. Healthcare professionals are the preferred source of information.</p>","PeriodicalId":30544,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacy","volume":"12 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11417743/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy12050131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Consecutive visitors to a public science event at Leipzig University were asked about their opinions/attitudes regarding their personal use of self-medication.

Methods: A written questionnaire survey addressed (i) participants' characteristics, (ii) frequency of self-medication use in the last 12 months, (iii) symptoms/complaints most frequently considered applicable, (iv) preconditions, (v) limitations, (vi) risks, (vii) fears, (viii) medication information sources, (ix) influencing factors, and (x) reasons for decision making.

Results: (i) A total of 189 visitors (median age: 29.0 years; Q25/Q75: 22.0/44.0) participated, of whom 64.0% were female, 38.6% had a university degree, 20.1% were in training, and 14.8% were licensed in a healthcare profession. (ii) A total of 59.3% of participants stated that they had used self-medication regularly in the last 12 months. The most common answers in the respective questions were (iii) headache, 86.2%; (iv) mild complaints/symptoms, 94.7%; (v) duration, 91.6%; (vi) "self-medication may cause adverse drug reactions", 94.2%; (vii) "developing a habituation effect", 58.7%; (viii) pharmacists, 93.7%; (ix) "physician's recommendation", 89.3%; (x) "intensity of complaints", 92.6%; and (vi) 61.3% believed that they could choose an appropriate self-medication.

Conclusion: Younger and well-educated adults report using self-medication frequently and rate their expertise as high. Healthcare professionals are the preferred source of information.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
年轻人和受过良好教育的成年人如何看待自我药疗?莱比锡大学公共科学活动期间的调查结果。
研究背景在莱比锡大学举办的一次公众科学活动中,我们连续询问了来访者对个人使用自我药疗的看法/态度:书面问卷调查的内容包括:(i) 参与者的特征;(ii) 过去 12 个月中使用自我药疗的频率;(iii) 最常出现的症状/不适;(iv) 前提条件;(v) 局限性;(vi) 风险;(vii) 恐惧;(viii) 药物信息来源;(ix) 影响因素;(x) 作出决定的原因。结果:(i) 共有 189 名来访者(年龄中位数:29.0 岁;Q25/Q75:22.0/44.0)参加了调查,其中 64.0% 为女性,38.6% 拥有大学学位,20.1% 正在接受培训,14.8% 拥有医疗保健专业执照。(ii) 共有 59.3%的参与者表示在过去 12 个月中经常使用自我药疗。在相应的问题中,最常见的答案是:(iii) 头痛,86.2%;(iv) 轻度不适/症状,94.7%;(v) 持续时间,91.6%;(vi) "自我药疗可能会引起药物不良反应",94.2%;(vii) "形成习惯效应",58.7%;(viii)药剂师,93.7%;(ix) "医生建议",89.3%;(x) "主诉强度",92.6%;以及(vi)61.3%的人认为他们可以选择适当的自我药疗:结论:较年轻和受过良好教育的成年人表示经常使用自我药疗,并对其专业知识评价较高。医疗保健专业人员是首选的信息来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmacy
Pharmacy PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
9.10%
发文量
141
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Pilot Study Evaluating the Impact of an Algorithm-Driven Protocol on Guideline-Concordant Antibiotic Prescribing in a Rural Primary Care Setting. The Mentorship Blueprint: A Comprehensive Review for the Development of Programs in Pharmacy Education. Experiences in a Clinical Innovation Pharmacy Fellowship: A Novel Model of Ambulatory Care Training and Practice Advancement. Development of Chronic Kidney Disease Screening Integrative Care Model Led by Community Pharmacists. Exploration of Challenges and Opportunities for Good Pharmacy Practices in Bangladesh: A Qualitative Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1