Why do physicians practice osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT)? A survey study.

IF 1.4 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Osteopathic Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI:10.1515/jom-2023-0288
Samantha M Lease, Jose S Figueroa Casanova
{"title":"Why do physicians practice osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT)? A survey study.","authors":"Samantha M Lease, Jose S Figueroa Casanova","doi":"10.1515/jom-2023-0288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Few osteopathic physicians (Doctors of Osteopathic Medicine [DOs]) utilize osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) in their clinical practice, although all DOs are trained to do so. The reasons why many do not utilize OMT are not entirely clear. Anecdotally, these authors have observed that if a physician utilizes OMT, it is because they witnessed the efficacy for themselves in real-life clinical diagnoses found on patients or volunteers. This study seeks to explore this phenomenon.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study seeks to explore the relationship between witnessing the efficacy of OMT and the future use of OMT in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Surveys were sent to DOs who work with Des Moines University's College of Osteopathic Medicine (COM) clinical students as well as osteopathic medical students enrolled at the Des Moines University's COM. Survey data were analyzed by separating physicians into cohorts based on their use of OMT and students into cohorts based on their interest in utilizing OMT in future practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DOs who practice OMT reported at least one, and often multiple, instances of witnessing the efficacy of OMT on real-life patients or volunteers while in their first 2 years of medical school. Those who do not utilize OMT reported few opportunities to witness the efficacy of OMT on a real-life patient. For physicians, 96.1 % of those who utilize OMT in their practice had the opportunity to see it work positively during the first 2 years of medical school, whereas only 7.4 % who do not utilize OMT had the opportunity. These findings are mirrored in the experience of current osteopathic medical students who are interested and uninterested in utilizing OMT in their future practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings emphasize the importance of exposing our medical students to some type of 'real-life' experience early in their careers; the data show that these experiences can be very beneficial in expanding the interest in utilizing osteopathic manipulative medicine (OMM) in future practice. COMs can consider the implementation of programs that provide this experience to students, including extracurricular activities dedicated to the use of OMT.</p>","PeriodicalId":36050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jom-2023-0288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Few osteopathic physicians (Doctors of Osteopathic Medicine [DOs]) utilize osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) in their clinical practice, although all DOs are trained to do so. The reasons why many do not utilize OMT are not entirely clear. Anecdotally, these authors have observed that if a physician utilizes OMT, it is because they witnessed the efficacy for themselves in real-life clinical diagnoses found on patients or volunteers. This study seeks to explore this phenomenon.

Objectives: This study seeks to explore the relationship between witnessing the efficacy of OMT and the future use of OMT in clinical practice.

Methods: Surveys were sent to DOs who work with Des Moines University's College of Osteopathic Medicine (COM) clinical students as well as osteopathic medical students enrolled at the Des Moines University's COM. Survey data were analyzed by separating physicians into cohorts based on their use of OMT and students into cohorts based on their interest in utilizing OMT in future practice.

Results: DOs who practice OMT reported at least one, and often multiple, instances of witnessing the efficacy of OMT on real-life patients or volunteers while in their first 2 years of medical school. Those who do not utilize OMT reported few opportunities to witness the efficacy of OMT on a real-life patient. For physicians, 96.1 % of those who utilize OMT in their practice had the opportunity to see it work positively during the first 2 years of medical school, whereas only 7.4 % who do not utilize OMT had the opportunity. These findings are mirrored in the experience of current osteopathic medical students who are interested and uninterested in utilizing OMT in their future practice.

Conclusions: These findings emphasize the importance of exposing our medical students to some type of 'real-life' experience early in their careers; the data show that these experiences can be very beneficial in expanding the interest in utilizing osteopathic manipulative medicine (OMM) in future practice. COMs can consider the implementation of programs that provide this experience to students, including extracurricular activities dedicated to the use of OMT.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医生为什么要进行整骨疗法(OMT)?一项调查研究。
背景:尽管所有骨科医师都接受过骨科手法治疗培训,但很少有骨科医师(骨科医师)在临床实践中使用骨科手法治疗。许多人不使用整骨疗法的原因并不完全清楚。根据这些作者的轶事观察,如果医生使用 OMT,那是因为他们在患者或志愿者的实际临床诊断中亲眼目睹了其疗效。本研究旨在探讨这一现象:本研究旨在探讨亲眼目睹 OMT 的疗效与今后在临床实践中使用 OMT 之间的关系:向与得梅因大学骨科医学院(COM)临床学生合作的医生以及在得梅因大学骨科医学院就读的骨科医学生发送了调查问卷。调查数据的分析方法是,根据医生使用骨科治疗法的情况将他们分成不同的组别,根据学生在未来实践中使用骨科治疗法的兴趣将他们分成不同的组别:结果:从事 OMT 的执业医师报告说,在他们就读医学院的头两年里,至少有一次(通常是多次)目睹了 OMT 对真实病人或志愿者的疗效。没有使用 OMT 的医生则表示很少有机会亲眼目睹 OMT 在真实病人身上的疗效。就医生而言,96.1% 在实践中使用 OMT 的医生在医学院的头两年有机会看到 OMT 发挥积极作用,而不使用 OMT 的医生只有 7.4% 有机会看到。这些发现也反映在目前骨科医学生的经历中,他们对在未来的实践中使用 OMT 感兴趣和不感兴趣:这些发现强调了让医学生在其职业生涯早期接触某种类型的 "真实生活 "体验的重要性;数据显示,这些体验对于提高他们在未来实践中使用整骨疗法(OMM)的兴趣非常有益。骨科医师协会可以考虑实施一些计划,为学生提供这种体验,包括开展专门使用整骨疗法的课外活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Osteopathic Medicine
Journal of Osteopathic Medicine Health Professions-Complementary and Manual Therapy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
118
期刊最新文献
The role of osteopathic manipulative treatment for dystonia: a literature review. Improving peripheral artery disease screening and treatment: a screening, diagnosis, and treatment tool for use across multiple care settings. Effects of the Strong Hearts program at two years post program completion. 2024 AOA Research Abstracts and Student Poster Competition. Perspectives of osteopathic medical students on preclinical urology exposure: a single institution cross-sectional survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1