Experiences of empathy of caregivers caring for persons with dementia: a qualitative systematic review protocol.

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JBI evidence synthesis Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.11124/JBIES-24-00010
Meiling Han, Hunsa Sethabouppha, Nonglak Chaloumsuk, Patraporn Bhatarasakoon
{"title":"Experiences of empathy of caregivers caring for persons with dementia: a qualitative systematic review protocol.","authors":"Meiling Han, Hunsa Sethabouppha, Nonglak Chaloumsuk, Patraporn Bhatarasakoon","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this systematic review will be to explore the experiences of empathy in informal caregivers caring for persons with dementia.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Positive caregiving experiences of informal caregivers caring for persons with dementia have many beneficial outcomes, such as improved well-being of both caregivers and care receivers and a higher quality of care for the persons with dementia. Empathy is a factor associated with positive caregiving experiences and is strongly correlated with reduced depression and reduced anxiety in informal caregivers of persons with dementia. Therefore, it is essential to understand the experiences of empathy, especially the caregiver characteristics such as their caring behaviors, relationship with the patient, and cultural beliefs.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review will include studies on the empathy experiences of informal caregivers caring for persons with any type of dementia. It will consider qualitative studies, including, but not limited to, designs such as phenomenology, grounded theory, ethnography, action research, and feminist research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study will follow the JBI guidance for systematic reviews of qualitative evidence and will use the meta-aggregation approach to synthesise qualitative studies. The search strategy will aim to locate both published and unpublished studies in English, Chinese, and Thai, with no date restrictions. Methodological quality will be evaluated using the standard JBI critical appraisal checklist for qualitative research. The findings will be pooled using the meta-aggregation approach or will be presented in narrative format.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration number: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42023490472.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI evidence synthesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-24-00010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this systematic review will be to explore the experiences of empathy in informal caregivers caring for persons with dementia.

Introduction: Positive caregiving experiences of informal caregivers caring for persons with dementia have many beneficial outcomes, such as improved well-being of both caregivers and care receivers and a higher quality of care for the persons with dementia. Empathy is a factor associated with positive caregiving experiences and is strongly correlated with reduced depression and reduced anxiety in informal caregivers of persons with dementia. Therefore, it is essential to understand the experiences of empathy, especially the caregiver characteristics such as their caring behaviors, relationship with the patient, and cultural beliefs.

Inclusion criteria: This review will include studies on the empathy experiences of informal caregivers caring for persons with any type of dementia. It will consider qualitative studies, including, but not limited to, designs such as phenomenology, grounded theory, ethnography, action research, and feminist research.

Methods: This study will follow the JBI guidance for systematic reviews of qualitative evidence and will use the meta-aggregation approach to synthesise qualitative studies. The search strategy will aim to locate both published and unpublished studies in English, Chinese, and Thai, with no date restrictions. Methodological quality will be evaluated using the standard JBI critical appraisal checklist for qualitative research. The findings will be pooled using the meta-aggregation approach or will be presented in narrative format.

Systematic review registration number: PROSPERO CRD42023490472.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
照顾痴呆症患者的护理人员的移情体验:定性系统性审查协议。
目的本系统综述旨在探讨非正规照护者在照护痴呆症患者时的移情体验:非正规照护者在照护痴呆症患者过程中的积极照护体验会产生许多有益的结果,例如改善照护者和受照护者的福祉,提高对痴呆症患者的照护质量。移情是与积极护理体验相关的一个因素,与痴呆症患者非正式护理者抑郁和焦虑的减少密切相关。因此,了解移情体验至关重要,尤其是护理者的特征,如他们的护理行为、与患者的关系以及文化信仰:本综述将包括有关非正规照护者在照护任何类型痴呆症患者时的移情体验的研究。研究将考虑定性研究,包括但不限于现象学、基础理论、人种学、行动研究和女性主义研究等设计:本研究将遵循 JBI 关于定性证据系统性综述的指南,并将使用元聚合法来综合定性研究。搜索策略旨在查找已发表和未发表的英文、中文和泰文研究,没有日期限制。将使用标准的 JBI 定性研究批判性评估清单对方法学质量进行评估。研究结果将采用元汇总法进行汇总,或以叙述的形式呈现:系统综述注册编号:PREMCORD42023490472。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JBI evidence synthesis
JBI evidence synthesis Nursing-Nursing (all)
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
218
期刊最新文献
Value-based outcome evaluation methods used by occupational therapists in primary care: a scoping review. Parents' and guardians' experiences of barriers and facilitators in accessing autism spectrum disorder diagnostic services for their children: a qualitative systematic review. Evidence on the accreditation of health professionals' education in the WHO Africa region: a scoping review protocol. Barriers and facilitators to designing, maintaining, and utilizing rare disease patient registries: a scoping review protocol. Supporting professional practice transition in undergraduate nursing education: a scoping review protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1