Storage of firearms in vehicles: findings from a sample of firearm owners in nine U.S. states.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Injury Epidemiology Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1186/s40621-024-00525-1
Alexander Testa, Daniel C Semenza, Michael Anestis
{"title":"Storage of firearms in vehicles: findings from a sample of firearm owners in nine U.S. states.","authors":"Alexander Testa, Daniel C Semenza, Michael Anestis","doi":"10.1186/s40621-024-00525-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In recent years, there has been a growing number of thefts of firearms stored in vehicles. Despite this trend, there is limited research on firearm storage patterns in vehicles in the United States. This study investigates these storage patterns and evaluates the relationship between the surge in firearm purchases after March 2020 and the practice of storing firearms in vehicles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Firearm storage practices were classified into four categories: (a) no vehicle storage, (b) locked vehicle storage only, (c) unlocked vehicle storage only, and (d) both locked and unlocked vehicle storage. Multinomial logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine the association between vehicle firearm storage practices and the main independent variable (firearm purchases since March 2020), adjusting for covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Those who purchased a firearm since March 2020 were significantly more likely to store at least one firearm in a vehicle unlocked only (RRR = 2.41, 95% CI 1.45-3.99) or both locked and unlocked (RRR = 2.57, 95% CI .180-3.67) compared to the reference category of no vehicle storage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Individuals who purchased a firearm after March 2020 were more likely to report storing a firearm in a vehicle. Given the limited research on patterns of firearm storage in vehicles, these findings provide novel evidence suggesting that firearm purchases following the March 2020 firearm purchasing surge may have fomented behaviors that increased the likelihood of firearm storage in automobiles. Moving forward, there is a need for additional quantitative and qualitative research that can better understand patterns and motivations of firearm storage in vehicles.</p>","PeriodicalId":37379,"journal":{"name":"Injury Epidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11386107/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40621-024-00525-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In recent years, there has been a growing number of thefts of firearms stored in vehicles. Despite this trend, there is limited research on firearm storage patterns in vehicles in the United States. This study investigates these storage patterns and evaluates the relationship between the surge in firearm purchases after March 2020 and the practice of storing firearms in vehicles.

Methods: Firearm storage practices were classified into four categories: (a) no vehicle storage, (b) locked vehicle storage only, (c) unlocked vehicle storage only, and (d) both locked and unlocked vehicle storage. Multinomial logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine the association between vehicle firearm storage practices and the main independent variable (firearm purchases since March 2020), adjusting for covariates.

Results: Those who purchased a firearm since March 2020 were significantly more likely to store at least one firearm in a vehicle unlocked only (RRR = 2.41, 95% CI 1.45-3.99) or both locked and unlocked (RRR = 2.57, 95% CI .180-3.67) compared to the reference category of no vehicle storage.

Conclusion: Individuals who purchased a firearm after March 2020 were more likely to report storing a firearm in a vehicle. Given the limited research on patterns of firearm storage in vehicles, these findings provide novel evidence suggesting that firearm purchases following the March 2020 firearm purchasing surge may have fomented behaviors that increased the likelihood of firearm storage in automobiles. Moving forward, there is a need for additional quantitative and qualitative research that can better understand patterns and motivations of firearm storage in vehicles.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
车内存放枪支:对美国九个州枪支所有者的抽样调查结果。
背景:近年来,车内枪支失窃案日益增多。尽管存在这一趋势,但有关美国车内枪支存储模式的研究却十分有限。本研究调查了这些存储模式,并评估了 2020 年 3 月后枪支购买量激增与在车内存储枪支的做法之间的关系:枪支存放方式分为四类:(a) 不在车内存放;(b) 仅在上锁的车内存放;(c) 仅在未上锁的车内存放;(d) 在上锁和未上锁的车内存放。我们进行了多项式逻辑回归分析,以确定车辆枪支存放方式与主要自变量(2020 年 3 月以来的枪支购买情况)之间的关联,并对协变量进行了调整:结果:2020 年 3 月以后购买枪支的人与不在车辆中存放枪支的参考类别相比,更有可能在车辆中存放至少一支枪支,且只在未上锁的情况下(RRR = 2.41,95% CI 1.45-3.99)或在上锁和未上锁的情况下(RRR = 2.57,95% CI .180-3.67):结论:2020 年 3 月后购买枪支的人更有可能报告在车内存放枪支。鉴于有关车内存放枪支模式的研究有限,这些发现提供了新的证据,表明在 2020 年 3 月枪支购买潮之后购买枪支的行为可能增加了在汽车内存放枪支的可能性。展望未来,有必要开展更多定量和定性研究,以便更好地了解车内存放枪支的模式和动机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Injury Epidemiology
Injury Epidemiology Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
34
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Injury Epidemiology is dedicated to advancing the scientific foundation for injury prevention and control through timely publication and dissemination of peer-reviewed research. Injury Epidemiology aims to be the premier venue for communicating epidemiologic studies of unintentional and intentional injuries, including, but not limited to, morbidity and mortality from motor vehicle crashes, drug overdose/poisoning, falls, drowning, fires/burns, iatrogenic injury, suicide, homicide, assaults, and abuse. We welcome investigations designed to understand the magnitude, distribution, determinants, causes, prevention, diagnosis, treatment, prognosis, and outcomes of injuries in specific population groups, geographic regions, and environmental settings (e.g., home, workplace, transport, recreation, sports, and urban/rural). Injury Epidemiology has a special focus on studies generating objective and practical knowledge that can be translated into interventions to reduce injury morbidity and mortality on a population level. Priority consideration will be given to manuscripts that feature contemporary theories and concepts, innovative methods, and novel techniques as applied to injury surveillance, risk assessment, development and implementation of effective interventions, and program and policy evaluation.
期刊最新文献
Therapeutic errors involving diabetes medications reported to United States poison centers. Storage of firearms in vehicles: findings from a sample of firearm owners in nine U.S. states. A multi-state evaluation of extreme risk protection orders: a research protocol. Political violence, racial violence, and new gun ownership: results from the 2023 National Survey of Gun Policy. Extortion experiences of recent adult immigrants from Latin America: self-reported prevalence, associated costs, and current mental health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1