首页 > 最新文献

Injury Epidemiology最新文献

英文 中文
Linkage of Medicare insurance claims to police-reported motor vehicle crashes: advancing traffic safety research in older adult populations. 医疗保险索赔与警方报告的机动车碰撞的联系:推进老年人口的交通安全研究。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2026-02-06 DOI: 10.1186/s40621-026-00658-5
Fang-Wen Lu, Andrew R Zullo, Allison E Curry, Melissa R Pfeiffer, Marzan A Khan, Nina R Joyce

Background: Motor vehicle crashes (MVCs) are a leading cause of injury among adults aged 65 years and older ("older adults"). As the number of older drivers grows, it is increasingly important to understand clinical factors associated with an increased risk of MVC. A major barrier, however, is the lack of data. To address this, we linked two large-scale administrative databases, the New Jersey Safety and Health Outcomes (NJ-SHO) Data Warehouse, which contains information on all police-reported crashes in New Jersey from 2004 to 2019, and Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) insurance claims, which contains health care encounters and prescription drug dispensings among older adults in the United States over the same period. This paper explains the linkage process, describes selected work leveraging these data to study MVCs in older drivers, and highlights features and strengths of this linkage for future research.

Methods: The NJ-SHO-Medicare linkage was performed using categories of name (first and last), sex, age (birth and death date), and residence (state and ZIP code). Matches were ranked by quality and overall confidence.

Results: After comparing different match strategies, we accepted a match when (1) the name match quality was High or Medium and the age match was High or (2) the name, sex, and residence match categories were all High. Of the 2,722,773 individuals successfully linked, we accepted 2,661,782 matches (97.76% of individuals linked and 91.59% of those submitted for linkage). All accepted matches were Strong or Fair. Among accepted matches who enrolled in Medicare FFS in 2019, 342,422 (28.57%) were 65-69 years old, 619,437 (51.69%) were female, and 955,309 (79.72%) were non-Hispanic White. Only 29,561 (2.47%) experienced an MVC and 25,478 (2.13%) received a citation. The most prevalent clinical conditions ever diagnosed were cataracts (669,044; 55.83%); chronic pain, fatigue, and fibromyalgia (367,165; 30.64%); and glaucoma (287,420; 23.98%).

Conclusions: With extensive temporal and population coverage, the NJ-SHO-Medicare linkage supports studying the relationships between clinical exposures (e.g., medications ), driving events (e.g., crashes, citations) and medical care trajectories, which can help advance the driving safety of older adults and inform future efforts to integrate administrative data.

背景:机动车碰撞(MVCs)是65岁及以上成年人(“老年人”)受伤的主要原因。随着老年驾驶员数量的增加,了解与MVC风险增加相关的临床因素变得越来越重要。然而,一个主要障碍是缺乏数据。为了解决这个问题,我们将两个大型行政数据库联系起来,一个是新泽西州安全与健康结果(NJ-SHO)数据仓库,其中包含2004年至2019年新泽西州所有警方报告的车祸信息,另一个是医疗保险按服务收费(FFS)保险索赔,其中包含同期美国老年人的医疗保健遭遇和处方药分配。本文解释了联动过程,描述了利用这些数据来研究老年司机的mvc的选定工作,并强调了这种联动的特点和优势,以供未来研究。方法:采用姓名(姓和名)、性别、年龄(出生和死亡日期)和居住地(州和邮政编码)分类进行nj - shoo - medicare关联。比赛根据质量和整体信心进行排名。结果:通过对不同匹配策略的比较,当(1)姓名匹配质量为高或中,年龄匹配为高或(2)姓名、性别和居住地匹配类别均为高时,我们接受匹配。在成功链接的2,722,773个个体中,我们接受了2,661,782个匹配(97.76%的个体链接和91.59%的提交链接)。所有被接受的比赛都是强壮或公平的。在2019年纳入医疗保险FFS的接受匹配者中,65-69岁的342,422人(28.57%),女性619,437人(51.69%),非西班牙裔白人955,309人(79.72%)。只有29,561人(2.47%)经历了MVC, 25,478人(2.13%)收到了引用。最常见的临床疾病是白内障(669,044例,占55.83%);慢性疼痛、疲劳和纤维肌痛(367,165人,30.64%);青光眼287,420例,占23.98%。结论:具有广泛的时间和人口覆盖,nj - shoo - medicare联动支持研究临床暴露(如药物)、驾驶事件(如碰撞、传票)和医疗护理轨迹之间的关系,这有助于提高老年人的驾驶安全性,并为未来整合管理数据的工作提供信息。
{"title":"Linkage of Medicare insurance claims to police-reported motor vehicle crashes: advancing traffic safety research in older adult populations.","authors":"Fang-Wen Lu, Andrew R Zullo, Allison E Curry, Melissa R Pfeiffer, Marzan A Khan, Nina R Joyce","doi":"10.1186/s40621-026-00658-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40621-026-00658-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Motor vehicle crashes (MVCs) are a leading cause of injury among adults aged 65 years and older (\"older adults\"). As the number of older drivers grows, it is increasingly important to understand clinical factors associated with an increased risk of MVC. A major barrier, however, is the lack of data. To address this, we linked two large-scale administrative databases, the New Jersey Safety and Health Outcomes (NJ-SHO) Data Warehouse, which contains information on all police-reported crashes in New Jersey from 2004 to 2019, and Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) insurance claims, which contains health care encounters and prescription drug dispensings among older adults in the United States over the same period. This paper explains the linkage process, describes selected work leveraging these data to study MVCs in older drivers, and highlights features and strengths of this linkage for future research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The NJ-SHO-Medicare linkage was performed using categories of name (first and last), sex, age (birth and death date), and residence (state and ZIP code). Matches were ranked by quality and overall confidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After comparing different match strategies, we accepted a match when (1) the name match quality was High or Medium and the age match was High or (2) the name, sex, and residence match categories were all High. Of the 2,722,773 individuals successfully linked, we accepted 2,661,782 matches (97.76% of individuals linked and 91.59% of those submitted for linkage). All accepted matches were Strong or Fair. Among accepted matches who enrolled in Medicare FFS in 2019, 342,422 (28.57%) were 65-69 years old, 619,437 (51.69%) were female, and 955,309 (79.72%) were non-Hispanic White. Only 29,561 (2.47%) experienced an MVC and 25,478 (2.13%) received a citation. The most prevalent clinical conditions ever diagnosed were cataracts (669,044; 55.83%); chronic pain, fatigue, and fibromyalgia (367,165; 30.64%); and glaucoma (287,420; 23.98%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With extensive temporal and population coverage, the NJ-SHO-Medicare linkage supports studying the relationships between clinical exposures (e.g., medications ), driving events (e.g., crashes, citations) and medical care trajectories, which can help advance the driving safety of older adults and inform future efforts to integrate administrative data.</p>","PeriodicalId":37379,"journal":{"name":"Injury Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146126733","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Public health and criminal justice funding for firearm injury prevention research in the United States. 美国枪支伤害预防研究的公共卫生和刑事司法资助。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2026-02-02 DOI: 10.1186/s40621-025-00644-3
John C Lin, Christopher Chang, Madison S McCarthy, Lily N Tran, Chaerim Kang, Abe Baker-Butler, Lauren A Magee, Guangyu Tong, Megan L Ranney

Objectives: To compare the differences in US federal funding sources for firearm injury prevention and publications.

Methods: We extracted publications from three literature databases and grant data for five federal agencies (CDC, NIH, SAMHSA, NSF, NIJ) through federal archives from 2020 to 2022, excluding case studies, editorials, and literature reviews. Specific funding sources for publications were further extracted. We calculated funding-to-publication (F-P) ratios for federal public health, science, and criminal justice agencies and tested associations. Health agencies with grant data included the CDC, NIH, and SAMHSA and were categorized as public health agencies. The NSF was classified as science and engineering. The NIJ was classified as criminal justice.

Results: The three largest funders were the NIH, CDC, and NIJ, and were associated with the most publications, with health agencies funding most studies (86%). Health agencies had higher F-P ratios than the NSF and NIJ. Public health funders were more likely to fund experimental studies, studies related to suicide, and unintentional firearm injury prevention. NIJ and NSF were more likely to support research on mass shootings. Most studies funded by all agencies examined community violence.

Conclusions: The NIH and CDC supported most firearm-injury-related grant funding and subsequent publications from 2020 to 2022. Differences in funding existed depending on the types of firearm injury. Federal funding is imperative to advance the science of firearm injury prevention, and future funding across federal agencies should be aligned with national public health and safety needs.

目的:比较美国枪支伤害预防和出版物的联邦资金来源的差异。方法:我们从三个文献数据库中提取出版物,并通过联邦档案提取五个联邦机构(CDC、NIH、SAMHSA、NSF、NIJ) 2020 - 2022年的拨款数据,不包括案例研究、社论和文献综述。进一步摘录了出版物的具体资金来源。我们计算了联邦公共卫生、科学和刑事司法机构的资助与发表(F-P)比率,并对协会进行了测试。拥有拨款数据的卫生机构包括CDC、NIH和SAMHSA,并被归类为公共卫生机构。NSF被划分为科学和工程。NIJ被归类为刑事司法。结果:三个最大的资助者是NIH、CDC和NIJ,与大多数出版物相关,卫生机构资助的研究最多(86%)。卫生机构的F-P比率高于NSF和NIJ。公共卫生资助者更有可能资助实验性研究、与自杀和意外枪支伤害预防有关的研究。NIJ和NSF更有可能支持大规模枪击事件的研究。由所有机构资助的大多数研究都调查了社区暴力。结论:从2020年到2022年,NIH和CDC支持了大多数与枪支伤害相关的拨款和随后的出版物。根据火器伤害的类型,在经费方面存在差异。联邦资金对于推进枪支伤害预防科学至关重要,未来联邦机构的资金应与国家公共卫生和安全需求保持一致。
{"title":"Public health and criminal justice funding for firearm injury prevention research in the United States.","authors":"John C Lin, Christopher Chang, Madison S McCarthy, Lily N Tran, Chaerim Kang, Abe Baker-Butler, Lauren A Magee, Guangyu Tong, Megan L Ranney","doi":"10.1186/s40621-025-00644-3","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40621-025-00644-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the differences in US federal funding sources for firearm injury prevention and publications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We extracted publications from three literature databases and grant data for five federal agencies (CDC, NIH, SAMHSA, NSF, NIJ) through federal archives from 2020 to 2022, excluding case studies, editorials, and literature reviews. Specific funding sources for publications were further extracted. We calculated funding-to-publication (F-P) ratios for federal public health, science, and criminal justice agencies and tested associations. Health agencies with grant data included the CDC, NIH, and SAMHSA and were categorized as public health agencies. The NSF was classified as science and engineering. The NIJ was classified as criminal justice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The three largest funders were the NIH, CDC, and NIJ, and were associated with the most publications, with health agencies funding most studies (86%). Health agencies had higher F-P ratios than the NSF and NIJ. Public health funders were more likely to fund experimental studies, studies related to suicide, and unintentional firearm injury prevention. NIJ and NSF were more likely to support research on mass shootings. Most studies funded by all agencies examined community violence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The NIH and CDC supported most firearm-injury-related grant funding and subsequent publications from 2020 to 2022. Differences in funding existed depending on the types of firearm injury. Federal funding is imperative to advance the science of firearm injury prevention, and future funding across federal agencies should be aligned with national public health and safety needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":37379,"journal":{"name":"Injury Epidemiology","volume":"13 1","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12866236/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146107718","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Lessons learned in a data linkage project on fatal drowning. 关于致命溺水的数据链接项目的经验教训。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2026-02-01 DOI: 10.1186/s40621-026-00660-x
Rohit P Shenoi, Ned Levine, Elizabeth A Camp, Linh Nguyen, Sandra McKay, Shaila Zaman

Background: Drowning is the leading cause of death in US children 1-4 years old. The epidemiology of drowning at a regional level is understudied because no single data source provides complete information on persons who drown. Probabilistic data linkage is a novel way of studying the epidemiology of drowning. This study aimed to document the lessons learned during the linkage process.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional study of persons of all ages who died from unintentional drowning in metropolitan Houston from 2016 to 2022. We describe the lessons learned during the project planning and execution phases which pertained to data curation, the regulatory aspects involved with obtaining data, data security, spatial identification, and the strengths and limitations of the different datasets.

Results: Twelve datasets were reviewed; eight were successfully linked. During the planning phase, the key issues identified pertained to data ownership and governance and robustness of data which impacted the availability and quality of data, variation in the description of drowning location, and risk and protective factors which helped identify subpopulations at-risk for drowning. In the execution phase, the major issues included data security, data sharing, and dissemination of results.

Conclusion: There are a plethora of data sources for fatal drowning. The process of obtaining and analyzing data to describe the epidemiology of fatal drowning using probabilistic data linkage is complex, lengthy, and cumbersome. Documenting the process and lessons learned can support drowning research and inform regional drowning prevention strategies.

背景:溺水是美国1-4岁儿童死亡的主要原因。区域一级的溺水流行病学研究不足,因为没有单一的数据来源提供关于溺水者的完整信息。概率数据链接是研究溺水流行病学的一种新方法。本研究旨在记录在联动过程中吸取的经验教训。方法:这是一项横断面研究,研究对象是2016年至2022年在休斯顿大都市因意外溺水死亡的所有年龄段的人。我们描述了在项目规划和执行阶段所学到的经验教训,这些经验教训与数据管理、获取数据的监管方面、数据安全、空间识别以及不同数据集的优势和局限性有关。结果:回顾了12个数据集;其中8人成功连接。在规划阶段,确定的关键问题涉及影响数据可用性和质量的数据所有权和治理以及数据的稳健性、对溺水地点描述的差异以及有助于确定有溺水风险的亚群体的风险和保护因素。在执行阶段,主要问题包括数据安全、数据共享和结果传播。结论:致命性溺水的数据来源过多。使用概率数据链接获取和分析数据以描述致命溺水的流行病学的过程是复杂、冗长和繁琐的。记录过程和经验教训可以支持溺水研究,并为区域溺水预防战略提供信息。
{"title":"Lessons learned in a data linkage project on fatal drowning.","authors":"Rohit P Shenoi, Ned Levine, Elizabeth A Camp, Linh Nguyen, Sandra McKay, Shaila Zaman","doi":"10.1186/s40621-026-00660-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40621-026-00660-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Drowning is the leading cause of death in US children 1-4 years old. The epidemiology of drowning at a regional level is understudied because no single data source provides complete information on persons who drown. Probabilistic data linkage is a novel way of studying the epidemiology of drowning. This study aimed to document the lessons learned during the linkage process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional study of persons of all ages who died from unintentional drowning in metropolitan Houston from 2016 to 2022. We describe the lessons learned during the project planning and execution phases which pertained to data curation, the regulatory aspects involved with obtaining data, data security, spatial identification, and the strengths and limitations of the different datasets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve datasets were reviewed; eight were successfully linked. During the planning phase, the key issues identified pertained to data ownership and governance and robustness of data which impacted the availability and quality of data, variation in the description of drowning location, and risk and protective factors which helped identify subpopulations at-risk for drowning. In the execution phase, the major issues included data security, data sharing, and dissemination of results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There are a plethora of data sources for fatal drowning. The process of obtaining and analyzing data to describe the epidemiology of fatal drowning using probabilistic data linkage is complex, lengthy, and cumbersome. Documenting the process and lessons learned can support drowning research and inform regional drowning prevention strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":37379,"journal":{"name":"Injury Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146100883","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Examining disparities in harmful reporting on community firearm violence in Philadelphia television news reports. 检查费城电视新闻报道中关于社区枪支暴力的有害报道的差异。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2026-02-01 DOI: 10.1186/s40621-026-00659-4
Jessica H Beard, Evan L Eschliman, Jennifer Midberry, Leah E Roberts, Anita Wamakima, Kallie Palm, Siena Wanders, Tyrone Muns, Jim MacMillan, Christopher N Morrison

Background: News coverage of community firearm violence (CFV) can cause multilevel harm. We aimed to quantify the frequency and severity of harmful CFV news content and examine how victim, shooting event, and place-based characteristics relate to harmful CFV reporting.

Methods: We performed a quantitative media content analysis of a random sample of CFV clips aired on Philadelphia local television news in 2021 using a novel codebook. We matched clips to shooting victims in the Philadelphia Police Department dataset and used shooting event location to obtain place-based characteristics from American Community Survey data. Generalized structural equation models evaluated associations between victim demographics, shooting event, and place-based characteristics (Group I), news coverage characteristics (Group II), and either composite harmful CFV reporting scores or specific harmful reporting elements determined by a prior modified Delphi process (Group III).

Results: Among 394 individuals covered in 303 clips, the mean (SD) individual-level harmful CFV reporting score was 15.2 (4.38) out of 29. Episodic framing (i.e. reporting lacking systematic context) (93.9%) was the most common harmful content element and perpetrator mugshot (4.8%) was least common element. Graphic and/or explicit content was present in 30.3% of clips. Individuals having more than one clip and longer total focus time had higher harmful reporting scores, while individuals involved in fatal shootings, having longer total clip length, and having a follow-up story had lower scores. Black, adult, victims in non-fatal shootings and people shot in areas with a higher proportion of Black residents were more likely to have news coverage containing graphic and/or explicit content.

Conclusions: Harmful CFV reporting is pervasive, and the severity of harm is associated with news coverage characteristics. Disparities in specific harmful CFV content elements may further exacerbate existing health inequities. Journalists should modify CFV reporting practices to minimize harm.

背景:社区枪支暴力(CFV)的新闻报道可以造成多层次的伤害。我们旨在量化有害的CFV新闻内容的频率和严重程度,并研究受害者、枪击事件和基于地点的特征与有害的CFV报道之间的关系。方法:我们使用一种新颖的密码本对2021年费城地方电视新闻播出的CFV片段随机样本进行了定量媒体内容分析。我们将片段与费城警察局数据集中的枪击受害者进行匹配,并使用枪击事件地点从美国社区调查数据中获得基于地点的特征。广义结构方程模型评估了受害者人口统计、枪击事件和基于地点的特征(第一组)、新闻报道特征(第二组)以及复合有害CFV报告得分或由事先修改的德尔菲过程确定的特定有害报告元素(第三组)之间的关联。结果:在303个片段的394个人中,平均(SD)个人水平有害CFV报告得分为15.2(4.38)/ 29。情节框架(即缺乏系统背景的报告)(93.9%)是最常见的有害内容元素,犯罪者的面部照片(4.8%)是最不常见的元素。30.3%的视频中出现了露骨和露骨的内容。拥有多个视频片段和较长总聚焦时间的个体有害报告得分较高,而涉及致命枪击事件的个体,拥有较长的视频片段长度,并有一个后续故事,得分较低。黑人、成年人、非致命枪击事件的受害者以及在黑人居民比例较高的地区被枪杀的人更有可能看到含有图像和/或露骨内容的新闻报道。结论:有害的CFV报道普遍存在,危害的严重程度与新闻报道特征有关。具体有害氯氟烃含量元素的差异可能进一步加剧现有的卫生不公平现象。记者应修改CFV的报道做法,以尽量减少伤害。
{"title":"Examining disparities in harmful reporting on community firearm violence in Philadelphia television news reports.","authors":"Jessica H Beard, Evan L Eschliman, Jennifer Midberry, Leah E Roberts, Anita Wamakima, Kallie Palm, Siena Wanders, Tyrone Muns, Jim MacMillan, Christopher N Morrison","doi":"10.1186/s40621-026-00659-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40621-026-00659-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>News coverage of community firearm violence (CFV) can cause multilevel harm. We aimed to quantify the frequency and severity of harmful CFV news content and examine how victim, shooting event, and place-based characteristics relate to harmful CFV reporting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a quantitative media content analysis of a random sample of CFV clips aired on Philadelphia local television news in 2021 using a novel codebook. We matched clips to shooting victims in the Philadelphia Police Department dataset and used shooting event location to obtain place-based characteristics from American Community Survey data. Generalized structural equation models evaluated associations between victim demographics, shooting event, and place-based characteristics (Group I), news coverage characteristics (Group II), and either composite harmful CFV reporting scores or specific harmful reporting elements determined by a prior modified Delphi process (Group III).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 394 individuals covered in 303 clips, the mean (SD) individual-level harmful CFV reporting score was 15.2 (4.38) out of 29. Episodic framing (i.e. reporting lacking systematic context) (93.9%) was the most common harmful content element and perpetrator mugshot (4.8%) was least common element. Graphic and/or explicit content was present in 30.3% of clips. Individuals having more than one clip and longer total focus time had higher harmful reporting scores, while individuals involved in fatal shootings, having longer total clip length, and having a follow-up story had lower scores. Black, adult, victims in non-fatal shootings and people shot in areas with a higher proportion of Black residents were more likely to have news coverage containing graphic and/or explicit content.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Harmful CFV reporting is pervasive, and the severity of harm is associated with news coverage characteristics. Disparities in specific harmful CFV content elements may further exacerbate existing health inequities. Journalists should modify CFV reporting practices to minimize harm.</p>","PeriodicalId":37379,"journal":{"name":"Injury Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146100847","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Perceived neighborhood safety and firearm secure storage: findings from the 2024 behavioral risk factor surveillance system. 感知社区安全和枪支安全存储:来自2024年行为风险因素监测系统的发现。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2026-01-30 DOI: 10.1186/s40621-026-00657-6
Alexander Testa, Karyn Fu, Muhammed Ahmed, Daniel C Semenza, Dylan B Jackson, Sandra McKay, Kyle T Ganson, Jason M Nagata

Background: Secure firearm storage (i.e., keeping firearms locked and ammunition stored separately) is a means of reducing risks of suicide, unintentional injury, and homicide. While prior research has examined demographic and household factors associated with storage practices, less is known about how contextual factors, such as perceived neighborhood safety from crime, influence firearm storage behavior.

Methods: Data were from the 2024 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), a nationally coordinated, state-based survey administered by state health departments with technical and methodological support from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Analyses were restricted to respondents in firearm-owning households from ten states (n = 18,443). Firearm storage was categorized as: (1) unloaded [safest], (2) loaded and locked [intermediate risk], or (3) loaded and unlocked [unsafe storage practice]. Perceived neighborhood safety from crime was classified as extremely safe, safe, or unsafe (unsafe and extremely unsafe combined). Multinomial logistic regression models were used to assess the associations between perceived neighborhood safety and firearm storage.

Results: Most respondents lived in households with firearms stored unloaded (63.2%), followed by loaded and locked (19.8%) and loaded and unlocked (17.0%). Compared with those who perceived their neighborhoods as extremely safe, respondents who perceived them as unsafe or extremely unsafe had a higher relative risk of living in a household with firearms loaded and unlocked (RRR = 1.773; 95% CI: 1.240-2.536).

Conclusions: Firearm injury prevention initiatives addressing storage practices should consider the role of community-level perceptions of safety through intervention-oriented and policy-relevant approaches, including via the integration of public health and violence prevention strategies.

背景:安全的枪支储存(即保持枪支上锁和弹药分开储存)是减少自杀、意外伤害和杀人风险的一种手段。虽然之前的研究已经调查了与储存行为相关的人口和家庭因素,但对环境因素(如感知到的社区安全免受犯罪的影响)如何影响枪支储存行为知之甚少。方法:数据来自2024年行为风险因素监测系统(BRFSS),这是一项由国家卫生部门在疾病控制和预防中心的技术和方法支持下进行的全国协调的、基于州的调查。分析仅限于来自10个州拥有枪支家庭的受访者(n = 18,443)。枪支储存分为:(1)未上膛[最安全],(2)上膛后上膛[中等风险],或(3)上膛后未上膛[不安全的储存做法]。从犯罪中感知到的社区安全被分为极其安全、安全或不安全(不安全和极度不安全的组合)。使用多项逻辑回归模型来评估感知社区安全与枪支储存之间的关系。结果:大多数受访者居住的家庭枪支未上膛(63.2%),其次是上膛上锁(19.8%)和上膛未上锁(17.0%)。与那些认为自己的社区非常安全的人相比,认为自己的社区不安全或极度不安全的受访者生活在一个枪支上膛且未上锁的家庭中的相对风险更高(rr = 1.773; 95% CI: 1.240-2.536)。结论:通过干预导向和政策相关的方法,包括通过公共卫生和暴力预防战略的整合,解决储存做法的枪支伤害预防倡议应考虑社区层面安全观念的作用。
{"title":"Perceived neighborhood safety and firearm secure storage: findings from the 2024 behavioral risk factor surveillance system.","authors":"Alexander Testa, Karyn Fu, Muhammed Ahmed, Daniel C Semenza, Dylan B Jackson, Sandra McKay, Kyle T Ganson, Jason M Nagata","doi":"10.1186/s40621-026-00657-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40621-026-00657-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Secure firearm storage (i.e., keeping firearms locked and ammunition stored separately) is a means of reducing risks of suicide, unintentional injury, and homicide. While prior research has examined demographic and household factors associated with storage practices, less is known about how contextual factors, such as perceived neighborhood safety from crime, influence firearm storage behavior.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were from the 2024 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), a nationally coordinated, state-based survey administered by state health departments with technical and methodological support from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Analyses were restricted to respondents in firearm-owning households from ten states (n = 18,443). Firearm storage was categorized as: (1) unloaded [safest], (2) loaded and locked [intermediate risk], or (3) loaded and unlocked [unsafe storage practice]. Perceived neighborhood safety from crime was classified as extremely safe, safe, or unsafe (unsafe and extremely unsafe combined). Multinomial logistic regression models were used to assess the associations between perceived neighborhood safety and firearm storage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most respondents lived in households with firearms stored unloaded (63.2%), followed by loaded and locked (19.8%) and loaded and unlocked (17.0%). Compared with those who perceived their neighborhoods as extremely safe, respondents who perceived them as unsafe or extremely unsafe had a higher relative risk of living in a household with firearms loaded and unlocked (RRR = 1.773; 95% CI: 1.240-2.536).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Firearm injury prevention initiatives addressing storage practices should consider the role of community-level perceptions of safety through intervention-oriented and policy-relevant approaches, including via the integration of public health and violence prevention strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":37379,"journal":{"name":"Injury Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146094446","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Changes in firearm intentions and behaviors after the 2024 United States presidential election. 2024年美国总统大选后枪支意向和行为的变化。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2026-01-30 DOI: 10.1186/s40621-026-00654-9
Michael D Anestis, Allison E Bond, Kimberly C Burke, Sultan Altikriti, Daniel C Semenza

Background: Firearm purchasing patterns, intentions, and behaviors change over time in response to specific events. Additionally, the nature of these changes may be evolving over time or differ depending on the nature of the event in question. Given the intensity of the rhetoric surrounding gun violence leading up to the 2024 election, we sought to examine the extent to which firearm purchasing patterns, intentions, and behaviors changed following the 2024 Presidential election and the extent to which any such changes varied by population.

Methods: A nationally representative sample was recruited to complete an online survey October 22-November 3, 2024 (n = 1,530) and assessed again January 7-January 22, 2025 (n = 1,359).

Results: Identifying as Black was associated with increases in urges to carry firearms because of the election results (β = 0.16; 95%CI = 0.07-0.61). Liberal beliefs were associated with greater increases in urges to carry firearms because of the election results (β = 0.11; 95%CI = 0.01-0.13) and greater odds of storing firearms more quickly accessible because of the election results (OR = 2.11; 95%CI = 1.29-3.44).

Conclusions: Individuals threatened by Trump administration policies appear to be experiencing urges to acquire firearms, carry them, and store them readily accessible. These results highlight that the current political environment may be fostering community-level decision making that, while motivated by the drive for protection, increases the risk for harm. Policies and programs that encourage secure storage and discourage firearm carrying may be increasingly important for the prevention of injury and death.

背景:枪支购买模式、意图和行为会随着特定事件的发生而改变。此外,这些变化的性质可能随着时间的推移而演变,或者根据所讨论事件的性质而有所不同。考虑到2024年大选前围绕枪支暴力的激烈言论,我们试图研究枪支购买模式、意图和行为在2024年总统大选后发生了多大程度的变化,以及这种变化在多大程度上因人口而不同。方法:选取具有全国代表性的样本,于2024年10月22日至11月3日完成在线调查(n = 1530),并于2025年1月7日至1月22日再次进行评估(n = 1359)。结果:由于选举结果,认为自己是黑人与携带枪支的冲动增加有关(β = 0.16; 95%CI = 0.07-0.61)。由于选举结果(β = 0.11; 95%CI = 0.01-0.13),自由主义信仰与携带枪支的冲动增加有关(OR = 2.11; 95%CI = 1.29-3.44),由于选举结果,储存枪支的可能性更大(OR = 2.11; 95%CI = 1.29-3.44)。结论:受到特朗普政府政策威胁的个人似乎正经历着获取枪支、携带枪支和储存枪支的冲动。这些结果突出表明,目前的政治环境可能正在促进社区一级的决策,尽管这种决策是出于保护的动机,但却增加了伤害的风险。鼓励安全储存和不鼓励携带枪支的政策和计划可能对预防伤害和死亡越来越重要。
{"title":"Changes in firearm intentions and behaviors after the 2024 United States presidential election.","authors":"Michael D Anestis, Allison E Bond, Kimberly C Burke, Sultan Altikriti, Daniel C Semenza","doi":"10.1186/s40621-026-00654-9","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40621-026-00654-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Firearm purchasing patterns, intentions, and behaviors change over time in response to specific events. Additionally, the nature of these changes may be evolving over time or differ depending on the nature of the event in question. Given the intensity of the rhetoric surrounding gun violence leading up to the 2024 election, we sought to examine the extent to which firearm purchasing patterns, intentions, and behaviors changed following the 2024 Presidential election and the extent to which any such changes varied by population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A nationally representative sample was recruited to complete an online survey October 22-November 3, 2024 (n = 1,530) and assessed again January 7-January 22, 2025 (n = 1,359).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Identifying as Black was associated with increases in urges to carry firearms because of the election results (β = 0.16; 95%CI = 0.07-0.61). Liberal beliefs were associated with greater increases in urges to carry firearms because of the election results (β = 0.11; 95%CI = 0.01-0.13) and greater odds of storing firearms more quickly accessible because of the election results (OR = 2.11; 95%CI = 1.29-3.44).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Individuals threatened by Trump administration policies appear to be experiencing urges to acquire firearms, carry them, and store them readily accessible. These results highlight that the current political environment may be fostering community-level decision making that, while motivated by the drive for protection, increases the risk for harm. Policies and programs that encourage secure storage and discourage firearm carrying may be increasingly important for the prevention of injury and death.</p>","PeriodicalId":37379,"journal":{"name":"Injury Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12874831/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146094441","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rural adolescent attitudes and use of helmets while snowmobiling. 农村青少年对雪地摩托的态度和头盔的使用。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2026-01-27 DOI: 10.1186/s40621-025-00648-z
Brianna J Iverson, Devin E Spolsdoff, Pam J Hoogerwerf, Brenda Vergara, Charles A Jennissen

Background: Helmet-preventable head injuries are a common cause of snowmobiling-related injury. Our objective was to determine the demographics, helmet use, and attitudes regarding snowmobile helmet use among rural adolescents.

Methods: An anonymous survey was administered to a convenience sample of adolescents (ages 13-18) at the 2022 Iowa FFA Leadership Conference. Frequency and comparative analyses were performed.

Results: Of the 1,331 respondents, 58% were female and 96% non-Hispanic White. One-half lived on farms, 21% lived in the country/not on a farm, and 28% lived in town. One-quarter (26%) lived in households owning a snowmobile, with higher ownership among farm residents (31%) compared to those in the country/not on a farm (23%) or in town (19%), p < 0.001. Over one-third of participants had ridden in the past year. Riding was more common amongst males, Caucasians, farm residents, and those from households owning snowmobiles (all p ≤ 0.01). Frequent riding (at least weekly) was higher among older teens and snowmobile-owning households (p = 0.025 and p < 0.001, respectively). Helmet use was: 67% always/mostly, 11% sometimes, and 21% rarely/never. The importance of snowmobile helmet use (from 1 to 10) was highly rated (median, 9; mean, 8.2). Relative to their peers, females (p = 0.018), those owning snowmobiles (p < 0.001), and frequent riders (p < 0.01) had greater proportions wearing helmets always/most of the time, and rated the importance of helmet use more highly. 59% supported snowmobile helmet laws.

Conclusion: While most rural adolescents value snowmobile helmet use and support legislation, nearly half report inconsistent use. Importantly, our study identified demographic groups for targeted interventions.

背景:头盔可预防的头部损伤是雪地摩托相关损伤的常见原因。我们的目的是确定农村青少年的人口统计、头盔使用情况和对雪地摩托头盔使用的态度。方法:对参加2022年爱荷华州FFA领导会议的青少年(13-18岁)进行匿名调查。进行频率分析和比较分析。结果:在1331名受访者中,58%是女性,96%是非西班牙裔白人。一半的人住在农场,21%的人住在乡村/不在农场,28%的人住在城镇。四分之一(26%)的人生活在拥有雪地摩托的家庭中,与农村/非农场(23%)或城镇(19%)的人相比,农场居民(31%)的拥有率更高。p结论:尽管大多数农村青少年重视雪地摩托头盔的使用并支持立法,但近一半的青少年报告使用不一致。重要的是,我们的研究确定了有针对性干预的人口群体。
{"title":"Rural adolescent attitudes and use of helmets while snowmobiling.","authors":"Brianna J Iverson, Devin E Spolsdoff, Pam J Hoogerwerf, Brenda Vergara, Charles A Jennissen","doi":"10.1186/s40621-025-00648-z","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40621-025-00648-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Helmet-preventable head injuries are a common cause of snowmobiling-related injury. Our objective was to determine the demographics, helmet use, and attitudes regarding snowmobile helmet use among rural adolescents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous survey was administered to a convenience sample of adolescents (ages 13-18) at the 2022 Iowa FFA Leadership Conference. Frequency and comparative analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1,331 respondents, 58% were female and 96% non-Hispanic White. One-half lived on farms, 21% lived in the country/not on a farm, and 28% lived in town. One-quarter (26%) lived in households owning a snowmobile, with higher ownership among farm residents (31%) compared to those in the country/not on a farm (23%) or in town (19%), p < 0.001. Over one-third of participants had ridden in the past year. Riding was more common amongst males, Caucasians, farm residents, and those from households owning snowmobiles (all p ≤ 0.01). Frequent riding (at least weekly) was higher among older teens and snowmobile-owning households (p = 0.025 and p < 0.001, respectively). Helmet use was: 67% always/mostly, 11% sometimes, and 21% rarely/never. The importance of snowmobile helmet use (from 1 to 10) was highly rated (median, 9; mean, 8.2). Relative to their peers, females (p = 0.018), those owning snowmobiles (p < 0.001), and frequent riders (p < 0.01) had greater proportions wearing helmets always/most of the time, and rated the importance of helmet use more highly. 59% supported snowmobile helmet laws.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While most rural adolescents value snowmobile helmet use and support legislation, nearly half report inconsistent use. Importantly, our study identified demographic groups for targeted interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":37379,"journal":{"name":"Injury Epidemiology","volume":"13 1","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12849359/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146067543","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Gang membership, firearm victimization, and mental health in a national sample of U.S. adults. 美国成年人的帮派成员,枪支受害者和心理健康。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2026-01-24 DOI: 10.1186/s40621-026-00656-7
James A Densley, David C Pyrooz, Jillian K Peterson

Background: Firearm violence in the United States is highly concentrated within specific demographic, economic, geographic, and social population groups. Prior research indicates elevated violence exposure among gang-involved individuals, but the extent and mental health implications of firearm victimization at the national level remain poorly understood.

Methods: We analyzed data from a national online survey of 10,000 U.S. adults fielded in 2024. Respondents self-reported lifetime gang membership and lifetime exposure to five forms of firearm victimization: presence at a mass shooting, gun threats, being shot at without injury, accidental gunshot injury, and intentional gunshot injury. Weighted descriptive statistics compared prevalence by lifetime gang status. Multivariable logistic regression estimated adjusted odds ratios controlling for several covariates. Among victims of firearm violence, self-reported psychological impacts, including anxiety, fear, depression, panic attacks, and post-traumatic stress symptoms, were assessed.

Results: People with a history of gang involvement reported substantially higher lifetime exposure to all forms of firearm victimization. After adjustment, gang involvement was associated with 2-4 times greater odds of firearm exposure across outcomes. Psychological impacts following firearm victimization were prevalent in both gang and non-gang groups. Differences in reported mental health impacts by gang status were generally modest, with relatively few statistically significant differences in adjusted models.

Conclusions: Firearm victimization is highly concentrated among people with a history of gang involvement, and such exposure is associated with substantial psychological distress. Mental health impacts were broadly similar across gang-involved and non-gang victims. These findings highlight the importance of recognizing gang-involved adults as a population with disproportionate exposure to firearm violence and significant trauma-related needs within a public health framework.

背景:美国的枪支暴力高度集中在特定的人口、经济、地理和社会人口群体中。先前的研究表明,在参与帮派的个人中,暴力暴露程度较高,但在国家层面上,枪支受害的程度和心理健康影响仍然知之甚少。方法:我们分析了2024年对10,000名美国成年人进行的全国在线调查的数据。受访者自我报告了其终生的帮派成员身份和终生接触五种形式的枪支伤害:参与大规模枪击、枪支威胁、被枪击而未受伤、意外枪伤和故意枪伤。加权描述性统计比较了终生帮派状态的患病率。多变量逻辑回归估计校正后的优势比控制了几个协变量。对枪支暴力受害者自我报告的心理影响进行了评估,包括焦虑、恐惧、抑郁、惊恐发作和创伤后应激症状。结果:有帮派历史的人一生中接触各种形式的枪支伤害的几率要高得多。调整后,帮派参与与2-4倍的枪支接触几率相关。枪支伤害后的心理影响在帮派和非帮派群体中都很普遍。帮派地位对报告心理健康影响的差异通常不大,在调整后的模型中,统计上的显著差异相对较少。结论:枪支受害者高度集中在有帮派历史的人群中,这种接触与严重的心理困扰有关。参与帮派和非帮派的受害者对心理健康的影响大致相似。这些研究结果强调了在公共卫生框架内认识到参与帮派的成年人是一个不成比例地暴露于枪支暴力和重大创伤相关需求的人群的重要性。
{"title":"Gang membership, firearm victimization, and mental health in a national sample of U.S. adults.","authors":"James A Densley, David C Pyrooz, Jillian K Peterson","doi":"10.1186/s40621-026-00656-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40621-026-00656-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Firearm violence in the United States is highly concentrated within specific demographic, economic, geographic, and social population groups. Prior research indicates elevated violence exposure among gang-involved individuals, but the extent and mental health implications of firearm victimization at the national level remain poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from a national online survey of 10,000 U.S. adults fielded in 2024. Respondents self-reported lifetime gang membership and lifetime exposure to five forms of firearm victimization: presence at a mass shooting, gun threats, being shot at without injury, accidental gunshot injury, and intentional gunshot injury. Weighted descriptive statistics compared prevalence by lifetime gang status. Multivariable logistic regression estimated adjusted odds ratios controlling for several covariates. Among victims of firearm violence, self-reported psychological impacts, including anxiety, fear, depression, panic attacks, and post-traumatic stress symptoms, were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>People with a history of gang involvement reported substantially higher lifetime exposure to all forms of firearm victimization. After adjustment, gang involvement was associated with 2-4 times greater odds of firearm exposure across outcomes. Psychological impacts following firearm victimization were prevalent in both gang and non-gang groups. Differences in reported mental health impacts by gang status were generally modest, with relatively few statistically significant differences in adjusted models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Firearm victimization is highly concentrated among people with a history of gang involvement, and such exposure is associated with substantial psychological distress. Mental health impacts were broadly similar across gang-involved and non-gang victims. These findings highlight the importance of recognizing gang-involved adults as a population with disproportionate exposure to firearm violence and significant trauma-related needs within a public health framework.</p>","PeriodicalId":37379,"journal":{"name":"Injury Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146044450","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Gun ownership for political protection or armed political expression: a nationally representative analysis of differences in 2025 vs. 2023. 为政治保护或武装政治表达而拥有枪支:2025年与2023年的全国代表性差异分析。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2026-01-19 DOI: 10.1186/s40621-026-00655-8
Julie A Ward, Rebecca A Valek, Vanya C Jones, Lilliana Mason, Cassandra K Crifasi

Background: Reasons for gun ownership have shifted from primarily for hunting, to protection from other people, and increasingly for concerns about political violence. In 2023, these reasons differed by party affiliation. In the aftermath of the 2024 Presidential election, the objective of this study was to compare gun owners' reasons for gun ownership in January 2025 vs. 2023, overall and by political party affiliation.

Methods: We analyzed two waves of gun owning respondents to the National Survey of Gun Policy (n = 2,003). In both waves, fielded 1/4/23 - 2/6/23 and 1/6/25 - 1/24/25, respondents identified personally important reasons for gun ownership from 10 potential reasons (e.g., at-home protection, out-of-home protection, protection from police, ideological conflict, hunting or recreation). We calculated weighted proportions to generate nationally representative estimates and compared reasons for gun ownership in 2025 to 2023 overall and by political affiliation (i.e., Republican, Democrat, or Independent).

Results: In 2025 (vs. 2023), more gun owners valued gun ownership "for protection at demonstrations, rallies, or protests" (42% vs. 35%) and for hunting (81% vs. 74%), but fewer valued ownership "to advance an important political objective" (22% vs. 35%). Increases were largely driven by Republican gun owners, who also rated higher at-home protection (97% vs. 93%) and protection against police violence (34% vs. 25%). Fewer Republican, Democrat, and Independent gun owners valued ownership "to advance an important political objective."

Conclusions: As political violence escalated nationally, larger portions of gun owners rejected such violence, while also seeking to protect themselves from it. Safety and policy implications are discussed.

背景:拥有枪支的原因已经从最初的狩猎转变为保护自己免受他人伤害,并越来越多地出于对政治暴力的担忧。在2023年,这些原因因党派而异。在2024年总统大选之后,本研究的目的是比较2025年1月和2023年1月枪支拥有者持有枪支的原因,总体上和按政党归属进行比较。方法:我们分析了全国枪支政策调查中两波持有枪支的受访者(n = 2003)。在23年1月4日至23年2月6日和25年1月6日至25年1月24日进行的两次调查中,受访者从10个潜在原因(例如,家庭保护、家庭外保护、警察保护、意识形态冲突、狩猎或娱乐)中确定了个人拥有枪支的重要原因。我们计算了加权比例,以产生具有全国代表性的估计,并比较了2025年至2023年总体上和政治派别(即共和党、民主党或独立派)持有枪支的原因。结果:到2025年(对比2023年),更多的枪支拥有者认为拥有枪支是为了“在示威、集会或抗议中保护自己”(42%对35%)和狩猎(81%对74%),而认为拥有枪支是为了“推进重要的政治目标”(22%对35%)的人较少。这一增长主要是由共和党枪支拥有者推动的,他们对家庭保护(97%对93%)和警察暴力保护(34%对25%)的评价也更高。越来越少的共和党、民主党和独立枪支拥有者认为拥有枪支是为了“推进一个重要的政治目标”。结论:随着政治暴力在全国范围内升级,大部分枪支拥有者拒绝这种暴力,同时也寻求保护自己免受其伤害。讨论了安全和政策影响。
{"title":"Gun ownership for political protection or armed political expression: a nationally representative analysis of differences in 2025 vs. 2023.","authors":"Julie A Ward, Rebecca A Valek, Vanya C Jones, Lilliana Mason, Cassandra K Crifasi","doi":"10.1186/s40621-026-00655-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40621-026-00655-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Reasons for gun ownership have shifted from primarily for hunting, to protection from other people, and increasingly for concerns about political violence. In 2023, these reasons differed by party affiliation. In the aftermath of the 2024 Presidential election, the objective of this study was to compare gun owners' reasons for gun ownership in January 2025 vs. 2023, overall and by political party affiliation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed two waves of gun owning respondents to the National Survey of Gun Policy (n = 2,003). In both waves, fielded 1/4/23 - 2/6/23 and 1/6/25 - 1/24/25, respondents identified personally important reasons for gun ownership from 10 potential reasons (e.g., at-home protection, out-of-home protection, protection from police, ideological conflict, hunting or recreation). We calculated weighted proportions to generate nationally representative estimates and compared reasons for gun ownership in 2025 to 2023 overall and by political affiliation (i.e., Republican, Democrat, or Independent).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2025 (vs. 2023), more gun owners valued gun ownership \"for protection at demonstrations, rallies, or protests\" (42% vs. 35%) and for hunting (81% vs. 74%), but fewer valued ownership \"to advance an important political objective\" (22% vs. 35%). Increases were largely driven by Republican gun owners, who also rated higher at-home protection (97% vs. 93%) and protection against police violence (34% vs. 25%). Fewer Republican, Democrat, and Independent gun owners valued ownership \"to advance an important political objective.\"</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As political violence escalated nationally, larger portions of gun owners rejected such violence, while also seeking to protect themselves from it. Safety and policy implications are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":37379,"journal":{"name":"Injury Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145999096","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Drowning among older people: a neglected yet vital component of global drowning prevention. 老年人溺水:全球预防溺水的一个被忽视但至关重要的组成部分。
IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2026-01-13 DOI: 10.1186/s40621-025-00651-4
Ali Işın, Amy E Peden

Globally in 2021, for the first time, the unintentional drowning fatality rate among people aged 70 years and older (8.15 per 100,000 people) surpassed the drowning rate of children under five years (7.66 per 100,000 people). While strong investment and advocacy in child drowning prevention have proven effective, we currently lack the research, consensus-based risk factors, and age-specific drowning prevention interventions for older people. Amid a globally aging population, we use this comment to highlight the need for increased evidence to reduce the persistent yet preventable fatal drowning rate for this age group.

2021年,全球70岁及以上人群的意外溺水死亡率(每10万人8.15人)首次超过五岁以下儿童的溺水率(每10万人7.66人)。虽然在儿童溺水预防方面的大力投资和宣传已被证明是有效的,但我们目前缺乏针对老年人的研究、基于共识的风险因素和针对特定年龄的溺水预防干预措施。在全球人口老龄化的背景下,我们使用这一评论来强调需要更多的证据来降低这一年龄组持续但可预防的致命溺水率。
{"title":"Drowning among older people: a neglected yet vital component of global drowning prevention.","authors":"Ali Işın, Amy E Peden","doi":"10.1186/s40621-025-00651-4","DOIUrl":"10.1186/s40621-025-00651-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Globally in 2021, for the first time, the unintentional drowning fatality rate among people aged 70 years and older (8.15 per 100,000 people) surpassed the drowning rate of children under five years (7.66 per 100,000 people). While strong investment and advocacy in child drowning prevention have proven effective, we currently lack the research, consensus-based risk factors, and age-specific drowning prevention interventions for older people. Amid a globally aging population, we use this comment to highlight the need for increased evidence to reduce the persistent yet preventable fatal drowning rate for this age group.</p>","PeriodicalId":37379,"journal":{"name":"Injury Epidemiology","volume":"13 1","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12802321/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145966860","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Injury Epidemiology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1