Correlation between macular perfusion status and visual acuity in retinal vein occlusion.

Ziyi Zhu, Yezhen Yang, Feng Zhang, Jiamin Cao, Wenhua Zhang
{"title":"Correlation between macular perfusion status and visual acuity in retinal vein occlusion.","authors":"Ziyi Zhu, Yezhen Yang, Feng Zhang, Jiamin Cao, Wenhua Zhang","doi":"10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2024.240295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is the second most common retinal vascular disease worldwide, and the retinal perfusion status is closely related to the prognosis of the disease. Macular perfusion status is particularly correlated with visual acuity. This study aims to investigate the changes in macular perfusion indicators in RVO using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) and analyze the correlation between macular perfusion status and visual acuity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included 41 RVO patients, who were divided into 2 groups based on the occlusion site: 18 cases in the central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) group and 23 cases in the branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) group. Additionally, they were categorized into ischemic RVO (23 cases) and non-ischemic RVO (16 cases) groups based on the presence of ischemia (2 eyes were excluded due to hemorrhage obscuring the peripheral retina, making it impossible to confirm the area of non-perfusion). A control group of 29 healthy individuals matched by sex and age was also recruited. Macular perfusion indicators were measured using OCTA, and the correlation between macular perfusion status and visual acuity was analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with healthy eyes, RVO eyes showed an increased foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area and significantly reduced superficial and deep vessel density (<i>P</i><0.001). However, there were no significant differences in central foveal thickness (CFT) or macular perfusion indicators between the CRVO and BRVO groups (<i>P</i>>0.05). The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR BCVA) was significantly negatively correlated with both superficial and deep retinal vessel density in RVO eyes (unstandardized coefficient <i>B</i>=-0.039, <i>B</i>=-0.042; <i>P</i>=0.017, <i>P</i>=0.040). The average BCVA in the ischemic RVO group was significantly worse than that in the non-ischemic RVO group (0.82±0.44 vs 0.45±0.29, <i>P</i>=0.007). The ischemic RVO group also had a larger FAZ area (<i>P</i>=0.003) and lower superficial and deep retinal vessel density (<i>P</i><0.001, <i>P</i>=0.008, respectively) compared with the non-ischemic RVO group. The severity of macular ischemia did not correspond directly with the peripheral ischemia severity in RVO.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Macular perfusion status is significantly reduced in RVO eyes compared to healthy eyes, which negatively impacts and limits visual acuity in RVO patients. Eyes with ischemic RVO have poorer visual acuity and macular perfusion status than those with non-ischemic RVO. OCTA is advantageous for observing vascular morphology and quantifying macular perfusion status, making it an effective tool for assessing disease progression.</p>","PeriodicalId":39801,"journal":{"name":"中南大学学报(医学版)","volume":"49 6","pages":"943-950"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11420977/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中南大学学报(医学版)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2024.240295","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is the second most common retinal vascular disease worldwide, and the retinal perfusion status is closely related to the prognosis of the disease. Macular perfusion status is particularly correlated with visual acuity. This study aims to investigate the changes in macular perfusion indicators in RVO using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) and analyze the correlation between macular perfusion status and visual acuity.

Methods: This cross-sectional study included 41 RVO patients, who were divided into 2 groups based on the occlusion site: 18 cases in the central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) group and 23 cases in the branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) group. Additionally, they were categorized into ischemic RVO (23 cases) and non-ischemic RVO (16 cases) groups based on the presence of ischemia (2 eyes were excluded due to hemorrhage obscuring the peripheral retina, making it impossible to confirm the area of non-perfusion). A control group of 29 healthy individuals matched by sex and age was also recruited. Macular perfusion indicators were measured using OCTA, and the correlation between macular perfusion status and visual acuity was analyzed.

Results: Compared with healthy eyes, RVO eyes showed an increased foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area and significantly reduced superficial and deep vessel density (P<0.001). However, there were no significant differences in central foveal thickness (CFT) or macular perfusion indicators between the CRVO and BRVO groups (P>0.05). The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR BCVA) was significantly negatively correlated with both superficial and deep retinal vessel density in RVO eyes (unstandardized coefficient B=-0.039, B=-0.042; P=0.017, P=0.040). The average BCVA in the ischemic RVO group was significantly worse than that in the non-ischemic RVO group (0.82±0.44 vs 0.45±0.29, P=0.007). The ischemic RVO group also had a larger FAZ area (P=0.003) and lower superficial and deep retinal vessel density (P<0.001, P=0.008, respectively) compared with the non-ischemic RVO group. The severity of macular ischemia did not correspond directly with the peripheral ischemia severity in RVO.

Conclusions: Macular perfusion status is significantly reduced in RVO eyes compared to healthy eyes, which negatively impacts and limits visual acuity in RVO patients. Eyes with ischemic RVO have poorer visual acuity and macular perfusion status than those with non-ischemic RVO. OCTA is advantageous for observing vascular morphology and quantifying macular perfusion status, making it an effective tool for assessing disease progression.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
视网膜静脉闭塞时黄斑灌注状态与视力之间的相关性。
研究目的视网膜静脉闭塞(RVO)是全球第二大最常见的视网膜血管疾病,视网膜灌注状态与疾病的预后密切相关。黄斑灌注状态与视力尤其相关。本研究旨在利用光学相干断层血管成像(OCTA)研究 RVO 患者黄斑灌注指标的变化,并分析黄斑灌注状态与视力之间的相关性:这项横断面研究包括 41 例 RVO 患者,根据闭塞部位分为两组:视网膜中央静脉闭塞(CRVO)组 18 例,视网膜分支静脉闭塞(BRVO)组 23 例。此外,根据是否存在缺血,他们被分为缺血性视网膜静脉阻塞组(23 例)和非缺血性视网膜静脉阻塞组(16 例)(有两只眼睛因出血遮盖了外周视网膜,无法确认非灌注区域而被排除在外)。另外还招募了由 29 名性别和年龄匹配的健康人组成的对照组。使用 OCTA 测量黄斑灌注指标,并分析黄斑灌注状态与视力之间的相关性:结果:与健康眼相比,RVO 眼的眼窝无血管区(FAZ)面积增大,浅层和深层血管密度明显降低(PP>0.05)。RVO眼最小分辨角对数处的最佳矫正视力(BCVA)与视网膜浅层和深层血管密度呈显著负相关(非标准化系数B=-0.039,B=-0.042;P=0.017,P=0.040)。缺血性 RVO 组的平均 BCVA 明显差于非缺血性 RVO 组(0.82±0.44 vs 0.45±0.29,P=0.007)。与非缺血性 RVO 组相比,缺血性 RVO 组的 FAZ 面积更大(P=0.003),视网膜浅层和深层血管密度更低(分别为 PP=0.008)。黄斑缺血的严重程度与 RVO 周围缺血的严重程度并不直接对应:结论:与健康眼相比,RVO 眼的黄斑灌注状态明显降低,这对 RVO 患者的视力造成了负面影响和限制。与非缺血性 RVO 患者相比,缺血性 RVO 患者的视力和黄斑灌注状况更差。OCTA 在观察血管形态和量化黄斑灌注状态方面具有优势,是评估疾病进展的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
中南大学学报(医学版)
中南大学学报(医学版) Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8237
期刊介绍: Journal of Central South University (Medical Sciences), founded in 1958, is a comprehensive academic journal of medicine and health sponsored by the Ministry of Education and Central South University. The journal has been included in many important databases and authoritative abstract journals at home and abroad, such as the American Medline, Pubmed and its Index Medicus (IM), the Netherlands Medical Abstracts (EM), the American Chemical Abstracts (CA), the WHO Western Pacific Region Medical Index (WPRIM), and the Chinese Science Citation Database (Core Database) (CSCD); it is a statistical source journal of Chinese scientific and technological papers, a Chinese core journal, and a "double-effect" journal of the Chinese Journal Matrix; it is the "2nd, 3rd, and 4th China University Excellent Science and Technology Journal", "2008 China Excellent Science and Technology Journal", "RCCSE China Authoritative Academic Journal (A+)" and Hunan Province's "Top Ten Science and Technology Journals". The purpose of the journal is to reflect the new achievements, new technologies, and new experiences in medical research, medical treatment, and teaching, report new medical trends at home and abroad, promote academic exchanges, improve academic standards, and promote scientific and technological progress.
期刊最新文献
Multidisciplinary integration and fusion based on critical care medicine and immunology: History, current status, and prospects. Pre-assembled nanospheres in mucoadhesive microneedle patch for sustained release of triamcinolone in the treatment of oral submucous fibrosis. Pyroptosis and sepsis-associated acute kidney injury. Regulatory role of the mTOR signaling pathway in autophagy and mesangial proliferation in IgA nephropathy. Research progress in anti-renal fibrosis drugs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1