Pulp Sensitivity Testing in Multiple Sclerosis: Disease Duration and Sensory/Motor Associations-A Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 2.2 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Multiple Sclerosis International Pub Date : 2024-09-11 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/6662518
Fatemeh Owlia, Fereshteh Noori, Marzieh Abutorabi Zarchi, Maryam Kazemipoor
{"title":"Pulp Sensitivity Testing in Multiple Sclerosis: Disease Duration and Sensory/Motor Associations-A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Fatemeh Owlia, Fereshteh Noori, Marzieh Abutorabi Zarchi, Maryam Kazemipoor","doi":"10.1155/2024/6662518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> This study explores a relatively unexplored aspect of multiple sclerosis (MS) by examining the sensitivity threshold of dental pulp as a potential indicator of neuropathy in MS patients. Building upon earlier research that focused on assessing the response to electrical pulp testing in MS patients who did not have a history of trigeminal neuralgia, this survey is aimed at delving into the relationship between MS duration and the threshold for stimulation in response to pulp sensitivity tests. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> This study encompassed a total of 124 maxillary central incisors from patients diagnosed with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). The participants were uniform in terms of age, falling within the 18-50 years range, and all had RRMS with no history of trigeminal neuralgia. The electric pulp sensitivity test was conducted on all samples, and the results of the electric pulp testing (EPT) were recorded according to the grade of the pulp tester that elicited a response. The threshold was considered reached when the patient first experienced a burning sensation after EPT application and the use of 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane spray. Data analysis employed paired <i>t</i>-tests, Fisher's exact test, and Spearman correlation, with a significance level set at <i>p</i> < 0.05. <b>Results:</b> Based on the study's findings, the average response value to EPT was 2.69 ± 1.17, while the response time to the cold test was 2.61 ± 1.03 s. There was no statistically significant difference in the response to the cold test based on age (<i>p</i> = 0.45). However, it was observed that the mean response time to the cold test was significantly longer among male participants (<i>p</i> = 0.001). No significant differences were identified in the pulpal response to EPT or the cold test between patients with and without sensory-motor involvement (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Furthermore, Spearman's analysis revealed a noteworthy positive correlation between the electrical pulp threshold and the time taken to respond to the cold test (<i>p</i> = 0.025, <i>r</i> = 0.2). <b>Conclusions:</b> The utilization of the pulpal sensitivity test in MS patients holds promise for practical clinical use. Notably, individuals with a more extended duration of the disease exhibited a notably elevated threshold for both the EPT and the cold test conducted on their maxillary central incisors.</p>","PeriodicalId":46096,"journal":{"name":"Multiple Sclerosis International","volume":"2024 ","pages":"6662518"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11410405/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multiple Sclerosis International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/6662518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study explores a relatively unexplored aspect of multiple sclerosis (MS) by examining the sensitivity threshold of dental pulp as a potential indicator of neuropathy in MS patients. Building upon earlier research that focused on assessing the response to electrical pulp testing in MS patients who did not have a history of trigeminal neuralgia, this survey is aimed at delving into the relationship between MS duration and the threshold for stimulation in response to pulp sensitivity tests. Materials and Methods: This study encompassed a total of 124 maxillary central incisors from patients diagnosed with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). The participants were uniform in terms of age, falling within the 18-50 years range, and all had RRMS with no history of trigeminal neuralgia. The electric pulp sensitivity test was conducted on all samples, and the results of the electric pulp testing (EPT) were recorded according to the grade of the pulp tester that elicited a response. The threshold was considered reached when the patient first experienced a burning sensation after EPT application and the use of 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane spray. Data analysis employed paired t-tests, Fisher's exact test, and Spearman correlation, with a significance level set at p < 0.05. Results: Based on the study's findings, the average response value to EPT was 2.69 ± 1.17, while the response time to the cold test was 2.61 ± 1.03 s. There was no statistically significant difference in the response to the cold test based on age (p = 0.45). However, it was observed that the mean response time to the cold test was significantly longer among male participants (p = 0.001). No significant differences were identified in the pulpal response to EPT or the cold test between patients with and without sensory-motor involvement (p > 0.05). Furthermore, Spearman's analysis revealed a noteworthy positive correlation between the electrical pulp threshold and the time taken to respond to the cold test (p = 0.025, r = 0.2). Conclusions: The utilization of the pulpal sensitivity test in MS patients holds promise for practical clinical use. Notably, individuals with a more extended duration of the disease exhibited a notably elevated threshold for both the EPT and the cold test conducted on their maxillary central incisors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多发性硬化症的牙髓敏感性测试:疾病持续时间与感觉/运动关联--一项横断面研究
导言:本研究将牙髓的敏感阈值作为多发性硬化症(MS)患者神经病变的一个潜在指标,从而探索了多发性硬化症(MS)中一个相对尚未探索的方面。早先的研究重点是评估没有三叉神经痛病史的多发性硬化症患者对牙髓电测试的反应,在此基础上,本调查旨在深入研究多发性硬化症病程与牙髓敏感性测试刺激阈值之间的关系。材料和方法:本研究共收集了124颗上颌中切牙,均来自被诊断为复发性-缓解性多发性硬化症(RRMS)的患者。参与者的年龄均在 18-50 岁之间,均为 RRMS 患者,无三叉神经痛病史。对所有样本进行了电牙髓敏感性测试,并根据引起反应的牙髓测试仪的等级记录了电牙髓测试(EPT)的结果。在使用 EPT 和 1,1,1,2-四氟乙烷喷雾剂后,当患者首次出现灼烧感时,即认为达到了阈值。数据分析采用配对 t 检验、费雪精确检验和斯皮尔曼相关性检验,显著性水平设定为 p <0.05。结果:根据研究结果,EPT 的平均反应值为 2.69 ± 1.17,而冷测试的反应时间为 2.61 ± 1.03 秒。从统计学角度看,不同年龄的人对冷冻测试的反应差异不大(p = 0.45)。但观察发现,男性参与者对冷测试的平均反应时间明显更长(p = 0.001)。有感觉运动受累和没有感觉运动受累的患者对 EPT 或冷测试的牙髓反应没有明显差异(p > 0.05)。此外,斯皮尔曼分析显示,牙髓电阈值与对冷测试做出反应所需的时间之间存在明显的正相关关系(p = 0.025,r = 0.2)。结论在多发性硬化症患者中使用牙髓敏感性测试具有实际临床应用前景。值得注意的是,病程较长的患者在上颌中切牙上进行电测和冷测时,阈值都明显升高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Multiple Sclerosis International
Multiple Sclerosis International CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Multiple Sclerosis International is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to all aspects of multiple sclerosis, including clinical neurology, neuroimaging, neuropathology, therapeutics, genetics, neuroimmunology, biomarkers, psychology and neurorehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
White Matter Lesion Volumes on 3-T MRI in People With MS Who Had Followed a Diet and Lifestyle Program for More Than 10 Years. Pulp Sensitivity Testing in Multiple Sclerosis: Disease Duration and Sensory/Motor Associations-A Cross-Sectional Study. Brain Atrophy as an Outcome of Disease-Modifying Therapy for Remitting-Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis. Cognitive Contributors of Backward Walking in Persons with Multiple Sclerosis. Patient and Clinician Perspectives of Physical Therapy for Walking Difficulties in Multiple Sclerosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1