Differences in Interfacility Transfer from Emergency Department and Inpatient Services for Inpatient Neurologic Care.

IF 0.9 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurohospitalist Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-13 DOI:10.1177/19418744241273205
Maulik P Shah, Anne G Douglas, Brian M Sauer, Megan B Richie, Vanja C Douglas, S Andrew Josephson, Elan L Guterman
{"title":"Differences in Interfacility Transfer from Emergency Department and Inpatient Services for Inpatient Neurologic Care.","authors":"Maulik P Shah, Anne G Douglas, Brian M Sauer, Megan B Richie, Vanja C Douglas, S Andrew Josephson, Elan L Guterman","doi":"10.1177/19418744241273205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Interhospital transfer is an important mechanism for improving access to specialized neurologic care but there are large gaps in our understanding of interhospital transfer for the management of non-stroke-related neurologic disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational study included consecutive patients admitted to an adult academic general neurology service via interhospital transfer from July 1, 2015 to July 1, 2017. Characteristics of the referring hospital and transferred patients were obtained through the American Hospital Association Directory, a hospital transfer database maintained by the accepting hospital, and the electronic medical record. The analyses used descriptive statistics to examine the cohort overall and compare characteristics of patients transferred from an emergency department and inpatient service.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>504 patients were admitted via interhospital transfer during the study period. Of these, 395 patients (78.4%) were transferred because the referring hospital lacked capability, and 139 patients (27.6%) were transferred from an emergency department as opposed to inpatient service. Seizures was the most common diagnosis (23.8%). Patients who were transferred from an emergency department had a higher proportion covered by Medicaid (44.6%) than those transferred from an inpatient service (28.8%) and had a shorter median length of stay (3 days; IQR 2-7 vs 7 days; IQR 4-12).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The majority of observed interhospital non-stroke neurologic transfers occurred to improve access to specialized neurological care for patients, though patients transferred from the ED, as opposed to an inpatient service, had lower health care utilization, and this will be important to consider when developing systems of care and in future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":46355,"journal":{"name":"Neurohospitalist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11412452/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurohospitalist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19418744241273205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Interhospital transfer is an important mechanism for improving access to specialized neurologic care but there are large gaps in our understanding of interhospital transfer for the management of non-stroke-related neurologic disease.

Methods: This observational study included consecutive patients admitted to an adult academic general neurology service via interhospital transfer from July 1, 2015 to July 1, 2017. Characteristics of the referring hospital and transferred patients were obtained through the American Hospital Association Directory, a hospital transfer database maintained by the accepting hospital, and the electronic medical record. The analyses used descriptive statistics to examine the cohort overall and compare characteristics of patients transferred from an emergency department and inpatient service.

Results: 504 patients were admitted via interhospital transfer during the study period. Of these, 395 patients (78.4%) were transferred because the referring hospital lacked capability, and 139 patients (27.6%) were transferred from an emergency department as opposed to inpatient service. Seizures was the most common diagnosis (23.8%). Patients who were transferred from an emergency department had a higher proportion covered by Medicaid (44.6%) than those transferred from an inpatient service (28.8%) and had a shorter median length of stay (3 days; IQR 2-7 vs 7 days; IQR 4-12).

Conclusions: The majority of observed interhospital non-stroke neurologic transfers occurred to improve access to specialized neurological care for patients, though patients transferred from the ED, as opposed to an inpatient service, had lower health care utilization, and this will be important to consider when developing systems of care and in future research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊科与住院部之间转院治疗神经科住院病人的差异。
简介:医院间转运是改善神经病学专科治疗的重要机制,但我们对医院间转运治疗非中风相关神经病学疾病的认识还存在很大差距:院间转运是改善神经专科医疗服务的一个重要机制,但我们对院间转运治疗非卒中相关神经疾病的认识还存在很大差距:这项观察性研究纳入了2015年7月1日至2017年7月1日期间通过院际转院入住成人普通神经病学学术服务机构的连续患者。转诊医院和转院患者的特征通过美国医院协会目录、接受医院维护的转院数据库以及电子病历获得。分析使用了描述性统计来研究队列的整体情况,并比较了从急诊科和住院部转来的患者的特征:研究期间有 504 名患者通过院际转院入院。其中,395 名患者(78.4%)因转诊医院能力不足而转院,139 名患者(27.6%)从急诊科而非住院部转院。癫痫发作是最常见的诊断(23.8%)。与住院病人(28.8%)相比,从急诊科转院的病人享受医疗补助的比例更高(44.6%),住院时间中位数更短(3 天;IQR 2-7 vs 7 天;IQR 4-12):虽然从急诊室而非住院部转院的患者的医疗服务利用率较低,但观察到的大部分院际非卒中神经系统转院都是为了改善患者获得专业神经系统医疗服务的机会,这一点在制定医疗服务体系和未来研究中将是非常重要的考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurohospitalist
Neurohospitalist CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
108
期刊最新文献
"Recurrent Pleomorphic Xanthoastrocytoma Presenting with Diffuse Leptomeningeal Spread". Clinical Problem-Solving: A 19-Year-Old Woman With Progressive Neurological Decline and Multiple Intracranial Lesions. Comparison of Telemedicine-Administered Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke by Neurology Subspecialty: A Cross-Sectional Study. Complete Third Nerve Palsy: A Rare Occurrence in Fulminant IIH Case Report. Concurrent Miller Fisher Syndrome and Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1