Housing Status and Healthcare Utilization in People Presenting With Seizure.

IF 0.7 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurohospitalist Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1177/19418744251321877
Sandeepa S Mullady, Andrew J Wood, Elan L Guterman, Nicole Rosendale
{"title":"Housing Status and Healthcare Utilization in People Presenting With Seizure.","authors":"Sandeepa S Mullady, Andrew J Wood, Elan L Guterman, Nicole Rosendale","doi":"10.1177/19418744251321877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the association between housing status and healthcare utilization in individuals presenting with seizure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of all adults (age >18) presenting to a public hospital emergency department with seizures, defined by ICD-9/10 codes, between 1/1/2016 and 8/03/2019. They were categorized by housing status (people experiencing homelessness [PEH], people with housing). Healthcare utilization outcomes were 30-day re-visit to acute care, discharge disposition, and hospital length of stay for those admitted. We used multivariable linear and logistic regression models adjusting for age, comorbidities, and insurance status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 6483 individuals (2092 [32.3%] PEH). Compared to people with housing, PEH were younger (48.2 vs 50.9, <i>P</i> < .0001), more likely to be a person of color (80.9 vs 75.1%, <i>P</i> < .0001), and have Medicaid (51.4% vs 42.9%, <i>P</i> < .0001). People with housing had a higher prevalence of admission to the intensive care unit (3.6% vs 1.8%, <i>P</i> < .0001). After adjustment, admitted PEH had higher odds of 30-day re-visit (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.58, 2.21), shorter length of stay (coef Β-12.87, 95% CI: -22.62, -3.11), and lower odds of being discharged to a facility (aOR 0.37, 95% CI: .26, .55) compared to people with housing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>PEH with seizures had increased healthcare utilization. Further analysis, including imaging findings, anti-seizure medications prescribed, and presumed etiology, is needed to understand the drivers of healthcare utilization and identify appropriate interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":46355,"journal":{"name":"Neurohospitalist","volume":" ","pages":"281-285"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11826817/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurohospitalist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19418744251321877","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To examine the association between housing status and healthcare utilization in individuals presenting with seizure.

Methods: We performed a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of all adults (age >18) presenting to a public hospital emergency department with seizures, defined by ICD-9/10 codes, between 1/1/2016 and 8/03/2019. They were categorized by housing status (people experiencing homelessness [PEH], people with housing). Healthcare utilization outcomes were 30-day re-visit to acute care, discharge disposition, and hospital length of stay for those admitted. We used multivariable linear and logistic regression models adjusting for age, comorbidities, and insurance status.

Results: There were 6483 individuals (2092 [32.3%] PEH). Compared to people with housing, PEH were younger (48.2 vs 50.9, P < .0001), more likely to be a person of color (80.9 vs 75.1%, P < .0001), and have Medicaid (51.4% vs 42.9%, P < .0001). People with housing had a higher prevalence of admission to the intensive care unit (3.6% vs 1.8%, P < .0001). After adjustment, admitted PEH had higher odds of 30-day re-visit (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.58, 2.21), shorter length of stay (coef Β-12.87, 95% CI: -22.62, -3.11), and lower odds of being discharged to a facility (aOR 0.37, 95% CI: .26, .55) compared to people with housing.

Conclusion and relevance: PEH with seizures had increased healthcare utilization. Further analysis, including imaging findings, anti-seizure medications prescribed, and presumed etiology, is needed to understand the drivers of healthcare utilization and identify appropriate interventions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
癫痫患者的住房状况和医疗保健利用
目的:探讨癫痫发作患者住房状况与医疗保健利用之间的关系。方法:我们对2016年1月1日至2019年3月8日期间在公立医院急诊科就诊的所有癫痫发作成人(年龄在bb0 - 18岁)进行了回顾性横断面分析。他们根据住房状况(无家可归的人[PEH],有住房的人)进行分类。医疗保健利用结果为30天的急诊复诊、出院处置和入院患者的住院时间。我们使用多变量线性和逻辑回归模型调整年龄、合并症和保险状况。结果:共6483例,其中PEH 2092例(32.3%)。与有住房的人相比,PEH更年轻(48.2比50.9,P < 0.0001),更有可能是有色人种(80.9比75.1%,P < 0.0001),并且有医疗补助(51.4%比42.9%,P < 0.0001)。有住房的人入住重症监护病房的患病率更高(3.6%对1.8%,P < 0.0001)。调整后,与有住房的患者相比,入院的PEH患者30天再访的几率更高(调整优势比[aOR] 1.87, 95%置信区间[CI] 1.58, 2.21),住院时间更短(coef Β-12.87, 95% CI: -22.62, -3.11),出院的几率更低(aOR 0.37, 95% CI: 0.26, 0.55)。结论及相关性:PEH合并癫痫发作增加了对医疗保健的利用。需要进一步分析,包括成像结果、处方抗癫痫药物和假定的病因,以了解医疗保健利用的驱动因素并确定适当的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurohospitalist
Neurohospitalist CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
108
期刊最新文献
Dengue-Associated Acute Necrotizing Encephalopathy: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. Family Perceptions of End-of-Life Care Quality in Patients With Stroke: A Descriptive and Comparative Survey Study. Hypercoagulable Workup in Cryptogenic Stroke: What to Test, and When. Quantitative EEG to Detect a Late-Onset Vasospasm After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage due to Basilar Artery Aneurysm: A Case Report. Clinical Problem Solving: A 68-Year-Old Woman With Acute Apraxic Agraphia, Constructional Apraxia, and Finger Agnosia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1