The lesser trochanter profile is an accurate and reliable measure of femoral rotation for intramedullary nailing.

IF 1.8 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS SICOT-J Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-20 DOI:10.1051/sicotj/2024036
Jack Mao, Malik Al-Jamal, David Allen, Brandon W Henry, Tannor Court, Rahul Vaidya
{"title":"The lesser trochanter profile is an accurate and reliable measure of femoral rotation for intramedullary nailing.","authors":"Jack Mao, Malik Al-Jamal, David Allen, Brandon W Henry, Tannor Court, Rahul Vaidya","doi":"10.1051/sicotj/2024036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The lesser trochanter profile (LTP) method is an intraoperative fluoroscopic technique that can assess the femoral version and limit malrotation. The purpose of this study was to directly assess the accuracy and reliability of the LTP method, as well as determine the incidence of malrotation produced by this technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three groups of observers (fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeons, orthopedic residents, and medical students) utilized the LTP method to replicate pre-imaged rotation angles on a cadaveric femur bone. Recorded outcomes include rotational error and number of attempts. Accuracy and interobserver reliability were assessed by rotational error and the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC), respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Accuracy was within 3° for all three groups. ICC between each group was greater than 0.99. There was no statistical difference between the accuracy of fellowship-trained surgeons, orthopedic residents, and medical students. Medical students on average required more attempts to obtain their final image compared to fellowship-trained surgeons. There was no statistical difference in the number of attempts between residents and fellowship-trained surgeons.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>None of the LTP measurements were greater than 15°, the clinical threshold for malrotation. The average error of the observers was less than 3°, demonstrating that the LTP is an effective method of assessing the femoral version. There was no statistically significant difference between the observers, indicating that this technique is reliable and easy to use. Ultimately, the LTP method is easily reproducible for surgeons to avoid femoral malrotation.</p>","PeriodicalId":46378,"journal":{"name":"SICOT-J","volume":"10 ","pages":"36"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11415034/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SICOT-J","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2024036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The lesser trochanter profile (LTP) method is an intraoperative fluoroscopic technique that can assess the femoral version and limit malrotation. The purpose of this study was to directly assess the accuracy and reliability of the LTP method, as well as determine the incidence of malrotation produced by this technique.

Methods: Three groups of observers (fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeons, orthopedic residents, and medical students) utilized the LTP method to replicate pre-imaged rotation angles on a cadaveric femur bone. Recorded outcomes include rotational error and number of attempts. Accuracy and interobserver reliability were assessed by rotational error and the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC), respectively.

Results: Accuracy was within 3° for all three groups. ICC between each group was greater than 0.99. There was no statistical difference between the accuracy of fellowship-trained surgeons, orthopedic residents, and medical students. Medical students on average required more attempts to obtain their final image compared to fellowship-trained surgeons. There was no statistical difference in the number of attempts between residents and fellowship-trained surgeons.

Conclusion: None of the LTP measurements were greater than 15°, the clinical threshold for malrotation. The average error of the observers was less than 3°, demonstrating that the LTP is an effective method of assessing the femoral version. There was no statistically significant difference between the observers, indicating that this technique is reliable and easy to use. Ultimately, the LTP method is easily reproducible for surgeons to avoid femoral malrotation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小转子轮廓是髓内钉准确可靠的股骨旋转测量方法。
简介:股骨小转子轮廓(LTP)法是一种术中透视技术,可评估股骨版本并限制股骨错位。本研究的目的是直接评估 LTP 方法的准确性和可靠性,并确定该技术造成的股骨旋转不良的发生率:三组观察者(经过研究员培训的骨科医生、骨科住院医师和医科学生)利用 LTP 方法在尸体股骨上复制预先成像的旋转角度。记录的结果包括旋转误差和尝试次数。准确性和观察者间可靠性分别通过旋转误差和类间相关系数(ICC)进行评估:结果:所有三组的准确度都在 3° 以内。各组之间的 ICC 均大于 0.99。接受过研究员培训的外科医生、骨科住院医师和医科学生的准确度没有统计学差异。与受过研究培训的外科医生相比,医科学生平均需要更多次尝试才能获得最终图像。住院医师和接受过研究培训的外科医生在尝试次数上没有统计学差异:结论:LTP测量值均未超过15°,即临床上的旋转不良阈值。观察者的平均误差小于 3°,表明 LTP 是评估股骨转位的有效方法。观察者之间没有统计学意义上的显著差异,表明该技术可靠且易于使用。最终,LTP方法对于外科医生来说很容易重复使用,以避免股骨旋转不良。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
SICOT-J
SICOT-J ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
12.50%
发文量
44
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Adapting hip arthroplasty practices during the COVID-19 pandemic: Assessing the impact of outpatient care sudden increase on early complications and clinical outcomes. Outcomes of total hip arthroplasty using dual mobility cups following failed internal fixation of proximal femoral fractures at a mean follow-up of 6 years. Prior medial meniscus arthroscopy is not associated with worst functional outcomes in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty: A retrospective single-center study with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Short-term functional outcomes of robotic-assisted TKA are better with functional alignment compared to adjusted mechanical alignment. Delayed presentation of lower cervical facet dislocations: What to learn from past reports?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1