Quality of life in dysphagia and functional performance of cancer patients in palliative care.

IF 0.9 Q4 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY CoDAS Pub Date : 2024-09-09 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/2317-1782/20242023266pt
Laressa Cardoso Barbosa, Leandro de Araújo Pernambuco, Hipólito Magalhães
{"title":"Quality of life in dysphagia and functional performance of cancer patients in palliative care.","authors":"Laressa Cardoso Barbosa, Leandro de Araújo Pernambuco, Hipólito Magalhães","doi":"10.1590/2317-1782/20242023266pt","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To correlate the functional performance and impact of dysphagia on the quality of life of cancer patients in palliative care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional, quantitative study was conducted at the outpatient clinic and oncology ward of a university hospital. Inclusion criteria required patients to respond positively to the question: \"Do you have difficulty or problems swallowing?\". Patients were excluded if they had been diagnosed with head and neck cancer, were unable to answer questionnaires due to actively dying status, were in a state of drowsiness, experienced extreme pain and systemic instability, or if data collection instruments were incomplete. Two instruments were used in their Brazilian Portuguese versions: the Palliative Performance Scale (PPS) and the M. D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI). The variables were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, with Pearson's correlation used at a 5% significance level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample consisted of 39 participants, with an average age of 65.3 years, of whom 24 (61.5%) were women. The most frequent neoplasm sites were the pancreas and stomach. The results of the PPS indicated that the average patient had reduced ambulation and inability to work, but maintained independence in self-care, with a complete level of swallowing and consciousness. The MDADI showed an average degree of limitation. Outpatients exhibited a moderate correlation between the MDADI result and the level of functionality according to the PPS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cancer patients at the palliative care outpatient clinic demonstrated a correlation between functional performance and the impact of dysphagia on quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":46547,"journal":{"name":"CoDAS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11404836/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CoDAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20242023266pt","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To correlate the functional performance and impact of dysphagia on the quality of life of cancer patients in palliative care.

Methods: This cross-sectional, quantitative study was conducted at the outpatient clinic and oncology ward of a university hospital. Inclusion criteria required patients to respond positively to the question: "Do you have difficulty or problems swallowing?". Patients were excluded if they had been diagnosed with head and neck cancer, were unable to answer questionnaires due to actively dying status, were in a state of drowsiness, experienced extreme pain and systemic instability, or if data collection instruments were incomplete. Two instruments were used in their Brazilian Portuguese versions: the Palliative Performance Scale (PPS) and the M. D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI). The variables were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, with Pearson's correlation used at a 5% significance level.

Results: The sample consisted of 39 participants, with an average age of 65.3 years, of whom 24 (61.5%) were women. The most frequent neoplasm sites were the pancreas and stomach. The results of the PPS indicated that the average patient had reduced ambulation and inability to work, but maintained independence in self-care, with a complete level of swallowing and consciousness. The MDADI showed an average degree of limitation. Outpatients exhibited a moderate correlation between the MDADI result and the level of functionality according to the PPS.

Conclusion: Cancer patients at the palliative care outpatient clinic demonstrated a correlation between functional performance and the impact of dysphagia on quality of life.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
吞咽困难患者的生活质量和姑息治疗中癌症患者的功能表现。
目的:对姑息治疗癌症患者的功能表现和吞咽困难对其生活质量的影响进行相关分析:这项横断面定量研究在一家大学医院的门诊部和肿瘤科病房进行。纳入标准要求患者对问题做出肯定回答:"您是否有吞咽困难或问题?如果患者已被确诊为头颈部癌症、因濒临死亡而无法回答问卷、处于嗜睡状态、极度疼痛和全身情况不稳定,或者数据收集工具不完整,则排除在外。我们使用了两种工具的巴西葡萄牙语版本:姑息表现量表(PPS)和M. D. 安德森吞咽困难量表(MDADI)。采用描述性和推论性统计方法对变量进行分析,并在 5%的显著性水平下使用皮尔逊相关性:样本由 39 名参与者组成,平均年龄为 65.3 岁,其中 24 名(61.5%)为女性。最常见的肿瘤部位是胰腺和胃。PPS结果显示,一般患者的行动能力下降,无法工作,但仍能保持自理能力,吞咽和意识完全正常。MDADI 显示患者的受限程度一般。门诊患者的 MDADI 结果与 PPS 所显示的功能水平呈中度相关:姑息治疗门诊癌症患者的功能表现与吞咽困难对生活质量的影响之间存在相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CoDAS
CoDAS AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
103
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Development and validation of Competing Sentence Test in Kannada. Activity ordering task: conceptualization and development of a novel context-based working memory task with a metacognitive facet. Development of a Comprehensive Cough Therapy Program (CCTP) for chronic cough in India: a qualitative study. Speech perception in the Specific Learning Disorder with and without Persistent Speech Sound Disorder. Analysis of brain activity for speech stimuli and child development of an infant with neurosyphilis: case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1