Critical factors challenging the integration of AI technologies in healthcare workplaces: a stakeholder assessment.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Journal of Health Organization and Management Pub Date : 2024-09-23 DOI:10.1108/JHOM-04-2024-0135
Abdullah H Alnasser, Mohammad A Hassanain, Mustafa A Alnasser, Ali H Alnasser
{"title":"Critical factors challenging the integration of AI technologies in healthcare workplaces: a stakeholder assessment.","authors":"Abdullah H Alnasser, Mohammad A Hassanain, Mustafa A Alnasser, Ali H Alnasser","doi":"10.1108/JHOM-04-2024-0135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to identify and assess the factors challenging the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in healthcare workplaces.</p><p><strong>Design/methodology/approach: </strong>The study utilized a mixed approach, that starts with a literature review, then developing and testing a questionnaire survey of the factors challenging the integration of AI technologies in healthcare workplaces. In total, 46 factors were identified and classified under 6 groups. These factors were assessed by four different stakeholder categories: facilities managers, medical staff, operational staff and patients/visitors. The evaluations gathered were examined to determine the relative importance index (RII), importance rating (IR) and ranking of each factor.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>All 46 factors were assessed as \"Very Important\" through the overall assessment by the four stakeholder categories. The results indicated that the most important factors, across all groups, are \"AI ability to learn from patient data\", \"insufficient data privacy measures for patients\", \"availability of technical support and maintenance services\", \"physicians' acceptance of AI in healthcare\", \"reliability and uptime of AI systems\" and \"ability to reduce medical errors\".</p><p><strong>Practical implications: </strong>Determining the importance ratings of the factors can lead to better resource allocation and the development of strategies to facilitate the adoption and implementation of these technologies, thus promoting the development of innovative solutions to improve healthcare practices.</p><p><strong>Originality/value: </strong>This study contributes to the body of knowledge in the domain of technology adoption and implementation in the medical workplace, through improving stakeholders' comprehension of the factors challenging the integration of AI technologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":47447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Organization and Management","volume":"ahead-of-print ahead-of-print","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Organization and Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-04-2024-0135","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to identify and assess the factors challenging the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in healthcare workplaces.

Design/methodology/approach: The study utilized a mixed approach, that starts with a literature review, then developing and testing a questionnaire survey of the factors challenging the integration of AI technologies in healthcare workplaces. In total, 46 factors were identified and classified under 6 groups. These factors were assessed by four different stakeholder categories: facilities managers, medical staff, operational staff and patients/visitors. The evaluations gathered were examined to determine the relative importance index (RII), importance rating (IR) and ranking of each factor.

Findings: All 46 factors were assessed as "Very Important" through the overall assessment by the four stakeholder categories. The results indicated that the most important factors, across all groups, are "AI ability to learn from patient data", "insufficient data privacy measures for patients", "availability of technical support and maintenance services", "physicians' acceptance of AI in healthcare", "reliability and uptime of AI systems" and "ability to reduce medical errors".

Practical implications: Determining the importance ratings of the factors can lead to better resource allocation and the development of strategies to facilitate the adoption and implementation of these technologies, thus promoting the development of innovative solutions to improve healthcare practices.

Originality/value: This study contributes to the body of knowledge in the domain of technology adoption and implementation in the medical workplace, through improving stakeholders' comprehension of the factors challenging the integration of AI technologies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
挑战将人工智能技术融入医疗保健工作场所的关键因素:利益相关者评估。
目的:本研究旨在确定和评估人工智能(AI)技术融入医疗工作场所的挑战因素:本研究采用了一种混合方法,首先进行文献综述,然后就医疗保健工作场所整合人工智能技术所面临的挑战因素编制问卷调查并进行测试。总共确定了 46 个因素,并将其分为 6 组。这些因素由四个不同的利益相关者类别进行评估:设施管理人员、医务人员、业务人员和患者/访客。对收集到的评估结果进行审查,以确定每个因素的相对重要性指数(RII)、重要性评级(IR)和排名:通过四个利益相关者类别的总体评估,所有 46 个因素都被评为 "非常重要"。结果表明,在所有组别中,最重要的因素是 "人工智能从患者数据中学习的能力"、"患者数据隐私措施不足"、"技术支持和维护服务的可用性"、"医生对医疗保健领域人工智能的接受程度"、"人工智能系统的可靠性和正常运行时间 "以及 "减少医疗失误的能力":确定这些因素的重要性等级可以更好地分配资源和制定战略,促进这些技术的采用和实施,从而推动创新解决方案的开发,改善医疗保健实践:本研究通过提高利益相关者对人工智能技术整合面临的挑战因素的理解,为医疗工作场所技术采用和实施领域的知识体系做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: ■International health and international organizations ■Organisational behaviour, governance, management and leadership ■The inter-relationship of health and public sector services ■Theories and practices of management and leadership in health and related organizations ■Emotion in health care organizations ■Management education and training ■Industrial relations and human resource theory and management. As the demands on the health care industry both polarize and intensify, effective management of financial and human resources, the restructuring of organizations and the handling of market forces are increasingly important areas for the industry to address.
期刊最新文献
Dry promotions and positive psychology: striking a balance for employee well-being. Artificial intelligence and big data from digital health applications: publication trends and analysis. Clinical leadership during the Covid-19 pandemic: a scoping review. Work engagement of hospital workers in times of pressure: do nonclinical hospital workers react differently from their well-studied clinical colleagues? Workplace health promotion interventions in EU-27 public administrations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1