Felipe Lopez-Ramirez, Sahar Soleimani, Javad R Azadi, Sheila Sheth, Satomi Kawamoto, Ammar A Javed, Florent Tixier, Ralph H Hruban, Elliot K Fishman, Linda C Chu
{"title":"Radiomics machine learning algorithm facilitates detection of small pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors on CT.","authors":"Felipe Lopez-Ramirez, Sahar Soleimani, Javad R Azadi, Sheila Sheth, Satomi Kawamoto, Ammar A Javed, Florent Tixier, Ralph H Hruban, Elliot K Fishman, Linda C Chu","doi":"10.1016/j.diii.2024.08.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to develop a radiomics-based algorithm to identify small pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) on CT and evaluate its robustness across manual and automated segmentations, exploring the feasibility of automated screening.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients with pathologically confirmed T1 stage PanNETs and healthy controls undergoing dual-phase CT imaging were retrospectively identified. Manual segmentation of pancreas and tumors was performed, then automated pancreatic segmentations were generated using a pretrained neural network. A total of 1223 radiomics features were independently extracted from both segmentation volumes, in the arterial and venous phases separately. Ten final features were selected to train classifiers to identify PanNETs and controls. The cohort was divided into training and testing sets, and performance of classifiers was assessed using area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC), specificity and sensitivity, and compared against two radiologists blinded to the diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 135 patients with 142 PanNETs, and 135 healthy controls were included. There were 168 women and 102 men, with a mean age of 55.4 ± 11.6 (standard deviation) years (range: 20-85 years). Median PanNET size was 1.3 cm (Q1, 1.0; Q3, 1.5; range: 0.5-1.9). The arterial phase LightGBM model achieved the best performance in the test set, with 90 % sensitivity (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 80-98), 76 % specificity (95 % CI: 62-88) and an AUC of 0.87 (95 % CI: 0.79-0.94). Using features from the automated segmentations, this model achieved an AUC of 0.86 (95 % CI: 0.79-0.93). In comparison, the two radiologists achieved a mean 50 % sensitivity and 100 % specificity using arterial phase CT images.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Radiomics features identify small PanNETs, with stable performance when extracted using automated segmentations. These models demonstrate high sensitivity, complementing the high specificity of radiologists, and could serve as opportunistic screeners.</p>","PeriodicalId":48656,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2024.08.003","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop a radiomics-based algorithm to identify small pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) on CT and evaluate its robustness across manual and automated segmentations, exploring the feasibility of automated screening.
Materials and methods: Patients with pathologically confirmed T1 stage PanNETs and healthy controls undergoing dual-phase CT imaging were retrospectively identified. Manual segmentation of pancreas and tumors was performed, then automated pancreatic segmentations were generated using a pretrained neural network. A total of 1223 radiomics features were independently extracted from both segmentation volumes, in the arterial and venous phases separately. Ten final features were selected to train classifiers to identify PanNETs and controls. The cohort was divided into training and testing sets, and performance of classifiers was assessed using area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC), specificity and sensitivity, and compared against two radiologists blinded to the diagnoses.
Results: A total of 135 patients with 142 PanNETs, and 135 healthy controls were included. There were 168 women and 102 men, with a mean age of 55.4 ± 11.6 (standard deviation) years (range: 20-85 years). Median PanNET size was 1.3 cm (Q1, 1.0; Q3, 1.5; range: 0.5-1.9). The arterial phase LightGBM model achieved the best performance in the test set, with 90 % sensitivity (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 80-98), 76 % specificity (95 % CI: 62-88) and an AUC of 0.87 (95 % CI: 0.79-0.94). Using features from the automated segmentations, this model achieved an AUC of 0.86 (95 % CI: 0.79-0.93). In comparison, the two radiologists achieved a mean 50 % sensitivity and 100 % specificity using arterial phase CT images.
Conclusion: Radiomics features identify small PanNETs, with stable performance when extracted using automated segmentations. These models demonstrate high sensitivity, complementing the high specificity of radiologists, and could serve as opportunistic screeners.
期刊介绍:
Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging accepts publications originating from any part of the world based only on their scientific merit. The Journal focuses on illustrated articles with great iconographic topics and aims at aiding sharpening clinical decision-making skills as well as following high research topics. All articles are published in English.
Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging publishes editorials, technical notes, letters, original and review articles on abdominal, breast, cancer, cardiac, emergency, forensic medicine, head and neck, musculoskeletal, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, interventional, obstetric, pediatric, thoracic and vascular imaging, neuroradiology, nuclear medicine, as well as contrast material, computer developments, health policies and practice, and medical physics relevant to imaging.