Real-time estimation of immunological responses against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants in the UK: a mathematical modelling study.

IF 36.4 1区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Lancet Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-11 DOI:10.1016/S1473-3099(24)00484-5
Timothy W Russell, Hermaleigh Townsley, Joel Hellewell, Joshua Gahir, Marianne Shawe-Taylor, David Greenwood, David Hodgson, Agnieszka Hobbs, Giulia Dowgier, Rebecca Penn, Theo Sanderson, Phoebe Stevenson-Leggett, James Bazire, Ruth Harvey, Ashley S Fowler, Murad Miah, Callie Smith, Mauro Miranda, Philip Bawumia, Harriet V Mears, Lorin Adams, Emine Hatipoglu, Nicola O'Reilly, Scott Warchal, Karen Ambrose, Amy Strange, Gavin Kelly, Svend Kjar, Padmasayee Papineni, Tumena Corrah, Richard Gilson, Vincenzo Libri, George Kassiotis, Steve Gamblin, Nicola S Lewis, Bryan Williams, Charles Swanton, Sonia Gandhi, Rupert Beale, Mary Y Wu, David L V Bauer, Edward J Carr, Emma C Wall, Adam J Kucharski
{"title":"Real-time estimation of immunological responses against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants in the UK: a mathematical modelling study.","authors":"Timothy W Russell, Hermaleigh Townsley, Joel Hellewell, Joshua Gahir, Marianne Shawe-Taylor, David Greenwood, David Hodgson, Agnieszka Hobbs, Giulia Dowgier, Rebecca Penn, Theo Sanderson, Phoebe Stevenson-Leggett, James Bazire, Ruth Harvey, Ashley S Fowler, Murad Miah, Callie Smith, Mauro Miranda, Philip Bawumia, Harriet V Mears, Lorin Adams, Emine Hatipoglu, Nicola O'Reilly, Scott Warchal, Karen Ambrose, Amy Strange, Gavin Kelly, Svend Kjar, Padmasayee Papineni, Tumena Corrah, Richard Gilson, Vincenzo Libri, George Kassiotis, Steve Gamblin, Nicola S Lewis, Bryan Williams, Charles Swanton, Sonia Gandhi, Rupert Beale, Mary Y Wu, David L V Bauer, Edward J Carr, Emma C Wall, Adam J Kucharski","doi":"10.1016/S1473-3099(24)00484-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants and COVID-19 vaccination have resulted in complex exposure histories. Rapid assessment of the effects of these exposures on neutralising antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 infection is crucial for informing vaccine strategy and epidemic management. We aimed to investigate heterogeneity in individual-level and population-level antibody kinetics to emerging variants by previous SARS-CoV-2 exposure history, to examine implications for real-time estimation, and to examine the effects of vaccine-campaign timing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our Bayesian hierarchical model of antibody kinetics estimated neutralising-antibody trajectories against a panel of SARS-CoV-2 variants quantified with a live virus microneutralisation assay and informed by individual-level COVID-19 vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 infection histories. Antibody titre trajectories were modelled with a piecewise linear function that depended on the key biological quantities of an initial titre value, time the peak titre is reached, set-point time, and corresponding rates of increase and decrease for gradients between two timing parameters. All process parameters were estimated at both the individual level and the population level. We analysed data from participants in the University College London Hospitals-Francis Crick Institute Legacy study cohort (NCT04750356) who underwent surveillance for SARS-CoV-2 either through asymptomatic mandatory occupational health screening once per week between April 1, 2020, and May 31, 2022, or symptom-based testing between April 1, 2020, and Feb 1, 2023. People included in the Legacy study were either Crick employees or health-care workers at three London hospitals, older than 18 years, and gave written informed consent. Legacy excluded people who were unable or unwilling to give informed consent and those not employed by a qualifying institution. We segmented data to include vaccination events occurring up to 150 days before the emergence of three variants of concern: delta, BA.2, and XBB 1.5. We split the data for each wave into two categories: real-time and retrospective. The real-time dataset contained neutralising-antibody titres collected up to the date of emergence in each wave; the retrospective dataset contained all samples until the next SARS-CoV-2 exposure of each individual, whether vaccination or infection.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We included data from 335 participants in the delta wave analysis, 223 (67%) of whom were female and 112 (33%) of whom were male (median age 40 years, IQR 22-58); data from 385 participants in the BA.2 wave analysis, 271 (70%) of whom were female and 114 (30%) of whom were male (41 years, 22-60); and data from 248 participants in the XBB 1.5 wave analysis, 191 (77%) of whom were female, 56 (23%) of whom were male, and one (<1%) of whom preferred not to say (40 years, 21-59). Overall, we included 968 exposures (vaccinations) across 1895 serum samples in the model. For the delta wave, we estimated peak titre values as 490·0 IC<sub>50</sub> (95% credible interval 224·3-1515·9) for people with no previous infection and as 702·4 IC<sub>50</sub> (300·8-2322·7) for people with a previous infection before omicron; the delta wave did not include people with a previous omicron infection. For the BA.2 wave, we estimated peak titre values as 858·1 IC<sub>50</sub> (689·8-1363·2) for people with no previous infection, 1020·7 IC<sub>50</sub> (725·9-1722·6) for people with a previous infection before omicron, and 1422·0 IC<sub>50</sub> (679·2-3027·3) for people with a previous omicron infection. For the XBB 1.5 wave, we estimated peak titre values as 703·2 IC<sub>50</sub> (415·0-3197·8) for people with no previous infection, 1215·9 IC<sub>50</sub> (511·6-7338·7) for people with a previous infection before omicron, and 1556·3 IC<sub>50</sub> (757·2-7907·9) for people with a previous omicron infection.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Our study shows the feasibility of real-time estimation of antibody kinetics before SARS-CoV-2 variant emergence. This estimation is valuable for understanding how specific combinations of SARS-CoV-2 exposures influence antibody kinetics and for examining how COVID-19 vaccination-campaign timing could affect population-level immunity to emerging variants.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Wellcome Trust, National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, UK Research and Innovation, UK Medical Research Council, Francis Crick Institute, and Genotype-to-Phenotype National Virology Consortium.</p>","PeriodicalId":49923,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"80-93"},"PeriodicalIF":36.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(24)00484-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants and COVID-19 vaccination have resulted in complex exposure histories. Rapid assessment of the effects of these exposures on neutralising antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 infection is crucial for informing vaccine strategy and epidemic management. We aimed to investigate heterogeneity in individual-level and population-level antibody kinetics to emerging variants by previous SARS-CoV-2 exposure history, to examine implications for real-time estimation, and to examine the effects of vaccine-campaign timing.

Methods: Our Bayesian hierarchical model of antibody kinetics estimated neutralising-antibody trajectories against a panel of SARS-CoV-2 variants quantified with a live virus microneutralisation assay and informed by individual-level COVID-19 vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 infection histories. Antibody titre trajectories were modelled with a piecewise linear function that depended on the key biological quantities of an initial titre value, time the peak titre is reached, set-point time, and corresponding rates of increase and decrease for gradients between two timing parameters. All process parameters were estimated at both the individual level and the population level. We analysed data from participants in the University College London Hospitals-Francis Crick Institute Legacy study cohort (NCT04750356) who underwent surveillance for SARS-CoV-2 either through asymptomatic mandatory occupational health screening once per week between April 1, 2020, and May 31, 2022, or symptom-based testing between April 1, 2020, and Feb 1, 2023. People included in the Legacy study were either Crick employees or health-care workers at three London hospitals, older than 18 years, and gave written informed consent. Legacy excluded people who were unable or unwilling to give informed consent and those not employed by a qualifying institution. We segmented data to include vaccination events occurring up to 150 days before the emergence of three variants of concern: delta, BA.2, and XBB 1.5. We split the data for each wave into two categories: real-time and retrospective. The real-time dataset contained neutralising-antibody titres collected up to the date of emergence in each wave; the retrospective dataset contained all samples until the next SARS-CoV-2 exposure of each individual, whether vaccination or infection.

Findings: We included data from 335 participants in the delta wave analysis, 223 (67%) of whom were female and 112 (33%) of whom were male (median age 40 years, IQR 22-58); data from 385 participants in the BA.2 wave analysis, 271 (70%) of whom were female and 114 (30%) of whom were male (41 years, 22-60); and data from 248 participants in the XBB 1.5 wave analysis, 191 (77%) of whom were female, 56 (23%) of whom were male, and one (<1%) of whom preferred not to say (40 years, 21-59). Overall, we included 968 exposures (vaccinations) across 1895 serum samples in the model. For the delta wave, we estimated peak titre values as 490·0 IC50 (95% credible interval 224·3-1515·9) for people with no previous infection and as 702·4 IC50 (300·8-2322·7) for people with a previous infection before omicron; the delta wave did not include people with a previous omicron infection. For the BA.2 wave, we estimated peak titre values as 858·1 IC50 (689·8-1363·2) for people with no previous infection, 1020·7 IC50 (725·9-1722·6) for people with a previous infection before omicron, and 1422·0 IC50 (679·2-3027·3) for people with a previous omicron infection. For the XBB 1.5 wave, we estimated peak titre values as 703·2 IC50 (415·0-3197·8) for people with no previous infection, 1215·9 IC50 (511·6-7338·7) for people with a previous infection before omicron, and 1556·3 IC50 (757·2-7907·9) for people with a previous omicron infection.

Interpretation: Our study shows the feasibility of real-time estimation of antibody kinetics before SARS-CoV-2 variant emergence. This estimation is valuable for understanding how specific combinations of SARS-CoV-2 exposures influence antibody kinetics and for examining how COVID-19 vaccination-campaign timing could affect population-level immunity to emerging variants.

Funding: Wellcome Trust, National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, UK Research and Innovation, UK Medical Research Council, Francis Crick Institute, and Genotype-to-Phenotype National Virology Consortium.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对英国新出现的 SARS-CoV-2 变体免疫反应的实时估计:数学模型研究。
背景:SARS-CoV-2 变体的出现和 COVID-19 疫苗接种导致了复杂的接触史。快速评估这些暴露对 SARS-CoV-2 感染的中和抗体的影响对于制定疫苗策略和疫情管理至关重要。我们的目的是根据以前的 SARS-CoV-2 暴露史研究个体水平和人群水平对新变种抗体动力学的异质性,研究对实时估计的影响,并研究疫苗接种时间的影响:我们的抗体动力学贝叶斯层次模型估算了针对一组 SARS-CoV-2 变异株的中和抗体轨迹,这些变异株是用活病毒微中和测定法量化的,并参考了个人水平的 COVID-19 疫苗接种史和 SARS-CoV-2 感染史。抗体滴度轨迹采用片断线性函数建模,该函数取决于初始滴度值、滴度达到峰值的时间、设定点时间以及两个时间参数之间梯度的相应增减率等关键生物量。所有过程参数都是在个体和群体水平上估算的。我们分析了伦敦大学学院医院-弗朗西斯-克里克研究所遗产研究队列(NCT04750356)参与者的数据,他们在 2020 年 4 月 1 日至 2022 年 5 月 31 日期间通过每周一次的无症状强制职业健康筛查或 2020 年 4 月 1 日至 2023 年 2 月 1 日期间的症状检测接受了 SARS-CoV-2 监测。参与 Legacy 研究的人员要么是克里克公司的员工,要么是伦敦三家医院的医护人员,年龄在 18 岁以上,并已提交知情同意书。Legacy研究排除了那些不能或不愿做出知情同意的人,以及那些不受雇于合格机构的人。我们对数据进行了细分,以包括在出现三种令人担忧的变异体:Delta、BA.2 和 XBB 1.5 之前 150 天内发生的疫苗接种事件。我们将每个波段的数据分为两类:实时数据和回顾数据。实时数据集包含直到每个波次中出现变异株之日收集的中和抗体滴度;回顾性数据集包含直到每个人下一次接触 SARS-CoV-2 之前的所有样本,无论是接种疫苗还是感染:我们在三角波分析中纳入了 335 名参与者的数据,其中 223 人(67%)为女性,112 人(33%)为男性(中位年龄 40 岁,IQR 22-58);在 BA.2 波分析中纳入了 385 名参与者的数据,其中 271 人(70%)为女性,112 人(33%)为男性(中位年龄 40 岁,IQR 22-58)。其中 271 人(70%)为女性,114 人(30%)为男性(41 岁,22-60 岁);XBB 1.5 波分析中 248 名参与者的数据,其中 191 人(77%)为女性,56 人(23%)为男性。对于 BA.2 波,我们估计既往未感染者的滴度峰值为 858-1 IC50 (689-8-1363-2),既往感染过奥米克隆者的滴度峰值为 1020-7 IC50 (725-9-1722-6),既往感染过奥米克隆者的滴度峰值为 1422-0 IC50 (679-2-3027-3)。对于 XBB 1.5 波,我们估计既往未感染者的滴度峰值为 703-2 IC50 (415-0-3197-8),既往感染过奥米克龙病毒者的滴度峰值为 1215-9 IC50 (511-6-7338-7),既往感染过奥米克龙病毒者的滴度峰值为 1556-3 IC50 (757-2-7907-9):我们的研究表明,在 SARS-CoV-2 变体出现之前实时估计抗体动力学是可行的。这种估计对于了解 SARS-CoV-2 暴露的特定组合如何影响抗体动力学,以及研究 COVID-19 疫苗接种活动的时机如何影响人群对新变种的免疫力都很有价值:资金来源:惠康基金会、英国国家健康研究所伦敦大学学院医院生物医学研究中心、英国研究与创新、英国医学研究委员会、弗朗西斯-克里克研究所和基因型对表型国家病毒学联合会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Lancet Infectious Diseases
Lancet Infectious Diseases 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
60.90
自引率
0.70%
发文量
1064
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Infectious Diseases was launched in August, 2001, and is a lively monthly journal of original research, review, opinion, and news covering international issues relevant to clinical infectious diseases specialists worldwide.The infectious diseases journal aims to be a world-leading publication, featuring original research that advocates change or sheds light on clinical practices related to infectious diseases. The journal prioritizes articles with the potential to impact clinical practice or influence perspectives. Content covers a wide range of topics, including anti-infective therapy and immunization, bacterial, viral, fungal, and parasitic infections, emerging infectious diseases, HIV/AIDS, malaria, tuberculosis, mycobacterial infections, infection control, infectious diseases epidemiology, neglected tropical diseases, and travel medicine. Informative reviews on any subject linked to infectious diseases and human health are also welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Correction to Lancet Infect Dis 2024; published online Oct 23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(24)00527-9 Effectiveness of sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine plus amodiaquine and dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine for seasonal malaria chemoprevention in Uganda: a three-arm, open-label, non-inferiority and superiority, cluster-randomised, controlled trial Expanding seasonal malaria chemoprevention beyond the Sahel region Interim analysis of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine NVX-CoV2601 as a heterologous booster dose Immunogenicity and safety of a monovalent omicron XBB.1.5 SARS-CoV-2 recombinant spike protein vaccine as a heterologous booster dose in US adults: interim analysis of a single-arm phase 2/3 study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1