Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasound Guidance in Transthoracic Needle Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Journal of Thoracic Imaging Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI:10.1097/RTI.0000000000000811
Simon Lemieux, Lorence Pinard, Raphaël Marchand, Sonia Kali, Stephan Altmayer, Vicky Mai, Steeve Provencher
{"title":"Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasound Guidance in Transthoracic Needle Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Simon Lemieux, Lorence Pinard, Raphaël Marchand, Sonia Kali, Stephan Altmayer, Vicky Mai, Steeve Provencher","doi":"10.1097/RTI.0000000000000811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of relevant studies to assess the diagnostic accuracy and safety outcomes of ultrasound (US)-guided transthoracic needle biopsy (TTNB) for peripheral lung and pleural lesions.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A search was performed through Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central from inception up to September 23, 2022 for diagnostic accuracy studies reporting US-guided TTNB (Prospero registration: CRD42021225168). The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy, which was assessed by sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios (LR), and diagnostic odds ratio. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate inter-study heterogeneity. The secondary outcome was the frequency of complications. Random-effects models were used for the analyses. The risk of bias and the applicability of the included studies were assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Publication bias was assessed by testing the association between the natural logarithm of the diagnostic odds ratio and the effective sample size.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 7841 citations identified, 83 independent cohorts (11,767 patients) were included in the analysis. The pooled sensitivity of US-TTNB was 88% (95% CI: 86%-91%, 80 studies). Pooled specificity was 100% (95% CI: 99%-100%, 72 studies), resulting in positive LR, negative LR, and diagnostic odds ratio of 946 (-743 to 2635), 0.12 (0.09 to 0.14), and 8141 (1344 to 49,321), respectively. Complications occurred in 4% (95% CI: 3%-5%) of the procedures, with pneumothorax being the most frequent (3%; 95% CI: 2%-3%, 72 studies) and resulting in chest tube placement in 0.4% (95% CI: 0.2%-0.7%, 64 studies) of the procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>US-TTNB is an effective and safe procedure for pleural lesions and peripheral lung lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":49974,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thoracic Imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thoracic Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RTI.0000000000000811","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of relevant studies to assess the diagnostic accuracy and safety outcomes of ultrasound (US)-guided transthoracic needle biopsy (TTNB) for peripheral lung and pleural lesions.

Materials and methods: A search was performed through Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central from inception up to September 23, 2022 for diagnostic accuracy studies reporting US-guided TTNB (Prospero registration: CRD42021225168). The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy, which was assessed by sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios (LR), and diagnostic odds ratio. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate inter-study heterogeneity. The secondary outcome was the frequency of complications. Random-effects models were used for the analyses. The risk of bias and the applicability of the included studies were assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Publication bias was assessed by testing the association between the natural logarithm of the diagnostic odds ratio and the effective sample size.

Results: Of the 7841 citations identified, 83 independent cohorts (11,767 patients) were included in the analysis. The pooled sensitivity of US-TTNB was 88% (95% CI: 86%-91%, 80 studies). Pooled specificity was 100% (95% CI: 99%-100%, 72 studies), resulting in positive LR, negative LR, and diagnostic odds ratio of 946 (-743 to 2635), 0.12 (0.09 to 0.14), and 8141 (1344 to 49,321), respectively. Complications occurred in 4% (95% CI: 3%-5%) of the procedures, with pneumothorax being the most frequent (3%; 95% CI: 2%-3%, 72 studies) and resulting in chest tube placement in 0.4% (95% CI: 0.2%-0.7%, 64 studies) of the procedures.

Conclusions: US-TTNB is an effective and safe procedure for pleural lesions and peripheral lung lesions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经胸穿刺活检中超声引导的诊断准确性:系统综述与 Meta 分析。
目的:对相关研究进行系统综述和荟萃分析,以评估超声(US)引导下经胸针活检(TTNB)治疗肺外周和胸膜病变的诊断准确性和安全性:通过Medline、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane Central检索了从开始到2022年9月23日报告US引导下经胸穿刺活检的诊断准确性研究(Prospero注册:CRD42021225168)。主要结果是诊断准确性,通过灵敏度、特异性、似然比 (LR) 和诊断几率比进行评估。为评估研究间的异质性,进行了敏感性和亚组分析。次要结果是并发症的发生频率。分析采用随机效应模型。使用 QUADAS-2 工具评估了纳入研究的偏倚风险和适用性。通过检验诊断几率比的自然对数与有效样本量之间的关系来评估发表偏倚:在已识别的 7841 篇引文中,有 83 个独立队列(11767 名患者)被纳入分析。US-TTNB的汇总灵敏度为88%(95% CI:86%-91%,80项研究)。汇总特异性为 100%(95% CI:99%-100%,72 项研究),导致阳性 LR、阴性 LR 和诊断几率比分别为 946(-743 至 2635)、0.12(0.09 至 0.14)和 8141(1344 至 49,321)。4%(95% CI:3%-5%)的手术出现并发症,其中气胸最为常见(3%;95% CI:2%-3%,72 项研究),0.4%(95% CI:0.2%-0.7%,64 项研究)的手术导致胸管置入:结论:US-TTNB 是治疗胸膜病变和肺周围病变的一种有效而安全的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Thoracic Imaging
Journal of Thoracic Imaging 医学-核医学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
87
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Thoracic Imaging (JTI) provides authoritative information on all aspects of the use of imaging techniques in the diagnosis of cardiac and pulmonary diseases. Original articles and analytical reviews published in this timely journal provide the very latest thinking of leading experts concerning the use of chest radiography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography, ultrasound, and all other promising imaging techniques in cardiopulmonary radiology. Official Journal of the Society of Thoracic Radiology: Japanese Society of Thoracic Radiology Korean Society of Thoracic Radiology European Society of Thoracic Imaging.
期刊最新文献
Spatial Resolution Fidelity Comparison Between Energy Integrating and Deep Silicon Photon Counting CT: Implications for Pulmonary Imaging. Incidental Apical Pleuroparenchymal Scarring on Computed Tomography: Diagnostic Yield, Progression, Morphologic Features and Clinical Significance. The Relationship Between Cardiac CT-based Left Atrial Structure and Epicardial Adipose Tissue and Postablation Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence Within 2 Years. Left Atrial Strain for Prediction of Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling After ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking. Coronary Atherosclerosis Progression Provides Incremental Prognostic Value and Optimizes Risk Reclassification by Computed Tomography Angiography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1