Apically extruded debris evaluation with the use of ProTaper Ultimate and TruNatomy files systems with and without glider preparation in primary tooth.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-03 DOI:10.22514/jocpd.2024.111
Büşra Karaağaç Eskibağlar, Merve Yeniçeri Özata
{"title":"Apically extruded debris evaluation with the use of ProTaper Ultimate and TruNatomy files systems with and without glider preparation in primary tooth.","authors":"Büşra Karaağaç Eskibağlar, Merve Yeniçeri Özata","doi":"10.22514/jocpd.2024.111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Information regarding the influence of resorption and glide paths on debris extrusion in primary teeth is lacking. Therefore, we evaluated debris extrusion with and without resorption and with and without the use of a path file in primary molar teeth prepared with ProTaper Ultimate (PTU) Prime and TruNatomy (TRN) Prime rotary file systems. Forty resorbed and forty non-resorbed primary molar teeth were collected. Both groups were divided into four subgroups (n = 10). The Eppendorf tubes were weighed pre-debris. The distal canals of the teeth were prepared with PTU Prime and TRN Prime file systems, with and without the use of path files. The debris-filled tubes were weighed, and the weight of only the extruded debris was calculated by subtraction. The data were analyzed using a three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test. The presence of tooth resorption significantly increased debris extrusion, and the use of a path file significantly decreased debris extrusion (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The binary and ternary interactions of the three evaluated parameters among the groups showed no significant differences in terms of the amount of debris extruded (<i>p</i> > 0.05). While debris extrusion was observed in all groups, the use of a glide path file in primary teeth before the preparation process resulted in less debris extrusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":50235,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","volume":"48 5","pages":"119-124"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22514/jocpd.2024.111","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Information regarding the influence of resorption and glide paths on debris extrusion in primary teeth is lacking. Therefore, we evaluated debris extrusion with and without resorption and with and without the use of a path file in primary molar teeth prepared with ProTaper Ultimate (PTU) Prime and TruNatomy (TRN) Prime rotary file systems. Forty resorbed and forty non-resorbed primary molar teeth were collected. Both groups were divided into four subgroups (n = 10). The Eppendorf tubes were weighed pre-debris. The distal canals of the teeth were prepared with PTU Prime and TRN Prime file systems, with and without the use of path files. The debris-filled tubes were weighed, and the weight of only the extruded debris was calculated by subtraction. The data were analyzed using a three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test. The presence of tooth resorption significantly increased debris extrusion, and the use of a path file significantly decreased debris extrusion (p < 0.001). The binary and ternary interactions of the three evaluated parameters among the groups showed no significant differences in terms of the amount of debris extruded (p > 0.05). While debris extrusion was observed in all groups, the use of a glide path file in primary teeth before the preparation process resulted in less debris extrusion.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用 ProTaper Ultimate 和 TruNatomy 牙科锉系统,对基牙牙尖挤出的碎屑进行评估,并进行和不进行滑行预备。
有关吸收和滑行路径对基牙碎屑挤出的影响的信息还很缺乏。因此,我们对使用 ProTaper Ultimate (PTU) Prime 和 TruNatomy (TRN) Prime 旋转锉系统制备的基磨牙在有和没有吸收以及使用和不使用路径锉时的碎屑挤出情况进行了评估。收集了四十颗吸收和四十颗未吸收的基磨牙。两组均分为四个亚组(n = 10)。Eppendorf 管在去渣前称重。使用 PTU Prime 和 TRN Prime 锉系统制备牙齿的远端根管,包括使用和不使用路径锉。对装满碎屑的试管进行称重,然后通过减法计算仅挤出碎屑的重量。数据采用三方方差分析(ANOVA)检验进行分析。牙齿吸收会明显增加碎屑的挤出量,而使用路径锉会明显减少碎屑的挤出量(p < 0.001)。各组间三个评估参数的二元和三元交互作用显示,碎屑挤出量无明显差异(p > 0.05)。虽然在所有组别中都观察到了碎屑挤出,但在预备过程前在基牙中使用滑道锉可减少碎屑挤出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry
Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-PEDIATRICS
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: The purpose of The Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry is to provide clinically relevant information to enable the practicing dentist to have access to the state of the art in pediatric dentistry. From prevention, to information, to the management of different problems encountered in children''s related medical and dental problems, this peer-reviewed journal keeps you abreast of the latest news and developments related to pediatric dentistry.
期刊最新文献
A comparative study of stress amongst different hierarchies of paediatric dental providers. Clinical effectiveness and parental acceptance of silver diamine fluoride in preschool children: a non-randomized trial. Clinical indications for the diagnosis and treatment of functional posterior crossbite in pediatric population: a narrative review with clinical description. Co-Mask R-CNN: collaborative learning-based method for tooth instance segmentation. Criteria for early diagnosis of congenitally missing second premolars based on the calcification grades of other permanent posterior teeth: a retrospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1