Periodontal health and oral hygiene of children with orofacial clefts in Eastern China.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-03 DOI:10.22514/jocpd.2024.107
Cong Li, Ling-Fa Xue, Yao-Xiang Xu, Jin Yue, Jin-Ze Zhao, Wen-Lin Xiao
{"title":"Periodontal health and oral hygiene of children with orofacial clefts in Eastern China.","authors":"Cong Li, Ling-Fa Xue, Yao-Xiang Xu, Jin Yue, Jin-Ze Zhao, Wen-Lin Xiao","doi":"10.22514/jocpd.2024.107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To comparatively assess the periodontal condition and oral hygiene of children and adolescents at different ages presenting with different types of orofacial clefts (OFCs). A total of 1608 patients aged 6-18 years who had not previously undergone periodontal treatment were enrolled in this study. Participants were categorized into two age groups: 6-12 years (Group I) and 13-18 years (Group II). Participants in both age groups were further classified into one of the three OFC-type subgroups: cleft lip only (without or with alveolar cleft), cleft lip and cleft palate, and cleft palate only. Periodontal health was determined by evaluating plaque formation and gingival status with reference to the Silness and Loe plaque index (PI), Loe gingival index (GI), and community periodontal index (CPI). Periodontal health and oral hygiene were not significantly different between Groups I and II for cleft type (<i>p</i> > 0.05). A significant difference was not observed in PI for cleft type among the groups (<i>p</i> > 0.05). In Group II, GI and CPI were significantly higher than in Group I (<i>p</i> < 0.05). According to our results, cleft type does not influence periodontal health of children and adolescents with OFCs. Age, however, influences periodontal diseases' prevalence and severity.</p>","PeriodicalId":50235,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22514/jocpd.2024.107","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To comparatively assess the periodontal condition and oral hygiene of children and adolescents at different ages presenting with different types of orofacial clefts (OFCs). A total of 1608 patients aged 6-18 years who had not previously undergone periodontal treatment were enrolled in this study. Participants were categorized into two age groups: 6-12 years (Group I) and 13-18 years (Group II). Participants in both age groups were further classified into one of the three OFC-type subgroups: cleft lip only (without or with alveolar cleft), cleft lip and cleft palate, and cleft palate only. Periodontal health was determined by evaluating plaque formation and gingival status with reference to the Silness and Loe plaque index (PI), Loe gingival index (GI), and community periodontal index (CPI). Periodontal health and oral hygiene were not significantly different between Groups I and II for cleft type (p > 0.05). A significant difference was not observed in PI for cleft type among the groups (p > 0.05). In Group II, GI and CPI were significantly higher than in Group I (p < 0.05). According to our results, cleft type does not influence periodontal health of children and adolescents with OFCs. Age, however, influences periodontal diseases' prevalence and severity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
华东地区口面裂儿童的牙周健康和口腔卫生。
比较评估不同年龄段患有不同类型口面裂(OFC)的儿童和青少年的牙周状况和口腔卫生情况。本研究共招募了 1608 名年龄在 6-18 岁之间、之前未接受过牙周治疗的患者。参与者被分为两个年龄组:6-12 岁(第一组)和 13-18 岁(第二组)。两个年龄组的参与者又被分为三个 OFC 类型亚组:仅唇裂(无或伴有齿槽裂)、唇裂和腭裂、仅腭裂。牙周健康是通过参照 Silness 和 Loe 牙菌斑指数 (PI)、Loe 牙龈指数 (GI) 和社区牙周指数 (CPI) 评估牙菌斑形成和牙龈状况来确定的。就裂隙类型而言,第一组和第二组的牙周健康和口腔卫生无明显差异(P > 0.05)。各组间的唇裂类型 PI 无明显差异(P > 0.05)。第二组的 GI 和 CPI 明显高于第一组(P < 0.05)。根据我们的研究结果,裂隙类型不会影响有口腔外翻的儿童和青少年的牙周健康。然而,年龄会影响牙周疾病的发病率和严重程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry
Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-PEDIATRICS
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: The purpose of The Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry is to provide clinically relevant information to enable the practicing dentist to have access to the state of the art in pediatric dentistry. From prevention, to information, to the management of different problems encountered in children''s related medical and dental problems, this peer-reviewed journal keeps you abreast of the latest news and developments related to pediatric dentistry.
期刊最新文献
Segmental root development of immature necrotic permanent teeth following regenerative endodontic procedures: a case series. Sleep bruxism in children main methods of treatment: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Temporal variation in the oral microbiome and the prediction of early childhood caries in different ethnicities. The impact of clinical audit on antibiotic prescribing in dental practice at Taibah University Dental Hospital. A severely damaged premolar tooth restored with coronal pulpotomy and a 3D-printed endocrown.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1