Meta-analysis of Targeted Therapies in EGFR-mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Efficacy and Safety of Osimertinib, Erlotinib, and Gefitinib as First-line Treatment.

Zaheer Qureshi, Faryal Altaf, Abdur Jamil, Rimsha Siddique
{"title":"Meta-analysis of Targeted Therapies in EGFR-mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Efficacy and Safety of Osimertinib, Erlotinib, and Gefitinib as First-line Treatment.","authors":"Zaheer Qureshi, Faryal Altaf, Abdur Jamil, Rimsha Siddique","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Some of the non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases enhance somatic mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene within the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) domain. In such cases, first-line treatments are EGFR-TKIs, including osimertinib, erlotinib, or gefitinib. Therefore, this meta-analysis aims to assess the safety and efficacy of first-line targeted therapies for EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC patients, focusing on osimertinib, erlotinib, and gefitinib.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic electronic search was conducted on 3 electronic databases-Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science-from inception to May 2024 to locate relevant trials reporting the safety and efficacy of osimertinib, erlotinib, or gefitinib in treating EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC. No language or data restriction was applied to the search strategy. The assessed effects were objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). RoB 2 tool was utilized to determine the risk of bias while R programming language performed all the statistical synthesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 15,275 search results, only 19 trials were eligible for this meta-analysis. All the 3 EGFR-TKIs depicted effectiveness and safety among NSCLC patients, but osimertinib improved the ORR by 72% (95% CI: 65%, 78%) as compared with erlotinib (69% [95% CI: 58%, 79%]) and gefitinib (64% [95% CI: 64%, 78%]). Overall, the 3 EGFR-TKIs were effective by improving ORR 68% (95% CI: 63%, 73%). Similarly, osimertinib demonstrated highly effective impacts in disease control among NSCLC patients by 94% (95% CI: 91%, 97%) compared with gefitinib (68% [95% CI: 41%, 89%]). Overall, the 2 EGFR-TKIs were effective in disease control among NSCLC patients (82% [95% CI: 67%, 93%]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The pooled analyses have shown that erlotinib, gefitinib, and osimertinib are safe and effective first-line treatment options for patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC. The meta-analysis outcomes have demonstrated that osimertinib, erlotinib, or gefitinib positively impact overall response rate and disease control.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000001138","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Some of the non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases enhance somatic mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene within the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) domain. In such cases, first-line treatments are EGFR-TKIs, including osimertinib, erlotinib, or gefitinib. Therefore, this meta-analysis aims to assess the safety and efficacy of first-line targeted therapies for EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC patients, focusing on osimertinib, erlotinib, and gefitinib.

Methods: A systematic electronic search was conducted on 3 electronic databases-Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science-from inception to May 2024 to locate relevant trials reporting the safety and efficacy of osimertinib, erlotinib, or gefitinib in treating EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC. No language or data restriction was applied to the search strategy. The assessed effects were objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). RoB 2 tool was utilized to determine the risk of bias while R programming language performed all the statistical synthesis.

Results: Out of 15,275 search results, only 19 trials were eligible for this meta-analysis. All the 3 EGFR-TKIs depicted effectiveness and safety among NSCLC patients, but osimertinib improved the ORR by 72% (95% CI: 65%, 78%) as compared with erlotinib (69% [95% CI: 58%, 79%]) and gefitinib (64% [95% CI: 64%, 78%]). Overall, the 3 EGFR-TKIs were effective by improving ORR 68% (95% CI: 63%, 73%). Similarly, osimertinib demonstrated highly effective impacts in disease control among NSCLC patients by 94% (95% CI: 91%, 97%) compared with gefitinib (68% [95% CI: 41%, 89%]). Overall, the 2 EGFR-TKIs were effective in disease control among NSCLC patients (82% [95% CI: 67%, 93%]).

Conclusions: The pooled analyses have shown that erlotinib, gefitinib, and osimertinib are safe and effective first-line treatment options for patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC. The meta-analysis outcomes have demonstrated that osimertinib, erlotinib, or gefitinib positively impact overall response rate and disease control.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
表皮生长因子受体突变非小细胞肺癌靶向治疗的 Meta 分析:奥希替尼、厄洛替尼和吉非替尼作为一线治疗的疗效和安全性。
背景:一些非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)基因在酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)结构域内发生了体细胞突变。在这种情况下,一线治疗药物是表皮生长因子受体-TKIs,包括奥希替尼、厄洛替尼或吉非替尼。因此,本荟萃分析旨在评估EGFR突变晚期NSCLC患者一线靶向治疗的安全性和有效性,重点关注奥希替尼、厄洛替尼和吉非替尼:从开始到2024年5月,在3个电子数据库--Scopus、PubMed和Web of Science上进行了系统的电子检索,以查找报道奥西替尼、厄洛替尼或吉非替尼治疗表皮生长因子受体突变晚期NSCLC的安全性和有效性的相关试验。搜索策略没有语言或数据限制。评估效果为客观反应率(ORR)和疾病控制率(DCR)。使用 RoB 2 工具确定偏倚风险,并使用 R 编程语言进行所有统计综合:在15275项检索结果中,只有19项试验符合荟萃分析的条件。3 种 EGFR-TKIs 在 NSCLC 患者中均具有有效性和安全性,但与厄洛替尼(69% [95% CI: 58%, 79%])和吉非替尼(64% [95% CI: 64%, 78%])相比,奥希替尼的 ORR 提高了 72% (95% CI: 65%, 78%)。总体而言,3种EGFR-TKIs疗效显著,ORR提高了68%(95% CI:63%,73%)。同样,与吉非替尼(68% [95% CI:41%, 89%])相比,奥希替尼对NSCLC患者的疾病控制率提高了94% (95% CI:91%, 97%),显示出非常有效的影响。总体而言,这两种表皮生长因子受体-TKIs能有效控制NSCLC患者的病情(82% [95% CI: 67%, 93%]):汇总分析表明,厄洛替尼、吉非替尼和奥西莫替尼是EGFR突变晚期NSCLC患者安全有效的一线治疗选择。荟萃分析结果表明,奥希替尼、厄洛替尼或吉非替尼对总体反应率和疾病控制有积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
130
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​American Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal for cancer surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, GYN oncologists, and pediatric oncologists. The emphasis of AJCO is on combined modality multidisciplinary loco-regional management of cancer. The journal also gives emphasis to translational research, outcome studies, and cost utility analyses, and includes opinion pieces and review articles. The editorial board includes a large number of distinguished surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, GYN oncologists, pediatric oncologists, and others who are internationally recognized for expertise in their fields.
期刊最新文献
Complications, Costs, and Health Care Resource Use with Tissue Biopsy Followed by Liquid Biopsy Versus Tissue Re-biopsy in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Nonsmall-cell Lung Cancer. Evaluating N-acetylcysteine as a Protective Agent Against Chemotherapy-induced Neuropathy in Breast Cancer: A Triple-blind, Randomized Clinical Trial. Efficacy and Safety of BRCA-targeted Therapy (Polyadenosine Diphosphate-ribose Polymerase Inhibitors) in Treatment of BRCA-mutated Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Institution-level Patterns of Care for Early-stage Oropharynx Cancers in the United States. Efficacy of Sacituzumab Govitecan in Hormone Receptor-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1