American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials最新文献

Objectives: We compared complications, costs, and health care resource utilization (HCRU) of patients with newly diagnosed metastatic nonsmall-cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) who had a tissue biopsy followed by either liquid biopsy (TFLB) (identified with a novel algorithm) or tissue re-biopsy (TRB).

Methods: This claims-based retrospective analysis included commercial and Medicare Advantage members in the Optum Research Database with mNSCLC (January 2017 to June 2021) and ≥2 tissue biopsy claims (7 to 90 d apart) (TRB) or ≥1 tissue and ≥1 liquid biopsy claim within 90 days (TFLB). Patients in the TFLB group were matched 1:1 to patients in the TRB group using propensity score matching. Surgical biopsy-related complications and complication-related and all-cause medical costs and HCRU during the 6-month follow-up were compared.

Results: Both groups had 235 patients post-match. During the follow-up, the surgical biopsy-related complication rate was lower in the TFLB group than the TRB group (65.1% [153/235] vs. 84.7% [199/235], P<0.001). Mean complication-related medical costs were significantly lower with TFLB ($8494 vs. $19,741, P<0.001) during the follow-up; mean (SD) duration of complication-related inpatient stays was significantly lower with TFLB (3.5 [7.0] vs. 6.6 [13.3] d, P=0.002). Mean all-cause medical costs were not significantly different between the groups; the TFLB group had fewer all-cause inpatient stays, inpatient days, and outpatient visits.

Conclusions: Multiple tissue biopsy procedures may be associated with significantly higher biopsy complication rates, higher complication-related medical costs, and longer complication-related inpatient stays than TFLB. All-cause medical costs were similar between groups.

Objectives: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a significant clinical issue that affects patients' quality of life and can limit the dosing of chemotherapeutic agents. N-acetylcysteine (NAC) has been proposed as a potential chemoprotective agent against CIPN due to its antioxidant properties. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of oral NAC in preventing and controlling taxane-induced neuropathy in patients with breast cancer.

Methods: This randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled trial included 80 breast cancer patients undergoing taxane-based chemotherapy. Participants were divided into 2 groups: an intervention group receiving 1200 mg of oral NAC in divided doses per day and a placebo group. Patients were evaluated for neuropathy grade and functional status at 1 and 12 weeks postintervention.

Results: Our analysis revealed no significant difference in the incidence and severity of neuropathy between the intervention and placebo groups at 1 (P=0.328) and 12 weeks (P=0.569) postchemotherapy. Baseline characteristics such as age, number of treatment cycles, and disease stage were similar between groups, indicating a homogeneous population.

Conclusions: Oral NAC at a dose of 1200 mg per day did not significantly reduce the incidence or severity of taxane-induced neuropathy. These findings suggest that the oral bioavailability of NAC may be insufficient to exert a protective effect and that future studies should consider alternative dosing strategies or routes of administration. The need for further research to optimize NAC's chemoprotective role in CIPN remains evident.

Objectives: The adoption of transoral robotic surgery and shifting epidemiology in oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer have stimulated debate over upfront and adjuvant treatment. Institutional variation in practice patterns can be obscured in patient-level analyses. We aimed to characterize institutional patterns of care as well as identify potential associations between patterns of care and survival.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients identified from 2004-2015 in the National Cancer Database. We analyzed 42,803 cases of oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer Stage cT1-2N0-2bM0 (AJCC 7th edition) treated with curative intent surgery and/or radiotherapy. We defined facility-4-year periods to account for changing institutional practice patterns. The 42,803 patients were treated within 2578 facility-4-year periods. We assessed institutional practice patterns, including the ratio of upfront surgery to definitive radiotherapy, case volumes, use of adjuvant therapies (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy), and margin positivity rates. Survival associations with institutional practice patterns were estimated with Cox regression.

Results: The ratio of upfront surgery to definitive radiotherapy ranged from 80-to-1 to 1-to-23. The institution-level median rate of adjuvant radiotherapy was 69% (IQR 50%-100%), adjuvant chemoradiotherapy was 44% (IQR 0%-67%), and margin-positive resection was 33% (IQR 0%-50%). On patient-level MVA, worse overall survival was not significantly associated with institutional case volume, adjuvant radiotherapy, or adjuvant chemoradiotherapy utilization.

Conclusions: High rates of multimodal therapy and positive margins underscore the importance of multidisciplinary care and highlight variable patterns of care across institutions. Further work is warranted to explore indicators of high-quality care and to optimize adjuvant therapy in the HPV era.

Objective: We aim to explore whether the surgical tumor free margin is important for overall survival (OS) and local control in patients who undergo neoadjuvant radiation (RT) for vulvar cancer.

Methods: A retrospective review from 2004 to 2021 of patients who underwent RT followed by surgical resection was performed. Patients were categorized into groups based on margin status (no residual disease, >8 mm, close margins defined as 1 to 7 mm, or positive). Local control and OS were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier with log rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed with cox hazards model.

Results: Eighty-three patients were included. A complete pathologic response (pCR) was found in 56% (n=46) of patients. The median follow-up time was 35 months (range: 4 to 216). The median OS for the entire cohort was 46 months (95% CI: 32.3-59.7). Having a pCR improved both OS and disease-free survival (DFS) compared with residual disease by 81 and 91 months, respectively ( P <0.001). In the 2 patients with a margin >8 mm, there was no statistical difference in survival between those with close margins (46 vs. 25 mo, P =0.485). Factors that significantly impacted both OS and DFS were depth of invasion (DOI) and LVSI. On multivariate analysis of those with residual disease, there was no difference in OS or DFS by margin status but having a DOI >9 mm showed decreased OS (HR: 3.654; 95% CI: 1.317-10.135).

Conclusions: In this cohort, response to RT, not margin status drives survival and recurrence. Given residual disease, the optimal margin is not clear, as there were only 2 patients with >8 mm margins. A close or positive margin had no impact on OS or local recurrence. A DOI >9 mm significantly impacts both OS and local recurrence even when accounting for other factors.

Objectives: Breast cancer is the most diagnosed cancer in women, with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) being the predominant subtype. Sacituzumab govitecan (SG), a novel antibody-drug conjugate, has emerged as a promising treatment for metastatic HR+/HER2- breast cancer. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate its efficacy and safety.

Methods: Adhering to "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses" guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases up to December 2023. We included clinical trials and observational studies evaluating SG in patients with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). In contrast, the secondary outcomes included overall survival, objective response rate, clinical benefit rate, duration of response (DOR), and adverse event profiles. Review Manager (Version 5.4) was used for the statistical analysis.

Results: Nine studies met the inclusion criteria for systematic review; 2 were suitable for meta-analysis. The pooled analysis showed a hazard ratio of 0.53 (95% CI: 0.34-0.83; P = 0.005; I2 = 86%) for PFSl and a hazard ratio of 0.63 (95% CI: 0.36-1.11; P = 0.11; I2 = 92%) for overall survival. The pooled analysis of the duration of response showed significant results with a standard mean difference = 0.22 (95% CI: 0.03-0.42; P = 0.02; I2 = 61%).

Conclusion: SG demonstrates significant benefit in PFS and duration of response in patients of HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer.

Objectives: Disparities exist in the length and quality of survival from melanoma. This study evaluated, in a Texas cohort, patient factors associated with melanoma survival and examined if newer immune-oncologic agents extend survival compared with conventional therapies.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with metastatic melanoma from 2011 to 2018 in the Texas Cancer Registry database. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression was used to evaluate patient characteristics associated with cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). The patient cohort was then grouped based on receipt of first-line immunotherapy or other therapies. The association between receipt of immunotherapy and survival was assessed with Kaplan-Meier analysis and inverse probability treatment weighted Cox regression.

Results: There were 1372 patients with metastatic melanoma. Factors associated with increased melanoma mortality risk (CSS) included being male (HR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.02-1.26), non-Hispanic black (HR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.13-1.45), living in poorer counties (HR: 1.40, 95%CI: 1.20-1.64), and having multimorbidity (HR: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.05-1.74). All minority races and Hispanics had poorer OS compared with non-Hispanic Whites. Patients who received first-line immunotherapy had significantly longer median (interquartile range) survival (CSS: 27.00 [21.00 to 42.00] mo vs. 16.00 [14.00 to 19.00] mo; OS: 22.00 [17.00 to 27.00] mo vs. 12.00 [11.00 to 14.00] mo). They also had reduced mortality risk (HR for CSS: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.73-0.88; P <0.0001; HR for OS: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.69-0.83; P <0.0001) compared with the nonimmunotherapy cohort.

Conclusions: This study showed differences in risks from melanoma survival based on patient demographic and clinical characteristics. Low socioeconomic status increased mortality risk, and first-line immunotherapy use favored survival. Health policies and tailored interventions that will promote equity in patient survival and survivorship are essential for managing metastatic melanoma.

Breast cancer is the second leading cause of women's cancer deaths after lung cancer. Risk factors such as environment, lifestyle, and genetics contribute to its development, including mutation in the breast cancer (BRCA) gene. Polyadenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) target these mutations, benefiting patients with advanced cancers. This review summarizes PARPi' safety and efficacy in the treatment of BRCA-mutated breast cancer. PubMed, The Cochrane Library for Clinical Trials, and Science Direct, were searched for articles from inception to April 2024. Eligible articles were analyzed, and data were extracted for meta-analysis using RevMan 5.4 software with a random-effect model. Out of 430 articles identified from online databases, only 6 randomized control trials including 3610 patients were included in the analysis. PARPi therapy improved progression-free survival (hazard ratio: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.56, 0.73; P < 0.00001) and overall survival (hazard ratio: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.73, 0.98 P = 0.02), according to the analysis. In our safety analysis, the risk of adverse events was not statistically different between PARPi versus chemotherapy (relative risk [RR]: 1.08; 95% CI: 0.44, 2.68; P = 0.86), and combined PARPi and standard chemotherapy (RR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.93, 1.07; P = 0.80). The only statistically significant difference was observed in anemia, where PARPi increased the risk of developing anemia compared with standard chemotherapy (RR: 6.17; 95% CI: 2.44, 15.58; P = 0.0001). In BRCA-mutated breast cancer, PARPi treatment shows better overall survival and progression-free survival compared with standard chemotherapy or placebo. Furthermore, PARPi, either alone or in combination therapy, does not increase the risk of adverse events in these patients, as per the meta-analysis.

Objective: Melanoma survival has greatly improved with the advent of immunotherapy, but unequal access to these medications may exist due to nonmedical patient factors such as insurance status, educational background, and geographic proximity to treatment.

Methods: We used the National Cancer Database to assess patients with nonmetastatic cutaneous melanoma who underwent surgical resection and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) with tumor involvement from 2015 to 2020. We evaluated rates of adjuvant immunotherapy among this patient population based on patient, tumor, and facility variables, including insurance status, socioeconomic status, pathologic stage (IIIA-IIID), and treatment facility type and volume.

Results: Adjuvant immunotherapy was associated with improved survival for stage III melanoma, with a slight increase in 5-year OS for stage IIIA (87.9% vs. 85.9%, P=0.044) and a higher increase in stages IIIB-D disease (70.3% vs. 59.6%, P<0.001). Receipt of adjuvant immunotherapy was less likely for patients who were older, low socioeconomic status, or uninsured. Low-volume and community cancer centers had higher rates of adjuvant immunotherapy overall for all stage III patients, whereas high-volume and academic centers used adjuvant immunotherapy much less often for stage IIIA patients compared with those in stages IIIB-D.

Conclusions: Our results demonstrate inconsistent use of adjuvant immunotherapy among patients with stage III melanoma despite a significant association with improved survival. Notably, there was a lower use of adjuvant immunotherapy in patients of lower SES and those treated at high-volume centers. Equity in access to novel standards of care represents an opportunity to improve outcomes for patients with melanoma.

Objectives: Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is a novel antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) promising in treating metastatic HER2+ and HER2-low breast cancer. This updated systematic review and meta-analysis, integrating data from the latest clinical trials, aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of T-DXd in this patient population.

Methods: We adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science up to January 2024, focusing on clinical trials that assessed T-DXd's efficacy and safety. Eligibility criteria were based on the PICOS framework, and selected studies underwent rigorous quality assessment and data extraction. The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and the incidence of adverse events. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to synthesize the data.

Results: Seven studies involving 2,201 patients met the inclusion criteria. The pooled analysis revealed that T-DXd significantly improved PFS (OR=0.37, 95% CI: 0.27-0.52), indicating a robust efficacy in slowing disease progression. However, treatment was associated with an increased risk of anemia (OR=2.10, 95% CI: 1.36-3.25), fatigue (OR=1.56, 95% CI: 1.21-2.02), nausea (OR=6.42, 95% CI: 4.37-9.42), vomiting (OR=6.21, 95% CI: 3.14-12.25), constipation (OR=2.26, 95% CI: 1.53-3.34), and notably, drug-related interstitial lung disease (OR=10.89, 95% CI: 3.81-31.12). The efficacy outcomes demonstrated significant heterogeneity, which was addressed through sensitivity analysis.

Conclusions: T-DXd shows significant efficacy in treating metastatic HER2+ and HER2-low breast cancer, offering a valuable therapeutic option for patients with advanced disease. However, the treatment is associated with notable adverse events, including a heightened risk of ILD. These findings underscore the need for careful patient selection, monitoring, and management strategies to mitigate risks. Future research should focus on optimizing treatment protocols and exploring methods to enhance safety profiles.

Objectives: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), such as programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors, have been approved to treat a variety of cancers. Recently, studies have suggested that ICIs and statins are synergistic. However, the addition of statins to ICI therapy may increase the risk of gastrointestinal immune-related adverse events (irAEs). We investigated the effect of combination therapy with PD-1 and/or L1 inhibitors and statins on overall survival and gastrointestinal irAEs.

Methods: We reviewed the charts of patients with select cancers who received PD-1 and/or PD-L1 inhibitors and statins. The incidence of gastrointestinal irAEs and overall survival were compared with that in a matched control group of patients who received PD-1 and/or PD-L1 inhibitors without statins.

Results: Of the 823 patients in the statin group, 707 received PD-1 inhibitors, 86 received PD-L1 inhibitors, and 30 received both. Patients taking any statins (10.8%) and those taking high-intensity statins (15.8%) had higher rates of gastrointestinal irAEs than patients not taking statins (8.7%; P=0.046 and 0.006, respectively). Compared with the nonstatin treatments, statin use was associated with improved overall survival for patients taking PD-1 inhibitors (P<0.001) and for patients with (P=0.021) and without (P<0.001) gastrointestinal irAEs.

Conclusions: Synergism of statins with PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors continues to be a developing field of interest. Our data demonstrate the survival benefit of combination therapy with PD-1 and/or PD-L1 inhibitors and statins, warranting further investigation.