Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-07-31DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000001240
Seho Park, Scott L Coven, Yvette H Tran, Eneida A Mendonca
Objectives: This study aimed to investigate how social determinants of health (SDoH) influence health disparities in pediatric central nervous system (CNS) tumor outcomes by integrating individual and community-level data.
Methods: Retrospective cohort study. Individual-level electronic health record data from the Indiana Health Information Exchange were linked with community-level data from the Social Assets and Vulnerabilities Indicators using a record linkage method. Associations between CNS tumor diagnoses and SDoH factors were analyzed, as well as the descriptive characteristics of SDoH factors and demographic characteristics of CNS tumor patients.
Results: The analysis revealed significant disparities in CNS tumor prevalence and treatment protocols based on SDoH factors. Areas with higher median household income and lower rates of poverty, unemployment, uninsured status, and lack of high school education showed a higher prevalence of CNS-PNET and Meningioma, lower incidence of high-grade glioma, low-grade glioma, and Medulloblastoma. In addition, the use of VP shunts was associated with lower poverty and unemployment rates and higher median household income, whereas Brain Biopsy with Stealth was linked to higher rates of uninsurance, poverty, and lack of a high school diploma.
Conclusions: Significant correlations were found between SDoH factors and both CNS tumor outcomes. These findings suggest that integrating community-level SDoH data with individual health records can provide valuable insights and should be leveraged to address health care disparities and improve outcomes in pediatric CNS tumor patients.
{"title":"Examining the Impact of Social Determinants of Health on Pediatric Central Nervous System Tumor Outcomes Through Medical Record Linkage.","authors":"Seho Park, Scott L Coven, Yvette H Tran, Eneida A Mendonca","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001240","DOIUrl":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001240","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to investigate how social determinants of health (SDoH) influence health disparities in pediatric central nervous system (CNS) tumor outcomes by integrating individual and community-level data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort study. Individual-level electronic health record data from the Indiana Health Information Exchange were linked with community-level data from the Social Assets and Vulnerabilities Indicators using a record linkage method. Associations between CNS tumor diagnoses and SDoH factors were analyzed, as well as the descriptive characteristics of SDoH factors and demographic characteristics of CNS tumor patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis revealed significant disparities in CNS tumor prevalence and treatment protocols based on SDoH factors. Areas with higher median household income and lower rates of poverty, unemployment, uninsured status, and lack of high school education showed a higher prevalence of CNS-PNET and Meningioma, lower incidence of high-grade glioma, low-grade glioma, and Medulloblastoma. In addition, the use of VP shunts was associated with lower poverty and unemployment rates and higher median household income, whereas Brain Biopsy with Stealth was linked to higher rates of uninsurance, poverty, and lack of a high school diploma.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significant correlations were found between SDoH factors and both CNS tumor outcomes. These findings suggest that integrating community-level SDoH data with individual health records can provide valuable insights and should be leveraged to address health care disparities and improve outcomes in pediatric CNS tumor patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":"82-88"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144755014","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-07-18DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000001238
Michael Augustin, Kelsey Lyons, Hayeon Kim, David G Kim, Yusung Kim
The systematic literature review was performed on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms in nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) prognostication. Studies were evaluated for the type of input data (histology and whether CT, PET, and MRI were used), cancer therapy intervention, prognosis performance, and comparisons to clinical prognosis systems such as TNM staging. Further comparisons were drawn between different types of AI, such as machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL). Syntheses of therapeutic interventions and algorithm input modalities were performed for comparison purposes. The review adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). The initial database identified 3880 results, which were reduced to 513 after the automatic screening, and 309 after the exclusion criteria. The prognostic performance of AI for NSCLC has been investigated using histology and genetic data, and CT, PET, and MR imaging for surgery, immunotherapy, and radiation therapy patients with and without chemotherapy. Studies per therapy intervention were 13 for immunotherapy, 10 for radiotherapy, 14 for surgery, and 34 for other, multiple, or no specific therapy. The results of this systematic review demonstrate that AI-based prognostication methods consistently present higher prognostic performance for NSCLC, especially when directly compared with traditional prognostication techniques such as TNM staging. The use of DL outperforms ML-based prognostication techniques. DL-based prognostication demonstrates the potential for personalized precision cancer therapy as a supplementary decision-making tool. Before it is fully utilized in clinical practice, it is recommended that it be thoroughly validated through well-designed clinical trials.
{"title":"AI Prognostication in Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Michael Augustin, Kelsey Lyons, Hayeon Kim, David G Kim, Yusung Kim","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001238","DOIUrl":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001238","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The systematic literature review was performed on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms in nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) prognostication. Studies were evaluated for the type of input data (histology and whether CT, PET, and MRI were used), cancer therapy intervention, prognosis performance, and comparisons to clinical prognosis systems such as TNM staging. Further comparisons were drawn between different types of AI, such as machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL). Syntheses of therapeutic interventions and algorithm input modalities were performed for comparison purposes. The review adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). The initial database identified 3880 results, which were reduced to 513 after the automatic screening, and 309 after the exclusion criteria. The prognostic performance of AI for NSCLC has been investigated using histology and genetic data, and CT, PET, and MR imaging for surgery, immunotherapy, and radiation therapy patients with and without chemotherapy. Studies per therapy intervention were 13 for immunotherapy, 10 for radiotherapy, 14 for surgery, and 34 for other, multiple, or no specific therapy. The results of this systematic review demonstrate that AI-based prognostication methods consistently present higher prognostic performance for NSCLC, especially when directly compared with traditional prognostication techniques such as TNM staging. The use of DL outperforms ML-based prognostication techniques. DL-based prognostication demonstrates the potential for personalized precision cancer therapy as a supplementary decision-making tool. Before it is fully utilized in clinical practice, it is recommended that it be thoroughly validated through well-designed clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":"89-103"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144660996","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-08-08DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000001236
Assile El Fakih, Pierre Loap, Luc Cabel, Sofiane Allali, Kim Cao, Mariana Mirabel, Jean-Yves Pierga, Youlia Kirova
Objectives: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for ∼15% of invasive breast cancers and is associated with a poor prognosis. The introduction of pembrolizumab in both neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings, as established by the KEYNOTE-522 trial, has improved event-free survival and is now considered standard of care. Postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy remains essential in reducing recurrence and mortality. However, combining radiotherapy with pembrolizumab may increase the risk of toxicities, particularly cardiac, and its long-term safety profile remains poorly characterized. This study aims to assess the safety of this combination in TNBC patients.
Methods: This monocentric retrospective study, conducted at Institut Curie in Paris, included patients with locally advanced TNBC treated according to the KEYNOTE-522 protocol-neoadjuvant chemotherapy and immunotherapy, followed by surgery and adjuvant therapy, including radiotherapy with or without pembrolizumab. Patients were divided into 2 groups: those receiving concurrent radiotherapy and pembrolizumab (RT-P), and those receiving radiotherapy alone (RT). The primary endpoint was treatment tolerance. Secondary endpoints included overall survival and cancer-specific survival. A P -value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: A total of 89 patients were included, with a median follow-up of 16 months. Forty-one patients received radiotherapy alone, and 48 received concurrent radiotherapy and pembrolizumab. No significant differences were observed between groups in baseline characteristics or overall toxicity, except for grade 1 radiodermatitis, which was more frequent in the RT-P group (83.3% vs. 43.9%). No grade ≥3 toxicities were reported. Two cases of grade 1 pulmonary toxicity occurred in the RT-P group. The mean heart dose was 1.8 Gy (range: 0.01-7.9), with no cardiac toxicity attributable to radiotherapy.
Conclusion: Adjuvant radiotherapy can be safely administered concurrently with pembrolizumab in TNBC patients without increasing radiation-related adverse events, supporting the continuation of systemic therapy in this high-risk population. Nevertheless, larger prospective studies are needed to assess long-term toxicity.
{"title":"Real-world Safety of Concurrent Pembrolizumab and Radiotherapy in Triple-negative Breast Cancer.","authors":"Assile El Fakih, Pierre Loap, Luc Cabel, Sofiane Allali, Kim Cao, Mariana Mirabel, Jean-Yves Pierga, Youlia Kirova","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001236","DOIUrl":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001236","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for ∼15% of invasive breast cancers and is associated with a poor prognosis. The introduction of pembrolizumab in both neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings, as established by the KEYNOTE-522 trial, has improved event-free survival and is now considered standard of care. Postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy remains essential in reducing recurrence and mortality. However, combining radiotherapy with pembrolizumab may increase the risk of toxicities, particularly cardiac, and its long-term safety profile remains poorly characterized. This study aims to assess the safety of this combination in TNBC patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This monocentric retrospective study, conducted at Institut Curie in Paris, included patients with locally advanced TNBC treated according to the KEYNOTE-522 protocol-neoadjuvant chemotherapy and immunotherapy, followed by surgery and adjuvant therapy, including radiotherapy with or without pembrolizumab. Patients were divided into 2 groups: those receiving concurrent radiotherapy and pembrolizumab (RT-P), and those receiving radiotherapy alone (RT). The primary endpoint was treatment tolerance. Secondary endpoints included overall survival and cancer-specific survival. A P -value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 89 patients were included, with a median follow-up of 16 months. Forty-one patients received radiotherapy alone, and 48 received concurrent radiotherapy and pembrolizumab. No significant differences were observed between groups in baseline characteristics or overall toxicity, except for grade 1 radiodermatitis, which was more frequent in the RT-P group (83.3% vs. 43.9%). No grade ≥3 toxicities were reported. Two cases of grade 1 pulmonary toxicity occurred in the RT-P group. The mean heart dose was 1.8 Gy (range: 0.01-7.9), with no cardiac toxicity attributable to radiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adjuvant radiotherapy can be safely administered concurrently with pembrolizumab in TNBC patients without increasing radiation-related adverse events, supporting the continuation of systemic therapy in this high-risk population. Nevertheless, larger prospective studies are needed to assess long-term toxicity.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":"62-68"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144800872","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-07-14DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000001235
Muzamil Khan, Abu Huraira Bin Gulzar, Fatima Shahid, Belal Hamed Mohamed, Amar Lal, Shree Rath, Nouman Aziz, Waseem Nabi, Anees Cheema, Usama Ali, Adnan Bhat
Objectives: Gastric cancer mortality has declined in recent decades, yet sociodemographic disparities remain. This study analyzed national trends in gastric cancer mortality among US adults, with stratification by demographic and geographic factors.
Methods: We examined gastric cancer deaths (ICD-10 C16) in adults aged ≥25 years using CDC WONDER data from 1999 to 2020. Mortality trends were analyzed by age, sex, race/ethnicity, region, and urbanization using joinpoint regression to calculate annual and average annual percent changes (APC, AAPC).
Results: From 1999 to 2020, there were 276,023 gastric cancer deaths. Mortality declined more in males (AAPC: -2.97 [95% CI: -3.15 to -2.79]) than females (-2.42 [-2.64 to -2.21]). The largest declines were among Asians (-3.83 [-4.08 to -3.56]) and Blacks (-3.25 [-3.49 to -3.02]), followed by Whites (-2.96 [-3.13 to -2.87]) and Hispanics (-2.31 [-2.58 to -2.06]). Metropolitan areas saw greater declines (-2.72 [-2.83 to -2.62]) than rural areas (-2.41 [-2.68 to -2.12]). By region, the Northeast showed the steepest decline (-3.16 [-3.34 to -2.99]), followed by the Midwest, South, and West. Notably, mortality increased among adults aged 25 to 34 years (AAPC: 0.38 [-1.24 to 2.70]) and 35 to 44 years (0.87 [0.12 to 1.73]).
Conclusions: Gastric cancer mortality declined overall but with persistent disparities. Rising rates among younger adults and slower declines in rural and western regions warrant further investigation and targeted interventions.
{"title":"Gastric Cancer Mortality in the United States: A Two-Decade Analysis of Trends and Disparities (1999-2020).","authors":"Muzamil Khan, Abu Huraira Bin Gulzar, Fatima Shahid, Belal Hamed Mohamed, Amar Lal, Shree Rath, Nouman Aziz, Waseem Nabi, Anees Cheema, Usama Ali, Adnan Bhat","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001235","DOIUrl":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001235","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Gastric cancer mortality has declined in recent decades, yet sociodemographic disparities remain. This study analyzed national trends in gastric cancer mortality among US adults, with stratification by demographic and geographic factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined gastric cancer deaths (ICD-10 C16) in adults aged ≥25 years using CDC WONDER data from 1999 to 2020. Mortality trends were analyzed by age, sex, race/ethnicity, region, and urbanization using joinpoint regression to calculate annual and average annual percent changes (APC, AAPC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 1999 to 2020, there were 276,023 gastric cancer deaths. Mortality declined more in males (AAPC: -2.97 [95% CI: -3.15 to -2.79]) than females (-2.42 [-2.64 to -2.21]). The largest declines were among Asians (-3.83 [-4.08 to -3.56]) and Blacks (-3.25 [-3.49 to -3.02]), followed by Whites (-2.96 [-3.13 to -2.87]) and Hispanics (-2.31 [-2.58 to -2.06]). Metropolitan areas saw greater declines (-2.72 [-2.83 to -2.62]) than rural areas (-2.41 [-2.68 to -2.12]). By region, the Northeast showed the steepest decline (-3.16 [-3.34 to -2.99]), followed by the Midwest, South, and West. Notably, mortality increased among adults aged 25 to 34 years (AAPC: 0.38 [-1.24 to 2.70]) and 35 to 44 years (0.87 [0.12 to 1.73]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Gastric cancer mortality declined overall but with persistent disparities. Rising rates among younger adults and slower declines in rural and western regions warrant further investigation and targeted interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":"76-81"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144627669","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-09-12DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000001233
Marjan Khan, Abdullah Chandasir, Rohan Kapuria, Muhammad Samsoor Zarak, Amir Humza Sohail, Asif Iqbal, Aman Goyal, Abu Baker Sheikh, Hritvik Jain, Lukman Tijani, Asad Ullah
Objectives: Alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) is a rare sarcoma affecting the deep soft tissues of the extremities in young adults and the head/trunk in children. This population-based study investigates demographics and factors influencing survival outcomes in ASPS.
Methods: The data for this study were collected from the SEER databases from 2000 to 2020.
Results: A total of 277 cases with ASPS were extracted from the database with a median age of 25 years and slight female predilection (52.3%). ASPS has a higher incidence in black (24.2%) and Hispanic (23.1%) races. Tumor location varied by age group: the head and neck were most commonly affected in younger patients (36.2%), while the lower extremities and hip region were predominant in older patients (68.8%). In most cases, the tumor size was >4 cm. When known, and majority were distant metastases (50.7%), and lung being the most common metastatic. The 5-year CSS with distant metastases was 33.0% (95% CI: 24.7-44.0). The highest 5-year CSS was observed with surgery with adjuvant radiation 86.7% (95% CI: 78.0-96.4). Multivariate analysis revealed that male sex was associated with worse survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.22), while surgery with adjuvant radiation was significantly associated with improved survival (HR = 0.36).
Conclusions: This study found that the male sex and larger tumors predict poorer ASPS outcomes, while surgery with adjuvant radiation improves survival. Future prospective clinical trials should focus on genomic mutation analysis for a personalized therapeutic approach.
{"title":"Alveolar Soft Part Sarcoma: Clinicopathologic Analysis, Predictive Nomogram, and the Role of Adjuvant Radiation for Survival in a Retrospective Population-based Study.","authors":"Marjan Khan, Abdullah Chandasir, Rohan Kapuria, Muhammad Samsoor Zarak, Amir Humza Sohail, Asif Iqbal, Aman Goyal, Abu Baker Sheikh, Hritvik Jain, Lukman Tijani, Asad Ullah","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001233","DOIUrl":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001233","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) is a rare sarcoma affecting the deep soft tissues of the extremities in young adults and the head/trunk in children. This population-based study investigates demographics and factors influencing survival outcomes in ASPS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The data for this study were collected from the SEER databases from 2000 to 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 277 cases with ASPS were extracted from the database with a median age of 25 years and slight female predilection (52.3%). ASPS has a higher incidence in black (24.2%) and Hispanic (23.1%) races. Tumor location varied by age group: the head and neck were most commonly affected in younger patients (36.2%), while the lower extremities and hip region were predominant in older patients (68.8%). In most cases, the tumor size was >4 cm. When known, and majority were distant metastases (50.7%), and lung being the most common metastatic. The 5-year CSS with distant metastases was 33.0% (95% CI: 24.7-44.0). The highest 5-year CSS was observed with surgery with adjuvant radiation 86.7% (95% CI: 78.0-96.4). Multivariate analysis revealed that male sex was associated with worse survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.22), while surgery with adjuvant radiation was significantly associated with improved survival (HR = 0.36).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found that the male sex and larger tumors predict poorer ASPS outcomes, while surgery with adjuvant radiation improves survival. Future prospective clinical trials should focus on genomic mutation analysis for a personalized therapeutic approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":"69-75"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145042083","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-07-22DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000001239
Andrew T Trout, Thomas P Boike, Anca M Avram, Parul Barry, Simin Dadparvar, Sai Duriseti, Robert R Flavell, Frederick D Grant, Neha Kwatra, Hollie A Lai, Marguerite T Parisi, Sue S Yom, Mark Tulchinsky, Munir V Ghesani, Rathan M Subramaniam, Terry L Levin, William Small, Naomi R Schechter
Objectives: This practice parameter was developed collaboratively by the American College of Radiology (ACR), the American College of Nuclear Medicine (ACNM), the American Radium Society (ARS), the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI), and the Society for Pediatric Radiology (SPR). This practice parameter is intended to guide appropriately trained and licensed physicians in the oral administration of I-131 sodium iodide for the treatment of benign and malignant thyroid diseases.
Methods: This practice parameter was revised according to the process described under the heading The Process for Developing ACR Practice Parameters and Technical Standards on the ACR website ( https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Practice-Parameters-and-Technical-Standards ) by the Committee on Practice Parameters-Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging of the ACR Commissions on Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, the Committee on Practice Parameters-Radiation Oncology of the ACR Commission on Radiation Oncology, the Committee on Practice Parameters-Pediatric Radiology of the ACR Commission on Pediatric Radiology in collaboration with the ACNM, the ARS, the SNMMI, and the SPR.
Results: I-131 sodium iodide is used for the treatment of hyperthyroidism and differentiated thyroid cancer. The therapeutic effect of I-131 sodium iodide is achieved by the emission of ionizing radiation in the form of high-energy beta particles. I-131 sodium iodide therapy requires close cooperation and communication between the clinicians who are responsible for the clinical management of the patient and the physicians who administer radiopharmaceutical therapy. This document provides guidance regarding optimal therapy procedures, appropriate precautions, and therapy in unique situations.
Conclusions: This practice parameter is designed to assist practitioners in providing appropriate radiologic care for treating benign and malignant thyroid disease with I-131 sodium iodide.
{"title":"ACR-ACNM-ARS-SNMMI-SPR Practice Parameter for Treatment of Benign and Malignant Thyroid Disease With I-131 Sodium Iodide.","authors":"Andrew T Trout, Thomas P Boike, Anca M Avram, Parul Barry, Simin Dadparvar, Sai Duriseti, Robert R Flavell, Frederick D Grant, Neha Kwatra, Hollie A Lai, Marguerite T Parisi, Sue S Yom, Mark Tulchinsky, Munir V Ghesani, Rathan M Subramaniam, Terry L Levin, William Small, Naomi R Schechter","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001239","DOIUrl":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001239","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This practice parameter was developed collaboratively by the American College of Radiology (ACR), the American College of Nuclear Medicine (ACNM), the American Radium Society (ARS), the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI), and the Society for Pediatric Radiology (SPR). This practice parameter is intended to guide appropriately trained and licensed physicians in the oral administration of I-131 sodium iodide for the treatment of benign and malignant thyroid diseases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This practice parameter was revised according to the process described under the heading The Process for Developing ACR Practice Parameters and Technical Standards on the ACR website ( https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Practice-Parameters-and-Technical-Standards ) by the Committee on Practice Parameters-Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging of the ACR Commissions on Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, the Committee on Practice Parameters-Radiation Oncology of the ACR Commission on Radiation Oncology, the Committee on Practice Parameters-Pediatric Radiology of the ACR Commission on Pediatric Radiology in collaboration with the ACNM, the ARS, the SNMMI, and the SPR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>I-131 sodium iodide is used for the treatment of hyperthyroidism and differentiated thyroid cancer. The therapeutic effect of I-131 sodium iodide is achieved by the emission of ionizing radiation in the form of high-energy beta particles. I-131 sodium iodide therapy requires close cooperation and communication between the clinicians who are responsible for the clinical management of the patient and the physicians who administer radiopharmaceutical therapy. This document provides guidance regarding optimal therapy procedures, appropriate precautions, and therapy in unique situations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This practice parameter is designed to assist practitioners in providing appropriate radiologic care for treating benign and malignant thyroid disease with I-131 sodium iodide.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":"51-61"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144692329","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-29DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000001292
Ibraheem Altamimi, Faisal A Al-Harbi, Abdelmalek Ammar AlHaj Abdelghani, Fahad S Almutairi, Jana Wadie Alahmadi, Renad Mashhour Alsaaedi, Kamel Majed Abdallah Enaim, Retaj Suliman Aldobiyan, Wareef Omran Albealdi, Faisal Ibrahim Alfadda, Alanoud Abdullah Al Daej, Hamza Ashraf, Haifa Alfalah
Objectives: Malignant melanoma, although less frequent than other skin cancers, accounts for most skin cancer deaths due to its aggressive and metastatic nature. Despite therapeutic progress, its global distribution remains uneven. Comparative analyses of United States and worldwide melanoma trends, particularly by sex, are limited.
Methods: We analyzed melanoma incidence, prevalence, and mortality from 1990 to 2023 using Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2023 data. Age-standardized rates per 100,000 population were obtained for the United States and globally. Temporal patterns were examined using joinpoint regression to estimate annual percent change (APC) and average annual percent change (AAPC) with 95% CIs. Pairwise tests compared US and global trajectories. Future mortality was projected through 2050 using autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) modeling.
Results: From 1990 to 2023, US age-standardized mortality declined by 28% (2.38 to 1.72 per 100,000; AAPC: -0.96*; 95% CI: -1.21 to -0.71), whereas global mortality decreased modestly (0.82 to 0.74; AAPC: -0.29*; 95% CI: -0.46 to -0.12). US incidence declined (AAPC: -0.41*; 95% CI: -0.65 to -0.16), contrasting with a global rise (AAPC: 0.54*; 95% CI: 0.38 to 0.70). Prevalence fell in the United States (AAPC: -0.39*; 95% CI: -0.62 to -0.16) but increased globally (AAPC: 0.80*; 95% CI: 0.55 to 1.04). Males consistently exhibited higher incidence and mortality than females. All pairwise comparisons between US and global trajectories were significant (P<0.001*). ARIMA projections indicate a slight increase in US male mortality by 2050, whereas female and global rates are expected to continue declining.
Conclusions: Between 1990 and 2023, melanoma incidence and mortality declined in the United States but rose or plateaued globally, with persistent male predominance. Sustaining global progress requires strengthened prevention, early detection, and equitable access to effective treatment.
{"title":"Three-Decade Trends and Future Projections of Malignant Skin Melanoma Burden in the United States and Globally: A Pairwise Analysis From the Global Burden of Disease 2023.","authors":"Ibraheem Altamimi, Faisal A Al-Harbi, Abdelmalek Ammar AlHaj Abdelghani, Fahad S Almutairi, Jana Wadie Alahmadi, Renad Mashhour Alsaaedi, Kamel Majed Abdallah Enaim, Retaj Suliman Aldobiyan, Wareef Omran Albealdi, Faisal Ibrahim Alfadda, Alanoud Abdullah Al Daej, Hamza Ashraf, Haifa Alfalah","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001292","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000001292","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Malignant melanoma, although less frequent than other skin cancers, accounts for most skin cancer deaths due to its aggressive and metastatic nature. Despite therapeutic progress, its global distribution remains uneven. Comparative analyses of United States and worldwide melanoma trends, particularly by sex, are limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed melanoma incidence, prevalence, and mortality from 1990 to 2023 using Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2023 data. Age-standardized rates per 100,000 population were obtained for the United States and globally. Temporal patterns were examined using joinpoint regression to estimate annual percent change (APC) and average annual percent change (AAPC) with 95% CIs. Pairwise tests compared US and global trajectories. Future mortality was projected through 2050 using autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) modeling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 1990 to 2023, US age-standardized mortality declined by 28% (2.38 to 1.72 per 100,000; AAPC: -0.96*; 95% CI: -1.21 to -0.71), whereas global mortality decreased modestly (0.82 to 0.74; AAPC: -0.29*; 95% CI: -0.46 to -0.12). US incidence declined (AAPC: -0.41*; 95% CI: -0.65 to -0.16), contrasting with a global rise (AAPC: 0.54*; 95% CI: 0.38 to 0.70). Prevalence fell in the United States (AAPC: -0.39*; 95% CI: -0.62 to -0.16) but increased globally (AAPC: 0.80*; 95% CI: 0.55 to 1.04). Males consistently exhibited higher incidence and mortality than females. All pairwise comparisons between US and global trajectories were significant (P<0.001*). ARIMA projections indicate a slight increase in US male mortality by 2050, whereas female and global rates are expected to continue declining.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Between 1990 and 2023, melanoma incidence and mortality declined in the United States but rose or plateaued globally, with persistent male predominance. Sustaining global progress requires strengthened prevention, early detection, and equitable access to effective treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146087201","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-26DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000001299
Umar Akram, Zain A Nadeem, Obaid Ur Rehman, Muhammad A Raza, Aimen Nadeem, Khawaja Abdul Rehman, Rutaab Kareem, Maheen Zahid, Eeshal Fatima, Hamza Ashraf, Haider Ashfaq, Muhammad K Amin, Moazzam Shahzad
Objectives: The role of camrelizumab in combination therapy for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of camrelizumab combination therapy in women with TNBC.
Methods: We electronically searched MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Clinicaltrials.gov from inception till March 2024. We performed a meta-analysis on the R version 4.3.3 using the "meta" and "metasens" packages through RStudio. Proportions were pooled using a random effects model. The between-study heterogeneity was assessed by Higgins I² statistics.
Results: A total of 9 studies comprising 357 patients were pooled. We observed an overall low risk of bias in the included studies. The results revealed an overall response rate of 58% (95% CI: 30%-84%, I2=94%), a 1-year survival rate of 71% (95% CI: 54%-85%, I2=49%), a 1-year progression free survival rate of 22% (95% CI: 0%-25%; I2=93%), stable disease in 25% (95% CI: 10%-44%, I2=85%) of participants at last follow-up and progressive disease in 11% (95% CI: 2%-25%, I2=79%) with camrelizumab combination therapy. Several treatment-related adverse events were reported in the included studies. Neutropenia was most common in 66% patients, followed by leukopenia in 59% patients. Among general AEs, asthenia was reported by 32% and fatigue was reported by 51% of the patients.
Conclusions: Camrelizumab combination therapy showed promising results in TNBC treatment, with good survival outcomes. Depending upon the outcomes of future phase III trials, factors influencing the efficacy of camrelizumab might be explored.
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Camrelizumab Combination Therapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Umar Akram, Zain A Nadeem, Obaid Ur Rehman, Muhammad A Raza, Aimen Nadeem, Khawaja Abdul Rehman, Rutaab Kareem, Maheen Zahid, Eeshal Fatima, Hamza Ashraf, Haider Ashfaq, Muhammad K Amin, Moazzam Shahzad","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001299","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000001299","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The role of camrelizumab in combination therapy for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of camrelizumab combination therapy in women with TNBC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We electronically searched MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Clinicaltrials.gov from inception till March 2024. We performed a meta-analysis on the R version 4.3.3 using the \"meta\" and \"metasens\" packages through RStudio. Proportions were pooled using a random effects model. The between-study heterogeneity was assessed by Higgins I² statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 9 studies comprising 357 patients were pooled. We observed an overall low risk of bias in the included studies. The results revealed an overall response rate of 58% (95% CI: 30%-84%, I2=94%), a 1-year survival rate of 71% (95% CI: 54%-85%, I2=49%), a 1-year progression free survival rate of 22% (95% CI: 0%-25%; I2=93%), stable disease in 25% (95% CI: 10%-44%, I2=85%) of participants at last follow-up and progressive disease in 11% (95% CI: 2%-25%, I2=79%) with camrelizumab combination therapy. Several treatment-related adverse events were reported in the included studies. Neutropenia was most common in 66% patients, followed by leukopenia in 59% patients. Among general AEs, asthenia was reported by 32% and fatigue was reported by 51% of the patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Camrelizumab combination therapy showed promising results in TNBC treatment, with good survival outcomes. Depending upon the outcomes of future phase III trials, factors influencing the efficacy of camrelizumab might be explored.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146054783","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-16DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000001295
Zaheer Qureshi, Abdur Jamil, Kazi Samsuddoha, Navkirat Kahlon
Objectives: Targeted immunotherapies have significantly revolutionized the treatment of hematologic malignancies. Among the most promising immunotherapies are bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTEs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We aim to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy and safety of BiTEs and ICIs in the treatment of various hematologic malignancies.
Methods: An extensive literature search from inception until January 2025 was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. The primary outcomes of our study were objective response rate (ORR) and treatment-related adverse events (AEs) of grade 3 or above.
Results: Thirty-one clinical trials involving 2507 patients with hematologic malignancies were included in our analysis. For patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), multiple myeloma, and myeloid malignancies, the pooled data showed that BiTEs resulted in ORRs of 34.1%, 60%, and 18.5%, whereas ICIs resulted in ORRs of 21.9%, 4.2%, and 13.8%, respectively. Furthermore, our statistical analysis demonstrated a pooled ORR of 47.1% for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients treated with BiTEs. The most common treatment-related AEs of grade 3 or greater in NHL patients treated with BiTEs and ICIs were neutropenia (17.1% and 7.2%, respectively). Similarly, the most common AEs of grade 3 or above in multiple myeloma, myeloid malignancy, and ALL patients treated with BiTEs were neutropenia (45.2%), CRS (12.9%), and anemia (21.4%).
Conclusions: BiTEs and ICIs are promising therapeutic strategies for patients with hematologic malignancies. However, BiTEs seem more effective than ICIs, especially in the treatment of NHL and multiple myeloma.
目的:靶向免疫疗法已经显著地改变了血液恶性肿瘤的治疗。其中最有前途的免疫疗法是双特异性t细胞接合物(BiTEs)和免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)。我们的目的是全面评估叮咬和ICIs治疗各种血液系统恶性肿瘤的疗效和安全性。方法:在PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane Library和谷歌Scholar中进行了从成立到2025年1月的广泛文献检索。我们研究的主要结果是客观缓解率(ORR)和治疗相关不良事件(ae)为3级或以上。结果:31项临床试验涉及2507例血液系统恶性肿瘤患者纳入我们的分析。对于非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)、多发性骨髓瘤和髓系恶性肿瘤患者,汇总数据显示,bite的orr分别为34.1%、60%和18.5%,而ICIs的orr分别为21.9%、4.2%和13.8%。此外,我们的统计分析显示,急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)患者接受叮咬治疗的总ORR为47.1%。在接受bite和ICIs治疗的NHL患者中,最常见的3级或以上治疗相关ae是中性粒细胞减少症(分别为17.1%和7.2%)。同样,在接受bite治疗的多发性骨髓瘤、髓系恶性肿瘤和ALL患者中,最常见的3级或以上ae是中性粒细胞减少症(45.2%)、CRS(12.9%)和贫血(21.4%)。结论:bite和ICIs是治疗血液系统恶性肿瘤的有效方法。然而,bite似乎比ICIs更有效,特别是在治疗NHL和多发性骨髓瘤方面。
{"title":"Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Bispecific T-Cell Engagers (BiTEs) Versus Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) in Hematologic Malignancies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Zaheer Qureshi, Abdur Jamil, Kazi Samsuddoha, Navkirat Kahlon","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001295","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000001295","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Targeted immunotherapies have significantly revolutionized the treatment of hematologic malignancies. Among the most promising immunotherapies are bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTEs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We aim to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy and safety of BiTEs and ICIs in the treatment of various hematologic malignancies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An extensive literature search from inception until January 2025 was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. The primary outcomes of our study were objective response rate (ORR) and treatment-related adverse events (AEs) of grade 3 or above.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-one clinical trials involving 2507 patients with hematologic malignancies were included in our analysis. For patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), multiple myeloma, and myeloid malignancies, the pooled data showed that BiTEs resulted in ORRs of 34.1%, 60%, and 18.5%, whereas ICIs resulted in ORRs of 21.9%, 4.2%, and 13.8%, respectively. Furthermore, our statistical analysis demonstrated a pooled ORR of 47.1% for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients treated with BiTEs. The most common treatment-related AEs of grade 3 or greater in NHL patients treated with BiTEs and ICIs were neutropenia (17.1% and 7.2%, respectively). Similarly, the most common AEs of grade 3 or above in multiple myeloma, myeloid malignancy, and ALL patients treated with BiTEs were neutropenia (45.2%), CRS (12.9%), and anemia (21.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BiTEs and ICIs are promising therapeutic strategies for patients with hematologic malignancies. However, BiTEs seem more effective than ICIs, especially in the treatment of NHL and multiple myeloma.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146013204","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Currently, cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors combined with hormone therapy are the standard treatment for patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer. It remains unclear which patients benefit most from CDK4/6 inhibitors and whether predictive biomarkers exist to guide treatment decisions. Therefore, we evaluate the association between phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA) mutation status and treatment response to CDK4/6 inhibitors in patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer.
Methods: We extensively searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases for articles published until December 2024. The primary outcome of our study was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR).
Results: Seven studies-involving 2221 women with HR+/HER2 metastatic breast cancer-were systematically analyzed. The pooled results showed that patients with PIK3CA mutation had significantly poorer PFS than those with PIK3CA wild-type (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.47; 95% CI: 1.22-1.77; P<0.0001). Similarly, PIK3CA mutation was associated with significantly poorer OS than PIK3CA wild-type (HR: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.06-1.89; P=0.02). ORR was only reported in one study, with the results showing that the ORR was higher in patients with wild-type PIK3CA than in patients with PIK3CA alteration (53/180 (29%) versus 13/85 (15%).
Conclusions: PIK3CA mutation correlates with poor PFS and OS in patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer receiving CDK4/6 inhibitors. Therefore, PIK3CA mutation status should be considered a potential predictive biomarker of resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors.
背景:目前,细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶4和6 (CDK4/6)抑制剂联合激素治疗是激素受体阳性/人表皮生长因子受体2阴性(HR+/HER2-)转移性乳腺癌患者的标准治疗方法。目前尚不清楚哪些患者从CDK4/6抑制剂中获益最多,以及是否存在预测性生物标志物来指导治疗决策。因此,我们评估了HR+/HER2-转移性乳腺癌患者中磷脂酰肌醇-4,5-二磷酸3-激酶催化亚单位α (PIK3CA)突变状态与CDK4/6抑制剂治疗反应之间的关系。方法:我们广泛检索PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane Library和b谷歌Scholar数据库,检索截止到2024年12月发表的文章。本研究的主要终点是无进展生存期(PFS),次要终点包括总生存期(OS)和客观缓解率(ORR)。结果:系统分析了7项研究,涉及2221例HR+/HER2转移性乳腺癌。汇总结果显示,PIK3CA突变患者的PFS明显差于PIK3CA野生型患者(风险比[HR]: 1.47; 95% CI: 1.22-1.77;结论:在接受CDK4/6抑制剂治疗的HR+/HER2-转移性乳腺癌患者中,PIK3CA突变与PFS差和OS相关。因此,PIK3CA突变状态应被视为对CDK4/6抑制剂耐药的潜在预测性生物标志物。
{"title":"Predictive Value of PIK3CA Mutations for Response to CDK4/6 Inhibitors in Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Zaheer Qureshi, Abdur Jamil, Neehal Wali, Tobechukwu Joseph Okobi, Navkirat Kahlon","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001294","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000001294","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Currently, cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors combined with hormone therapy are the standard treatment for patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer. It remains unclear which patients benefit most from CDK4/6 inhibitors and whether predictive biomarkers exist to guide treatment decisions. Therefore, we evaluate the association between phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA) mutation status and treatment response to CDK4/6 inhibitors in patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We extensively searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases for articles published until December 2024. The primary outcome of our study was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies-involving 2221 women with HR+/HER2 metastatic breast cancer-were systematically analyzed. The pooled results showed that patients with PIK3CA mutation had significantly poorer PFS than those with PIK3CA wild-type (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.47; 95% CI: 1.22-1.77; P<0.0001). Similarly, PIK3CA mutation was associated with significantly poorer OS than PIK3CA wild-type (HR: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.06-1.89; P=0.02). ORR was only reported in one study, with the results showing that the ORR was higher in patients with wild-type PIK3CA than in patients with PIK3CA alteration (53/180 (29%) versus 13/85 (15%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PIK3CA mutation correlates with poor PFS and OS in patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer receiving CDK4/6 inhibitors. Therefore, PIK3CA mutation status should be considered a potential predictive biomarker of resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145913808","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}