The impact of fast-food energy posting on college students' food purchases.

IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS American Journal of Clinical Nutrition Pub Date : 2024-09-14 DOI:10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.09.007
Elizabeth F Racine, Lilian O Ademu, Alicia Anne Dahl, Stacy M Fandetti, Lisa Schulkind
{"title":"The impact of fast-food energy posting on college students' food purchases.","authors":"Elizabeth F Racine, Lilian O Ademu, Alicia Anne Dahl, Stacy M Fandetti, Lisa Schulkind","doi":"10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.09.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Patient Protection US Affordable Care Act (ACA) energy posting mandate requires restaurant chains to disclose information on the energy content of their food items. Assessments of the effect of menu energy labeling on dietary choices have reported inconsistent findings.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study examined the impact of menu energy labeling on food items purchased by college students after the mandate was enacted nationally.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Student food sales data from purchases made at 3 fast-food restaurants during the 2017/2018 and 2018/2019 academic years at a university campus were used for the analysis. The total sample included 1662 students on the university meal plan; these students generated 145,295 food transactions at the restaurants over the study period. We utilized a difference-in-differences (DiD) empirical strategy, comparing changes in transaction-level energy purchases at 2 fast-food restaurants B and C (FFRB and FFRC - treatment groups) that posted energy information in the summer of 2018 with another fast-food restaurant A (FFRA - control group) that began posting energy information before the study period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We observed increases in the mean energy content per transaction after implementing the menu-labeling policy. The DiD estimates found an increase of 20.6 in the mean calories of energy purchased per transaction at the treatment restaurants relative to the control restaurant. In the subgroup analyses, the DiD estimates indicated calories of energy increased: 18.7 for female students, 20.5 for male students, 23.5 for non-Hispanic Black students, 30.2 for students eligible for federal financial aid, and 19.9 for students not eligible for federal financial aid.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results suggest that the ACA energy menu-labeling policy led to an increase in the energy content per transaction by students at a public university. This paper highlights the need for more research to better understand the determinants of food choice among college students.</p>","PeriodicalId":50813,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Nutrition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Clinical Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.09.007","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Patient Protection US Affordable Care Act (ACA) energy posting mandate requires restaurant chains to disclose information on the energy content of their food items. Assessments of the effect of menu energy labeling on dietary choices have reported inconsistent findings.

Objectives: This study examined the impact of menu energy labeling on food items purchased by college students after the mandate was enacted nationally.

Methods: Student food sales data from purchases made at 3 fast-food restaurants during the 2017/2018 and 2018/2019 academic years at a university campus were used for the analysis. The total sample included 1662 students on the university meal plan; these students generated 145,295 food transactions at the restaurants over the study period. We utilized a difference-in-differences (DiD) empirical strategy, comparing changes in transaction-level energy purchases at 2 fast-food restaurants B and C (FFRB and FFRC - treatment groups) that posted energy information in the summer of 2018 with another fast-food restaurant A (FFRA - control group) that began posting energy information before the study period.

Results: We observed increases in the mean energy content per transaction after implementing the menu-labeling policy. The DiD estimates found an increase of 20.6 in the mean calories of energy purchased per transaction at the treatment restaurants relative to the control restaurant. In the subgroup analyses, the DiD estimates indicated calories of energy increased: 18.7 for female students, 20.5 for male students, 23.5 for non-Hispanic Black students, 30.2 for students eligible for federal financial aid, and 19.9 for students not eligible for federal financial aid.

Conclusions: The results suggest that the ACA energy menu-labeling policy led to an increase in the energy content per transaction by students at a public university. This paper highlights the need for more research to better understand the determinants of food choice among college students.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
快餐店能量海报对大学生购买食品的影响。
背景:美国《平价医疗法案》(ACA)规定,连锁餐厅必须公布其食品的能量含量信息。有关菜单能量标签对饮食选择影响的评估报告结果并不一致:本研究探讨了菜单能量标识在全国范围内实施后对大学生购买食品的影响:研究使用了某大学校园内三家快餐店 2017/2018 学年和 2018/2019 学年的学生食品销售数据进行分析。总样本包括 1,662 名参加大学膳食计划的学生;这些学生在研究期间在餐馆共进行了 145,295 次食品交易。我们采用了差异实证策略(DiD),比较了两家快餐店(FFRB 和 FFRC - 治疗组)与另一家快餐店(FFRA - 对照组)在交易层面的能量购买变化,前者在 2018 年夏季发布了能量信息,而后者在研究期间之前就开始发布能量信息:我们观察到,实施菜单标注政策后,每笔交易的平均能量含量有所增加。根据 DiD 估算,与对照餐厅相比,治疗餐厅每次交易购买的平均能量热量增加了 20.6 卡路里。在分组分析中,DiD 估计值显示能量卡路里有所增加:女生为 18.7,男生为 20.5,非西班牙裔黑人学生为 23.5,有资格获得联邦经济援助的学生为 30.2,无资格获得联邦经济援助的学生为 19.9:结果表明,ACA 能源菜单标签政策提高了公立大学学生每次交易的能源含量。本文强调有必要开展更多研究,以更好地了解大学生食品选择的决定因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
332
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: American Journal of Clinical Nutrition is recognized as the most highly rated peer-reviewed, primary research journal in nutrition and dietetics.It focuses on publishing the latest research on various topics in nutrition, including but not limited to obesity, vitamins and minerals, nutrition and disease, and energy metabolism. Purpose: The purpose of AJCN is to: Publish original research studies relevant to human and clinical nutrition. Consider well-controlled clinical studies describing scientific mechanisms, efficacy, and safety of dietary interventions in the context of disease prevention or health benefits. Encourage public health and epidemiologic studies relevant to human nutrition. Promote innovative investigations of nutritional questions employing epigenetic, genomic, proteomic, and metabolomic approaches. Include solicited editorials, book reviews, solicited or unsolicited review articles, invited controversy position papers, and letters to the Editor related to prior AJCN articles. Peer Review Process: All submitted material with scientific content undergoes peer review by the Editors or their designees before acceptance for publication.
期刊最新文献
Metabolomics signatures of sweetened beverages and added sugar are related to anthropometric measures of adiposity in young individuals: results from a cohort study. Childhood Nutritional Factors and Cardiometabolic Outcomes at 9-11 y of Age: Findings from the ROLO Longitudinal Birth Cohort Study. Perceptions and preferences for environmentally sustainable food and associated factors: a cross-sectional analysis of a nationally representative survey of United States consumers. Cause-specific and all-cause mortalities in vegetarian compared with those in nonvegetarian participants from the Adventist Health Study-2 cohort. Navigating complex nutritional challenges after bariatric surgery: malnutrition, multiple nutrient deficiencies, and gastrointestinal dysfunction in pregnancy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1