Association between elevated lipoprotein(a) levels and vulnerability of carotid atherosclerotic plaque: A systematic review

Fernando Garagoli MD, Walter Masson MD, Leandro Barbagelata MD
{"title":"Association between elevated lipoprotein(a) levels and vulnerability of carotid atherosclerotic plaque: A systematic review","authors":"Fernando Garagoli MD,&nbsp;Walter Masson MD,&nbsp;Leandro Barbagelata MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2024.108020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The role of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] as a potential risk factor for atherosclerotic arterial disease has been extensively studied. However, the available data regarding its association with the vulnerability of carotid atherosclerotic plaque is limited. The main objective of the present systematic review was to assess the association between elevated Lp(a) levels and carotid vulnerable plaque features.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This systematic review adhered to PRISMA guidelines, conducting a comprehensive literature search to identify studies examining the association between Lp(a) levels and vulnerability of carotid atherosclerotic plaque. Experimental or observational studies were eligible, without language, country, or publication type restrictions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Nine studies including 2058 patients were eligible for this systematic review. Five cross-sectional studies, 3 prospective/retrospective cohorts, and 1 subanalysis of a randomized controlled trial were analyzed. Two cross-sectional studies that compared Lp(a) levels between patients with and without vulnerable carotid plaque showed discordant results. Nevertheless, all the studies that evaluated the prevalence or incidence of vulnerable carotid plaque according to Lp(a) levels showed a positive association. Similarly, one study found a significant correlation between vulnerability of carotid plaque and Lp(a) levels.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Almost all studies analyzed in the present review showed a positive association between elevated Lp(a) levels and carotid vulnerable plaque features. However, further research is needed to clarify this issue.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54368,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases","volume":"33 12","pages":"Article 108020"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1052305724004658","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The role of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] as a potential risk factor for atherosclerotic arterial disease has been extensively studied. However, the available data regarding its association with the vulnerability of carotid atherosclerotic plaque is limited. The main objective of the present systematic review was to assess the association between elevated Lp(a) levels and carotid vulnerable plaque features.

Methods

This systematic review adhered to PRISMA guidelines, conducting a comprehensive literature search to identify studies examining the association between Lp(a) levels and vulnerability of carotid atherosclerotic plaque. Experimental or observational studies were eligible, without language, country, or publication type restrictions.

Results

Nine studies including 2058 patients were eligible for this systematic review. Five cross-sectional studies, 3 prospective/retrospective cohorts, and 1 subanalysis of a randomized controlled trial were analyzed. Two cross-sectional studies that compared Lp(a) levels between patients with and without vulnerable carotid plaque showed discordant results. Nevertheless, all the studies that evaluated the prevalence or incidence of vulnerable carotid plaque according to Lp(a) levels showed a positive association. Similarly, one study found a significant correlation between vulnerability of carotid plaque and Lp(a) levels.

Conclusion

Almost all studies analyzed in the present review showed a positive association between elevated Lp(a) levels and carotid vulnerable plaque features. However, further research is needed to clarify this issue.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脂蛋白(a)水平升高与颈动脉粥样硬化斑块易损性之间的关系:系统综述。
背景:脂蛋白(a)[Lp(a)]作为动脉粥样硬化性疾病潜在风险因素的作用已被广泛研究。然而,关于脂蛋白(a)与颈动脉粥样硬化斑块脆弱性之间关系的现有数据却很有限。本系统综述的主要目的是评估脂蛋白(a)水平升高与颈动脉易损斑块特征之间的关系:本系统性综述遵循 PRISMA 指南,进行了全面的文献检索,以确定探讨脂蛋白(a)水平与颈动脉粥样硬化斑块易损性之间关系的研究。实验性或观察性研究均可,不受语言、国家或出版类型的限制:共有 9 项研究(包括 2058 名患者)符合本系统综述的要求。共分析了 5 项横断面研究、3 项前瞻性/回顾性队列研究和 1 项随机对照试验的子分析。两项横断面研究比较了有颈动脉易损斑块和无颈动脉易损斑块患者的脂蛋白(a)水平,结果并不一致。不过,所有根据脂蛋白(a)水平评估颈动脉易损斑块患病率或发病率的研究均显示出正相关性。同样,一项研究发现颈动脉斑块的易损性与脂蛋白(a)水平之间存在显著相关性:本综述分析的几乎所有研究都表明,脂蛋白(a)水平升高与颈动脉易损斑块特征之间存在正相关。然而,还需要进一步的研究来澄清这一问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
583
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases publishes original papers on basic and clinical science related to the fields of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases. The Journal also features review articles, controversies, methods and technical notes, selected case reports and other original articles of special nature. Its editorial mission is to focus on prevention and repair of cerebrovascular disease. Clinical papers emphasize medical and surgical aspects of stroke, clinical trials and design, epidemiology, stroke care delivery systems and outcomes, imaging sciences and rehabilitation of stroke. The Journal will be of special interest to specialists involved in caring for patients with cerebrovascular disease, including neurologists, neurosurgeons and cardiologists.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "Spontaneous Neuronal Plasticity in the Contralateral Motor Cortex and Corticospinal Tract after Focal Cortical Infarction in Hypertensive Rats" [J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis,2020 Dec;29(12):105235/Manuscript NO:JSCVD-D-20-00162]. CONTEXTUAL AND CLINICAL FACTORS AS EXPLAINERS OF STROKE SEVERITY, RESIDUAL MOTOR IMPAIRMENTS, AND FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE DURING HOSPITALIZATION. CTP-Derived Venous Outflow Profiles Correlate With Tissue-Level Collaterals Regardless of Arterial Collateral Status. Relationship between hyoid-carotid distance, hyoid position and morphology and degree of stenosis and associated stroke. Stroke education: Engaging learners and the community to advance care for cerebrovascular disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1