Effectiveness of Message Framing Interventions on Improving Health Outcomes for Individuals in Diabetes Health Education Communication: A Systematic Review.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Public Health Nursing Pub Date : 2024-09-23 DOI:10.1111/phn.13423
Wei Zhang, Xiaoli Ye, Tong Shen, Fangfang Zhao
{"title":"Effectiveness of Message Framing Interventions on Improving Health Outcomes for Individuals in Diabetes Health Education Communication: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Wei Zhang, Xiaoli Ye, Tong Shen, Fangfang Zhao","doi":"10.1111/phn.13423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify the effects of message-framing interventions on improving health outcomes of individuals in diabetes health education communication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four electronic databases including Web of Science, PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were the search engines used. The period of literature search was from their inception until December 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-experimental trials reporting the effects of message-framing interventions for diabetes were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review included 10 studies. Many studies have investigated multiple health outcomes. Of the seven studies that evaluated behavioral health-related outcomes, all studies (7/7, 100%) found a positive effect, and four studies (4/7, 57.1%) found that there was no significant difference between gain and loss framing. Of the seven studies that assessed nonbehavioral health-related outcomes, six studies (6/7, 85.7%) reported a positive postintervention effect, whereas four studies (4/7, 57.1%) found that loss-framed messages were more effective. One study (1/7, 14.3%) reported that there was no effect of the message framing on mental health-related outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In diabetes health education communication, message framing of gain and loss framing has a positive effect on health outcomes for individuals. The advantage of the loss framing is more significant in improving nonbehavioral health-related outcomes.</p><p><strong>Practice implications: </strong>When constructing a message to promote health outcomes for patients with diabetes, the message framing is worth applying, and the advantages of loss framing can be considered more.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>PROSPERO registration ID: CRD42023445074. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=445074.</p>","PeriodicalId":54533,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.13423","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To identify the effects of message-framing interventions on improving health outcomes of individuals in diabetes health education communication.

Methods: Four electronic databases including Web of Science, PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were the search engines used. The period of literature search was from their inception until December 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-experimental trials reporting the effects of message-framing interventions for diabetes were included.

Results: The review included 10 studies. Many studies have investigated multiple health outcomes. Of the seven studies that evaluated behavioral health-related outcomes, all studies (7/7, 100%) found a positive effect, and four studies (4/7, 57.1%) found that there was no significant difference between gain and loss framing. Of the seven studies that assessed nonbehavioral health-related outcomes, six studies (6/7, 85.7%) reported a positive postintervention effect, whereas four studies (4/7, 57.1%) found that loss-framed messages were more effective. One study (1/7, 14.3%) reported that there was no effect of the message framing on mental health-related outcomes.

Conclusions: In diabetes health education communication, message framing of gain and loss framing has a positive effect on health outcomes for individuals. The advantage of the loss framing is more significant in improving nonbehavioral health-related outcomes.

Practice implications: When constructing a message to promote health outcomes for patients with diabetes, the message framing is worth applying, and the advantages of loss framing can be considered more.

Trial registration: PROSPERO registration ID: CRD42023445074. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=445074.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在糖尿病健康教育交流中,信息框架干预对改善个人健康结果的效果:系统回顾
目的确定信息框架干预对改善糖尿病健康教育传播中个人健康结果的影响:使用 Web of Science、PubMed、EMBASE 和 Cochrane Library 等四个电子数据库作为搜索引擎。文献检索时间从开始到 2023 年 12 月。纳入了报告糖尿病信息框架干预效果的随机对照试验(RCT)和准实验试验:结果:综述包括 10 项研究。许多研究调查了多种健康结果。在对行为健康相关结果进行评估的 7 项研究中,所有研究(7/7,100%)都发现了积极的效果,4 项研究(4/7,57.1%)发现收益框架和损失框架之间没有显著差异。在七项评估非行为健康相关结果的研究中,六项研究(6/7,85.7%)报告了干预后的积极效果,而四项研究(4/7,57.1%)发现损失框架信息更有效。一项研究(1/7,14.3%)报告称,信息框架对心理健康相关结果没有影响:结论:在糖尿病健康教育传播中,收益和损失的信息框架对个人的健康结果有积极影响。在改善非行为健康相关结果方面,损失框架的优势更为显著:实践意义:在为糖尿病患者构建促进健康结果的信息时,信息框架值得应用,而且可以更多地考虑损失框架的优势:试验注册:PROSPERO 注册 ID:CRD42023445074。https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=445074。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health Nursing
Public Health Nursing 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
117
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Public Health Nursing publishes empirical research reports, program evaluations, and case reports focused on populations at risk across the lifespan. The journal also prints articles related to developments in practice, education of public health nurses, theory development, methodological innovations, legal, ethical, and public policy issues in public health, and the history of public health nursing throughout the world. While the primary readership of the Journal is North American, the journal is expanding its mission to address global public health concerns of interest to nurses.
期刊最新文献
Exploring barriers and facilitators to feeding children with minimal or no "Junk Food": Insights from Mexican women. Exploring the Relationship Between Cyberbullying and Technology Addiction in Adolescents. eHealth Interventions of Health Literacy for Stroke Survivors: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Exploring Nursing Students' Metaphorical Perceptions and Cognitive Structures Related to the Global Climate Crisis's Impact on Nursing. Storage practice and wastage of pharmaceuticals in Chinese urban-dwelling households: Description of urban-dwelling households.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1