Effectiveness study of surface electromyography combined with spine 3D data system to evaluate scoliosis.

IF 1.4 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY American journal of clinical and experimental immunology Pub Date : 2024-08-25 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.62347/BLSO4420
Li-Huang Zhang, Yong Bao, Xiao-Pei Sun, Jie-Jian Shi, Jie Zhang, Jing-Yun Xu, Qing Xie
{"title":"Effectiveness study of surface electromyography combined with spine 3D data system to evaluate scoliosis.","authors":"Li-Huang Zhang, Yong Bao, Xiao-Pei Sun, Jie-Jian Shi, Jie Zhang, Jing-Yun Xu, Qing Xie","doi":"10.62347/BLSO4420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of surface electromyography combined with a spine 3D data system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>10 idiopathic scoliosis patients (age: 12.90±3.67 years, height: 155.90±20.07 cm, weight: 48.00±12.86 kg, 6 major thoracic lateral bends and 4 lumbar bends) who were selected to attend the outpatient clinic of Ruijin Rehabilitation Hospital, First diagnosed as scoliosis by imaging examination (EOS system), evaluation by using the surface electromyography monitoring system, the radiation-free 3D spine data acquisition and analysis system, the surface electromyography of the paravertebral muscles (root mean square value (RMS) of the resting standing and action position of the spine) and the Cobb angle of scoliosis were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The RMS of the convex side was larger than that of the concave side in the two postures (P<0.05), and The RMS value of bilateral action position was significantly higher than that of rest position (P<0.05). There was no correlation between RMS ratio and Cobb angle in two positions of thoracic scoliosis (P>0.05). There was a significant correlation between the RMS ratio at rest position of lumbar scoliosis and Cobb angle. At rest, the RMS value of convex side was significantly correlated with the Cobb angle measured by the EOS system and the 3D data system (P<0.05, of which P<0.01). The Cobb angle measured by 3D data system and the EOS system was significantly correlated (P<0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Surface EMG can be used to evaluate the motor function of paravertebral muscles on both sides of scoliosis patients. The new 3D data system has high accuracy in evaluating scoliosis. The combination of the two can dynamically evaluate scoliosis, which is more clinically effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":72163,"journal":{"name":"American journal of clinical and experimental immunology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11411156/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of clinical and experimental immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/BLSO4420","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of surface electromyography combined with a spine 3D data system.

Methods: 10 idiopathic scoliosis patients (age: 12.90±3.67 years, height: 155.90±20.07 cm, weight: 48.00±12.86 kg, 6 major thoracic lateral bends and 4 lumbar bends) who were selected to attend the outpatient clinic of Ruijin Rehabilitation Hospital, First diagnosed as scoliosis by imaging examination (EOS system), evaluation by using the surface electromyography monitoring system, the radiation-free 3D spine data acquisition and analysis system, the surface electromyography of the paravertebral muscles (root mean square value (RMS) of the resting standing and action position of the spine) and the Cobb angle of scoliosis were recorded.

Results: The RMS of the convex side was larger than that of the concave side in the two postures (P<0.05), and The RMS value of bilateral action position was significantly higher than that of rest position (P<0.05). There was no correlation between RMS ratio and Cobb angle in two positions of thoracic scoliosis (P>0.05). There was a significant correlation between the RMS ratio at rest position of lumbar scoliosis and Cobb angle. At rest, the RMS value of convex side was significantly correlated with the Cobb angle measured by the EOS system and the 3D data system (P<0.05, of which P<0.01). The Cobb angle measured by 3D data system and the EOS system was significantly correlated (P<0.01).

Conclusion: Surface EMG can be used to evaluate the motor function of paravertebral muscles on both sides of scoliosis patients. The new 3D data system has high accuracy in evaluating scoliosis. The combination of the two can dynamically evaluate scoliosis, which is more clinically effective.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
表面肌电图结合脊柱三维数据系统评估脊柱侧弯的有效性研究。
目的:评估表面肌电图与脊柱三维数据系统相结合的临床效果:方法:选取10例特发性脊柱侧弯患者(年龄:12.90±3.67岁,身高:155.90±20.07cm,体重:48.00±12.86 kg,胸大弯6例,腰大弯4例),经影像学检查(EOS系统)确诊为脊柱侧弯,采用表面肌电监测系统、无辐射三维脊柱数据采集分析系统进行评估,记录椎旁肌表面肌电(脊柱静止站立位和活动位的均方根值)和脊柱侧弯的Cobb角:两种姿势下,凸侧的均方根值均大于凹侧(P0.05)。腰椎侧弯静息姿势下的有效值比与 Cobb 角之间存在明显的相关性。在静息状态下,凸侧的 RMS 值与 EOS 系统和三维数据系统测量的 Cobb 角有明显相关性(PC结论:表面肌电图可用于评估脊柱侧凸患者两侧椎旁肌肉的运动功能。新的三维数据系统在评估脊柱侧弯方面具有很高的准确性。两者结合可动态评估脊柱侧弯,临床效果更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Advance in the mechanism and clinical research of myalgia in long COVID. Characterization of tumor suppressors and oncogenes evaluated from TCGA cancers. Clinical utility of multi-row spiral CT in diagnosing hepatic nodular lesions, gastric cancer, and Crohn's disease: a comprehensive meta-analysis. Effectiveness study of surface electromyography combined with spine 3D data system to evaluate scoliosis. The relationship between metabolites and gout: a Mendelian randomization study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1