Trends and outcomes in community-onset and hospital-onset Staphylococcus bacteremia among hospitals in the United States from 2015 to 2020.

Takaaki Kobayashi, ChinEn Ai, Molly Jung, Jorge L Salinas, Kalvin C Yu
{"title":"Trends and outcomes in community-onset and hospital-onset <i>Staphylococcus bacteremia</i> among hospitals in the United States from 2015 to 2020.","authors":"Takaaki Kobayashi, ChinEn Ai, Molly Jung, Jorge L Salinas, Kalvin C Yu","doi":"10.1017/ash.2024.402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We investigated trends in <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (staph) bacteremia incidence stratified by methicillin susceptibility (methicillin-susceptible <i>S. aureus</i> [MSSA] vs. methicillin-resistant <i>S. aureus</i> [MRSA]) and onset designation (community-onset [CO] vs. hospital-onset [HO]).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated the microbiological data among adult patients who were admitted to 267 acute-care hospitals during October 1, 2015, to February 28, 2020. Using a subset of data from 41 acute-care hospitals, we conducted a retrospective cohort study to assess patient demographics, characteristics, mortality, length of stay, and costs. We also conducted a case-control study between those with and without staph bacteremia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of MSSA bacteremia significantly increased from 2.43 per 1,000 admissions to 2.87 per 1,000 admissions (estimate=0.0047, <i>P</i>-value=.0006). The incidence of MRSA significantly increased from 2.11 per 1,000 admissions to 2.42 per 1,000 admissions (estimate=0.0126, <i>P</i>-value <.0001). While the incidence of CO MSSA and CO MRSA demonstrated a significant increase (p=0.0023, and p < 0.0001), the incidence of HO MSSA and HO MRSA did not significantly change (p=0.2795 and p < 0.4464). Compared to those without staph bacteremia, mortality, length of stay, and total cost were significantly higher in those with staph bacteremia, regardless of methicillin susceptibility or onset designation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The increasing incidence of CO MSSA and MRSA bacteremia might suggest the necessity for dedicated infection control measures and interventions for community members colonized with or at risk of acquiring <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":72246,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11406565/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2024.402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We investigated trends in Staphylococcus aureus (staph) bacteremia incidence stratified by methicillin susceptibility (methicillin-susceptible S. aureus [MSSA] vs. methicillin-resistant S. aureus [MRSA]) and onset designation (community-onset [CO] vs. hospital-onset [HO]).

Methods: We evaluated the microbiological data among adult patients who were admitted to 267 acute-care hospitals during October 1, 2015, to February 28, 2020. Using a subset of data from 41 acute-care hospitals, we conducted a retrospective cohort study to assess patient demographics, characteristics, mortality, length of stay, and costs. We also conducted a case-control study between those with and without staph bacteremia.

Results: The incidence of MSSA bacteremia significantly increased from 2.43 per 1,000 admissions to 2.87 per 1,000 admissions (estimate=0.0047, P-value=.0006). The incidence of MRSA significantly increased from 2.11 per 1,000 admissions to 2.42 per 1,000 admissions (estimate=0.0126, P-value <.0001). While the incidence of CO MSSA and CO MRSA demonstrated a significant increase (p=0.0023, and p < 0.0001), the incidence of HO MSSA and HO MRSA did not significantly change (p=0.2795 and p < 0.4464). Compared to those without staph bacteremia, mortality, length of stay, and total cost were significantly higher in those with staph bacteremia, regardless of methicillin susceptibility or onset designation.

Conclusion: The increasing incidence of CO MSSA and MRSA bacteremia might suggest the necessity for dedicated infection control measures and interventions for community members colonized with or at risk of acquiring Staphylococcus aureus.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2015 年至 2020 年美国医院中社区发病和医院发病葡萄球菌菌血症的趋势和结果。
背景:我们研究了金黄色葡萄球菌(葡萄球菌)菌血症发病率的趋势,按照甲氧西林敏感性(甲氧西林易感金黄色葡萄球菌 [MSSA] 与耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌 [MRSA] )和发病类型(社区发病 [CO] 与医院发病 [HO])进行了分层:我们评估了 2015 年 10 月 1 日至 2020 年 2 月 28 日期间 267 家急诊医院收治的成人患者的微生物学数据。我们利用 41 家急诊医院的数据子集,开展了一项回顾性队列研究,以评估患者的人口统计学、特征、死亡率、住院时间和费用。我们还对葡萄球菌血症患者和非葡萄球菌血症患者进行了病例对照研究:结果:MSSA菌血症的发病率从每1000例住院患者中2.43例显著增加到2.87例(估计值=0.0047,P值=0.0006)。MRSA 的发病率从每 1,000 例住院患者中 2.11 例明显上升至 2.42 例(估计值=0.0126,P 值=结论):CO MSSA 和 MRSA 菌血症发病率的增加可能表明,有必要对已感染或有感染金黄色葡萄球菌风险的社区成员采取专门的感染控制措施和干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of automated identification of antimicrobial stewardship opportunities for suspected urinary tract infections. Impacts of risk-stratified inpatient penicillin allergy label delabeling on subsequent antimicrobial spectrum index and costs. Successful adaptation of an initiative to reduce unnecessary antibiotics for acute respiratory infections across two Veteran Affairs ambulatory healthcare systems. Trends in antibiotic utilization for patients hospitalized with COVID-19 with and without signs of sepsis. Assessing a safety climate tool adapted to address respiratory illnesses in Canadian hospitals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1