[Rectovaginal fistulas : Differentiated diagnostics and treatment].

Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-16 DOI:10.1007/s00104-024-02151-5
Oliver Schwandner
{"title":"[Rectovaginal fistulas : Differentiated diagnostics and treatment].","authors":"Oliver Schwandner","doi":"10.1007/s00104-024-02151-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rectovaginal fistulas (RVF) represent less than 5% of anorectal fistulas. The classification of RVF is based on the localization (low vs. high) and the etiology. The most frequent causes of RVF are birth trauma, Crohn's disease, previous surgery and pelvic irradiation. In most cases a clinical diagnostic assessment is sufficient. Additionally, endosonography is a reliable tool to detect sphincter defects. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are reserved for special situations (e.g., RVF related to anastomotic leakage, after pelvic irradiation or associated with complex perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease). The surgical treatment is primarily oriented to the localization and etiology. Surgical techniques range from local procedures (e.g., endorectal advancement flap repair, transvaginal or transperineal closure) up to more invasive tissue interposition (e.g., bulbocavernosus muscle fat tissue flap or transposition of the gracilis muscle). In \"high\" RVF transabdominal approaches such as coloanal anastomosis, pull through procedures or omental interposition are indicated. All surgical procedures show high recurrence rates. Several operations are mostly necessary and a stoma creation is often required.</p>","PeriodicalId":72588,"journal":{"name":"Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":"1027-1040"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-024-02151-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rectovaginal fistulas (RVF) represent less than 5% of anorectal fistulas. The classification of RVF is based on the localization (low vs. high) and the etiology. The most frequent causes of RVF are birth trauma, Crohn's disease, previous surgery and pelvic irradiation. In most cases a clinical diagnostic assessment is sufficient. Additionally, endosonography is a reliable tool to detect sphincter defects. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are reserved for special situations (e.g., RVF related to anastomotic leakage, after pelvic irradiation or associated with complex perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease). The surgical treatment is primarily oriented to the localization and etiology. Surgical techniques range from local procedures (e.g., endorectal advancement flap repair, transvaginal or transperineal closure) up to more invasive tissue interposition (e.g., bulbocavernosus muscle fat tissue flap or transposition of the gracilis muscle). In "high" RVF transabdominal approaches such as coloanal anastomosis, pull through procedures or omental interposition are indicated. All surgical procedures show high recurrence rates. Several operations are mostly necessary and a stoma creation is often required.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[直肠阴道瘘:差异化诊断和治疗]。
直肠阴道瘘(RVF)占肛门直肠瘘的比例不到 5%。直肠阴道瘘的分类依据是定位(低位与高位)和病因。最常见的 RVF 病因是分娩创伤、克罗恩病、既往手术和盆腔照射。在大多数情况下,临床诊断评估就足够了。此外,内窥镜检查也是检测括约肌缺陷的可靠工具。计算机断层扫描(CT)和磁共振成像(MRI)适用于特殊情况(如与吻合口漏有关的 RVF、盆腔照射后或与复杂的肛周瘘化性克罗恩病有关)。手术治疗主要以定位和病因为导向。手术技术包括从局部手术(如肛门直肠内推进皮瓣修复术、经阴道或经会阴闭合术)到更具创伤性的组织插植术(如球海绵体肌脂肪组织瓣或腓肠肌转位)。在 "高 "RVF情况下,可采用经腹方法,如结肠肛门吻合术、拉通手术或网膜插置术。所有手术方法的复发率都很高。大多数情况下需要进行多次手术,通常还需要造口。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Multimorbid patients in endocrine surgery]. [Prognostic influence of the operative technique on survival after esophagectomy and a delayed interval after chemoradiotherapy]. [Video-assisted thoracic surgery-Indications, importance and technique]. [Draining umbilicus in adulthood?] [Evidence for the extent and oncological benefit of lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1