The potential clinical utility of an artificial intelligence model for identification of vertebral compression fractures in chest radiographs.

Ankita Ghatak, James M Hillis, Sarah F Mercaldo, Isabella Newbury-Chaet, John K Chin, Subba R Digumarthy, Karen Rodriguez, Victorine V Muse, Katherine P Andriole, Keith J Dreyer, Mannudeep K Kalra, Bernardo C Bizzo
{"title":"The potential clinical utility of an artificial intelligence model for identification of vertebral compression fractures in chest radiographs.","authors":"Ankita Ghatak, James M Hillis, Sarah F Mercaldo, Isabella Newbury-Chaet, John K Chin, Subba R Digumarthy, Karen Rodriguez, Victorine V Muse, Katherine P Andriole, Keith J Dreyer, Mannudeep K Kalra, Bernardo C Bizzo","doi":"10.1016/j.jacr.2024.08.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the ability of the Annalise Enterprise CXR Triage Trauma artificial intelligence model to identify vertebral compression fractures on chest radiographs and its potential to address undiagnosed osteoporosis and its treatment.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study used a consecutive cohort of 596 chest radiographs from four U.S. hospitals between 2015 and 2021. Each radiograph included both frontal (anteroposterior or posteroanterior) and lateral projections. These radiographs were assessed for the presence of vertebral compression fracture in a consensus manner by up to three thoracic radiologists. The model then performed inference on the cases. A chart review was also performed for the presence of osteoporosis-related ICD-10 diagnostic codes and medication use for the study period and an additional year of follow up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The model successfully completed inference on 595 cases (99.8%); these cases included 272 positive cases and 323 negative cases. The model performed with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.955 (95% CI: 0.939 to 0.968), sensitivity 89.3% (95% CI: 85.7 to 92.7%) and specificity 89.2% (95% CI: 85.4 to 92.3%). Out of the 236 true-positive cases (i.e., correctly identified vertebral compression fractures by the model) with available chart information, only 86 (36.4%) had a diagnosis of vertebral compression fracture and 140 (59.3%) had a diagnosis of either osteoporosis or osteopenia; only 78 (33.1%) were receiving a disease modifying medication for osteoporosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The model identified vertebral compression fracture accurately with a sensitivity 89.3% (95% CI: 85.7 to 92.7%) and specificity of 89.2% (95% CI: 85.4 to 92.3%). Its automated use could help identify patients who have undiagnosed osteoporosis and who may benefit from taking disease modifying medications.</p>","PeriodicalId":73968,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2024.08.026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the ability of the Annalise Enterprise CXR Triage Trauma artificial intelligence model to identify vertebral compression fractures on chest radiographs and its potential to address undiagnosed osteoporosis and its treatment.

Materials and methods: This retrospective study used a consecutive cohort of 596 chest radiographs from four U.S. hospitals between 2015 and 2021. Each radiograph included both frontal (anteroposterior or posteroanterior) and lateral projections. These radiographs were assessed for the presence of vertebral compression fracture in a consensus manner by up to three thoracic radiologists. The model then performed inference on the cases. A chart review was also performed for the presence of osteoporosis-related ICD-10 diagnostic codes and medication use for the study period and an additional year of follow up.

Results: The model successfully completed inference on 595 cases (99.8%); these cases included 272 positive cases and 323 negative cases. The model performed with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.955 (95% CI: 0.939 to 0.968), sensitivity 89.3% (95% CI: 85.7 to 92.7%) and specificity 89.2% (95% CI: 85.4 to 92.3%). Out of the 236 true-positive cases (i.e., correctly identified vertebral compression fractures by the model) with available chart information, only 86 (36.4%) had a diagnosis of vertebral compression fracture and 140 (59.3%) had a diagnosis of either osteoporosis or osteopenia; only 78 (33.1%) were receiving a disease modifying medication for osteoporosis.

Conclusion: The model identified vertebral compression fracture accurately with a sensitivity 89.3% (95% CI: 85.7 to 92.7%) and specificity of 89.2% (95% CI: 85.4 to 92.3%). Its automated use could help identify patients who have undiagnosed osteoporosis and who may benefit from taking disease modifying medications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能模型在识别胸片椎体压缩性骨折方面的潜在临床实用性。
目的:评估 Annalise Enterprise CXR Triage Trauma 人工智能模型识别胸片上椎体压缩性骨折的能力及其解决未诊断的骨质疏松症及其治疗的潜力:这项回顾性研究使用了 2015 年至 2021 年间来自四家美国医院的 596 张连续队列胸片。每张照片都包括正面(前胸或后背)和侧面投影。这些X光片由最多三名胸部放射科医生以协商一致的方式评估是否存在椎体压缩性骨折。然后,模型对病例进行推断。此外,还进行了病历审查,以确定是否存在与骨质疏松症相关的 ICD-10 诊断代码,以及研究期间和额外一年随访期间的药物使用情况:该模型成功完成了 595 个病例(99.8%)的推断,其中包括 272 个阳性病例和 323 个阴性病例。该模型的接收者操作特征曲线下面积为 0.955(95% CI:0.939 至 0.968),灵敏度为 89.3%(95% CI:85.7 至 92.7%),特异度为 89.2%(95% CI:85.4 至 92.3%)。在236例有病历信息的真阳性病例(即模型正确识别的椎体压缩性骨折)中,只有86例(36.4%)确诊为椎体压缩性骨折,140例(59.3%)确诊为骨质疏松症或骨质疏松症;只有78例(33.1%)正在接受治疗骨质疏松症的药物:该模型能准确识别椎体压缩性骨折,灵敏度为 89.3%(95% CI:85.7% 至 92.7%),特异性为 89.2%(95% CI:85.4% 至 92.3%)。该模型的自动使用有助于识别未确诊的骨质疏松症患者,以及可能从服用疾病调节药物中获益的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Classification and communication of critical findings in emergency radiology: a scoping review. Institutional review of usage and referral pattern of radiologic voiding examinations (ceVUS and VCUG). Patient-Friendly Summary of the ACR Appropriateness Criteria®: Dizziness and Ataxia: 2024 Update. Embracing Appreciative Inquiry in Radiology: A Strategy for Enhancing Performance. Large Language Model Use in Radiology Residency Applications: Unwelcomed but Inevitable.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1