A Resident-Led Quality Improvement Project in a Community Based Hospital Emergency Department - The Benefits of Simplified Plan-Do-Study-Act/Patient-Safety Quality Improvement Projects Regardless of Staffing Levels.

Spartan medical research journal Pub Date : 2024-09-09 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.51894/001c.123236
Martina Ghiardi, Shauncie Skidmore, Christina George, Rachael Crise, Olga J Santiago
{"title":"A Resident-Led Quality Improvement Project in a Community Based Hospital Emergency Department - The Benefits of Simplified Plan-Do-Study-Act/Patient-Safety Quality Improvement Projects Regardless of Staffing Levels.","authors":"Martina Ghiardi, Shauncie Skidmore, Christina George, Rachael Crise, Olga J Santiago","doi":"10.51894/001c.123236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>An emergency department (ED) resident believed ED patients, who needed a simple laceration repair, would be better served if the ED used a laceration cart for supplies, as opposed to the hunt-and-gather method for collecting needed supplies. To address this issue, a two-step Plan-Do-Study-Act/Patient-Safety quality improvement (PDSA/PS QI) project was initiated, with the intent that the project could be completed in a timely manner regardless of staffing levels. The primary purpose of the project was two-fold: 1) to explore the possible time-to-repair benefits of using a laceration repair supply cart in the emergency department and 2) to determine the feasibility of conducting a simple multi-cycle PDSA/PS QI project in a potential staffing-shortage environment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective study using a simple 2-cycle PDSA/PS QI procedure was initiated. During cycle 1, baseline data, to determine the time to complete simple-laceration repairs using a hunt-and-gather supply process, was collected in the form of sign-out/return sheets located next to a laceration repair kit. Cycle 2 introduced the use of a simple-laceration supply cart in the ED, with data collected in the form of a sign-out/return sheet located on the supply cart. Data analysis included a two-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum (Mann-Whitney) test to assess the effectiveness of the suture cart implementation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pre-intervention. Twelve valid cases were recorded on the sign-out/return sheets. The baseline time range to complete a simple laceration repair varied from 26 minutes to 151 minutes, with an average of 68.3 minutes (SD=40.8).Post-intervention. Twenty-nine valid cases were recorded on the revised sign-out/return sheet. The time to complete a simple laceration repair, using the supply cart, varied from 10 minutes to 116 minutes, with a mean of 36.9 minutes (SD=25.0), a statistically significant average decrease (p = 0.005) of 31.4 minutes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of a suture repair cart in the ED reduced the time required for physicians to perform a simple laceration repair. A minimal 2-cycle PDSA/PS QI process allowed residents and staff to participate in a quality-improvement project, even in a potential staffing-shortage environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":74853,"journal":{"name":"Spartan medical research journal","volume":"9 3","pages":"123236"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11389386/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spartan medical research journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51894/001c.123236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: An emergency department (ED) resident believed ED patients, who needed a simple laceration repair, would be better served if the ED used a laceration cart for supplies, as opposed to the hunt-and-gather method for collecting needed supplies. To address this issue, a two-step Plan-Do-Study-Act/Patient-Safety quality improvement (PDSA/PS QI) project was initiated, with the intent that the project could be completed in a timely manner regardless of staffing levels. The primary purpose of the project was two-fold: 1) to explore the possible time-to-repair benefits of using a laceration repair supply cart in the emergency department and 2) to determine the feasibility of conducting a simple multi-cycle PDSA/PS QI project in a potential staffing-shortage environment.

Methods: A prospective study using a simple 2-cycle PDSA/PS QI procedure was initiated. During cycle 1, baseline data, to determine the time to complete simple-laceration repairs using a hunt-and-gather supply process, was collected in the form of sign-out/return sheets located next to a laceration repair kit. Cycle 2 introduced the use of a simple-laceration supply cart in the ED, with data collected in the form of a sign-out/return sheet located on the supply cart. Data analysis included a two-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum (Mann-Whitney) test to assess the effectiveness of the suture cart implementation.

Results: Pre-intervention. Twelve valid cases were recorded on the sign-out/return sheets. The baseline time range to complete a simple laceration repair varied from 26 minutes to 151 minutes, with an average of 68.3 minutes (SD=40.8).Post-intervention. Twenty-nine valid cases were recorded on the revised sign-out/return sheet. The time to complete a simple laceration repair, using the supply cart, varied from 10 minutes to 116 minutes, with a mean of 36.9 minutes (SD=25.0), a statistically significant average decrease (p = 0.005) of 31.4 minutes.

Conclusion: The use of a suture repair cart in the ED reduced the time required for physicians to perform a simple laceration repair. A minimal 2-cycle PDSA/PS QI process allowed residents and staff to participate in a quality-improvement project, even in a potential staffing-shortage environment.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社区医院急诊科居民主导的质量改进项目--无论人员配备水平如何,简化的 "计划-实施-研究-行动/患者安全 "质量改进项目的益处。
导言:一名急诊科(ED)住院医师认为,如果急诊科使用裂伤推车来收集用品,而不是采用打猎收集的方法来收集所需用品,就能更好地为需要进行简单裂伤修复的急诊科病人提供服务。为了解决这个问题,我们启动了一个分为两个步骤的 "计划-实施-研究-行动/患者安全 "质量改进(PDSA/PS QI)项目,目的是无论人员配备情况如何,都能及时完成该项目。该项目的主要目的有两个:1)探索在急诊科使用裂伤修复供应车可能带来的修复时间上的优势;2)确定在可能出现人员短缺的环境中开展简单的多周期 PDSA/PS QI 项目的可行性:方法:采用简单的两周期 PDSA/PS QI 程序启动了一项前瞻性研究。在第 1 个周期中,基线数据是通过放置在裂伤修补工具包旁边的签出/返回表收集的,以确定使用 "猎取-收集 "供应流程完成简单裂伤修补的时间。周期 2 在急诊室引入了简单裂伤供应车,通过供应车上的签出/返回表收集数据。数据分析包括双样本 Wilcoxon 秩和(Mann-Whitney)检验,以评估缝合车的实施效果:干预前。签出/返回表上记录了 12 个有效病例。完成简单裂伤修补的基线时间从 26 分钟到 151 分钟不等,平均为 68.3 分钟(SD=40.8)。修订后的签出/返回表记录了 29 个有效病例。使用供应车完成简单裂伤修补的时间从 10 分钟到 116 分钟不等,平均为 36.9 分钟(SD=25.0),平均缩短了 31.4 分钟(P=0.005),具有显著的统计学意义:结论:在急诊室使用缝合修复车缩短了医生进行简单裂伤修复所需的时间。即使在可能出现人员短缺的情况下,一个最简单的两周期 PDSA/PS QI 流程也能让住院医师和员工参与到质量改进项目中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Improving the Diagnostic Workup of Vertigo: A Multidisciplinary Review. Functional Outcome of Uncemented (Hydroxyapatite Coated) Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty in Fracture Neck of Femur in Elderly. Comparing Clinical Treatments and Outcomes of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Osteopathic Otolaryngology Residency Match Trends: Impact of the ACGME Single Accreditation System (2010-2024). Descriptive Characteristics of Undergraduate Research Associate Programs in the United States: Findings from a National Registry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1