Anatomical and functional evidence for renal autonomic innervation in normotensive and hypertensive rats.

Min Dai, Cai-Yu Li, Jing-Xiao Wang, Xiao-Yu Xu, Shi-Xiu Sun, Ying Kang, Ai-Dong Chen, Ying Han, Guo-Qing Zhu
{"title":"Anatomical and functional evidence for renal autonomic innervation in normotensive and hypertensive rats.","authors":"Min Dai, Cai-Yu Li, Jing-Xiao Wang, Xiao-Yu Xu, Shi-Xiu Sun, Ying Kang, Ai-Dong Chen, Ying Han, Guo-Qing Zhu","doi":"10.1152/ajprenal.00133.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Renal denervation (RDN) has been used for treating resistant hypertension. A few recent studies show vagal innervation of kidneys causing confusion. This study aimed to provide anatomical and functional evidence for renal autonomic innervation. Experiments were performed in male Wistar-Kyoto rats (WKY) and spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). Pseudorabies virus (PRV) in paraventricular nucleus and rostral ventrolateral medulla was prevented by bilateral RDN, but not subdiaphragmatic vagotomy. PRV did not appear in dorsal motor nucleus of vagus and nucleus tractus solitarii 72 h after renal injection of PRV. Adrenergic fibers were approximately 7 times more than cholinergic fibers in main renal artery (MRA) and its first (1RA) and second grade (2RA) branches. Adrenergic fibers in 1RA were more than these in MRA and 2RA. Tyrosine hydroxylase immunoreactivity in these arteries was higher in SHR than WKY. Norepinephrine (NE) increased, and α-receptor antagonist reduced vascular ring tension of renal arteries. The effect of NE was greater in 1RA and 2RA than MRA, which was prevented by α-receptor antagonist. Acetylcholine (ACh) or blockage of β-receptors, M- or N-receptors had no significant effects on vascular ring tension and the effect of NE. Renal blood flow was reduced by electrical stimulation of renal nerves, but not affected by stimulation of subdiaphragmatic vagus. These results provide anatomical and functional evidence that kidneys are innervated and renal blood flow is regulated by renal sympathetic nerves rather than vagus. Renal vasoconstriction is regulated by NE and adrenergic fibers rather than ACh or cholinergic fibers in WKY and SHR.</p>","PeriodicalId":93867,"journal":{"name":"American journal of physiology. Renal physiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of physiology. Renal physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/ajprenal.00133.2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Renal denervation (RDN) has been used for treating resistant hypertension. A few recent studies show vagal innervation of kidneys causing confusion. This study aimed to provide anatomical and functional evidence for renal autonomic innervation. Experiments were performed in male Wistar-Kyoto rats (WKY) and spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). Pseudorabies virus (PRV) in paraventricular nucleus and rostral ventrolateral medulla was prevented by bilateral RDN, but not subdiaphragmatic vagotomy. PRV did not appear in dorsal motor nucleus of vagus and nucleus tractus solitarii 72 h after renal injection of PRV. Adrenergic fibers were approximately 7 times more than cholinergic fibers in main renal artery (MRA) and its first (1RA) and second grade (2RA) branches. Adrenergic fibers in 1RA were more than these in MRA and 2RA. Tyrosine hydroxylase immunoreactivity in these arteries was higher in SHR than WKY. Norepinephrine (NE) increased, and α-receptor antagonist reduced vascular ring tension of renal arteries. The effect of NE was greater in 1RA and 2RA than MRA, which was prevented by α-receptor antagonist. Acetylcholine (ACh) or blockage of β-receptors, M- or N-receptors had no significant effects on vascular ring tension and the effect of NE. Renal blood flow was reduced by electrical stimulation of renal nerves, but not affected by stimulation of subdiaphragmatic vagus. These results provide anatomical and functional evidence that kidneys are innervated and renal blood flow is regulated by renal sympathetic nerves rather than vagus. Renal vasoconstriction is regulated by NE and adrenergic fibers rather than ACh or cholinergic fibers in WKY and SHR.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
正常血压和高血压大鼠肾脏自主神经支配的解剖和功能证据
肾脏神经支配(RDN)已被用于治疗抵抗性高血压。最近的一些研究显示,肾脏的迷走神经支配引起了人们的困惑。本研究旨在为肾脏自主神经支配提供解剖学和功能学证据。实验在雄性 Wistar-Kyoto 大鼠(WKY)和自发性高血压大鼠(SHR)中进行。室旁核和侧腹外侧髓质中的伪狂犬病毒(PRV)可通过双侧 RDN 而不是膈下迷走神经切断术被阻止。肾脏注射 PRV 72 小时后,迷走神经背运动核和束状垂体核中未出现 PRV。肾动脉主干(MRA)及其一级(1RA)和二级(2RA)分支中的肾上腺素能纤维约为胆碱能纤维的 7 倍。1RA 中的肾上腺素能纤维多于 MRA 和 2RA 中的肾上腺素能纤维。在这些动脉中,SHR 的酪氨酸羟化酶免疫反应活性高于 WKY。去甲肾上腺素(NE)增加,α受体拮抗剂降低了肾动脉血管环张力。NE对1RA和2RA的影响大于对MRA的影响,而α受体拮抗剂可阻止NE对MRA的影响。乙酰胆碱(ACh)或阻断β受体、M受体或N受体对血管环张力和NE的作用没有显著影响。肾神经电刺激会降低肾血流量,但膈下迷走神经刺激不会影响肾血流量。这些结果提供了解剖学和功能性证据,证明肾脏受肾交感神经而不是迷走神经支配,肾血流量受肾交感神经而不是迷走神经调节。在 WKY 和 SHR 中,肾血管收缩受 NE 和肾上腺素能纤维而非 ACh 或胆碱能纤维调节。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Chronic central nervous system leptin administration attenuates kidney dysfunction and injury in a model of ischemia/reperfusion-induced acute kidney injury. Deletion of AT1a receptors selectively in the proximal tubules alters the hypotensive and natriuretic response to ANP via NPRA/cGMP/NO Signaling. Matrix metalloproteinases in kidney homeostasis and diseases: an update. Optimized protocol for the multi-omics processing of cryopreserved human kidney tissue. Bayesian mapping of protein kinases to vasopressin-regulated phosphorylation sites in renal collecting duct.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1