Explainable AI for computational pathology identifies model limitations and tissue biomarkers.

ArXiv Pub Date : 2024-11-18
Jakub R Kaczmarzyk, Joel H Saltz, Peter K Koo
{"title":"Explainable AI for computational pathology identifies model limitations and tissue biomarkers.","authors":"Jakub R Kaczmarzyk, Joel H Saltz, Peter K Koo","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Deep learning models hold great promise for digital pathology, but their opaque decision-making processes undermine trust and hinder clinical adoption. Explainable AI methods are essential to enhance model transparency and reliability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed HIPPO, an explainable AI framework that systematically modifies tissue regions in whole slide images to generate image counterfactuals, enabling quantitative hypothesis testing, bias detection, and model evaluation beyond traditional performance metrics. HIPPO was applied to a variety of clinically important tasks, including breast metastasis detection in axillary lymph nodes, prognostication in breast cancer and melanoma, and <i>IDH</i> mutation classification in gliomas. In computational experiments, HIPPO was compared against traditional metrics and attention-based approaches to assess its ability to identify key tissue elements driving model predictions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In metastasis detection, HIPPO uncovered critical model limitations that were undetectable by standard performance metrics or attention-based methods. For prognostic prediction, HIPPO outperformed attention by providing more nuanced insights into tissue elements influencing outcomes. In a proof-of-concept study, HIPPO facilitated hypothesis generation for identifying melanoma patients who may benefit from immunotherapy. In <i>IDH</i> mutation classification, HIPPO more robustly identified the pathology regions responsible for false negatives compared to attention, suggesting its potential to outperform attention in explaining model decisions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HIPPO expands the explainable AI toolkit for computational pathology by enabling deeper insights into model behavior. This framework supports the trustworthy development, deployment, and regulation of weakly-supervised models in clinical and research settings, promoting their broader adoption in digital pathology.</p>","PeriodicalId":93888,"journal":{"name":"ArXiv","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11398542/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ArXiv","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Deep learning models hold great promise for digital pathology, but their opaque decision-making processes undermine trust and hinder clinical adoption. Explainable AI methods are essential to enhance model transparency and reliability.

Methods: We developed HIPPO, an explainable AI framework that systematically modifies tissue regions in whole slide images to generate image counterfactuals, enabling quantitative hypothesis testing, bias detection, and model evaluation beyond traditional performance metrics. HIPPO was applied to a variety of clinically important tasks, including breast metastasis detection in axillary lymph nodes, prognostication in breast cancer and melanoma, and IDH mutation classification in gliomas. In computational experiments, HIPPO was compared against traditional metrics and attention-based approaches to assess its ability to identify key tissue elements driving model predictions.

Results: In metastasis detection, HIPPO uncovered critical model limitations that were undetectable by standard performance metrics or attention-based methods. For prognostic prediction, HIPPO outperformed attention by providing more nuanced insights into tissue elements influencing outcomes. In a proof-of-concept study, HIPPO facilitated hypothesis generation for identifying melanoma patients who may benefit from immunotherapy. In IDH mutation classification, HIPPO more robustly identified the pathology regions responsible for false negatives compared to attention, suggesting its potential to outperform attention in explaining model decisions.

Conclusions: HIPPO expands the explainable AI toolkit for computational pathology by enabling deeper insights into model behavior. This framework supports the trustworthy development, deployment, and regulation of weakly-supervised models in clinical and research settings, promoting their broader adoption in digital pathology.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于计算病理学的可解释人工智能可识别模型限制和组织生物标记。
深度学习模型在组织病理学图像分析中大有可为,但其不透明的决策过程给高风险医疗场景带来了挑战。在此,我们介绍一种可解释的人工智能方法--HIPPO,该方法通过整张切片图像中的组织斑块修改生成反事实示例,在计算病理学中对基于注意力的多实例学习(ABMIL)模型进行检验。将 HIPPO 应用于为检测乳腺癌转移而训练的 ABMIL 模型时发现,这些模型可能会忽略小肿瘤,并可能被非肿瘤组织误导,而广泛用于解释的注意力图谱往往会突出显示不直接影响预测的区域。通过解释在预后预测任务中训练的 ABMIL 模型,HIPPO 发现了比高注意力区域具有更强预后效应的组织区域,而高注意力区域有时会对风险评分产生反直觉的影响。这些发现证明了 HIPPO 在综合模型评估、偏差检测和定量假设检验方面的能力。HIPPO 极大地扩展了可解释人工智能工具的能力,以评估计算病理学中弱监督模型的开发、部署和监管是否值得信赖和可靠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Metastability in networks of nonlinear stochastic integrate-and-fire neurons. On the linear scaling of entropy vs. energy in human brain activity, the Hagedorn temperature and the Zipf law. Timing consistency of T cell receptor activation in a stochastic model combining kinetic segregation and proofreading. Brain Morphology Normative modelling platform for abnormality and Centile estimation: Brain MoNoCle. Adversarial Attacks on Large Language Models in Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1