Healthcare Provider Experiences With Unvaccinated COVID-19 Patients: A Qualitative Study.

Q4 Medicine Critical care explorations Pub Date : 2024-09-09 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1097/CCE.0000000000001157
Candice Griffin, Christie Lee, Phil Shin, Andrew Helmers, Csilla Kalocsai, Allia Karim, Dominique Piquette
{"title":"Healthcare Provider Experiences With Unvaccinated COVID-19 Patients: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Candice Griffin, Christie Lee, Phil Shin, Andrew Helmers, Csilla Kalocsai, Allia Karim, Dominique Piquette","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>In the setting of an active pandemic the impact of public vaccine hesitancy on healthcare workers has not yet been explored. There is currently a paucity of literature that examines how patient resistance to disease prevention in general impacts practitioners.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic created unprecedented healthcare challenges with impacts on healthcare workers' wellbeing. Vaccine hesitancy added complexity to providing care for unvaccinated patients. Our study qualitatively explored experiences of healthcare providers caring for unvaccinated patients with severe COVID-19 infection in the intensive care setting.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We used interview-based constructivist grounded theory methodology to explore experiences of healthcare providers with critically ill unvaccinated COVID-19 patients.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>Healthcare providers who cared for unvaccinated patients with severe COVID-19 respiratory failure following availability of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccines were recruited from seven ICUs located within two large academic centers and one community-based hospital. We interviewed 24 participants, consisting of eight attending physicians, seven registered nurses, six critical care fellows, one respiratory therapist, one physiotherapist, and one social worker between March 2022 and September 2022 (approximately 1.5 yr after the availability of COVID-19 vaccines in Canada).</p><p><strong>Analysis: </strong>Interviews were recorded, transcribed, de-identified, and coded to identify emerging themes. The final data was analyzed to generate the thematic framework. Reflexivity was employed to reflect upon and discuss individual pre-conceptions and opinions that may impact collection and interpretation of the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Healthcare providers maintained dedication toward professionalism during provision of care, at the cost of suffering emotional turmoil from the pandemic and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Evolving sources of stress associated with vaccine hesitancy included ongoing high volumes of critically ill patients, resource shortages, and visitation restrictions, which contributed to perceived emotional distress, empathy loss, and professional dissatisfaction. As a result, there were profound personal and professional consequences for healthcare professionals, with perceived impacts on patient care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study highlights struggles of healthcare providers in fulfilling professional duties while navigating emotional stressors unique to vaccine hesitancy. System-based interventions should be explored to help providers navigate biases and moral distress, and to foster resilience for the next major healthcare system strain.</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":"6 9","pages":"e1157"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11387047/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: In the setting of an active pandemic the impact of public vaccine hesitancy on healthcare workers has not yet been explored. There is currently a paucity of literature that examines how patient resistance to disease prevention in general impacts practitioners.

Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic created unprecedented healthcare challenges with impacts on healthcare workers' wellbeing. Vaccine hesitancy added complexity to providing care for unvaccinated patients. Our study qualitatively explored experiences of healthcare providers caring for unvaccinated patients with severe COVID-19 infection in the intensive care setting.

Design: We used interview-based constructivist grounded theory methodology to explore experiences of healthcare providers with critically ill unvaccinated COVID-19 patients.

Setting and participants: Healthcare providers who cared for unvaccinated patients with severe COVID-19 respiratory failure following availability of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccines were recruited from seven ICUs located within two large academic centers and one community-based hospital. We interviewed 24 participants, consisting of eight attending physicians, seven registered nurses, six critical care fellows, one respiratory therapist, one physiotherapist, and one social worker between March 2022 and September 2022 (approximately 1.5 yr after the availability of COVID-19 vaccines in Canada).

Analysis: Interviews were recorded, transcribed, de-identified, and coded to identify emerging themes. The final data was analyzed to generate the thematic framework. Reflexivity was employed to reflect upon and discuss individual pre-conceptions and opinions that may impact collection and interpretation of the data.

Results: Healthcare providers maintained dedication toward professionalism during provision of care, at the cost of suffering emotional turmoil from the pandemic and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Evolving sources of stress associated with vaccine hesitancy included ongoing high volumes of critically ill patients, resource shortages, and visitation restrictions, which contributed to perceived emotional distress, empathy loss, and professional dissatisfaction. As a result, there were profound personal and professional consequences for healthcare professionals, with perceived impacts on patient care.

Conclusions: Our study highlights struggles of healthcare providers in fulfilling professional duties while navigating emotional stressors unique to vaccine hesitancy. System-based interventions should be explored to help providers navigate biases and moral distress, and to foster resilience for the next major healthcare system strain.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医护人员与未接种 COVID-19 疫苗的患者相处的经历:定性研究。
重要性:在大流行病活跃的背景下,公众对疫苗犹豫不决对医疗工作者的影响尚未得到探讨。目前,研究患者对疾病预防的抵触情绪如何影响从业人员的文献很少:COVID-19 大流行给医疗保健带来了前所未有的挑战,对医疗保健工作者的健康造成了影响。对疫苗的犹豫不决增加了为未接种疫苗的患者提供护理的复杂性。我们的研究从定性角度探讨了医护人员在重症监护环境中护理未接种疫苗的 COVID-19 重症感染患者的经验:设计:我们采用基于访谈的建构主义基础理论方法,探讨医护人员护理未接种 COVID-19 疫苗的重症患者的经验:我们从两家大型学术中心和一家社区医院的七家重症监护室中招募了医疗服务提供者,他们负责在严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒 2 疫苗上市后护理未接种 COVID-19 疫苗的重症呼吸衰竭患者。我们在 2022 年 3 月至 2022 年 9 月期间(加拿大 COVID-19 疫苗上市后约 1.5 年)对 24 名参与者进行了访谈,其中包括 8 名主治医生、7 名注册护士、6 名重症监护研究员、1 名呼吸治疗师、1 名物理治疗师和 1 名社会工作者:对访谈进行记录、转录、去标识和编码,以确定新出现的主题。对最终数据进行分析,以生成主题框架。分析:对访谈进行记录、转录、去标识和编码,以确定新出现的主题:结果:医疗服务提供者在提供医疗服务的过程中保持了对专业精神的执着,但也付出了因大流行病和 COVID-19 疫苗犹豫不决而产生的情绪波动的代价。与疫苗犹豫不决相关的压力来源不断变化,包括持续大量的危重病人、资源短缺和探视限制,这些都导致了感知到的情绪困扰、同理心缺失和职业不满。因此,对医护人员的个人和职业造成了深远的影响,并对患者护理产生了明显的影响:我们的研究凸显了医护人员在履行专业职责的同时,在应对疫苗接种犹豫所带来的情绪压力方面所面临的困境。应探索基于系统的干预措施,以帮助医疗服务提供者克服偏见和道德困扰,并培养其应对下一次重大医疗系统压力的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
"Awake" Cannulation of Patients for Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygen: An Analysis of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry. Current Emergency Medical Service Vasoactive Use for the Management of Shock. Critical Data for Critical Care: A Primer on Leveraging Electronic Health Record Data for Research From Society of Critical Care Medicine's Panel on Data Sharing and Harmonization. Clinical Subtype Trajectories in Sepsis Patients Admitted to the ICU: A Secondary Analysis of an Observational Study. Septic Shock Requiring Three Vasopressors: Patient Demographics and Outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1