Body image concerns in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator: association with other patient-reported outcome measures.

Vivi Skibdal Frydensberg, Sören Möller, Jens Brock Johansen, Anna Strömberg, Susanne S Pedersen
{"title":"Body image concerns in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator: association with other patient-reported outcome measures.","authors":"Vivi Skibdal Frydensberg, Sören Möller, Jens Brock Johansen, Anna Strömberg, Susanne S Pedersen","doi":"10.1093/eurjcn/zvae121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To investigate associations between body image concerns (BICs) measured by the implantable cardioverter defibrillator body image concerns questionnaire (ICD-BICQ) and other patient-reported outcomes (PROs), in a cohort of patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD).</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>In a cross-sectional survey, we included patients > 18 years implanted with a first-time ICD (VVI, DDD, and cardiac re-synchronization therapy defibrillator) who had lived with their ICD from 3-24 months. They completed the 39-item ICD-BICQ together with the Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale, Patient Health Questionnaire, Type D Scale, Health Status Questionnaire, and the Florida Patient Acceptance Survey. Data were analysed using linear regression to compare personality constructs between patients with and without BICs. Logistic repression and receiver operating characteristic curves were used to predict patients with BICs based on other PROs. A total of 330 patients completed the survey. Five patients were excluded due to re-operations leaving 325 patients in the analyses. A total of 20% reported BICs at the recommended cut-off at 36 points. Patients with BICs reported higher anxiety and depression levels, lower device acceptance and health status, and had a Type D personality as compared to patients without BICs. Florida Patient Acceptance Survey was moderately able to predict BICs, while other PROs only had limited ability to predict BICs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with BICs reported poorer PROs. The PRO instruments were not able to predict patients with BICs, indicating that the ICD-BICQ provides independent relevant clinical information. In clinical practice, healthcare professionals can use the ICD-BICQ to identify and obtain information on possible BICs. The ICD-BICQ can also be used to evaluate new operation techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":93997,"journal":{"name":"European journal of cardiovascular nursing","volume":" ","pages":"91-101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of cardiovascular nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjcn/zvae121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To investigate associations between body image concerns (BICs) measured by the implantable cardioverter defibrillator body image concerns questionnaire (ICD-BICQ) and other patient-reported outcomes (PROs), in a cohort of patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD).

Methods and results: In a cross-sectional survey, we included patients > 18 years implanted with a first-time ICD (VVI, DDD, and cardiac re-synchronization therapy defibrillator) who had lived with their ICD from 3-24 months. They completed the 39-item ICD-BICQ together with the Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale, Patient Health Questionnaire, Type D Scale, Health Status Questionnaire, and the Florida Patient Acceptance Survey. Data were analysed using linear regression to compare personality constructs between patients with and without BICs. Logistic repression and receiver operating characteristic curves were used to predict patients with BICs based on other PROs. A total of 330 patients completed the survey. Five patients were excluded due to re-operations leaving 325 patients in the analyses. A total of 20% reported BICs at the recommended cut-off at 36 points. Patients with BICs reported higher anxiety and depression levels, lower device acceptance and health status, and had a Type D personality as compared to patients without BICs. Florida Patient Acceptance Survey was moderately able to predict BICs, while other PROs only had limited ability to predict BICs.

Conclusion: Patients with BICs reported poorer PROs. The PRO instruments were not able to predict patients with BICs, indicating that the ICD-BICQ provides independent relevant clinical information. In clinical practice, healthcare professionals can use the ICD-BICQ to identify and obtain information on possible BICs. The ICD-BICQ can also be used to evaluate new operation techniques.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
植入式心律转复除颤器患者对身体形象的担忧:与其他 PRO 测量的关联。
目的:在一组植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)患者中调查通过 ICD 身体形象问题问卷(ICD-BICQ)测量的身体形象问题(BICs)与其他患者报告结果(PROs)之间的关系:在一项横断面调查中,我们纳入了首次植入 ICD(VVI、DDD 和 CRT-D)且年龄大于 18 岁、使用 ICD 3-24 个月的患者。他们填写了 39 个项目的 ICD-BICQ 以及广泛性焦虑症量表、患者健康问卷、D 型量表、健康状况问卷和佛罗里达患者接受度问卷。数据采用线性回归法进行分析,以比较有 BIC 和无 BIC 患者的人格结构。共 330 名患者完成了调查。共有 330 名患者完成了调查,其中 5 名患者因再次手术而被排除在外,剩下 325 名患者参与了分析。共有 20% 的患者报告的 BIC 达到了建议的 36 分临界值。与无 BIC 的患者相比,有 BIC 的患者焦虑和抑郁程度较高,对设备的接受程度和健康状况较低,并具有 D 型人格。FPAS 预测 BIC 的能力一般,而其他 PROs 预测 BIC 的能力有限:结论:BICs 患者的 PROs 报告较差。PRO工具无法预测BICs患者,这表明ICD-BICQ提供了独立的相关临床信息。在临床实践中,医护人员可以使用 ICD-BICQ 来识别可能的 BIC 并获取相关信息。ICD-BICQ 还可用于评估新的操作技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mapping Memories: Enhancing Retrospective Data with the Life History Calendar. The struggle is real! Measuring and managing heart failure congestion in the outpatient setting. From invisible to visible: a new position for informal caregivers. Exploring the full potential of the electronic health record: the application of natural language processing for clinical practice. Psychological interventions for depression and anxiety in patients with coronary heart disease, heart failure or atrial fibrillation: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1