Janusz Strzelczyk, Monika Wójcik-Giertuga, Karolina Makulik, Violetta Rosiek, Grzegorz Kamiński, Dariusz Kajdaniuk, Beata Kos-Kudła
{"title":"Angiogenic biomarkers of response to treatment with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in neuroendocrine tumours.","authors":"Janusz Strzelczyk, Monika Wójcik-Giertuga, Karolina Makulik, Violetta Rosiek, Grzegorz Kamiński, Dariusz Kajdaniuk, Beata Kos-Kudła","doi":"10.5603/ep.100241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) are a heterogeneous group of tumours, which is characterized by rich vascularization. The role of angiogenesis in NETs has been widely researched. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is an effective treatment method for patients with disease progression in NETs. Due to the heterogeneousness of NETs, the response to treatment varies. Currently, the finding of efficient markers helpful in assessing the response to treatment in NETs is crucial. The aim of this study was to assess chromogranin A (CgA) and angiogenic factors in gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP) and broncho-pulmonary (BP) NET patients treated with PRRT.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study group included 40 patients with GEP NETs and BP NETs who completed four cycles of PRRT. Serum levels of CgA and angiogenic factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), its receptors (VEGF-R1, VEGF-R2, VEGF-R3), were assessed before and after four cycles of PRRT. All tests were determined using ELISA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The concentration of CgA, VEGF-R1 and VEGF-R2 decreased significantly, whereas VEGF-R3 increased significantly after PRRT. PRRT did not affect VEGF, it was similar before and after the radioisotope treatment. Based on AUROC, only for VEGF-R1 AUC was a consequence of 0.7 which can be considered as a good response to PRRT treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>VEGF-R1 may be a potential biomarker useful in assessing the effectiveness of PRRT in NET patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":93990,"journal":{"name":"Endokrynologia Polska","volume":"75 4","pages":"412-418"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endokrynologia Polska","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/ep.100241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) are a heterogeneous group of tumours, which is characterized by rich vascularization. The role of angiogenesis in NETs has been widely researched. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is an effective treatment method for patients with disease progression in NETs. Due to the heterogeneousness of NETs, the response to treatment varies. Currently, the finding of efficient markers helpful in assessing the response to treatment in NETs is crucial. The aim of this study was to assess chromogranin A (CgA) and angiogenic factors in gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP) and broncho-pulmonary (BP) NET patients treated with PRRT.
Material and methods: The study group included 40 patients with GEP NETs and BP NETs who completed four cycles of PRRT. Serum levels of CgA and angiogenic factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), its receptors (VEGF-R1, VEGF-R2, VEGF-R3), were assessed before and after four cycles of PRRT. All tests were determined using ELISA.
Results: The concentration of CgA, VEGF-R1 and VEGF-R2 decreased significantly, whereas VEGF-R3 increased significantly after PRRT. PRRT did not affect VEGF, it was similar before and after the radioisotope treatment. Based on AUROC, only for VEGF-R1 AUC was a consequence of 0.7 which can be considered as a good response to PRRT treatment.
Conclusions: VEGF-R1 may be a potential biomarker useful in assessing the effectiveness of PRRT in NET patients.