Community design of the Brooklyn Health Equity Index.

Health affairs scholar Pub Date : 2024-09-09 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1093/haschl/qxae112
Aimee Afable, Margaret Salisu, Tenya Blackwell, Anthony Divittis, Mark Hoglund, Gwendolyn Lewis, Carla Boutin-Foster, Montgomery Douglas
{"title":"Community design of the Brooklyn Health Equity Index.","authors":"Aimee Afable, Margaret Salisu, Tenya Blackwell, Anthony Divittis, Mark Hoglund, Gwendolyn Lewis, Carla Boutin-Foster, Montgomery Douglas","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxae112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Health equity drives quality care. Few reliable metrics that capture patients' perceptions of health equity exist. We report on the development of a patient-centered metric for health systems change in central Brooklyn, which stands out as an outlier in New York City with a disproportionate burden of poverty, disease, and death. A community-engaged, sequential, mixed-methods research design was used. Qualitative interviews were conducted with 80 community and health care stakeholders across central Brooklyn. Candidate items were derived from qualitative themes and examined for face, interpretive validity, and language. Interitem reliability and confirmatory factor analysis was assessed using data collected via text and automated discharge calls among 368 patients from a local hospital. Qualitative data analysis informed the content of 11 draft questions covering 3 broad domains: trust-building, provider appreciation of social determinants of health, and experiences of discrimination. Psychometric testing resulted in a Cronbach's alpha of 0.774 and led to deletion of 1 item, resulting in a 10-item Brooklyn Health Equity Index (BKHI). The 10-item BKHI is a novel, brief, and reliable measure that captures patients' perceptions of inequities and offers a real-time measure for health systems and payors to monitor progress toward advancing health equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"2 9","pages":"qxae112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11412247/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health affairs scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxae112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Health equity drives quality care. Few reliable metrics that capture patients' perceptions of health equity exist. We report on the development of a patient-centered metric for health systems change in central Brooklyn, which stands out as an outlier in New York City with a disproportionate burden of poverty, disease, and death. A community-engaged, sequential, mixed-methods research design was used. Qualitative interviews were conducted with 80 community and health care stakeholders across central Brooklyn. Candidate items were derived from qualitative themes and examined for face, interpretive validity, and language. Interitem reliability and confirmatory factor analysis was assessed using data collected via text and automated discharge calls among 368 patients from a local hospital. Qualitative data analysis informed the content of 11 draft questions covering 3 broad domains: trust-building, provider appreciation of social determinants of health, and experiences of discrimination. Psychometric testing resulted in a Cronbach's alpha of 0.774 and led to deletion of 1 item, resulting in a 10-item Brooklyn Health Equity Index (BKHI). The 10-item BKHI is a novel, brief, and reliable measure that captures patients' perceptions of inequities and offers a real-time measure for health systems and payors to monitor progress toward advancing health equity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
布鲁克林健康公平指数的社区设计。
健康公平推动优质护理。目前很少有可靠的指标能反映患者对健康公平的看法。我们报告了在布鲁克林中心区制定以患者为中心的医疗系统变革指标的情况,布鲁克林中心区是纽约市的异类,贫困、疾病和死亡负担过重。这项研究采用了社区参与、循序渐进、混合方法的研究设计。对布鲁克林中心区的 80 名社区和医疗利益相关者进行了定性访谈。候选项目来自定性主题,并进行了表面、解释有效性和语言方面的检查。利用通过文本和自动出院电话收集的数据,对当地一家医院的 368 名患者进行了项目间可靠性和确认性因素分析评估。定性数据分析为 11 个问题草案的内容提供了参考,这些问题涵盖 3 个广泛的领域:信任的建立、医疗服务提供者对健康的社会决定因素的理解以及歧视的经历。心理测试的 Cronbach's alpha 值为 0.774,因此删除了 1 个项目,最终形成了 10 个项目的布鲁克林健康公平指数 (BKHI)。10 个项目的布鲁克林健康公平指数是一种新颖、简短、可靠的测量方法,可捕捉患者对不公平现象的感知,并为医疗系统和付款人提供实时测量方法,以监控促进健康公平的进展情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Limitations of the Washington Group Short Set in capturing moderate and severe mobility disabilities. Pediatric vaccination in pharmacies is not associated with delayed well-child visits among commercially insured children. What explains the growth in hospital assets from 2000 through 2019? A decomposition analysis. Leveraging stringency and lifecycle thinking to advance environmental sustainability in health technology regulation. Publishers face antitrust lawsuit with potential implications for peer review, duplicate submission, and dissemination practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1