Impact of Teaching Methods on Clinical Reasoning in Forensic Medicine: A Quasi-Experimental Study.

Mehreen Fatima, Arshad Khan, Ramlah Naz, Muhammad Yahya Noori
{"title":"Impact of Teaching Methods on Clinical Reasoning in Forensic Medicine: A Quasi-Experimental Study.","authors":"Mehreen Fatima, Arshad Khan, Ramlah Naz, Muhammad Yahya Noori","doi":"10.29271/jcpsp.2024.09.1096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the effectiveness of flipped classroom and video-assisted learning techniques with didactic lectures in promoting clinical reasoning skills in Forensic Medicine.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Quasi-experimental study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Forensic Medicine, Dow International Medical College and Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan, from May to October 2023.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>The study included 114 third-year medical students divided into three predefined tutorial groups. Over four weeks, within the Forensic Medicine respiratory module, each group was taught one topic per week using a distinct teaching strategy: Traditional lectures (TL) for the first group, flipped classroom (FC) method for the second group, and video-assisted teaching (VAT) for the third group. Students' learning achievements and clinical reasoning skills were assessed through a pre-test, post-test, and revision post-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pre-test scores showed no significant differences among the groups (p = 0.655). However, post-test scores differed significantly (F2:111 = 11.93, p <0.001). Tukiye's test indicated that the mean score for the FC group was significantly different from the TL group (p = 0.003) and the VAT group (p <0.001), but there was no significant difference between the TL and VAT groups (p = 0.422). The revision post-test indicated a significant decrease in mean scores across all groups, regardless of the instructional approach (p <0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The FC approach for teaching clinical reasoning in Forensic Medicine shows promising results, effectively improving student performance and learning experience.</p><p><strong>Key words: </strong>Flipped classroom, Video-assisted teaching, Clinical reasoning, Forensic Medicine teaching.</p>","PeriodicalId":94116,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP","volume":"34 9","pages":"1096-1100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2024.09.1096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of flipped classroom and video-assisted learning techniques with didactic lectures in promoting clinical reasoning skills in Forensic Medicine.

Study design: Quasi-experimental study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Forensic Medicine, Dow International Medical College and Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan, from May to October 2023.

Methodology: The study included 114 third-year medical students divided into three predefined tutorial groups. Over four weeks, within the Forensic Medicine respiratory module, each group was taught one topic per week using a distinct teaching strategy: Traditional lectures (TL) for the first group, flipped classroom (FC) method for the second group, and video-assisted teaching (VAT) for the third group. Students' learning achievements and clinical reasoning skills were assessed through a pre-test, post-test, and revision post-test.

Results: Pre-test scores showed no significant differences among the groups (p = 0.655). However, post-test scores differed significantly (F2:111 = 11.93, p <0.001). Tukiye's test indicated that the mean score for the FC group was significantly different from the TL group (p = 0.003) and the VAT group (p <0.001), but there was no significant difference between the TL and VAT groups (p = 0.422). The revision post-test indicated a significant decrease in mean scores across all groups, regardless of the instructional approach (p <0.001).

Conclusion: The FC approach for teaching clinical reasoning in Forensic Medicine shows promising results, effectively improving student performance and learning experience.

Key words: Flipped classroom, Video-assisted teaching, Clinical reasoning, Forensic Medicine teaching.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教学方法对法医学临床推理的影响:一项准实验研究。
目的:比较翻转课堂和视频辅助学习技术与说教式授课在提高法医学临床推理能力方面的效果:比较翻转课堂和视频辅助学习技术与说教式授课在提高法医学临床推理能力方面的效果:准实验研究。研究地点和时间:研究地点和时间:巴基斯坦卡拉奇陶氏国际医学院和陶氏健康科学大学法医学系,2023 年 5 月至 10 月:研究对象包括 114 名三年级医科学生,分为三个预先确定的辅导小组。在为期四周的法医学呼吸模块中,每个小组每周使用不同的教学策略讲授一个主题:第一组采用传统授课法(TL),第二组采用翻转课堂法(FC),第三组采用视频辅助教学法(VAT)。通过前测、后测和复习后测评估学生的学习成绩和临床推理能力:结果:各组的前测成绩无明显差异(P = 0.655)。然而,后测得分却有显著差异(F2:111 = 11.93,p 结论:FC 教学法在临床推理教学中的应用效果显著:FC法医学临床推理教学法效果良好,有效提高了学生的学习成绩和学习体验:翻转课堂 视频辅助教学 临床推理 法医学教学
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Application of Multi-Slice Spiral CT Renal Angiography Combined with Intraoperative Ultrasound in Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy. Association of Vitamin D with Haematological Inflammatory Indices in Patients with Back Pain. Beyond Laparoscopy: Embracing a Scarless Solution for Gallstones "The Notes". Clinical Effectiveness of Green Tea Extracts as a Local Haemostatic Agent Following Mandibular Molar Extraction. Congenital Anomalies of the Kidney and Urinary Tract in Patients with Hirschsprung Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1