The effect of plerixafor on autologous stem cell mobilization, cell viability, and apheresis challenges.

Christian J Puzo, Philippa Li, Christopher A Tormey, Alexa J Siddon
{"title":"The effect of plerixafor on autologous stem cell mobilization, cell viability, and apheresis challenges.","authors":"Christian J Puzo, Philippa Li, Christopher A Tormey, Alexa J Siddon","doi":"10.1093/labmed/lmae080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of plerixafor for hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) mobilization prior to autologous stem cell transplantation (aSCT) for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and various lymphomas, using an oncologist-guided HSC collection goal and markers of cell viability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review of all aSCT patients at Yale New Haven Hospital between 2017 and 2021 who met diagnostic criteria for MM, non-Hodgkin, or Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 382) was undertaken. Logistic regression evaluated plerixafor's effect on meeting the individual's HSC goal. The use of t-tests determined plerixafor's relationship to HSC yield and analysis of variance testing assessed its effect on cell viability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mobilization with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and plerixafor (odds ratio [OR] = 0.08; P < .05) relative to G-CSF alone was negatively associated with meeting the individual's HSC goal. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in patients mobilized with plerixafor yielded fewer HSCs than those without plerixafor (t = -2.78; P = .03). Mobilization regimen (P = .13) had no association with HSC viability. Mobilization failure with plerixafor was rare but occurred in patients with multiple risk factors, including exposure to several rounds of HSC-affecting chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Plerixafor is effective across multiple diagnoses using an oncologist-driven HSC collection endpoint. Its association with mobilization failure is likely attributable to its use in patients predicted to be poor mobilizers.</p>","PeriodicalId":94124,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/labmed/lmae080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of plerixafor for hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) mobilization prior to autologous stem cell transplantation (aSCT) for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and various lymphomas, using an oncologist-guided HSC collection goal and markers of cell viability.

Methods: A retrospective chart review of all aSCT patients at Yale New Haven Hospital between 2017 and 2021 who met diagnostic criteria for MM, non-Hodgkin, or Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 382) was undertaken. Logistic regression evaluated plerixafor's effect on meeting the individual's HSC goal. The use of t-tests determined plerixafor's relationship to HSC yield and analysis of variance testing assessed its effect on cell viability.

Results: Mobilization with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and plerixafor (odds ratio [OR] = 0.08; P < .05) relative to G-CSF alone was negatively associated with meeting the individual's HSC goal. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in patients mobilized with plerixafor yielded fewer HSCs than those without plerixafor (t = -2.78; P = .03). Mobilization regimen (P = .13) had no association with HSC viability. Mobilization failure with plerixafor was rare but occurred in patients with multiple risk factors, including exposure to several rounds of HSC-affecting chemotherapy.

Conclusion: Plerixafor is effective across multiple diagnoses using an oncologist-driven HSC collection endpoint. Its association with mobilization failure is likely attributable to its use in patients predicted to be poor mobilizers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
plerixafor对自体干细胞动员、细胞存活率和分离挑战的影响。
研究目的本研究旨在确定普乐沙福对多发性骨髓瘤(MM)和各种淋巴瘤患者自体干细胞移植(aSCT)前动员造血干细胞(HSC)的疗效,采用肿瘤学家指导的HSC收集目标和细胞活力标志物:对耶鲁大学纽黑文医院 2017 年至 2021 年期间所有符合 MM、非霍奇金或霍奇金淋巴瘤诊断标准的 aSCT 患者(n = 382)进行了回顾性病历审查。逻辑回归评估了plerixafor对达到个体造血干细胞目标的影响。使用t检验确定plerixafor与造血干细胞产量的关系,方差分析检验评估其对细胞活力的影响:结果:使用粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)和plerixafor进行动员(几率比[OR] = 0.08;P 结论:plerixafor对不同人群都有效:采用肿瘤学家驱动的造血干细胞收集终点,普乐沙福在多种诊断中均有效。它与动员失败的关系可能是由于它被用于预测动员能力较差的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of basic lymphocyte phenotype results between a diagnostic and a research laboratory. Evidence-based approach for the generation of a multivariate logistic regression model that predicts instrument failure. Correlation of the abundance of MDSCs, Tregs, PD-1, and PD-L1 with the efficacy of chemotherapy and prognosis in gastric cancer. Correction to: The utility of an algorithm based on procalcitonin monitoring in patients with sepsis. Implementing laboratory internal audit to improve compliance and quality of care in the municipal public health system-based ambulatory care health clinics in New York city.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1