National survey on clinical practice in obstetric analgesia in Spain

L. Hernández González , N. Brogly , S. Manrique Muñoz , C. Suárez Castaño , G. Yerga Pozo , M. Raynard Ortiz , E. Guasch Arévalo
{"title":"National survey on clinical practice in obstetric analgesia in Spain","authors":"L. Hernández González ,&nbsp;N. Brogly ,&nbsp;S. Manrique Muñoz ,&nbsp;C. Suárez Castaño ,&nbsp;G. Yerga Pozo ,&nbsp;M. Raynard Ortiz ,&nbsp;E. Guasch Arévalo","doi":"10.1016/j.redare.2024.07.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>A national survey was conducted among maternity hospitals nationwide to understand the variability in clinical practice for obstetric analgesia and to reach a consensus on optimal care in the future in Spain.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>Spanish experts in obstetric anesthesiology designed a survey on the practice of obstetric analgesia during childbirth, following a Delphi process. The survey was sent to 195 Spanish maternity hospitals between April and September 2022 using Google Forms. A descriptive study of the results was performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Responses were obtained from 108 centres (55.4%), of which 88 (83.8%) were public hospitals. The most commonly used technique was epidural analgesia in 97 (92.4%) centres. Nine (8.6%) centres used the combined spinal-epidural (CSE) technique, 5 (4.8%) used spinal analgesia, and 3 (2.9%) used dural puncture epidural (DPE) analgesia. The most commonly used local anaesthetic was levobupivacaine 0.1−0.25% in 82 (78.1%) centres. Fentanyl or sufentanil were added to the local anaesthetic in 96 (91.4%) centres. Epidural maintenance was performed with continuous epidural infusion (CEI) + patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) or programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) + PCEA in 64 (60.9%) and 33 (30.5%) centres, respectively. Fifteen (14.3%) centres lacked alternative techniques to epidural analgesia and 25 (23.8%) did not follow obstetric analgesia protocols.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Despite the variability in clinical practice for obstetric analgesia in Spain, the vast majority of centres follow recommendations in this field. There is room for improvement, which should be considered a fundamental strategy for progressing towards excellence.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94196,"journal":{"name":"Revista espanola de anestesiologia y reanimacion","volume":"71 10","pages":"Pages 732-739"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista espanola de anestesiologia y reanimacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2341192924001392","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

A national survey was conducted among maternity hospitals nationwide to understand the variability in clinical practice for obstetric analgesia and to reach a consensus on optimal care in the future in Spain.

Materials and methods

Spanish experts in obstetric anesthesiology designed a survey on the practice of obstetric analgesia during childbirth, following a Delphi process. The survey was sent to 195 Spanish maternity hospitals between April and September 2022 using Google Forms. A descriptive study of the results was performed.

Results

Responses were obtained from 108 centres (55.4%), of which 88 (83.8%) were public hospitals. The most commonly used technique was epidural analgesia in 97 (92.4%) centres. Nine (8.6%) centres used the combined spinal-epidural (CSE) technique, 5 (4.8%) used spinal analgesia, and 3 (2.9%) used dural puncture epidural (DPE) analgesia. The most commonly used local anaesthetic was levobupivacaine 0.1−0.25% in 82 (78.1%) centres. Fentanyl or sufentanil were added to the local anaesthetic in 96 (91.4%) centres. Epidural maintenance was performed with continuous epidural infusion (CEI) + patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) or programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) + PCEA in 64 (60.9%) and 33 (30.5%) centres, respectively. Fifteen (14.3%) centres lacked alternative techniques to epidural analgesia and 25 (23.8%) did not follow obstetric analgesia protocols.

Conclusion

Despite the variability in clinical practice for obstetric analgesia in Spain, the vast majority of centres follow recommendations in this field. There is room for improvement, which should be considered a fundamental strategy for progressing towards excellence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
西班牙产科镇痛临床实践全国调查。
导言:为了了解产科镇痛临床实践中的差异,并就西班牙未来的最佳护理达成共识,我们在全国产科医院中开展了一项全国性调查:西班牙产科麻醉学专家按照德尔菲程序设计了一项关于分娩期间产科镇痛实践的调查。调查于 2022 年 4 月至 9 月间通过谷歌表格发送至 195 家西班牙产科医院。对调查结果进行了描述性研究:108家中心(55.4%)做出了回复,其中88家(83.8%)为公立医院。最常用的技术是硬膜外镇痛,有 97 家(92.4%)。9个中心(8.6%)使用脊髓-硬膜外联合镇痛(CSE)技术,5个中心(4.8%)使用脊髓镇痛,3个中心(2.9%)使用硬膜外穿刺镇痛(DPE)。在82家(78.1%)中心中,最常用的局麻药是0.1-0.25%的左旋布比卡因。96家(91.4%)中心在局麻药中添加了芬太尼或舒芬太尼。64家(60.9%)和33家(30.5%)中心分别采用连续硬膜外输注(CEI)+患者自控硬膜外镇痛(PCEA)或程序化间歇硬膜外栓剂(PIEB)+PCEA进行硬膜外维持。15个(14.3%)中心缺乏硬膜外镇痛的替代技术,25个(23.8%)中心未遵循产科镇痛方案:尽管西班牙产科镇痛的临床实践存在差异,但绝大多数中心都遵循了该领域的建议。但仍有改进的余地,这应被视为迈向卓越的基本策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Postoperative anaemia is associated with poor long term postoperative outcomes after elective colorectal oncologic surgery within an enhanced recovery after surgery pathway. Preoperative haemoglobin as a predictor of in-hospital morbidity and 5-year mortality in colorectal cancer. Anaesthesetic considerations in the perioperative management of patients with hereditary angioedema-FXII. Multicentre cohort study on the prevalence of postoperative delirium 48 hours after surgery: "DELPO study" protocol. Importance of training in anesthesia systems technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1