Children Are Not Small Adults: Addressing Limited Generalizability of an Adult Deep Learning CT Organ Segmentation Model to the Pediatric Population.

Devina Chatterjee, Adway Kanhere, Florence X Doo, Jerry Zhao, Andrew Chan, Alexander Welsh, Pranav Kulkarni, Annie Trang, Vishwa S Parekh, Paul H Yi
{"title":"Children Are Not Small Adults: Addressing Limited Generalizability of an Adult Deep Learning CT Organ Segmentation Model to the Pediatric Population.","authors":"Devina Chatterjee, Adway Kanhere, Florence X Doo, Jerry Zhao, Andrew Chan, Alexander Welsh, Pranav Kulkarni, Annie Trang, Vishwa S Parekh, Paul H Yi","doi":"10.1007/s10278-024-01273-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Deep learning (DL) tools developed on adult data sets may not generalize well to pediatric patients, posing potential safety risks. We evaluated the performance of TotalSegmentator, a state-of-the-art adult-trained CT organ segmentation model, on a subset of organs in a pediatric CT dataset and explored optimization strategies to improve pediatric segmentation performance. TotalSegmentator was retrospectively evaluated on abdominal CT scans from an external adult dataset (n = 300) and an external pediatric data set (n = 359). Generalizability was quantified by comparing Dice scores between adult and pediatric external data sets using Mann-Whitney U tests. Two DL optimization approaches were then evaluated: (1) 3D nnU-Net model trained on only pediatric data, and (2) an adult nnU-Net model fine-tuned on the pediatric cases. Our results show TotalSegmentator had significantly lower overall mean Dice scores on pediatric vs. adult CT scans (0.73 vs. 0.81, P < .001) demonstrating limited generalizability to pediatric CT scans. Stratified by organ, there was lower mean pediatric Dice score for four organs (P < .001, all): right and left adrenal glands (right adrenal, 0.41 [0.39-0.43] vs. 0.69 [0.66-0.71]; left adrenal, 0.35 [0.32-0.37] vs. 0.68 [0.65-0.71]); duodenum (0.47 [0.45-0.49] vs. 0.67 [0.64-0.69]); and pancreas (0.73 [0.72-0.74] vs. 0.79 [0.77-0.81]). Performance on pediatric CT scans improved by developing pediatric-specific models and fine-tuning an adult-trained model on pediatric images where both methods significantly improved segmentation accuracy over TotalSegmentator for all organs, especially for smaller anatomical structures (e.g., > 0.2 higher mean Dice for adrenal glands; P < .001).</p>","PeriodicalId":516858,"journal":{"name":"Journal of imaging informatics in medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of imaging informatics in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-024-01273-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deep learning (DL) tools developed on adult data sets may not generalize well to pediatric patients, posing potential safety risks. We evaluated the performance of TotalSegmentator, a state-of-the-art adult-trained CT organ segmentation model, on a subset of organs in a pediatric CT dataset and explored optimization strategies to improve pediatric segmentation performance. TotalSegmentator was retrospectively evaluated on abdominal CT scans from an external adult dataset (n = 300) and an external pediatric data set (n = 359). Generalizability was quantified by comparing Dice scores between adult and pediatric external data sets using Mann-Whitney U tests. Two DL optimization approaches were then evaluated: (1) 3D nnU-Net model trained on only pediatric data, and (2) an adult nnU-Net model fine-tuned on the pediatric cases. Our results show TotalSegmentator had significantly lower overall mean Dice scores on pediatric vs. adult CT scans (0.73 vs. 0.81, P < .001) demonstrating limited generalizability to pediatric CT scans. Stratified by organ, there was lower mean pediatric Dice score for four organs (P < .001, all): right and left adrenal glands (right adrenal, 0.41 [0.39-0.43] vs. 0.69 [0.66-0.71]; left adrenal, 0.35 [0.32-0.37] vs. 0.68 [0.65-0.71]); duodenum (0.47 [0.45-0.49] vs. 0.67 [0.64-0.69]); and pancreas (0.73 [0.72-0.74] vs. 0.79 [0.77-0.81]). Performance on pediatric CT scans improved by developing pediatric-specific models and fine-tuning an adult-trained model on pediatric images where both methods significantly improved segmentation accuracy over TotalSegmentator for all organs, especially for smaller anatomical structures (e.g., > 0.2 higher mean Dice for adrenal glands; P < .001).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童不是小大人:解决成人深度学习 CT 器官分割模型在儿科人群中通用性有限的问题。
在成人数据集上开发的深度学习(DL)工具可能无法很好地推广到儿科患者,从而带来潜在的安全风险。我们在儿科 CT 数据集的器官子集上评估了最先进的成人训练 CT 器官分割模型 TotalSegmentator 的性能,并探索了提高儿科分割性能的优化策略。在外部成人数据集(n = 300)和外部儿科数据集(n = 359)的腹部 CT 扫描上对 TotalSegmentator 进行了回顾性评估。通过使用 Mann-Whitney U 检验比较成人和儿童外部数据集的 Dice 分数,对通用性进行量化。然后对两种 DL 优化方法进行了评估:(1) 仅根据儿科数据训练的 3D nnU-Net 模型;(2) 根据儿科病例微调的成人 nnU-Net 模型。我们的结果表明,TotalSegmentator 在儿科与成人 CT 扫描上的总体平均 Dice 分数明显较低(0.73 与 0.81,P 0.2,肾上腺平均 Dice 分数较高;P 0.3,肾上腺平均 Dice 分数较低;P 0.4,肾上腺平均 Dice 分数较高)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dual Energy CT for Deep Learning-Based Segmentation and Volumetric Estimation of Early Ischemic Infarcts. Empowering Women in Imaging Informatics: Confronting Imposter Syndrome, Addressing Microaggressions, and Striving for Work-Life Harmony. Deep Conformal Supervision: Leveraging Intermediate Features for Robust Uncertainty Quantification. Leveraging Ensemble Models and Follow-up Data for Accurate Prediction of mRS Scores from Radiomic Features of DSC-PWI Images. A Lightweight Method for Breast Cancer Detection Using Thermography Images with Optimized CNN Feature and Efficient Classification.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1