Health visiting in the UK in light of the COVID-19 pandemic experience: (RReHOPE) findings from a realist review.

Emma King, Erica Gadsby, Madeline Bell, Geoff Wong, Sally Kendall
{"title":"Health visiting in the UK in light of the COVID-19 pandemic experience: (RReHOPE) findings from a realist review.","authors":"Emma King, Erica Gadsby, Madeline Bell, Geoff Wong, Sally Kendall","doi":"10.3310/MYRT5921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Child health programmes in the United Kingdom offer every child and their family an evidence-based programme to support child health and development. During the COVID-19 pandemic, health visiting services in many areas were reduced to a partial service, with significant variability between and within the four United Kingdom countries. This study investigated the impact of the pandemic on health visiting services and developed recommendations for policy and practice.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Conduct a realist review of relevant literature. Engage with key stakeholders in policy, practice and research across the United Kingdom. Identify recommendations for improving the organisation and delivery of health visiting services, with a focus on services being equitable, effective and efficient.</p><p><strong>Review methods: </strong>The realist review followed Pawson's five iterative steps and involved key stakeholder representatives at every step. We searched five electronic databases and references of included articles, as well as relevant organisational websites, to find quantitative, qualitative, mixed-methods and grey literature related to health visiting services in the United Kingdom during the COVID-19 pandemic. An assessment of their relevance to our initial programme theory determined inclusion in the review. Data were extracted, organised and presented as draft context, mechanism and outcome configurations. These were iteratively refined through meetings with 6 people with lived experience of caring for babies during the pandemic and 23 professional stakeholders. Context, mechanism and outcome configurations were then translated into findings and recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and eighteen documents contributed to the review and collectively revealed the far-reaching, uneven and enduring impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on babies and families. Data uncovered significant concerns of families and practitioners amidst the pandemic, along with the service's corresponding actions. These concerns and responses underscored the critical importance of fostering and sustaining trusting relationships between health visitors and families, as well as conducting holistic assessments for early intervention. Although we found minimal evidence of decision-making within organisational/managerial levels, the data illustrated the diverse and complex nature of health visiting work and the need for flexibility and resourcefulness.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The primary limitation of this review was a lack of specific evidence from the United Kingdom nations other than England. There was also a lack of data focusing on changes during the COVID-19 pandemic at a local management level.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The needs of babies, children and families, and the delivery of services to support them, were not prioritised in the early phase of the pandemic response. Our data show that the health visiting service was concerned with maintaining visibility of all children, and especially supporting families with a new baby. Health visiting services adapted in numerous ways to respond to these concerns. Implications for policy and practice are presented, identified from our analysis and discussions with stakeholders.</p><p><strong>Future work: </strong>The RReHOPE study is part of a jigsaw of evidence, which will provide a much stronger evidence base for future policy and practice. This realist review presents several areas for future research, including how health visiting is organised at local management level; how to optimise limited resources; factors affecting differing uptake in different regions; and analysis of the effectiveness of health visiting using large cohort studies.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This article presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme under award number NIHR134986.</p>","PeriodicalId":519880,"journal":{"name":"Health and social care delivery research","volume":" ","pages":"1-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health and social care delivery research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/MYRT5921","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Child health programmes in the United Kingdom offer every child and their family an evidence-based programme to support child health and development. During the COVID-19 pandemic, health visiting services in many areas were reduced to a partial service, with significant variability between and within the four United Kingdom countries. This study investigated the impact of the pandemic on health visiting services and developed recommendations for policy and practice.

Objectives: Conduct a realist review of relevant literature. Engage with key stakeholders in policy, practice and research across the United Kingdom. Identify recommendations for improving the organisation and delivery of health visiting services, with a focus on services being equitable, effective and efficient.

Review methods: The realist review followed Pawson's five iterative steps and involved key stakeholder representatives at every step. We searched five electronic databases and references of included articles, as well as relevant organisational websites, to find quantitative, qualitative, mixed-methods and grey literature related to health visiting services in the United Kingdom during the COVID-19 pandemic. An assessment of their relevance to our initial programme theory determined inclusion in the review. Data were extracted, organised and presented as draft context, mechanism and outcome configurations. These were iteratively refined through meetings with 6 people with lived experience of caring for babies during the pandemic and 23 professional stakeholders. Context, mechanism and outcome configurations were then translated into findings and recommendations.

Results: One hundred and eighteen documents contributed to the review and collectively revealed the far-reaching, uneven and enduring impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on babies and families. Data uncovered significant concerns of families and practitioners amidst the pandemic, along with the service's corresponding actions. These concerns and responses underscored the critical importance of fostering and sustaining trusting relationships between health visitors and families, as well as conducting holistic assessments for early intervention. Although we found minimal evidence of decision-making within organisational/managerial levels, the data illustrated the diverse and complex nature of health visiting work and the need for flexibility and resourcefulness.

Limitations: The primary limitation of this review was a lack of specific evidence from the United Kingdom nations other than England. There was also a lack of data focusing on changes during the COVID-19 pandemic at a local management level.

Conclusions: The needs of babies, children and families, and the delivery of services to support them, were not prioritised in the early phase of the pandemic response. Our data show that the health visiting service was concerned with maintaining visibility of all children, and especially supporting families with a new baby. Health visiting services adapted in numerous ways to respond to these concerns. Implications for policy and practice are presented, identified from our analysis and discussions with stakeholders.

Future work: The RReHOPE study is part of a jigsaw of evidence, which will provide a much stronger evidence base for future policy and practice. This realist review presents several areas for future research, including how health visiting is organised at local management level; how to optimise limited resources; factors affecting differing uptake in different regions; and analysis of the effectiveness of health visiting using large cohort studies.

Funding: This article presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme under award number NIHR134986.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从 COVID-19 大流行的经验看英国的健康访问:(RReHOPE)现实主义审查结果。
背景:英国的儿童健康计划为每个儿童及其家庭提供以证据为基础的计划,以支持儿童的健康和发展。在 COVID-19 大流行期间,许多地区的健康访视服务缩减为部分服务,英国四个国家之间和内部的差异很大。本研究调查了大流行病对健康访视服务的影响,并为政策和实践提出了建议:对相关文献进行现实主义审查。与英国政策、实践和研究领域的主要利益相关者接触。确定改善健康访视服务的组织和提供的建议,重点关注服务的公平性、有效性和效率:现实主义审查遵循 Pawson 的五个迭代步骤,每个步骤都有主要利益相关者代表参与。我们搜索了五个电子数据库和收录文章的参考文献以及相关组织网站,以查找与 COVID-19 大流行期间英国健康访视服务相关的定量、定性、混合方法和灰色文献。通过评估这些文献与我们最初计划理论的相关性,决定是否将其纳入综述。我们对数据进行了提取、整理,并以背景、机制和结果配置草案的形式呈现。通过与大流行期间照顾婴儿的 6 位亲身经历者和 23 位专业利益相关者会面,对这些内容进行了反复推敲。然后将背景、机制和结果配置转化为研究结果和建议:118 份文件参与了审查,这些文件共同揭示了 COVID-19 大流行对婴儿和家庭造成的深远、不均衡和持久的影响。数据揭示了家庭和从业人员在疫情中的重大关切,以及服务部门采取的相应措施。这些担忧和应对措施强调了培养和维持健康访视员与家庭之间的信任关系以及为早期干预进行整体评估的重要性。尽管我们发现在组织/管理层面进行决策的证据极少,但数据说明了健康访视工作的多样性和复杂性,以及灵活性和机智性的必要性:本综述的主要局限性在于缺乏来自英国英格兰以外国家的具体证据。此外,还缺乏有关 COVID-19 大流行期间地方管理层面变化的数据:结论:在大流行应对的早期阶段,婴儿、儿童和家庭的需求以及为他们提供的支持服务并没有得到优先考虑。我们的数据显示,健康访视服务关注的是保持所有儿童的可见度,尤其是为有新生儿的家庭提供支持。为了应对这些问题,健康访视服务以多种方式进行了调整。根据我们的分析和与利益相关者的讨论,提出了对政策和实践的启示:RReHOPE 研究是证据拼图的一部分,它将为未来的政策和实践提供更有力的证据基础。这篇现实主义评论提出了未来研究的几个领域,包括健康访视在地方管理层面的组织方式;如何优化有限的资源;影响不同地区不同接受率的因素;以及利用大型队列研究分析健康访视的有效性:本文为独立研究,由美国国家健康与护理研究所(NIHR)的健康与社会护理服务研究项目资助,项目编号为 NIHR134986。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Systematic review of integrated mental and physical health services for children and young people with eating and functional symptoms. Peer support for adult social care in prisons in England and Wales: a mixed-methods rapid evaluation. A model of occupational stress to assess impact of COVID-19 on critical care and redeployed nurses: a mixed-methods study. Exploratory study from an end-of-life research partnership network to improve access for ethnically diverse communities in one region. Early mental health intervention and supported self-care for LGBTQ+ young people in the UK: a mixed-methods study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1