首页 > 最新文献

Health and social care delivery research最新文献

英文 中文
Developing palliative and end-of-life care research partnerships in the North East and North Cumbria: A report on the first year of the RIPEN network. 在东北和北坎布里亚郡发展姑息治疗和临终关怀研究伙伴关系:关于ripe网络第一年的报告。
Pub Date : 2025-12-03 DOI: 10.3310/GJKF1425
Katherine Frew, Joanne Atkinson, Dawn Craig, Sonia Dalkin, Felicity Dewhurst, Yu Fu, Olivia Grant, Kathryn Mannix, Fiona Matthews, Paul Paes, Felicity Shenton, Daniel Stow, Adam Todd, Donna Wakefield, Barbara Hanratty

Background: The North East is one of the most disadvantaged areas of England with end-of-life care needs shaped by high levels of disability, physical and mental ill health. This programme of work aimed to set the foundation for the development of a palliative and end-of-life care research community, equipped to meet local and national challenges.

Objectives: Develop a self-sustaining research culture in North East palliative and end-of-life care. Build research collaborations around older age, frailty, multiple long-term conditions and inequalities and submit at least one research proposal. Convene a diverse patient and public advisory group.

Methods and findings: To establish cross-institutional collaborations, we worked with patient and public partners and key stakeholders from local National Health Service trusts, hospices, social care, our National Institute for Health and Care Research infrastructure (Applied Research Collaboration North East and North Cumbria, Policy Research Unit Older People and Frailty, National Institute for Health and Care Research Innovation Observatory, Comprehensive Research Network, and Research Design Service). A series of events were hosted to foster a research culture, including establishing a monthly seminar programme, research sandpits, bespoke research training and dissemination events. A diverse community of patient and public involvement partners was established to support and shape the developing research. Multiple project and two fellowship applications were supported by the partnership. A qualitative study identified issues pertinent to local access to data that could support research.

Conclusions: This work has been a catalyst for palliative and end-of-life care research and practice collaborations to develop. Funding success and ongoing research and training events should provide a platform for sustained research development in this area.

Funding: This article presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme as award number NIHR135278.

背景:东北部是英格兰最弱势的地区之一,其临终关怀需求受到高水平残疾、身体和精神疾病的影响。这项工作方案的目的是为发展一个缓和和临终关怀研究界奠定基础,使之有能力应对地方和国家的挑战。目标:发展一个自我维持的研究文化在东北姑息治疗和临终关怀。围绕老年、虚弱、多种长期条件和不平等建立研究合作,并提交至少一份研究计划。召集一个多样化的病人和公众咨询小组。方法与发现:为了建立跨机构合作,我们与患者和公共合作伙伴以及来自当地国家卫生服务信托,临终关怀,社会关怀,我们的国家卫生和护理研究基础设施研究所(东北和北坎布里亚郡应用研究合作,政策研究单位老年人和虚弱,国家卫生和护理研究所创新观察站,综合研究网络和研究设计服务)的主要利益相关者合作。举办了一系列活动,以培育研究文化,包括设立每月研讨会计划、研究沙坑、定制研究培训和传播活动。建立了一个由患者和公众参与伙伴组成的多元化社区,以支持和塑造发展中的研究。该伙伴关系支持了多个项目和两个奖学金申请。一项定性研究确定了与当地获取可支持研究的数据有关的问题。结论:这项工作已经成为缓和和临终关怀研究和实践合作发展的催化剂。资助成功和正在进行的研究和培训活动应该为这一领域的持续研究发展提供一个平台。资助:本文介绍了由国家卫生和保健研究所(NIHR)卫生和社会保健提供研究项目资助的独立研究,奖励号为NIHR135278。
{"title":"Developing palliative and end-of-life care research partnerships in the North East and North Cumbria: A report on the first year of the RIPEN network.","authors":"Katherine Frew, Joanne Atkinson, Dawn Craig, Sonia Dalkin, Felicity Dewhurst, Yu Fu, Olivia Grant, Kathryn Mannix, Fiona Matthews, Paul Paes, Felicity Shenton, Daniel Stow, Adam Todd, Donna Wakefield, Barbara Hanratty","doi":"10.3310/GJKF1425","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3310/GJKF1425","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The North East is one of the most disadvantaged areas of England with end-of-life care needs shaped by high levels of disability, physical and mental ill health. This programme of work aimed to set the foundation for the development of a palliative and end-of-life care research community, equipped to meet local and national challenges.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Develop a self-sustaining research culture in North East palliative and end-of-life care. Build research collaborations around older age, frailty, multiple long-term conditions and inequalities and submit at least one research proposal. Convene a diverse patient and public advisory group.</p><p><strong>Methods and findings: </strong>To establish cross-institutional collaborations, we worked with patient and public partners and key stakeholders from local National Health Service trusts, hospices, social care, our National Institute for Health and Care Research infrastructure (Applied Research Collaboration North East and North Cumbria, Policy Research Unit Older People and Frailty, National Institute for Health and Care Research Innovation Observatory, Comprehensive Research Network, and Research Design Service). A series of events were hosted to foster a research culture, including establishing a monthly seminar programme, research sandpits, bespoke research training and dissemination events. A diverse community of patient and public involvement partners was established to support and shape the developing research. Multiple project and two fellowship applications were supported by the partnership. A qualitative study identified issues pertinent to local access to data that could support research.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This work has been a catalyst for palliative and end-of-life care research and practice collaborations to develop. Funding success and ongoing research and training events should provide a platform for sustained research development in this area.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This article presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme as award number NIHR135278.</p>","PeriodicalId":519880,"journal":{"name":"Health and social care delivery research","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145688888","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Witness to Harm-Holding to Account. Improving patient, family and colleague experiences of Fitness to Practise proceedings: A mixed-methods study. 损害追究证人。改善病人、家属和同事的健身实践经验:一项混合方法研究。
Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.3310/SSPP1118
Louise Wallace, Sara Ryan, Rosalind Searle, Gemma Hughes, Annie Sorbie, Gemma Ryan-Blackwell, Sharif Haider, Richard West
<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the United Kingdom, over 2.5 million health and social care professionals are registered by 13 statutory professional regulators. When professional conduct falls below standard, registered professionals may face an investigation into matters such as their conduct, health or competence via fitness to practise processes. Very serious cases are heard in public by an independent adjudication panel. The public, the largest source of concerns, may be asked by the regulator to be cross-examined in a hearing where their evidence may be crucial. Witness cross-examination is known to be distressing in the criminal context, where the victim is questioned about the harm they experienced and how they faced the alleged perpetrator. In fitness to practise, retelling stories could be similarly retraumatising. Our research focuses on the public (and colleagues) who raise concerns, including that they have been harmed by a professional, and examines their experience of engaging with fitness to practise processes.</p><p><strong>Design and methods: </strong>The study employed multiple qualitative methods. Public website materials were analysed using thematic content analysis, accessibility and readability algorithms and a useability survey about submitting a complaint (<i>n</i> = 11). The views of the public and those with personal experience of fitness to practise validated our analysis of the web content (<i>n</i> = 15). Sociolegal analysis was conducted of the United Kingdom's social work/social care regulators' conceptualisations of witness vulnerability and special measures. Twenty-seven registrants' employers were approached, and 25 were interviewed about organisational support for registrants, patients and service users. Data collection via regulators (<i>n</i> = 285) with small numbers via social media included surveys, (<i>n</i> = 64 in total) across 9 regulators, interviews (<i>n</i> = 47) across 10 regulators, ethnographic observation of hearings (<i>n</i> = 22) with 81 days of observation across 9 regulators, and documentary analysis of hearings determinations and witness statements across 13 regulators (<i>n</i> = 207). Project recommendations were coproduced through six formative workshops involving public members, legal, health and social care professionals, regulatory staff and lawyers and academics. Analytic methods included institutional ethnography, thematic analysis and narrative portraits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The website information for the public was often too much or too little, in inaccessible formats, and requiring high literacy and digital skills. The social care regulators' conceptions of vulnerability largely relied on inherent factors (e.g. disability), or misconduct categories, rather than being situationally sensitive to witnesses' diverse needs. The experience of those who had been harmed was found to be profoundly distressing for most participants at each stage of the fitness to practise
背景:在联合王国,有超过250万保健和社会护理专业人员在13个法定专业监管机构注册。当专业操守达不到标准时,注册专业人员可能会透过适合执业程序,就其操守、健康或能力等事项接受调查。非常严重的案件由一个独立的审判小组公开审理。公众是担忧的最大来源,监管机构可能会要求他们在听证会上接受盘问,而他们的证据可能是至关重要的。众所周知,证人交叉盘问在刑事案件中是令人痛苦的,因为受害人被询问他们所遭受的伤害以及他们如何面对被指控的犯罪者。在健身练习中,复述故事可能同样会造成创伤。我们的研究重点是那些提出担忧的公众(和同事),包括他们被专业人士伤害,并检查他们参与健身练习过程的经验。设计与方法:本研究采用多种定性方法。使用主题内容分析、可访问性和可读性算法以及提交投诉的可用性调查对公共网站材料进行分析(n = 11)。公众和有健身实践经验的人的观点验证了我们对网络内容的分析(n = 15)。对英国社会工作/社会关怀监管机构对证人脆弱性和特别措施的概念进行了社会法律分析。我们接触了二十七名注册者的雇主,并与二十五名注册者、病人和服务使用者就组织支持进行了访谈。通过监管机构(n = 285)通过社交媒体收集少量数据,包括9家监管机构的调查(n = 64), 10家监管机构的访谈(n = 47), 9家监管机构81天的听证会人种学观察(n = 22), 13家监管机构听证会决定和证人陈述的文献分析(n = 207)。项目建议是通过由公众成员、法律、保健和社会保健专业人员、管理人员、律师和学者参与的六个形成性讲习班共同提出的。分析方法包括制度人种学、主题分析和叙事肖像。结果:面向公众的网站信息往往过多或过少,格式难以访问,要求较高的文化水平和数字技能。社会关怀监管机构对脆弱性的概念很大程度上依赖于固有因素(如残疾)或不当行为类别,而不是对证人的不同需求具有情境敏感性。研究发现,对于大多数参与者来说,在适应实践过程的每个阶段,那些受到伤害的人的经历都是非常痛苦的:不得不重新讲述他们的故事,不确定他们何时何地需要回应,参与一个法律上和对抗性的过程,他们的证据和可信度受到质疑。调查结果提出了20项建议。项目资源可供所有干系人使用。结论:该项目为公众参与卫生和保健专业监管的经验提供了全球独特的证据。它建议通过以公众为中心的信息、富有同情心和创伤知情的沟通和支持以及独立的跨监管机构评估来改进专业监管。公众和利益相关者的参与和参与:我们的研究是由具有个人执业经验的人、监管机构、雇主、律师和专业团体提供的。资助:本摘要介绍了由国家卫生和保健研究所(NIHR)卫生和社会保健提供研究计划资助的独立研究,奖励号为NIHR131322。
{"title":"Witness to Harm-Holding to Account. Improving patient, family and colleague experiences of Fitness to Practise proceedings: A mixed-methods study.","authors":"Louise Wallace, Sara Ryan, Rosalind Searle, Gemma Hughes, Annie Sorbie, Gemma Ryan-Blackwell, Sharif Haider, Richard West","doi":"10.3310/SSPP1118","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3310/SSPP1118","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;In the United Kingdom, over 2.5 million health and social care professionals are registered by 13 statutory professional regulators. When professional conduct falls below standard, registered professionals may face an investigation into matters such as their conduct, health or competence via fitness to practise processes. Very serious cases are heard in public by an independent adjudication panel. The public, the largest source of concerns, may be asked by the regulator to be cross-examined in a hearing where their evidence may be crucial. Witness cross-examination is known to be distressing in the criminal context, where the victim is questioned about the harm they experienced and how they faced the alleged perpetrator. In fitness to practise, retelling stories could be similarly retraumatising. Our research focuses on the public (and colleagues) who raise concerns, including that they have been harmed by a professional, and examines their experience of engaging with fitness to practise processes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Design and methods: &lt;/strong&gt;The study employed multiple qualitative methods. Public website materials were analysed using thematic content analysis, accessibility and readability algorithms and a useability survey about submitting a complaint (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 11). The views of the public and those with personal experience of fitness to practise validated our analysis of the web content (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 15). Sociolegal analysis was conducted of the United Kingdom's social work/social care regulators' conceptualisations of witness vulnerability and special measures. Twenty-seven registrants' employers were approached, and 25 were interviewed about organisational support for registrants, patients and service users. Data collection via regulators (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 285) with small numbers via social media included surveys, (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 64 in total) across 9 regulators, interviews (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 47) across 10 regulators, ethnographic observation of hearings (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 22) with 81 days of observation across 9 regulators, and documentary analysis of hearings determinations and witness statements across 13 regulators (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 207). Project recommendations were coproduced through six formative workshops involving public members, legal, health and social care professionals, regulatory staff and lawyers and academics. Analytic methods included institutional ethnography, thematic analysis and narrative portraits.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;The website information for the public was often too much or too little, in inaccessible formats, and requiring high literacy and digital skills. The social care regulators' conceptions of vulnerability largely relied on inherent factors (e.g. disability), or misconduct categories, rather than being situationally sensitive to witnesses' diverse needs. The experience of those who had been harmed was found to be profoundly distressing for most participants at each stage of the fitness to practise","PeriodicalId":519880,"journal":{"name":"Health and social care delivery research","volume":"13 44","pages":"1-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145807010","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Health visiting in the UK in light of the COVID-19 pandemic experience (RReHOPE): study synopsis. 基于COVID-19大流行经验的英国健康访问(RReHOPE):研究摘要。
Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.3310/GJEG0402
Erica Gadsby, Emma King, Madeline Bell, Geoff Wong, Sally Kendall
<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic interrupted and, in some cases, transformed the way health visiting teams work, the way they interact with families and children and with the wider community and other service providers. Health visiting services are organised, delivered and experienced differently in different places, with little evidence to suggest what works best, for whom and in what contexts.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To synthesise the evidence on changes during the pandemic to identify the potential for improving health visiting services and their delivery in the United Kingdom.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This realist review engaged professional stakeholders (<i>N</i> = 28) and those caring for babies during the pandemic (<i>N</i> = 6) throughout the process. We searched five electronic databases for publications on health visiting during the COVID-19 pandemic from October 2022 to April 2023. This was followed by citation searching and review of organisational websites. Programme theory was iteratively refined through discussions with the team, professional stakeholders and people with lived experience and was translated into key findings and recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and eighteen documents informed this review; most focused on health visiting in England (56%) or the United Kingdom (34%), with relatively few from Wales (6%), Scotland (3%) and Northern Ireland (1%). Documents highlighted the widespread, uneven and lasting impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on babies and families. Findings revealed significant concerns expressed by both families and practitioners and corresponding actions taken by health visiting services. These concerns and responses emphasised the flexibility and resourcefulness of health visitors, the vital role of trusting relationships between health visitors and families and the importance of holistic assessments for early intervention. Changes in service delivery were varied and were not always evaluated or sustainable. While the data illuminated some of the hidden complexities of health visiting practice, limited evidence was found on decision-making at organisational and managerial levels during the pandemic response.</p><p><strong>Evidence limitations: </strong>Included papers were predominantly from an advocacy or practitioner perspective, and few focused on health visiting in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. Our focus on the universal health visiting pathways meant that documents pertaining to additional support received by the most vulnerable families might have been excluded. Experiences of Black, Asian and minority ethnic families and staff were illustrated in several papers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the essential role of health visitors in safeguarding child and family well-being in the United Kingdom. While digital adaptations provide necessary continuity, face-to-face interactions remain essentia
背景:2019冠状病毒病大流行中断并在某些情况下改变了卫生访问团队的工作方式,以及他们与家庭和儿童以及更广泛的社区和其他服务提供者的互动方式。在不同的地方,保健访问服务的组织、提供和体验各不相同,几乎没有证据表明哪种方式最有效,对谁最有效,在什么情况下最有效。目的:综合大流行期间变化的证据,以确定改善联合王国健康访问服务及其提供的潜力。方法:这一现实主义综述在整个过程中涉及专业利益相关者(N = 28)和大流行期间照顾婴儿的人员(N = 6)。我们检索了五个电子数据库,检索了2022年10月至2023年4月COVID-19大流行期间的健康访问出版物。其次是引文搜索和组织网站的审查。通过与团队、专业利益相关者和有实际经验的人的讨论,不断完善项目理论,并将其转化为关键的发现和建议。结果:本次综述涉及118份文献;大多数集中在英格兰(56%)或联合王国(34%),威尔士(6%)、苏格兰(3%)和北爱尔兰(1%)的访视相对较少。文件强调了COVID-19大流行对婴儿和家庭的广泛、不平衡和持久影响。调查结果显示,家庭和医生都表达了严重的关切,保健访问服务机构也采取了相应的行动。这些关切和答复强调保健访视者的灵活性和足智多谋、保健访视者与家庭之间信任关系的重要作用以及全面评估对早期干预的重要性。服务提供方面的变化各不相同,并不总是得到评价或可持续。虽然这些数据揭示了卫生访问实践中隐藏的一些复杂性,但在大流行应对期间,在组织和管理层面的决策方面发现的证据有限。证据限制:纳入的论文主要来自倡导或从业者的角度,很少关注苏格兰、威尔士和北爱尔兰的保健访问。我们将重点放在全民健康访问途径上,这意味着与最脆弱家庭获得的额外支持有关的文件可能被排除在外。几篇论文阐述了黑人、亚洲人和少数族裔家庭和工作人员的经历。结论:2019冠状病毒病大流行凸显了卫生巡视员在保障英国儿童和家庭福祉方面的重要作用。虽然数字化调整提供了必要的连续性,但面对面的互动对于有效的卫生访问仍然至关重要。危机暴露了先前存在的劳动力压力和服务提供方面的不一致,强调了对充分支持和资金的需求。决策者必须认识到保健访问的复杂性,并确保对普遍家访服务的持续投资。未来的复原力需要现实地了解卫生巡视员的工作,将其纳入更广泛的儿童保健政策,并加强机构间合作,以解决不平等问题,改善长期的公共卫生成果。未来工作:我们对政策制定者的启示将转化为反思性问题,以促进对当地卫生访问服务的批判性思考。来自英国以外国家的少量文件突出了这是未来研究的关键领域。资助:本摘要介绍了由国家卫生和保健研究所(NIHR)卫生和社会保健提供研究计划资助的独立研究,奖励号为NIHR134986。
{"title":"Health visiting in the UK in light of the COVID-19 pandemic experience (RReHOPE): study synopsis.","authors":"Erica Gadsby, Emma King, Madeline Bell, Geoff Wong, Sally Kendall","doi":"10.3310/GJEG0402","DOIUrl":"10.3310/GJEG0402","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;The COVID-19 pandemic interrupted and, in some cases, transformed the way health visiting teams work, the way they interact with families and children and with the wider community and other service providers. Health visiting services are organised, delivered and experienced differently in different places, with little evidence to suggest what works best, for whom and in what contexts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;To synthesise the evidence on changes during the pandemic to identify the potential for improving health visiting services and their delivery in the United Kingdom.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;This realist review engaged professional stakeholders (&lt;i&gt;N&lt;/i&gt; = 28) and those caring for babies during the pandemic (&lt;i&gt;N&lt;/i&gt; = 6) throughout the process. We searched five electronic databases for publications on health visiting during the COVID-19 pandemic from October 2022 to April 2023. This was followed by citation searching and review of organisational websites. Programme theory was iteratively refined through discussions with the team, professional stakeholders and people with lived experience and was translated into key findings and recommendations.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;One hundred and eighteen documents informed this review; most focused on health visiting in England (56%) or the United Kingdom (34%), with relatively few from Wales (6%), Scotland (3%) and Northern Ireland (1%). Documents highlighted the widespread, uneven and lasting impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on babies and families. Findings revealed significant concerns expressed by both families and practitioners and corresponding actions taken by health visiting services. These concerns and responses emphasised the flexibility and resourcefulness of health visitors, the vital role of trusting relationships between health visitors and families and the importance of holistic assessments for early intervention. Changes in service delivery were varied and were not always evaluated or sustainable. While the data illuminated some of the hidden complexities of health visiting practice, limited evidence was found on decision-making at organisational and managerial levels during the pandemic response.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Evidence limitations: &lt;/strong&gt;Included papers were predominantly from an advocacy or practitioner perspective, and few focused on health visiting in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. Our focus on the universal health visiting pathways meant that documents pertaining to additional support received by the most vulnerable families might have been excluded. Experiences of Black, Asian and minority ethnic families and staff were illustrated in several papers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the essential role of health visitors in safeguarding child and family well-being in the United Kingdom. While digital adaptations provide necessary continuity, face-to-face interactions remain essentia","PeriodicalId":519880,"journal":{"name":"Health and social care delivery research","volume":"13 42","pages":"1-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145703672","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Integration of specialised services for eating disorders and functional symptom disorders in children and young people: discrete choice experiments and qualitative study. 整合针对儿童和年轻人饮食失调和功能性症状失调的专门服务:离散选择实验和定性研究。
Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.3310/CLHA1094
Stephen Morris, Efthalia Massou, Josefine Magnusson, Saheli Gandhi, Pei Li Ng, Angus Ig Ramsay, Naomi J Fulop
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence suggests that centralising specialist healthcare services can improve outcomes for patients but increase travel distances and times. Traditionally, people requiring specialist health care were cared for by a single specialist, with mental and physical health care delivered by separate services. Recent trends involve greater collaboration between specialists. Integrated care is the highest level of collaboration, including shared access to medical records and multidisciplinary care.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate how centralisation of specialised healthcare services can be characterised. To examine the proposed integration between physical and mental health services in the care of children and young people with eating disorders and functional symptom disorders in one region of England.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Mixed-methods study comprising: a scoping review (conducted in November 2020) of four databases to characterise centralisation of specialised healthcare services; a systematic literature review (conducted in August 2022, updated in July 2024) of three databases to evaluate integration of physical and mental health services for children and young people with eating disorders and functional symptom disorders; an interview study of parents (<i>n</i> = 10 participants), healthcare professionals (<i>n</i> = 14 participants) and a project lead (<i>n</i> = 1 participants) to understand perspectives on integration, which analysed data in themes organised within the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research; and two discrete choice experiments of preferences using online surveys (<i>n</i> = 400 participants).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The scoping review (<i>n</i> = 93 studies) found that definitions of centralisation commonly lacked detail but, where available, covered centralisation's form, objectives, mechanisms and drivers. Limited evidence suggests centralisation could be linked to better outcomes, but many important outcomes were rarely examined. The systematic review of integration found one low-quality (uncontrolled) pre-post study of eating disorders in Australia. Findings from the interviews suggest that service redesign should ensure the concept of 'integration' has shared meaning among professionals, and that agreement is reached over roles and responsibilities. From the discrete choice experiments, the main things that mattered to parents when thinking about integration were days missed from school in the case of eating disorders and time to diagnosis for functional symptom disorders.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Limited, poor-quality literature in the reviews; small numbers of interview participants; difficulties engaging parents, carers and healthcare professionals for the discrete choice experiment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a lack of evidence around integrated care for children and young people affected by eating disorders and fu
背景:有证据表明,集中专科医疗服务可以改善患者的预后,但增加了旅行距离和时间。传统上,需要专科保健的人由一名专科医生照顾,精神和身体保健由不同的服务部门提供。最近的趋势涉及专家之间更大的合作。综合护理是最高级别的协作,包括共享医疗记录和多学科护理。目的:调查如何集中的专业医疗保健服务可以表征。在英格兰的一个地区,对患有饮食失调和功能性症状失调的儿童和青少年进行身体和心理健康服务的整合。设计:混合方法研究,包括:对四个数据库进行范围审查(于2020年11月进行),以确定专业医疗服务的集中化特征;对三个数据库进行系统文献综述(于2022年8月进行,2024年7月更新),以评估对患有饮食失调和功能性症状障碍的儿童和青少年的身心健康服务的整合;对家长(n = 10名参与者)、保健专业人员(n = 14名参与者)和项目负责人(n = 1名参与者)进行访谈研究,以了解一体化的观点,分析了在实施研究综合框架内组织的主题中的数据;和两个离散选择实验的偏好使用在线调查(n = 400参与者)。结果:范围审查(n = 93项研究)发现,中央集权的定义通常缺乏细节,但在可用的情况下,涵盖了中央集权的形式、目标、机制和驱动因素。有限的证据表明,集中化可能与更好的结果有关,但许多重要的结果很少得到检验。对整合的系统回顾发现了澳大利亚一项低质量(不受控制的)饮食失调前后研究。访谈的结果表明,服务重新设计应确保“集成”的概念在专业人员之间具有共同的意义,并且在角色和责任上达成一致。从离散选择实验中可以看出,对于父母来说,考虑整合的主要因素是饮食失调的孩子缺课天数和功能性症状障碍的诊断时间。局限性:综述中文献数量有限,质量较差;受访人数少;参与离散选择实验的父母,照顾者和医疗保健专业人员的困难。结论:缺乏对受饮食失调和功能症状障碍影响的儿童和青少年的综合护理的证据。集成服务的实现需要处理有关角色、责任和领导的问题。未来的评估应该根据本研究中对参与者最重要的因素来衡量影响。未来的工作:混合方法研究,以评估综合途径。资助:本摘要介绍了由国家卫生和保健研究所(NIHR)卫生和社会保健提供研究计划资助的独立研究,奖励号为NIHR133613。
{"title":"Integration of specialised services for eating disorders and functional symptom disorders in children and young people: discrete choice experiments and qualitative study.","authors":"Stephen Morris, Efthalia Massou, Josefine Magnusson, Saheli Gandhi, Pei Li Ng, Angus Ig Ramsay, Naomi J Fulop","doi":"10.3310/CLHA1094","DOIUrl":"10.3310/CLHA1094","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Evidence suggests that centralising specialist healthcare services can improve outcomes for patients but increase travel distances and times. Traditionally, people requiring specialist health care were cared for by a single specialist, with mental and physical health care delivered by separate services. Recent trends involve greater collaboration between specialists. Integrated care is the highest level of collaboration, including shared access to medical records and multidisciplinary care.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objectives: &lt;/strong&gt;To investigate how centralisation of specialised healthcare services can be characterised. To examine the proposed integration between physical and mental health services in the care of children and young people with eating disorders and functional symptom disorders in one region of England.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Design: &lt;/strong&gt;Mixed-methods study comprising: a scoping review (conducted in November 2020) of four databases to characterise centralisation of specialised healthcare services; a systematic literature review (conducted in August 2022, updated in July 2024) of three databases to evaluate integration of physical and mental health services for children and young people with eating disorders and functional symptom disorders; an interview study of parents (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 10 participants), healthcare professionals (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 14 participants) and a project lead (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 1 participants) to understand perspectives on integration, which analysed data in themes organised within the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research; and two discrete choice experiments of preferences using online surveys (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 400 participants).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;The scoping review (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 93 studies) found that definitions of centralisation commonly lacked detail but, where available, covered centralisation's form, objectives, mechanisms and drivers. Limited evidence suggests centralisation could be linked to better outcomes, but many important outcomes were rarely examined. The systematic review of integration found one low-quality (uncontrolled) pre-post study of eating disorders in Australia. Findings from the interviews suggest that service redesign should ensure the concept of 'integration' has shared meaning among professionals, and that agreement is reached over roles and responsibilities. From the discrete choice experiments, the main things that mattered to parents when thinking about integration were days missed from school in the case of eating disorders and time to diagnosis for functional symptom disorders.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Limitations: &lt;/strong&gt;Limited, poor-quality literature in the reviews; small numbers of interview participants; difficulties engaging parents, carers and healthcare professionals for the discrete choice experiment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;There is a lack of evidence around integrated care for children and young people affected by eating disorders and fu","PeriodicalId":519880,"journal":{"name":"Health and social care delivery research","volume":"13 43","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145806986","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Proactive Integrated Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry for older medical inpatients: The HOME Study RCT of its effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. 主动综合咨询-联络精神病学对老年住院患者:HOME研究的有效性和成本效益的随机对照试验。
Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.3310/KGFS3671
Michael Sharpe, Jane Walker, Maike van Niekerk, Mark Toynbee, Nicholas Magill, Chris Frost, Ian R White, Simon Walker, Ana Duarte, Colm Owens, Chris Dickens, Annabel Price, Rowan Harwood, Sarah E Lamb, Daniel Lasserson, Sasha Shepperd
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Older medical inpatients have complex biopsychosocial problems, which often lead to prolonged hospital stays. Proactive Integrated Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry was designed to help ward teams manage biopsychosocial complexity and thereby reduce the time that older medical inpatients spend in hospital.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the experience, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of enhancing medical care with Proactive Integrated Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry in The HOME Study.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>A parallel-group, multicentre, individually randomised controlled trial with process and economic evaluations in 24 medical wards of three National Health Service hospitals.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Patients aged ≥ 65 years, admitted in an emergency and expected to remain in hospital for at least 2 days from the time of enrolment.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Proactive Integrated Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry clinicians (consultation-liaison psychiatrists supported by assisting clinicians) made proactive biopsychosocial assessments of patients' problems, then delivered discharge-focused care as integrated members of ward teams. Usual care was provided by ward teams.</p><p><strong>Process evaluation: </strong>Observations on training Proactive Integrated Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry clinicians and the care they provided; Proactive Integrated Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry clinicians' experiences of working in the new service model; patients' and ward staff members' experiences of Proactive Integrated Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry.</p><p><strong>Primary outcome: </strong>Time spent as an inpatient (during the index admission and any emergency re-admissions) in the 30 days post randomisation.</p><p><strong>Secondary outcomes: </strong>Rate of discharge for the total length of the index admission; discharge destination; length of the index admission post randomisation truncated at 30 days; number of emergency re-admissions, number of days in hospital and rate of death in the year post randomisation; the patient's experience of the hospital stay and view on its length; anxiety; depression; cognitive function; independent functioning; health-related quality of life; overall quality of life.</p><p><strong>Economic evaluation: </strong>Cost-effectiveness of Proactive Integrated Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry over 1, 3 and 12 months from a hospital perspective.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two thousand seven hundred and forty-four participants were enrolled (1399 male, 1345 female; mean age 82.3 years; 2565 White; 1373 Proactive Integrated Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry, 1371 usual care). Proactive Integrated Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry was experienced positively by patients (43 interviews) and ward staff (54 interviews). The mean time spent in hospital in the 30 days post randomisation was 11.37 days (standard deviation 8.74) with Proactive Integ
背景:老年住院患者存在复杂的生物心理社会问题,往往导致住院时间延长。主动综合咨询-联络精神病学旨在帮助病房团队管理生物心理社会复杂性,从而减少老年住院患者在医院的时间。目的:在HOME研究中评估主动综合咨询-联络精神病学加强医疗护理的经验、效果和成本效益。设计和环境:在三家国家卫生服务医院的24个病房中进行平行组、多中心、单独随机对照试验,进行过程和经济评估。受试者:年龄≥65岁,因急诊入院,预计从入组时起至少住院2天的患者。干预措施:主动综合咨询-联络精神科医生(由辅助临床医生支持的咨询-联络精神科医生)对患者的问题进行主动的生物心理社会评估,然后作为病房小组的综合成员提供以出院为重点的护理。日常护理由病房小组提供。过程评价:前瞻性综合会诊-联络精神病学临床医生培训及其护理的观察主动整合会诊——联络精神科临床医生在新服务模式下的工作经验病人及病房工作人员在精神病学主动综合会诊联络的经验。主要结局:随机分组后30天内作为住院患者的时间(在索引入院期间和任何紧急再次入院期间)。次要结局:指标入院总时间的出院率;放电目的地;随机化后索引纳入的长度缩短为30天;随机分组后一年内紧急再入院人数、住院天数和死亡率;病人的住院经历及对住院时间长短的看法;焦虑;抑郁症;认知功能;独立运作;与健康有关的生活质量;整体生活质量。经济评估:从医院的角度来看,主动综合咨询-联络精神病学在1、3和12个月内的成本效益。结果:共纳入2744名参与者(男性1399人,女性1345人;平均年龄82.3岁;白人2565人;主动综合咨询-联络精神病学1373人,常规护理1371人)。患者(43次访谈)和病房工作人员(54次访谈)对积极主动的综合咨询-联络精神病学有积极的体验。随机化后30天的平均住院时间为主动综合咨询-联络精神病学11.37天(标准差8.74),常规护理11.85天(标准差9.00);校正平均差-0.45(95%置信区间-1.11至0.21;p = 0.18)。在次要结局方面,唯一具有统计学和临床意义的差异是出院率,出院率高出8.5%[率比1.09(95%可信区间1.00 ~ 1.17);p = 0.042]与主动综合咨询-联络精神病学(Proactive Integrated Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry)的治疗效果相比,这种差异在住院10 ~ 2周的患者中最为明显。与常规治疗相比,主动综合咨询-联络精神病学估计在1个月和3个月(但不是12个月)中节省了适度的成本和成本效益。主要限制:对其他人群、医院和卫生保健系统的推广不确定。结论:这是第一项前瞻性综合咨询-联络精神病学的随机对照试验。主动综合咨询-联络精神病学是老年住院病人和病房工作人员的经验,可以加强医疗护理。这也可能在短期内节省成本。虽然该试验没有提供强有力的证据表明主动综合咨询-联络精神病学减少了住院时间,但它确实支持并为其未来的发展和评估提供了信息。未来研究:不同形式的主动综合咨询-联络精神病学的有效性长期住院的预测因素;实施生物心理社会医疗保健的障碍和促进因素。研究注册:本研究注册号为当前对照试验ISRCTN86120296。资助:该奖项由国家卫生和保健研究所(NIHR)卫生和社会保健提供研究项目(NIHR奖励编号:15/11/16)资助,全文发表在《卫生和社会保健提供研究》上;第13卷,第41号有关进一步的奖励信息,请参阅美国国立卫生研究院资助和奖励网站。
{"title":"Proactive Integrated Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry for older medical inpatients: The HOME Study RCT of its effectiveness and cost-effectiveness.","authors":"Michael Sharpe, Jane Walker, Maike van Niekerk, Mark Toynbee, Nicholas Magill, Chris Frost, Ian R White, Simon Walker, Ana Duarte, Colm Owens, Chris Dickens, Annabel Price, Rowan Harwood, Sarah E Lamb, Daniel Lasserson, Sasha Shepperd","doi":"10.3310/KGFS3671","DOIUrl":"10.3310/KGFS3671","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Older medical inpatients have complex biopsychosocial problems, which often lead to prolonged hospital stays. Proactive Integrated Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry was designed to help ward teams manage biopsychosocial complexity and thereby reduce the time that older medical inpatients spend in hospital.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objectives: &lt;/strong&gt;To assess the experience, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of enhancing medical care with Proactive Integrated Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry in The HOME Study.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Design and setting: &lt;/strong&gt;A parallel-group, multicentre, individually randomised controlled trial with process and economic evaluations in 24 medical wards of three National Health Service hospitals.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Participants: &lt;/strong&gt;Patients aged ≥ 65 years, admitted in an emergency and expected to remain in hospital for at least 2 days from the time of enrolment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Interventions: &lt;/strong&gt;Proactive Integrated Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry clinicians (consultation-liaison psychiatrists supported by assisting clinicians) made proactive biopsychosocial assessments of patients' problems, then delivered discharge-focused care as integrated members of ward teams. Usual care was provided by ward teams.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Process evaluation: &lt;/strong&gt;Observations on training Proactive Integrated Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry clinicians and the care they provided; Proactive Integrated Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry clinicians' experiences of working in the new service model; patients' and ward staff members' experiences of Proactive Integrated Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Primary outcome: &lt;/strong&gt;Time spent as an inpatient (during the index admission and any emergency re-admissions) in the 30 days post randomisation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Secondary outcomes: &lt;/strong&gt;Rate of discharge for the total length of the index admission; discharge destination; length of the index admission post randomisation truncated at 30 days; number of emergency re-admissions, number of days in hospital and rate of death in the year post randomisation; the patient's experience of the hospital stay and view on its length; anxiety; depression; cognitive function; independent functioning; health-related quality of life; overall quality of life.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Economic evaluation: &lt;/strong&gt;Cost-effectiveness of Proactive Integrated Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry over 1, 3 and 12 months from a hospital perspective.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Two thousand seven hundred and forty-four participants were enrolled (1399 male, 1345 female; mean age 82.3 years; 2565 White; 1373 Proactive Integrated Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry, 1371 usual care). Proactive Integrated Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry was experienced positively by patients (43 interviews) and ward staff (54 interviews). The mean time spent in hospital in the 30 days post randomisation was 11.37 days (standard deviation 8.74) with Proactive Integ","PeriodicalId":519880,"journal":{"name":"Health and social care delivery research","volume":"13 41","pages":"1-85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145703682","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Implementation and use of technology-enabled remote monitoring for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a rapid qualitative evaluation. 实施和使用技术远程监测慢性阻塞性肺疾病:快速定性评价。
Pub Date : 2025-11-19 DOI: 10.3310/GJSS1422
Nikki Newhouse, Agne Ulyte, Zuzanna Marciniak-Nuqui, Jackie van Dael, Sonja Marjanovic, Sharon Brennan, Sara Shaw
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease affects around 2% United Kingdom population. Timely identification of patients at risk of deterioration is crucial. Technology-enabled remote monitoring may help prevent deterioration, support chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients at home and appropriate use of National Health Service services. Evidence on the adoption, use and experience of technology-enabled remote monitoring in the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease pathway is currently limited, impeding efforts to inform effective technology-enabled remote monitoring design and implementation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To understand what supports good practice in the implementation and use of technology-enabled remote monitoring in the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease care pathway and draw transferable lessons that can inform spread and scale up.</p><p><strong>Design and methods: </strong>Rapid evaluation, combining qualitative interviews, focused case studies and stakeholder workshops. Patient and public voices informed evaluation design, conduct and co-design of resources.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>Scoping interviews with a purposive sample of 29 national and regional stakeholders informed selection of four case study sites involved in delivering technology-enabled remote monitoring for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Case studies combined interviews with 19 staff and review of 18 documents. Analysis was informed by the non-adoption, abandonment and challenges to scale-up, spread and sustainability of technology framework. A stakeholder workshop (<i>n</i> = 23 participants) refined emerging findings. Interviews with respiratory patients and a co-design workshop informed development of patient-facing resources.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Technology-enabled remote monitoring for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease occurs along a continuum of scope and scale. Technology-enabled care pathways have some common overarching features, but variation is seen across contexts and patient cohorts. Technology-enabled remote monitoring services influence care provision on a system level. Effective implementation is underpinned by service characteristics affecting its use, technology functionalities and organisational capabilities and capacities. Technology-enabled remote monitoring success also depends on defining the data-driven purpose and value proposition, ensuring buy-in, organising the workforce and workload in sustainable ways, data and IT platform interoperability, support for patients in using the service safely and appropriately, utilising existing resources, team buy-in, financial resourcing and clear policy incentives, and openness to ongoing learning. Patients value technology-enabled remote monitoring services that help them feel more connected to healthcare providers and provide timely information and support. Healthcare staff value high-quality patient care, s
背景:慢性阻塞性肺疾病影响约2%的英国人口。及时识别有恶化风险的患者至关重要。技术支持的远程监测可能有助于预防病情恶化,支持慢性阻塞性肺病患者在家并适当利用国民保健服务。目前,在慢性阻塞性肺病途径中采用、使用和体验技术远程监测的证据有限,阻碍了为有效的技术远程监测设计和实施提供信息的努力。目的:了解支持在慢性阻塞性肺疾病护理途径中实施和使用技术支持的远程监测的良好做法的因素,并吸取可转移的经验教训,为传播和扩大提供信息。设计和方法:快速评估,结合定性访谈,重点案例研究和利益相关者研讨会。病人和公众的声音为评估设计、实施和资源共同设计提供了信息。环境和参与者:对29个国家和区域利益攸关方的有目的样本进行了范围界定访谈,为参与提供技术支持的慢性阻塞性肺病远程监测的四个案例研究地点的选择提供了信息。案例研究包括对19名工作人员的采访和对18份文件的审查。对技术框架的不采用、放弃和扩大、推广和可持续性方面的挑战进行了分析。利益相关者研讨会(n = 23名参与者)改进了新发现。与呼吸系统患者的访谈和共同设计研讨会为面向患者的资源的开发提供了信息。结果:技术支持的慢性阻塞性肺疾病的远程监测在范围和规模上都是连续的。技术支持的护理途径有一些共同的总体特征,但在不同的背景和患者群体中也存在差异。技术支持的远程监控服务在系统级别影响护理提供。有效的实施是由影响其使用、技术功能和组织能力的服务特征支撑的。技术支持的远程监测的成功还取决于确定数据驱动的目的和价值主张,确保支持,以可持续的方式组织劳动力和工作量,数据和IT平台的互操作性,支持患者安全适当地使用服务,利用现有资源,团队支持,财务资源和明确的政策激励,以及对持续学习的开放性。患者重视技术支持的远程监控服务,这些服务可以帮助他们与医疗保健提供者建立更紧密的联系,并提供及时的信息和支持。医疗保健人员重视高质量的患者护理,服务重视可负担性和可持续的工作量影响。局限性:有节奏地进行小规模定性评价。结论:技术可以支持远程监控,但这只是技术支持的有效远程监控服务的一个方面。它需要纳入慢性阻塞性肺病途径,并以具有成本效益的方式与服务需求和现有能力保持一致,并对质量和安全进行适当的监督。决策者需要考虑技术的哪些方面是必不可少的,如何有效地嵌入并得到配备适当的工作人员的支持,以及不同患者群体的需求。今后的工作:需要有证据表明技术支持的慢性阻塞性肺病远程监测的长期有效性和成本效益、对患者和工作人员体验的影响以及公平获取的问题。需要定性和定量方法来了解不同的技术和在不同环境/群体中不断发展的使用。资助:本文介绍了由国家卫生和保健研究所(NIHR)卫生和社会保健提供研究计划资助的独立研究,奖励号为NIHR154231。
{"title":"Implementation and use of technology-enabled remote monitoring for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a rapid qualitative evaluation.","authors":"Nikki Newhouse, Agne Ulyte, Zuzanna Marciniak-Nuqui, Jackie van Dael, Sonja Marjanovic, Sharon Brennan, Sara Shaw","doi":"10.3310/GJSS1422","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3310/GJSS1422","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease affects around 2% United Kingdom population. Timely identification of patients at risk of deterioration is crucial. Technology-enabled remote monitoring may help prevent deterioration, support chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients at home and appropriate use of National Health Service services. Evidence on the adoption, use and experience of technology-enabled remote monitoring in the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease pathway is currently limited, impeding efforts to inform effective technology-enabled remote monitoring design and implementation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;To understand what supports good practice in the implementation and use of technology-enabled remote monitoring in the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease care pathway and draw transferable lessons that can inform spread and scale up.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Design and methods: &lt;/strong&gt;Rapid evaluation, combining qualitative interviews, focused case studies and stakeholder workshops. Patient and public voices informed evaluation design, conduct and co-design of resources.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Setting and participants: &lt;/strong&gt;Scoping interviews with a purposive sample of 29 national and regional stakeholders informed selection of four case study sites involved in delivering technology-enabled remote monitoring for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Case studies combined interviews with 19 staff and review of 18 documents. Analysis was informed by the non-adoption, abandonment and challenges to scale-up, spread and sustainability of technology framework. A stakeholder workshop (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 23 participants) refined emerging findings. Interviews with respiratory patients and a co-design workshop informed development of patient-facing resources.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Technology-enabled remote monitoring for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease occurs along a continuum of scope and scale. Technology-enabled care pathways have some common overarching features, but variation is seen across contexts and patient cohorts. Technology-enabled remote monitoring services influence care provision on a system level. Effective implementation is underpinned by service characteristics affecting its use, technology functionalities and organisational capabilities and capacities. Technology-enabled remote monitoring success also depends on defining the data-driven purpose and value proposition, ensuring buy-in, organising the workforce and workload in sustainable ways, data and IT platform interoperability, support for patients in using the service safely and appropriately, utilising existing resources, team buy-in, financial resourcing and clear policy incentives, and openness to ongoing learning. Patients value technology-enabled remote monitoring services that help them feel more connected to healthcare providers and provide timely information and support. Healthcare staff value high-quality patient care, s","PeriodicalId":519880,"journal":{"name":"Health and social care delivery research","volume":" ","pages":"1-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145574994","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evidence of the impact on and views of NHS staff following a colleague's suicide to inform postvention guidance: a multi-methods study. 影响的证据和意见的NHS工作人员在同事自杀后通知后续指导:一项多方法研究。
Pub Date : 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.3310/GFTA1212
Ruth Riley, Johanna Spiers, Hilary Causer, Jill Maben, Carolyn Chew-Graham, Nikolaos Efstathiou, Anya Gopfert, Kathryn Grayling, Maria van Hove
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Healthcare professionals are 24% more likely to die by suicide than the general population. The impact of such deaths on National Health Service colleagues is unclear. Early post-suicide support (postvention) is beneficial for those affected, yet little is known about how to offer this support within the National Health Service.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We set out to: (1) review existing research on suicide impact and postvention interventions in workplace settings; (2) explore the impact of colleague suicide on staff well-being; (3) examine staff perceptions of contributing factors to their colleague's suicide; (4) identify what supports or hinders bereaved colleagues in seeking help, and gather staff preferences for future support; (5) explore how managers currently support workers following a death by suicide; and (6) use the findings to develop evidence-based postvention guidance for National Health Service organisations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study had four work packages: (1) an integrative review of primary research to review the impact of suicide in the workplace; (2) a qualitative interview study with National Health Service staff affected by a colleague's suicide or involved in supporting others (<i>n</i> = 29 affected staff, <i>n</i> = 22 supporters). Data were analysed using grounded theory and thematic analysis; (3) a co-production workshop with key stakeholders to review research findings and generate recommendations; and (4) a synthesis of all findings and recommendations to develop evidence-based postvention guidance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The integrative review revealed that existing postvention guidance often lacks empirical support and does not address how workplace culture affects staff after a suicide. Those tasked with delivering postvention face stigma and complex challenges, and current support does not fully meet the needs of affected staff. In the interview study, two theories were developed. First, staff affected by a colleague's suicide faced cultural and behavioural barriers to accessing support. Some devised strategies to overcome these barriers, while others fell through the gaps. Second, those providing postvention support also encountered barriers and required emotional and practical backing to effectively support others. Thematic analysis generated key recommendations for National Health Service trusts: (1) promote staff mental health and encourage open discussions about suicide; (2) establish trained teams to deliver timely support; (3) share information swiftly and compassionately, giving staff space to reflect together; (4) offer ongoing emotional support and staff-led activities like memorials and (5) ensure support teams also receive emotional and practical assistance. All findings and recommendations were discussed during our co-design workshop. Stakeholder attendees supported the recommendations. Findings informed our guidance, which emphasi
背景:医疗专业人员死于自杀的可能性比一般人群高24%。这些死亡对英国国家卫生服务体系(nhs)同事的影响尚不清楚。早期的自杀后支持(postvention)对那些受影响的人是有益的,但人们对如何在国家卫生服务体系内提供这种支持知之甚少。目的:本研究旨在:(1)回顾有关工作场所自杀影响和预防干预的现有研究;(2)探讨同事自杀对员工幸福感的影响;(3)调查员工对同事自杀因素的认知;(4)找出支持或阻碍失去亲人的同事寻求帮助的因素,并收集员工对未来支持的偏好;(5)探讨管理人员目前如何支持自杀死亡的工人;(6)利用这些发现为国家卫生服务组织制定基于证据的预防指南。方法:本研究分为4个工作包:(1)对工作场所自杀的影响进行综合研究;(2)对受同事自杀影响或参与支持他人的国民卫生服务工作人员(n = 29名受影响工作人员,n = 22名支持者)进行定性访谈研究。数据分析采用扎根理论和专题分析;(3)与主要利益相关者共同举办研讨会,审查研究成果并提出建议;(4)综合所有研究结果和建议,制定循证预防指南。结果:综合评估显示,现有的后撤指导往往缺乏经验支持,并且没有解决职场文化如何影响自杀后的员工。负责提供后续服务的人员面临耻辱和复杂的挑战,目前的支持不能完全满足受影响工作人员的需求。在访谈研究中,发展了两种理论。首先,受同事自杀影响的员工在获得支持方面面临文化和行为障碍。一些人想出了克服这些障碍的策略,而另一些人则陷入了困境。其次,那些提供事后支持的人也遇到了障碍,需要情感和实际的支持来有效地支持他人。专题分析为国民保健服务信托基金提出了重要建议:(1)促进工作人员的心理健康,鼓励公开讨论自杀问题;(2)建立训练有素的团队,及时提供支持;(3)迅速而富有同情心地分享信息,给员工共同反思的空间;(4)提供持续的情感支持和员工主导的活动,如纪念活动;(5)确保支持团队也能获得情感和实际帮助。所有的发现和建议都在我们的共同设计研讨会上进行了讨论。利益相关者与会者支持这些建议。调查结果为我们的指导提供了信息,该指导强调了在国家卫生服务信托和综合护理委员会内建立后发团队的必要性,以及在同事自杀发生之前做好应对准备的必要性。局限性:综合评价仅限于英语论文。大多数受访者是英国白人女性,这意味着调查结果可能并不代表所有国民健康服务机构员工的经历。此外,许多接受采访的“支持者”已经提供了高质量的支持,这可能会导致对目前提供的延期的过度乐观的看法。结论:我们的指南建议如下:有技能和训练有素的个人必须积极地为国民保健服务人员提供即时和持续的后撤支持;那些提供延期的人必须得到支持,这样他们才能支持其他人;国民保健服务信托基金和综合护理委员会必须培养一种意识到自杀的支持性文化,使支持者能够执行我们的建议。未来的工作:我们建议进行进一步的研究,以探讨同事自杀对少数群体和全球多数卫生工作者的影响。此外,我们建议进行一项强有力的评估研究,以报告指南的实施情况,并确定哪些在实践中有效。研究注册:本研究注册为IRAS: 291050;HRA 21 / HRA / 4450。资助:该奖项由国家卫生和保健研究所(NIHR)卫生和社会保健提供研究项目(NIHR奖励编号:NIHR129341)资助,全文发表在《卫生和社会保健提供研究》上;第13卷第40期有关进一步的奖励信息,请参阅美国国立卫生研究院资助和奖励网站。
{"title":"Evidence of the impact on and views of NHS staff following a colleague's suicide to inform postvention guidance: a multi-methods study.","authors":"Ruth Riley, Johanna Spiers, Hilary Causer, Jill Maben, Carolyn Chew-Graham, Nikolaos Efstathiou, Anya Gopfert, Kathryn Grayling, Maria van Hove","doi":"10.3310/GFTA1212","DOIUrl":"10.3310/GFTA1212","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Healthcare professionals are 24% more likely to die by suicide than the general population. The impact of such deaths on National Health Service colleagues is unclear. Early post-suicide support (postvention) is beneficial for those affected, yet little is known about how to offer this support within the National Health Service.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objectives: &lt;/strong&gt;We set out to: (1) review existing research on suicide impact and postvention interventions in workplace settings; (2) explore the impact of colleague suicide on staff well-being; (3) examine staff perceptions of contributing factors to their colleague's suicide; (4) identify what supports or hinders bereaved colleagues in seeking help, and gather staff preferences for future support; (5) explore how managers currently support workers following a death by suicide; and (6) use the findings to develop evidence-based postvention guidance for National Health Service organisations.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;This study had four work packages: (1) an integrative review of primary research to review the impact of suicide in the workplace; (2) a qualitative interview study with National Health Service staff affected by a colleague's suicide or involved in supporting others (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 29 affected staff, &lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 22 supporters). Data were analysed using grounded theory and thematic analysis; (3) a co-production workshop with key stakeholders to review research findings and generate recommendations; and (4) a synthesis of all findings and recommendations to develop evidence-based postvention guidance.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;The integrative review revealed that existing postvention guidance often lacks empirical support and does not address how workplace culture affects staff after a suicide. Those tasked with delivering postvention face stigma and complex challenges, and current support does not fully meet the needs of affected staff. In the interview study, two theories were developed. First, staff affected by a colleague's suicide faced cultural and behavioural barriers to accessing support. Some devised strategies to overcome these barriers, while others fell through the gaps. Second, those providing postvention support also encountered barriers and required emotional and practical backing to effectively support others. Thematic analysis generated key recommendations for National Health Service trusts: (1) promote staff mental health and encourage open discussions about suicide; (2) establish trained teams to deliver timely support; (3) share information swiftly and compassionately, giving staff space to reflect together; (4) offer ongoing emotional support and staff-led activities like memorials and (5) ensure support teams also receive emotional and practical assistance. All findings and recommendations were discussed during our co-design workshop. Stakeholder attendees supported the recommendations. Findings informed our guidance, which emphasi","PeriodicalId":519880,"journal":{"name":"Health and social care delivery research","volume":"13 40","pages":"1-87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145497793","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Development and implementation of a digital health intervention in routine care for long COVID patients: a comprehensive synopsis. 在长期COVID患者的常规护理中制定和实施数字健康干预措施:综合摘要。
Pub Date : 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.3310/GJHG0331
Henry Goodfellow, Ann Blandford, Katherine Bradbury, Manuel Gomes, Fiona Hamilton, William Henley, Fiona Stevenson, Delmiro Fernandez-Reyes, John Hurst, Melissa Heightman, Paul Pfeffer, William Ricketts, Richa Singh, Hannah Hylton, Stuart Linke, Julia Bindman, Chris Robson, Sarah Walker, Hadiza Ismaila
<p><strong>Background: </strong>By July 2020, large numbers of post-COVID patients were experiencing symptoms for weeks or months, but traditional National Health Service models of rehabilitation service delivery could not meet demand.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Design and deploy a digital health intervention to provide digitally delivered, remotely supported rehabilitation to long COVID patients on complicated and evolving pathways.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The multidisciplinary team combined established research methods based on engineering and computer science (considering safety, stability and user requirements) with those based on biomedical and health service research (considering effectiveness and population impact). Qualitative data comprised recordings of meetings between study team members and clinicians and semistructured interviews with clinician and patient users. Quantitative data comprised referral, registration and usage rates; demographic and clinical characteristics of patients; and patient-reported outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We created a modifiable digital health intervention, 'Living With COVID Recovery<sup>TM</sup> developed by Living With Ltd', London, UK, that continues to be used by National Health Service trusts. The digital health intervention included integration into a clinical pathway, a clinician-facing dashboard, two-way messaging and a patient-facing app with information and evidence-based treatments. We aimed to register 1000 users. By study completion on 20 December 2022, there were 9781 patients invited, of whom 7679 (78.5%) had registered, at 33 National Health Service clinics.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Data came from patients at long COVID clinics, however data were unlikely to be representative of people with long COVID. We could not observe clinics under lockdown and had limited access to patient digital health intervention users or to people not engaging with the digital health intervention. Patient user data were incomplete, with inconsistent patient-reported outcome measure and other questionnaire data completion and no data on initial severity of disease, vaccination status, comorbidities or other individual circumstances.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Long COVID can be extremely debilitating, comparable to stage IV lung cancer in relation to fatigue and health-related quality of life. Care and rehabilitation should address the management of fatigue and reflect the impact of social disadvantage on symptom severity. With sufficient resources, a digital health intervention can be developed quickly and effectively using agile methodology and bringing together a genuinely multidisciplinary team, including, importantly, an industry partner. Digital health intervention product design and deployment are both important in getting National Health Service trusts, healthcare professionals and patients to engage with a digital health intervention. Projects should
背景:截至2020年7月,大量新冠肺炎后患者出现数周或数月的症状,但传统的国家卫生服务体系(nhs)康复服务模式无法满足需求。目标:设计和部署数字健康干预措施,为长期感染COVID的患者提供数字交付、远程支持的康复,途径复杂且不断发展。方法:多学科团队将基于工程和计算机科学(考虑安全性、稳定性和用户需求)的既定研究方法与基于生物医学和卫生服务研究(考虑有效性和人群影响)的研究方法相结合。定性数据包括研究小组成员和临床医生之间的会议记录,以及与临床医生和患者用户的半结构化访谈。定量数据包括转诊率、注册率和使用率;患者的人口学和临床特征;以及患者报告的结果测量。结果:我们创建了一个可修改的数字健康干预措施,由英国伦敦Living With Ltd开发的“Living With COVID RecoveryTM”,继续被国家卫生服务信托机构使用。数字健康干预包括整合到临床途径、面向临床医生的仪表板、双向信息和面向患者的应用程序中,其中包含信息和循证治疗。我们的目标是注册1000名用户。到2022年12月20日研究结束时,共邀请了9781名患者,其中7679名(78.5%)已在33个国家卫生服务诊所登记。局限性:数据来自长COVID诊所的患者,但数据不太可能代表长COVID患者。我们无法观察到被封锁的诊所,接触数字健康干预患者或不参与数字健康干预的人的机会有限。患者用户数据不完整,患者报告的结果测量和其他问卷数据不一致,没有关于疾病初始严重程度、疫苗接种状况、合并症或其他个人情况的数据。结论:长COVID可能非常虚弱,在疲劳和健康相关生活质量方面与IV期肺癌相当。护理和康复应解决疲劳的管理问题,并反映社会不利条件对症状严重程度的影响。有了足够的资源,就可以使用敏捷方法,并将真正的多学科团队(重要的是,包括行业合作伙伴)聚集在一起,快速有效地制定数字卫生干预措施。数字健康干预产品的设计和部署对于让国民健康服务信托机构、医疗保健专业人员和患者参与数字健康干预都很重要。项目应与所有用户组密切合作。封锁和新患者群体的需求未得到满足,鼓励了那些本来可能不愿尝试数字健康干预的人。许多患者和诊所接受了这种数字远程支持,这有助于患者感到受到照顾,同时减少了卫生服务的压力。这可能会鼓励人们接受其他数字医疗干预措施,尽管医疗记录整合仍然是诊所的一个障碍。未来工作:本研究的重点是长期COVID数字化康复计划的开发、部署和评估。临床有效性将在“症状、轨迹、不平等和管理:了解长期covid以解决和改变现有综合护理途径”(伦敦大学学院,英国伦敦)研究中进行评估。资助:本摘要介绍了由国家卫生和保健研究所(NIHR)卫生和社会保健提供研究计划资助的独立研究,奖励号为NIHR132243。
{"title":"Development and implementation of a digital health intervention in routine care for long COVID patients: a comprehensive synopsis.","authors":"Henry Goodfellow, Ann Blandford, Katherine Bradbury, Manuel Gomes, Fiona Hamilton, William Henley, Fiona Stevenson, Delmiro Fernandez-Reyes, John Hurst, Melissa Heightman, Paul Pfeffer, William Ricketts, Richa Singh, Hannah Hylton, Stuart Linke, Julia Bindman, Chris Robson, Sarah Walker, Hadiza Ismaila","doi":"10.3310/GJHG0331","DOIUrl":"10.3310/GJHG0331","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;By July 2020, large numbers of post-COVID patients were experiencing symptoms for weeks or months, but traditional National Health Service models of rehabilitation service delivery could not meet demand.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objectives: &lt;/strong&gt;Design and deploy a digital health intervention to provide digitally delivered, remotely supported rehabilitation to long COVID patients on complicated and evolving pathways.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;The multidisciplinary team combined established research methods based on engineering and computer science (considering safety, stability and user requirements) with those based on biomedical and health service research (considering effectiveness and population impact). Qualitative data comprised recordings of meetings between study team members and clinicians and semistructured interviews with clinician and patient users. Quantitative data comprised referral, registration and usage rates; demographic and clinical characteristics of patients; and patient-reported outcome measures.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;We created a modifiable digital health intervention, 'Living With COVID Recovery&lt;sup&gt;TM&lt;/sup&gt; developed by Living With Ltd', London, UK, that continues to be used by National Health Service trusts. The digital health intervention included integration into a clinical pathway, a clinician-facing dashboard, two-way messaging and a patient-facing app with information and evidence-based treatments. We aimed to register 1000 users. By study completion on 20 December 2022, there were 9781 patients invited, of whom 7679 (78.5%) had registered, at 33 National Health Service clinics.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Limitations: &lt;/strong&gt;Data came from patients at long COVID clinics, however data were unlikely to be representative of people with long COVID. We could not observe clinics under lockdown and had limited access to patient digital health intervention users or to people not engaging with the digital health intervention. Patient user data were incomplete, with inconsistent patient-reported outcome measure and other questionnaire data completion and no data on initial severity of disease, vaccination status, comorbidities or other individual circumstances.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;Long COVID can be extremely debilitating, comparable to stage IV lung cancer in relation to fatigue and health-related quality of life. Care and rehabilitation should address the management of fatigue and reflect the impact of social disadvantage on symptom severity. With sufficient resources, a digital health intervention can be developed quickly and effectively using agile methodology and bringing together a genuinely multidisciplinary team, including, importantly, an industry partner. Digital health intervention product design and deployment are both important in getting National Health Service trusts, healthcare professionals and patients to engage with a digital health intervention. Projects should","PeriodicalId":519880,"journal":{"name":"Health and social care delivery research","volume":"13 39","pages":"1-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145491401","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Accessibility and acceptability of perinatal mental health services for women from ethnic minority groups: a synopsis of the PAAM study. 少数民族妇女围产期心理健康服务的可及性和可接受性:PAAM研究摘要
Pub Date : 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.3310/TDAS1298
Nikolina Jovanović, Maev Conneely, Sarah Bicknell, Jelena Janković
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ethnic minority women face worse maternity outcomes and increased risk of perinatal mental health issues, yet research on the accessibility and acceptability of perinatal mental health services for these groups is limited.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>(1) To explore access to and utilisation of mental health services during the perinatal period among ethnic minority women; (2) to explore care pathways to community and inpatient perinatal mental health services; (3) to explore the attitudes, experiences and service improvement suggestions of ethnic minority women with perinatal mental health problems, as well as those of their partners, family members and healthcare professionals and (4) to produce recommendations for improving clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mixed-methods study was conducted during 2018-23, encompassing four studies aligned with specific aims: (1) a population-based study of 615,092 women who gave birth in National Health Services hospitals in England, using data from the National Commissioning Data Repository; (2) a retrospective evaluation of patients accessing community perinatal mental health services in Birmingham and London (<i>n</i> = 228) and inpatient services in Birmingham, London and Nottingham (<i>n</i> = 198) using an adapted World Health Organization care pathways questionnaire; (3) a qualitative study with four cohorts across England: service users (<i>n</i> = 37), non-users or those who disengaged (<i>n</i> = 23), partners/family (<i>n</i> = 15) and healthcare professionals (<i>n</i> = 24); (4) findings informed recommendations for practice improvements, coproduced with individuals with lived experience of perinatal mental illness and of being in a minoritised ethnic group. Data were analysed using quantitative and qualitative approaches.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Access issues to mental health services were evident for Black African, Asian and White other women compared to White British women. Variability in patient journeys to community perinatal mental health services seem to stem from service-level factors rather than patient needs. Asian patients had more emergency admissions to Mother and Baby Units, while Black patients were less likely to experience multiple services before Mother and Baby Unit admission. Barriers to access included limited service awareness, fear of child removal, stigma, remote clinical appointments and unresponsive services. Despite these challenges, many women found services helpful. Family members noted gaps in family-focused care. Recommendations for improvement include raising awareness, monitoring access for different ethnic groups and addressing concerns about child removal, with a focus on consistent care, family involvement and cultural sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings shed light on health inequalities in perinatal mental health care for ethnic minority women. The results can be utilised
背景:少数民族妇女面临更差的分娩结果和围产期心理健康问题的风险增加,但对这些群体围产期心理健康服务的可及性和可接受性的研究有限。目标:(1)探讨少数民族妇女在围产期获得和利用心理健康服务的情况;(2)探索社区和住院围生期心理健康服务的护理途径;(3)探讨少数民族妇女及其伴侣、家庭成员和医护人员对围产期心理健康问题的态度、经验和服务改进建议;(4)提出改进临床实践的建议。方法:在2018-23年期间进行了混合方法研究,包括四项符合具体目标的研究:(1)基于人群的研究,研究对象是615092名在英格兰国家卫生服务医院分娩的妇女,使用的数据来自国家委托数据库;(2)采用世界卫生组织护理路径问卷对伯明翰和伦敦社区围产期精神卫生服务(n = 228)和伯明翰、伦敦和诺丁汉住院服务(n = 198)的患者进行回顾性评估;(3)在英格兰进行的四组定性研究:服务使用者(n = 37)、非使用者或脱离者(n = 23)、伴侣/家庭(n = 15)和医疗保健专业人员(n = 24);(4)研究结果为实践改进提供了建议,这些建议是与有围产期精神疾病生活经历的个体和少数民族共同提出的。采用定量和定性方法分析数据。结果:与英国白人妇女相比,非洲黑人、亚洲人和其他白人妇女获得心理健康服务的问题很明显。患者前往社区围产期心理健康服务的行程差异似乎源于服务水平因素,而不是患者需求。亚裔患者有更多的紧急入院的母婴,而黑人患者不太可能在母婴入院前经历多种服务。获得服务的障碍包括对服务的认识有限、害怕儿童被带走、耻辱、远程临床预约和服务反应迟钝。尽管面临这些挑战,许多妇女发现服务很有帮助。家庭成员注意到以家庭为中心的护理存在差距。改进的建议包括提高认识,监测不同族裔群体的使用情况,解决有关儿童被带走的问题,重点是持续的照料、家庭参与和文化敏感性。结论:本研究结果揭示了少数民族妇女围产期心理保健中的健康不平等现象。研究结果可用于解决现有障碍,改善母亲、婴儿和家庭的结果。限制:合并的族裔群体内部的多样性;有限的非英语女性样本;依赖自我报告的措施;使用covid -19前数据;在探索母婴病房患者途径的研究中,伯明翰和伦敦样本中黑人和亚洲患者的代表性过高(与产妇人口相比),未参与服务的黑人妇女的代表性不足。今后的工作:在围产期心理保健方面实施良好做法,采取有针对性的干预措施,消除对儿童被带走的恐惧,采取创新战略,招募黑人和非英语妇女,探索“其他白人”妇女的经历。资助:本摘要介绍了由国家卫生和保健研究所(NIHR)卫生和社会保健提供研究方案资助的独立研究,奖励号为17/105/14。
{"title":"Accessibility and acceptability of perinatal mental health services for women from ethnic minority groups: a synopsis of the PAAM study.","authors":"Nikolina Jovanović, Maev Conneely, Sarah Bicknell, Jelena Janković","doi":"10.3310/TDAS1298","DOIUrl":"10.3310/TDAS1298","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Ethnic minority women face worse maternity outcomes and increased risk of perinatal mental health issues, yet research on the accessibility and acceptability of perinatal mental health services for these groups is limited.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objectives: &lt;/strong&gt;(1) To explore access to and utilisation of mental health services during the perinatal period among ethnic minority women; (2) to explore care pathways to community and inpatient perinatal mental health services; (3) to explore the attitudes, experiences and service improvement suggestions of ethnic minority women with perinatal mental health problems, as well as those of their partners, family members and healthcare professionals and (4) to produce recommendations for improving clinical practice.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;Mixed-methods study was conducted during 2018-23, encompassing four studies aligned with specific aims: (1) a population-based study of 615,092 women who gave birth in National Health Services hospitals in England, using data from the National Commissioning Data Repository; (2) a retrospective evaluation of patients accessing community perinatal mental health services in Birmingham and London (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 228) and inpatient services in Birmingham, London and Nottingham (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 198) using an adapted World Health Organization care pathways questionnaire; (3) a qualitative study with four cohorts across England: service users (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 37), non-users or those who disengaged (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 23), partners/family (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 15) and healthcare professionals (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 24); (4) findings informed recommendations for practice improvements, coproduced with individuals with lived experience of perinatal mental illness and of being in a minoritised ethnic group. Data were analysed using quantitative and qualitative approaches.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Access issues to mental health services were evident for Black African, Asian and White other women compared to White British women. Variability in patient journeys to community perinatal mental health services seem to stem from service-level factors rather than patient needs. Asian patients had more emergency admissions to Mother and Baby Units, while Black patients were less likely to experience multiple services before Mother and Baby Unit admission. Barriers to access included limited service awareness, fear of child removal, stigma, remote clinical appointments and unresponsive services. Despite these challenges, many women found services helpful. Family members noted gaps in family-focused care. Recommendations for improvement include raising awareness, monitoring access for different ethnic groups and addressing concerns about child removal, with a focus on consistent care, family involvement and cultural sensitivity.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion: &lt;/strong&gt;These findings shed light on health inequalities in perinatal mental health care for ethnic minority women. The results can be utilised","PeriodicalId":519880,"journal":{"name":"Health and social care delivery research","volume":"13 36","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145277004","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Design and deployment of digital health interventions to reduce the risk of the digital divide and to inform development of the living with COVID recovery: a systematic scoping review. 设计和部署数字卫生干预措施,以减少数字鸿沟的风险,并为COVID - 19康复患者的发展提供信息:系统的范围审查。
Pub Date : 2025-10-01 DOI: 10.3310/GJHG1331
Fiona L Hamilton, Sumayyah Imran, Aamina Mahmood, Joanna Dobbin, Katherine Bradbury, Shoba Poduval, Jamie Scuffell, Fred Thomas, Fiona Stevenson
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Digital health interventions can support health-related knowledge transfer, for example through websites or mobile applications, and may reduce health inequalities by making health care available, where access is difficult, and by translating content to overcome language barriers. However, digital health intervention can also increase health inequalities due to the digital divide. To reach digitally excluded populations, design and delivery mechanisms need to specifically address this issue. This review was conducted during the evolving COVID-19 pandemic and informed the rapid design, deployment and evaluation of a post-COVID-19 rehabilitation digital health intervention: 'Living with COVID Recovery' (LWCR). LWCR needed to be engaging and usable for patients and to avoid exacerbating health inequalities. LWCR was introduced as a service into 33 NHS clinics, was used by 7679 patients, and evaluation ran from August 2020 to December 2022.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify evidence-based digital health intervention design and deployment features conducive to mitigating the digital divide.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cochrane Library, Epistemonikos, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Evidence, PROSPERO, PubMed (with MEDLINE and Europe PMC) and Turning Research into Practice; OpenGrey and Google Scholar were searched for primary research studies published in English from 1 October 2011 to 1 October 2021. Adults who were likely to be affected by the digital divide, including older age, minority ethnic groups, lower income/education level and in any healthcare setting.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Any digital health intervention with features of design and/or deployment intended to enable access and engagement by the population of focus.</p><p><strong>Comparators: </strong>Any or none.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Any related to participants' access and/or use of digital health intervention and/or change in digital skills and confidence.</p><p><strong>Analysis: </strong>Data from studies that met the inclusion criteria were extracted, narratively synthesised and thematically analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two papers met the inclusion criteria. Digital health interventions evaluated included telehealth, text message interventions, virtual assistants, self-management programmes and decision aids. Co-development with end-users, user testing through iterative design cycles, digital health interventions that also helped improve digital skills and digital health literacy, tailoring for low literacy through animations, pictures, videos and writing for low reading ages; virtual assistants to collect information from patients and guide the use of a digital health intervention.</p><p><strong>Deployment themes included: </strong>Free devices and data, or signposting to sources of cheap/free devices and Wi-Fi, text message interventions, providing 'human support',
背景:数字卫生干预措施可以支持与卫生有关的知识转移,例如通过网站或移动应用程序,并且可以通过向难以获得的地方提供卫生保健以及通过翻译内容克服语言障碍来减少卫生不平等现象。然而,数字卫生干预也可能因数字鸿沟而加剧卫生不平等。为了接触到被数字排斥的人群,设计和实施机制需要专门解决这一问题。本综述是在不断演变的COVID-19大流行期间进行的,为COVID-19后康复数字健康干预措施的快速设计、部署和评估提供了信息:“与COVID-19一起康复”(LWCR)。LWCR需要对患者具有吸引力和可用性,并避免加剧卫生不平等。LWCR作为一项服务被引入33家NHS诊所,有7679名患者使用,评估从2020年8月持续到2022年12月。目的:确定有助于缓解数字鸿沟的循证数字卫生干预设计和部署特征。方法:Cochrane Library、Epistemonikos、National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Evidence、PROSPERO、PubMed (with MEDLINE和Europe PMC)和Turning Research into Practice;OpenGrey和谷歌Scholar检索了2011年10月1日至2021年10月1日发表的英文初级研究。环境和人口:可能受到数字鸿沟影响的成年人,包括年龄较大、少数民族群体、收入/教育水平较低以及在任何医疗保健环境中。干预措施:任何数字卫生干预措施,其设计和/或部署特点旨在使重点人群能够获得和参与。比较对象:有或没有。结果衡量指标:任何与参与者获取和/或使用数字健康干预措施和/或数字技能和信心变化有关的指标。分析:从符合纳入标准的研究中提取数据,进行叙事综合和主题分析。结果:22篇论文符合纳入标准。评估的数字卫生干预措施包括远程保健、短信干预、虚拟助理、自我管理方案和决策辅助。设计主题包括:与最终用户共同开发、通过迭代设计周期进行用户测试、也有助于提高数字技能和数字卫生素养的数字卫生干预措施、通过针对低阅读年龄的动画、图片、视频和写作为低识字率量身定制;虚拟助理从患者那里收集信息并指导数字健康干预的使用。部署主题包括:免费设备和数据,或标明廉价/免费设备和Wi-Fi的来源,短信干预,提供“人力支持”,提供量身定制的数字技能教育作为干预的一部分,并提供同伴/家庭支持。局限性:我们的研究延伸到2021年底,在大流行之后,文献数量大幅增加。然而,由于我们的审查是为了为LWCR数字健康干预措施的设计和部署提供信息而进行的,因此我们报告了为这项工作提供信息的结果。纳入本综述的研究是异质性的,因此通用性可能有限。很少有随机对照试验通过使用有效的措施来评估数字卫生干预对数字卫生技能的影响。结论:在制定数字卫生干预措施时使用上述设计和部署结果可能有助于克服数字鸿沟。除了为LWCR数字卫生干预措施的发展提供信息外,审查结果对数字卫生干预措施的公平设计、提供和评估具有更广泛的影响。资助:本文介绍了由国家卫生和保健研究所(NIHR)卫生和社会保健提供研究项目资助的独立研究,奖励号为NIHR132243。
{"title":"Design and deployment of digital health interventions to reduce the risk of the digital divide and to inform development of the living with COVID recovery: a systematic scoping review.","authors":"Fiona L Hamilton, Sumayyah Imran, Aamina Mahmood, Joanna Dobbin, Katherine Bradbury, Shoba Poduval, Jamie Scuffell, Fred Thomas, Fiona Stevenson","doi":"10.3310/GJHG1331","DOIUrl":"10.3310/GJHG1331","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Digital health interventions can support health-related knowledge transfer, for example through websites or mobile applications, and may reduce health inequalities by making health care available, where access is difficult, and by translating content to overcome language barriers. However, digital health intervention can also increase health inequalities due to the digital divide. To reach digitally excluded populations, design and delivery mechanisms need to specifically address this issue. This review was conducted during the evolving COVID-19 pandemic and informed the rapid design, deployment and evaluation of a post-COVID-19 rehabilitation digital health intervention: 'Living with COVID Recovery' (LWCR). LWCR needed to be engaging and usable for patients and to avoid exacerbating health inequalities. LWCR was introduced as a service into 33 NHS clinics, was used by 7679 patients, and evaluation ran from August 2020 to December 2022.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;To identify evidence-based digital health intervention design and deployment features conducive to mitigating the digital divide.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;Cochrane Library, Epistemonikos, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Evidence, PROSPERO, PubMed (with MEDLINE and Europe PMC) and Turning Research into Practice; OpenGrey and Google Scholar were searched for primary research studies published in English from 1 October 2011 to 1 October 2021. Adults who were likely to be affected by the digital divide, including older age, minority ethnic groups, lower income/education level and in any healthcare setting.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Interventions: &lt;/strong&gt;Any digital health intervention with features of design and/or deployment intended to enable access and engagement by the population of focus.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Comparators: &lt;/strong&gt;Any or none.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Outcome measures: &lt;/strong&gt;Any related to participants' access and/or use of digital health intervention and/or change in digital skills and confidence.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Analysis: &lt;/strong&gt;Data from studies that met the inclusion criteria were extracted, narratively synthesised and thematically analysed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Twenty-two papers met the inclusion criteria. Digital health interventions evaluated included telehealth, text message interventions, virtual assistants, self-management programmes and decision aids. Co-development with end-users, user testing through iterative design cycles, digital health interventions that also helped improve digital skills and digital health literacy, tailoring for low literacy through animations, pictures, videos and writing for low reading ages; virtual assistants to collect information from patients and guide the use of a digital health intervention.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Deployment themes included: &lt;/strong&gt;Free devices and data, or signposting to sources of cheap/free devices and Wi-Fi, text message interventions, providing 'human support', ","PeriodicalId":519880,"journal":{"name":"Health and social care delivery research","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145369284","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Health and social care delivery research
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1