Meeting social welfare legal needs in end-of-life care: co-creation of a system-wide research partnership.

Colette Hawkins, Amy Wheatman, David Black, Alexis Pala, Yu Fu, Tomos Robinson, Jonathan Ling, Sarah Gorman, Sarah Beardon, Hazel Genn, Hannah Hesselgreaves
{"title":"Meeting social welfare legal needs in end-of-life care: co-creation of a system-wide research partnership.","authors":"Colette Hawkins, Amy Wheatman, David Black, Alexis Pala, Yu Fu, Tomos Robinson, Jonathan Ling, Sarah Gorman, Sarah Beardon, Hazel Genn, Hannah Hesselgreaves","doi":"10.3310/YGRA9852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social welfare legal needs (matters of daily life, such as finances, housing and employment with legal rights, entitlements or protections) are prevalent towards end of life, creating significant difficulties for both patients and carers. Most people do not know where to go, although a range of services provide advice and support for addressing social welfare legal problems. Navigating this complex and fragmented system across health, social care and social welfare legal support is very challenging. Healthcare professionals are often the first contact for social welfare legal needs, although these are often overlooked and their impact on health and well-being unrecognised. Interprofessional learning can increase awareness of social welfare legal needs and build connections between service providers, offering a more holistic and cohesive multiagency response to the complex needs around end of life. The aim of the research was to co-create a robust foundation for cross-agency research investigating the impact of interprofessional learning on social welfare legal needs towards end of life in the North East England region.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Convene a research partnership group across academics, multiagency service providers and members of the public with lived experience. Consider and agree key issues for successful place-based multiagency research in this area. Co-create a complexity-appropriate research proposal with interprofessional learning as an intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A series of research activities was implemented to convene a multiagency partnership group and consider the key issues for successful place-based multiagency research. Data were collected from two online workshops, an optional reflective workbook, and a modified Delphi technique. Initial participants were selectively recruited from our established stakeholder and patient and public involvement groups. Increasing diversity of the partnership continued throughout the project, using contacts provided by group members. Representation of services supporting underserved groups was a priority.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All invited participants were recruited to the partnership, although contribution to research activities was variable. The partnership bridged knowledge gaps between services and united diverse perspectives, expertise and experience. A greater understanding of the barriers and opportunities for place-based multiagency working was generated, such as considering the importance of language in facilitating collaboration and responding to concerns around capacity. A non-hierarchical partnership was meaningful, with both personal and professional insights viewed as equally important. Facilitators to engagement with interprofessional learning were identified including the need for leadership endorsement. A non-traditional, mixed-method approach to interprofessional learning evaluation was favoured, with both qualitative and quantitative measures at three levels: patient and carer, professional learners and organisations. Important outcomes included raising awareness, connectedness and space to reflect.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The partnership group expanded throughout the course of the project. While this extended diversity, variable participation hindered depth of discussion, with participants engaging at different points and with different understanding levels of the project. Supplementary materials provided some mitigation. Capacity and funding constraints limited engagement for some participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Convening a multiagency partnership generated insights into the benefits, barriers and facilitators to research co-design and potential measures of success of interprofessional learning.</p><p><strong>Future work: </strong>Learning from this project has informed a complexity-appropriate research proposal to evaluate the impact of interprofessional learning as an intervention across different stakeholders.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This article presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) <i>Health and Social Care Delivery Research</i> programme as award number NIHR135276.</p>","PeriodicalId":519880,"journal":{"name":"Health and social care delivery research","volume":" ","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health and social care delivery research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/YGRA9852","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Social welfare legal needs (matters of daily life, such as finances, housing and employment with legal rights, entitlements or protections) are prevalent towards end of life, creating significant difficulties for both patients and carers. Most people do not know where to go, although a range of services provide advice and support for addressing social welfare legal problems. Navigating this complex and fragmented system across health, social care and social welfare legal support is very challenging. Healthcare professionals are often the first contact for social welfare legal needs, although these are often overlooked and their impact on health and well-being unrecognised. Interprofessional learning can increase awareness of social welfare legal needs and build connections between service providers, offering a more holistic and cohesive multiagency response to the complex needs around end of life. The aim of the research was to co-create a robust foundation for cross-agency research investigating the impact of interprofessional learning on social welfare legal needs towards end of life in the North East England region.

Objectives: Convene a research partnership group across academics, multiagency service providers and members of the public with lived experience. Consider and agree key issues for successful place-based multiagency research in this area. Co-create a complexity-appropriate research proposal with interprofessional learning as an intervention.

Methods: A series of research activities was implemented to convene a multiagency partnership group and consider the key issues for successful place-based multiagency research. Data were collected from two online workshops, an optional reflective workbook, and a modified Delphi technique. Initial participants were selectively recruited from our established stakeholder and patient and public involvement groups. Increasing diversity of the partnership continued throughout the project, using contacts provided by group members. Representation of services supporting underserved groups was a priority.

Results: All invited participants were recruited to the partnership, although contribution to research activities was variable. The partnership bridged knowledge gaps between services and united diverse perspectives, expertise and experience. A greater understanding of the barriers and opportunities for place-based multiagency working was generated, such as considering the importance of language in facilitating collaboration and responding to concerns around capacity. A non-hierarchical partnership was meaningful, with both personal and professional insights viewed as equally important. Facilitators to engagement with interprofessional learning were identified including the need for leadership endorsement. A non-traditional, mixed-method approach to interprofessional learning evaluation was favoured, with both qualitative and quantitative measures at three levels: patient and carer, professional learners and organisations. Important outcomes included raising awareness, connectedness and space to reflect.

Limitations: The partnership group expanded throughout the course of the project. While this extended diversity, variable participation hindered depth of discussion, with participants engaging at different points and with different understanding levels of the project. Supplementary materials provided some mitigation. Capacity and funding constraints limited engagement for some participants.

Conclusions: Convening a multiagency partnership generated insights into the benefits, barriers and facilitators to research co-design and potential measures of success of interprofessional learning.

Future work: Learning from this project has informed a complexity-appropriate research proposal to evaluate the impact of interprofessional learning as an intervention across different stakeholders.

Funding: This article presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme as award number NIHR135276.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
满足临终关怀的社会福利法律需求:共同创建全系统研究伙伴关系。
背景:社会福利法律需求(日常生活事项,如具有法律权利、权益或保护的财务、住房和就业)在临终前十分普遍,给病人和照护者都带来了很大的困难。尽管有一系列服务机构为解决社会福利法律问题提供建议和支持,但大多数人并不知道该去哪里。要在这个复杂而分散的系统中找到医疗、社会护理和社会福利法律支持是非常具有挑战性的。医疗保健专业人员往往是满足社会福利法律需求的第一联系人,但这些需求往往被忽视,其对健康和福祉的影响也未被认识到。跨专业学习可以提高对社会福利法律需求的认识,并在服务提供者之间建立联系,从而为生命末期的复杂需求提供更全面、更有凝聚力的多机构响应。这项研究旨在为跨机构研究共同创建一个坚实的基础,调查跨专业学习对英格兰东北部地区临终社会福利法律需求的影响:召集学术界、多机构服务提供者和有生活经验的公众成员组成研究合作小组。考虑并商定在该领域成功开展基于地方的多机构研究的关键问题。以跨专业学习作为干预措施,共同制定适合复杂性的研究方案:开展了一系列研究活动,以召集多机构合作小组,并考虑成功开展基于地方的多机构研究的关键问题。数据收集来自两个在线研讨会、一个可选的反思工作手册和一个改良的德尔菲技术。最初的参与者是从我们已建立的利益相关者、患者和公众参与小组中有选择地招募的。在整个项目过程中,利用小组成员提供的联系方式,不断增加合作伙伴的多样性。优先考虑支持服务不足群体的服务机构:结果:尽管对研究活动的贡献不尽相同,但所有受邀参与者都加入了合作伙伴关系。伙伴关系弥补了服务机构之间的知识差距,并将不同的观点、专业知识和经验结合在一起。对基于地方的多机构工作的障碍和机遇有了更深入的了解,例如考虑到语言在促进合作方面的重要性,以及对能力方面的担忧做出回应。无等级之分的伙伴关系是有意义的,个人和专业见解被视为同等重要。确定了参与跨专业学习的促进因素,包括领导认可的必要性。对跨专业学习的评估倾向于采用非传统的混合方法,在病人和护理者、专业学习者和组织这三个层面进行定性和定量测量。重要成果包括提高认识、加强联系和提供反思空间:局限性:在整个项目过程中,合作小组不断扩大。局限性:在整个项目过程中,合作小组的规模不断扩大。虽然这扩大了多样性,但不同的参与程度阻碍了讨论的深度,参与者在不同的阶段参与讨论,对项目的理解程度也不尽相同。补充材料起到了一定的缓解作用。能力和资金方面的制约限制了一些参与者的参与:通过召集多机构合作伙伴,我们深入了解了研究共同设计的益处、障碍和促进因素,以及衡量跨专业学习成功与否的潜在标准:今后的工作:从本项目中汲取的经验为一项复杂性适当的研究提案提供了信息,该提案旨在评估跨专业学习作为一项干预措施对不同利益相关者的影响:本文为独立研究,由美国国家健康与护理研究所(NIHR)健康与社会护理服务研究项目资助,奖励编号为NIHR135276。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Systematic review of integrated mental and physical health services for children and young people with eating and functional symptoms. Peer support for adult social care in prisons in England and Wales: a mixed-methods rapid evaluation. A model of occupational stress to assess impact of COVID-19 on critical care and redeployed nurses: a mixed-methods study. Exploratory study from an end-of-life research partnership network to improve access for ethnically diverse communities in one region. Early mental health intervention and supported self-care for LGBTQ+ young people in the UK: a mixed-methods study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1