The Politics of Outrage: Violence, Policing, and the Archive in Colonial Ireland

IF 0.7 1区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY Journal of British Studies Pub Date : 2024-09-20 DOI:10.1017/jbr.2024.115
Nicholas Sprenger
{"title":"The Politics of Outrage: Violence, Policing, and the Archive in Colonial Ireland","authors":"Nicholas Sprenger","doi":"10.1017/jbr.2024.115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the nineteenth century in Ireland, agents of the colonial state like the police, along with the administrators that they served, forged an association between political motivations and Irish agrarian violence. They did so not only through the policing of Irish violence, but through the methods used by the colonial state to categorize, process, record, and archive it. Central to this endeavor was the category of “outrage.” Using this category, the Irish Constabulary created a record that impressed an association between Irish violence or criminality and political resistance. Because the British colonial state had control over the production of the archive, it also dictated the metanarratives present in this “archive of outrages” that gave form and function to the colonial state's fears that Irish violence represented a budding insurrection or a desire to fracture the Union. By perpetuating this logic in document and archival form, Dublin Castle (the seat of the British government's administration of Ireland) helped create the very demon that it sought to exorcise—that of Irish nationalist action and sentiment.","PeriodicalId":46738,"journal":{"name":"Journal of British Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of British Studies","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jbr.2024.115","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the nineteenth century in Ireland, agents of the colonial state like the police, along with the administrators that they served, forged an association between political motivations and Irish agrarian violence. They did so not only through the policing of Irish violence, but through the methods used by the colonial state to categorize, process, record, and archive it. Central to this endeavor was the category of “outrage.” Using this category, the Irish Constabulary created a record that impressed an association between Irish violence or criminality and political resistance. Because the British colonial state had control over the production of the archive, it also dictated the metanarratives present in this “archive of outrages” that gave form and function to the colonial state's fears that Irish violence represented a budding insurrection or a desire to fracture the Union. By perpetuating this logic in document and archival form, Dublin Castle (the seat of the British government's administration of Ireland) helped create the very demon that it sought to exorcise—that of Irish nationalist action and sentiment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
愤怒的政治:殖民时期爱尔兰的暴力、治安和档案
在 19 世纪的爱尔兰,警察等殖民国家代理人与他们所服务的管理者一起,将政治动机与爱尔兰的农业暴力联系在一起。他们不仅通过维持爱尔兰暴力的治安,还通过殖民国家对暴力进行分类、处理、记录和存档的方法来实现这一目的。这项工作的核心是 "愤怒 "类别。爱尔兰警察局利用这一类别创建了一种记录,将爱尔兰的暴力或犯罪行为与政治反抗联系在一起。由于英国殖民地国家控制着档案的制作,它也决定了 "暴行档案 "中的元叙事,这些元叙事赋予殖民地国家恐惧的形式和功能,即爱尔兰的暴力代表着叛乱的萌芽或分裂联邦的欲望。都柏林城堡(英国政府管理爱尔兰的所在地)通过以文件和档案的形式延续这种逻辑,帮助制造了它试图驱除的恶魔--爱尔兰民族主义行动和情绪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
163
期刊介绍: The official publication of the North American Conference on British Studies (NACBS), the Journal of British Studies, has positioned itself as the critical resource for scholars of British culture from the Middle Ages through the present. Drawing on both established and emerging approaches, JBS presents scholarly articles and books reviews from renowned international authors who share their ideas on British society, politics, law, economics, and the arts. In 2005 (Vol. 44), the journal merged with the NACBS publication Albion, creating one journal for NACBS membership. The NACBS also sponsors an annual conference , as well as several academic prizes, graduate fellowships, and undergraduate essay contests .
期刊最新文献
“A Place of Refuge to Republicans and Royalists”: The French Revolution in British Dominica Fire in Jamaica, 1831–32 The Politics of Outrage: Violence, Policing, and the Archive in Colonial Ireland “A Colony to Themselves”: Scottish Highland Settler Colonialism in British North America, 1770–1804 The Making and Unmaking of a Presidency: Envisioning Empire in British Bencoolen, 1685–1825
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1