Why do partners often prefer the same political parties? Evidence from couples in Germany

IF 3.3 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY Social Forces Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1093/sf/soae133
Ansgar Hudde, Daniela Grunow
{"title":"Why do partners often prefer the same political parties? Evidence from couples in Germany","authors":"Ansgar Hudde, Daniela Grunow","doi":"10.1093/sf/soae133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research has demonstrated that couples have similar partisan preferences, a finding associated with political polarization. However, it remains debated to what extent different mechanisms contribute to this homogamy. Analyzing dyadic panel data from the German Socio-Economic Panel 1984–2020, we distinguish analytically between (1) direct political matching (i.e., partner selection on matching party preferences); (2) indirect political matching (i.e., social structural homogamy with political homogamy as a by-product); and (3) couples’ political alignment over time, to explain party preference similarity. First, we study matching among recently formed couples using an innovative method that compares real-world couples with three types of counterfactuals: couples that are matched (1) randomly, (2) by multidimensional social structural characteristics, and (3) by maximizing similarity in party preference. Second, we study couples’ political alignment over the course of relationships, tracking real-world couples over time and controlling for macro-level changes in the party-political landscape. Results indicate substantial political homogamy among recently formed couples, which is best explained by political matching (i.e., direct selection based on partisan preferences). Effects of social structural homogamy appear weak in comparison and rather stable across cohorts. Couples further align in their partisan preferences over time, but this effect is countered by an increasing heterogeneity of the German political landscape.","PeriodicalId":48400,"journal":{"name":"Social Forces","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Forces","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soae133","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research has demonstrated that couples have similar partisan preferences, a finding associated with political polarization. However, it remains debated to what extent different mechanisms contribute to this homogamy. Analyzing dyadic panel data from the German Socio-Economic Panel 1984–2020, we distinguish analytically between (1) direct political matching (i.e., partner selection on matching party preferences); (2) indirect political matching (i.e., social structural homogamy with political homogamy as a by-product); and (3) couples’ political alignment over time, to explain party preference similarity. First, we study matching among recently formed couples using an innovative method that compares real-world couples with three types of counterfactuals: couples that are matched (1) randomly, (2) by multidimensional social structural characteristics, and (3) by maximizing similarity in party preference. Second, we study couples’ political alignment over the course of relationships, tracking real-world couples over time and controlling for macro-level changes in the party-political landscape. Results indicate substantial political homogamy among recently formed couples, which is best explained by political matching (i.e., direct selection based on partisan preferences). Effects of social structural homogamy appear weak in comparison and rather stable across cohorts. Couples further align in their partisan preferences over time, but this effect is countered by an increasing heterogeneity of the German political landscape.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为什么伴侣往往喜欢相同的政党?来自德国夫妇的证据
研究表明,夫妻双方具有相似的党派偏好,这一发现与政治极化有关。然而,不同的机制在多大程度上促成了这种同质性,目前仍存在争议。通过分析 1984-2020 年德国社会经济面板研究(German Socio-Economic Panel 1984-2020)中的夫妇面板数据,我们在分析中区分了(1)直接政治匹配(即在匹配党派偏好的基础上选择伴侣);(2)间接政治匹配(即作为政治同配副产品的社会结构同配);以及(3)夫妇随着时间推移的政治一致性,以解释党派偏好的相似性。首先,我们使用一种创新方法来研究新近结成的夫妻之间的匹配情况,该方法将现实世界中的夫妻与三种反事实夫妻进行比较:(1) 随机匹配的夫妻,(2) 根据多维社会结构特征匹配的夫妻,(3) 根据政党偏好相似性最大化匹配的夫妻。其次,我们研究了夫妻在恋爱过程中的政治倾向,对现实世界中的夫妻进行了长期跟踪,并对政党政治格局的宏观变化进行了控制。结果表明,在新近结成的夫妻中,政治上的同质性很高,而政治匹配(即基于党派偏好的直接选择)可以很好地解释这一点。相比之下,社会结构同质性的影响似乎较弱,而且在不同组群中相当稳定。随着时间的推移,夫妻双方的党派偏好进一步趋于一致,但德国政治格局的日益异质性抵消了这一效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social Forces
Social Forces SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
123
期刊介绍: Established in 1922, Social Forces is recognized as a global leader among social research journals. Social Forces publishes articles of interest to a general social science audience and emphasizes cutting-edge sociological inquiry as well as explores realms the discipline shares with psychology, anthropology, political science, history, and economics. Social Forces is published by Oxford University Press in partnership with the Department of Sociology at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
期刊最新文献
Intergenerational family life courses and wealth accumulation in Norway Why do partners often prefer the same political parties? Evidence from couples in Germany Pay talk in contemporary workplaces Families of austerity: benefit cutbacks and family stress in the UK The promise and limits of inclusive public policy: federal safety net clinics and immigrant access to health care in the U.S.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1